HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Coming up on Ed Shultz af...

Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:46 PM

Coming up on Ed Shultz after the break - Christie's burning bridge

5 replies, 438 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
Reply Coming up on Ed Shultz after the break - Christie's burning bridge (Original post)
malaise Dec 2013 OP
Myrina Dec 2013 #1
malaise Dec 2013 #2
tularetom Dec 2013 #3
malaise Dec 2013 #4
tblue37 Dec 2013 #5

Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:52 PM

1. MSNBC is getting really irritating ...

... every damn talking head last night covered the Christie story.
You'd think there was nothing else going on in the world. 4 hours, 4 different talking heads, all repeating the same thing.

Sad excuse for 'journalism'.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Myrina (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:56 PM

2. Huh? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Myrina (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 17, 2013, 05:58 PM

3. Hey, it's a page right out of the Fox "news" playbook

As in "Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi" 24/7.

You're right it isn't journalism, but it does attract viewers. Mostly viewers of the low information persuasion, but viewers nonetheless.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tularetom (Reply #3)

Tue Dec 17, 2013, 07:03 PM

4. I don't see how reporting on Christie and this bridge scandal

is like the ReTHUG Benghazi. An investigation is underway - Tweety starts with the story. It is everywhere. If Christie is tied to this he has a huge problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Myrina (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 17, 2013, 07:10 PM

5. GOOD! We need the M$M to focus for once on shining a spotlight on the

crimes of the RW darling of the day instead of glorifying him to make sure he can win elections, which is what they usually do.

Christie is dangerous because a lot of low-info Dems and independents are fooled by him and by the PR boost the MSM usually gives him-sort of like the fools who thought Ron Paul was a good person to vote for. Let the MSM spend as much time as they like revealing Christie's true face!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread