General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo Morsel Too Minuscule for All-Consuming N.S.A. - NYT
No Morsel Too Minuscule for All-Consuming N.S.A.By SCOTT SHANE - NYT
Published: November 2, 2013
<snip>
When Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary general, sat down with President Obama at the White House in April to discuss Syrian chemical weapons, Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and climate change, it was a cordial, routine exchange.
The National Security Agency nonetheless went to work in advance and intercepted Mr. Bans talking points for the meeting, a feat the agency later reported as an operational highlight in a weekly internal brag sheet. It is hard to imagine what edge this could have given Mr. Obama in a friendly chat, if he even saw the N.S.A.s modest scoop. (The White House wont say.)
But it was emblematic of an agency that for decades has operated on the principle that any eavesdropping that can be done on a foreign target of any conceivable interest now or in the future should be done. After all, American intelligence officials reasoned, whos going to find out?
From thousands of classified documents, the National Security Agency emerges as an electronic omnivore of staggering capabilities, eavesdropping and hacking its way around the world to strip governments and other targets of their secrets, all the while enforcing the utmost secrecy about its own operations. It spies routinely on friends as well as foes, as has become obvious in recent weeks; the agencys official mission list includes using its surveillance powers to achieve diplomatic advantage over such allies as France and Germany and economic advantage over Japan and Brazil, among other countries.
Mr. Obama found himself in September standing uncomfortably beside the president of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff, who was furious at being named as a target of N.S.A. eavesdropping. Since then, there has been a parade of such protests, from the European Union, Mexico, France, Germany and Spain. Chagrined American officials joke that soon there will be complaints from foreign leaders feeling slighted because the agency had not targeted them.
James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, has repeatedly dismissed such objections as brazen hypocrisy from countries that do their own share of spying. But in a recent interview, he acknowledged that the scale of eavesdropping by the N.S.A., with 35,000 workers and $10.8 billion a year, sets it apart. Theres no question that from a capability standpoint we probably dwarf everybody on the planet, just about, with perhaps the exception of Russia and China, he said.
<snip>
More: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/03/world/no-morsel-too-minuscule-for-all-consuming-nsa.html?_r=0&pagewanted=all
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)the UK itself, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. So I guess they could be considered friends. Everyone else is on their own.
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)I don't believe it takes a great leap of logic from we can't trust 95+% of the world's leaders to we can't trust any of them.
At one time the NSA spied on our own Senators (D) Frank Church and (R) Howard Baker and they may doing it today, so I don't see them drawing a line with foreign leaders of any persuasion.
Once you become addicted to knowing everything while disregarding the inherent right of privacy then the ends always justify the means, no matter the victim.
Playful Piranha
(13 posts)U saw that part?
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)we would have a bug in their HQ as well. Just something we do really well.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)A lot of what the NSA is doing seems to be worthwhile.
"Working closely with the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which handles satellite photography, as well as G.C.H.Q., the N.S.A. team studied the Iranian leaders entourage, its vehicles and its weaponry from satellites, and intercepted air traffic messages as planes and helicopters took off and landed.
They heard Ayatollah Khameneis aides fretting about finding a crane to load an ambulance and fire truck onto trucks for the journey. They listened as he addressed a crowd, segregated by gender, in a soccer field.
They studied Iranian air defense radar stations and recorded the travelers rich communications trail, including Iranian satellite coordinates collected by an N.S.A. program called Ghosthunter. The point was not so much to catch the Iranian leaders words, but to gather the data for blanket eavesdropping on Iran in the event of a crisis."
but a lot of it seems to be a waste of time, diplomatically dangerous and a threat to privacy rights at home.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)what NSA has been doing, but what this article is so horrendous I had a hard time even finishing it!
This is so big...I don't see how it can ever be shut down. And, the scope of it is well....the word EVIL comes to mind.
The money spent on this for little results needs to go back to the people for our needs and not for the glorification of the NSA and it's contractors all over the world.
jsr
(7,712 posts)Its scale and aggressiveness are breathtaking."
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Police me..
xchrom
(108,903 posts)gulliver
(13,180 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 2, 2013, 05:23 PM - Edit history (1)
Our ace reporter, Judith Miller was able to get key inside information, and it helped start a war. You can't get much better at snooping than that. We didn't need to bug the White House either. We just listened to what Mr. Cheney said and reported it.
Response to gulliver (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed