General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (bigtree) on Mon Nov 4, 2013, 11:47 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
BeyondGeography
(39,367 posts)Whatever it is, some people just never know when to stfu.
bigtree
(85,986 posts)just how lucky is a dog with . . .
JimboBillyBubbaBob
(1,389 posts)I can hear them saying such down there. I recall that expression somewhere back in time. I always thought, "Now that's kind of unusual, but somehow I can sense what it means.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)bigtree
(85,986 posts). . . if he didn't write that Clinton was repeating it.
My two cents says this represents the worst of Clinton politics - as lurid as it's nauseatingly superior. Wouldn't be surprised though to find it either utterly true or typically false from Halperin.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)BootinUp
(47,136 posts)In fact he aspires to drudge.
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)fried eggs
(910 posts)The "lucky" 2 dicked dog reference is just... odd... but it does provide insight into where his head is at.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)"luckier than a 2 dick dog".
I don't see the big deal...or are you worried dogs will be insulted...
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Well that may be a contender for stupidest fucking thing I've read in a while.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)Hekate
(90,627 posts)There are legions of professional Clinton-haters still out there, and they are starting to crawl out of the wordwork in 3....2...1... ah! there they are now.
People -- even politicians -- say all kinds of things in private that they would not say in public. The Big Dog (ha!) saying that about Obama (if he said it) falls into that category. Used to be we'd just say it was "earthy" -- now we get a lot of faux outrage.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)their own throats.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)I love campaign post-mortems.
Response to bigtree (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)when I am living here.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)Funny though. Reminds me of a book of colorful Southern expressions someone gave me once.
One was, "Happier than a dead pig in sunshine." Even harder to cipher how that one works.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Oh, I luvs me some Southern idioms!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)well you know what they do. first guy says to the second one, "I wish I could do that." Second guy says "that dog would bite you."
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)I saw this guy called Uncle Dirty in some stand up place in New York, early 80s.
I am soooo bad at telling jokes, but that one works all the time. heh hehe.
Monk06
(7,675 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)What did the tomcat say after making love to the skunk? "I've enjoyed about as much of this as I can stand!"
Allegedly uttered to a friend who asked him how it felt to "pull out" of his second run for the presidency.
My husband works with a couple of guys from Georgia. They have all sorts of those kind of sayings.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Seems like it would be a burden.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)The Big Dog is saying Pres. Obama is lucky because of how inept Romney and his campaign was.
Does nobody remember Sen. Dole and his campaign?
IMO, Bill must have been luckier than a dog with three dicks.
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)Sounds like ol' Bill is projecting here.
MADem
(135,425 posts)In fact, in the right circumstances, Bob Dole, with his Boardwalk Empire-like "Remus" way of referring to himself, was an absolutely riveting speaker. He had a wit that was sharp as a damn razor.
Clinton's luck came from the fact that, good as Bob Dole was at spinning a yarn, Clinton was way, way, WAY better, and his message of empathy and mitigators for those who were caught in the whole "outsourcing" trend, was what did it for Clinton.
I haven't heard that expression in forty or fifty years, but I have heard it. I think people getting "outraged" about it are being silly. He's making a comparison that is apt, given the circumstance. Dogs who have not been neutered LIKE to reproduce. Their enthusiasm and joy for the practice knows no bounds. They'll do it as often as they're physically able, to the point of staggering and falling down, if left to their own devices. It's simply an acknowledgement of a fact of bygone country life (sex education classes, back in the old days before the schools took that on and taught "Just say no" as a strategy). Bill, as we all learned years ago, was "a hard dog to keep on the porch" so he should know how a lucky dog feels.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)The idea that somehow Pres. Obama just got lucky is not one that I give any credence to whatsoever.
Pres. Clinton easily got just as lucky, if not more so. Dole's campaign was a shambles.
MADem
(135,425 posts)First, take out the "just"--because in no way does that come across in his comment.
And there was nothing wrong with "going there" because it's a funny old saying, and only a prude would take issue with it.
I took it as him saying "How wonderful for Obama, he got a good hand, for a change!" Not "I hate and resent that man."
Look, if Bill Clinton really wanted to fuck Barack Obama over, he wouldn't have served as "Explainer in Chief" and helped POTUS over that rough spot during the convention.
How soon some people forget!!!
I also think that some people, not just here on DU, but everywhere in the anonymous virtual world, don't get their jollies unless there's a perception of a knock-down drag-out, a catfight, a hissy fit, or some kind of pointless venality.
My attitude towards Clinton's comments are this--he was glad that Obama was able to get his second term, and pleased, too, that he didn't have an opponent of the McCain-Palin caliber (in terms of gloves-off viciousness and willingness to play dirty, not in terms of quality of nominees). He knew that with the GOP vote rigging and other shenanigans, that if it had been at all an uphill climb, they might have muddied the waters, and he was pleased that it went the way it did.
I think people should read carefully, contextually, and not assume the worst. Obama WILL be helping Hillary Clinton in her campaign, you know--one hand washes the other. HRC and WJC have helped him plenty over the past eight years, and he will--with open heart and pleasure-- return the favor. It's what people on the SAME TEAM do.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)But to me it really does sound like Clinton was saying that Obama just got lucky.
It is right up there with "Jesse Jackson won South Carolina too".
It is diminishing Pres. Obama's accomplishment.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I saw it as nothing more than accurate political analysis. Obama did get lucky--he could have had someone who was more charismatic, competent, and a better public speaker than Dinky Mitt as his opponent. Someone who was a bit more slash-and-burn. Imagine Obama running against someone like Christie, who likes to get in people's faces? It wouldn't have been pretty. It could have gotten messy, indeed.
That Mitt actually managed to con the RNC was pure LUCK--along with the dogged hubris and cash of Mitt and his money pals pushing that dumbass dressage-horse-dork to the nomination. Thank heaven for a wingnut party in disarray.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Romney was the best they had and they gave it their best shot.
Your point of view makes no sense. The term "got lucky" implies that skill was not involved.
I guess agreeing to disagree is the best possible way to go here.
Edit to add: Colin Powell was a possible candidate back in "96, Want to talk about getting lucky on who the opponent was.....
MADem
(135,425 posts)Bill Clinton "got lucky" having a three way race in 92 and 96.
Are you saying he is an unskilled politician because he "got lucky?"
Stop being so painfully obvious.
Romney was not the best they had, even that nitwit Pawlenty would have run a better campaign--he was the one with the most money and drive (to avenge his "deddy" and we've seen that before). He bigfooted his way into the nomination by sheer force of will and cash; no one else had the money he had, he had the business connections to whom he made promises, the party was in disarray, and he took advantage of that.
Colin Powell was NEVER a potential candidate. He was talked about, but he never had any intention of running--he was uninterested in getting killed, for starters (I guess no one remembers the jokes that so many comedians made, about a possible President Powell picking a Mexican American VP to keep the hating racists from shooting him?), and second, his wife wouldn't let him. Spend five minutes with Alma and you'll understand that, clearly. And mark my words--she's the boss in that household. If she says NO, the answer is NO.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)1) All the big hitters on the Democratic side in 1992 decided to bow out of the primary with Bush's approval soaring. Mario Cuomo certainly would have handed Clinton his tail in that primary had he run - but alas, the biggest competition was the boring Tsongas, who had questions about his health, and an odd Jerry Brown. Clinton fantastically came back from the brink - but the field in '92 was weak and he benefited from it.
2) Bush had an approval rating in the 30s. Republicans had controlled the White House for twelve years. The economy was in the tank. Crime was high. The deficit was high - and he still couldn't muster 50% of the vote.
3) As you said, Bob Dole. Dole was as inept as Romney - but also proclaimed to be out of touch, too old and too tired to serve as president. Hell, Dole made McCain look young, even though I suspect McCain was probably older when he ran for president?
Clinton lucked out - and even then, in both his elections, he still couldn't break 50%.
MADem
(135,425 posts)have been very different indeed. He knows he was a lucky dog, too.
Bush's flash of "popularity" was a transient thing, having to do with Desert Shield/Desert Storm. He couldn't run on "brave Kuwaiti people" and babies in incubators. It had no staying power.
People forget that there were THREE people in those two Presidential races, not two. It's hard to break fifty when there's three people running. And Clinton took the lion's share in 92--the breakdown was Clinton: 43.0%--Bush 37.5%--Perot 18.9%. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992
He IMPROVED his percentage of the vote four years later--again, in a three way field, and took 49.2 percent of the vote in that 1996 contest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1996
bemildred
(90,061 posts)mitchtv
(17,718 posts)not particularly on point,nor funny, certainly nothing to read into, nor does it portend anything. BFD, colorful is about all I can say.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)He wouldn't be talking like this unless she was planning on running in '16.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)stillcool
(32,626 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Why is a dog with two dicks lucky?
Or is this just another case of Clinton trying to be clever?
It might be helpful if he'd just shut the fuck up.
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)It shouldn't be surprising that a guy who can't keep his own dick in his pants would think that having two of them is somehow "lucky".
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)or campaigned for him till he lost his voice in 2012?
MADem
(135,425 posts)The force is strong with them, to the point that they won't eat, sleep, or rest while the iron, as it were, is hot.
No one wanted Clinton to "shut the fuck up" when he was playing "Explainer in Chief" when his speech revitalized Obama's campaign at the convention, now, were they?
I think people would do well to not assume the worst about a leader who had two Peace and Prosperity terms and is one of the greatest humanitarians in recent history. This is not the "Twilight" series, only with Presidents instead of vampire heart-throbs--they are on the same damn team.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)your explanation of horny dog metaphors and politics.
Throd
(7,208 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,286 posts)vagina's so I don't think it's too damn lucky...
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)Shades of ornery Bill pop out from time to time. I hope he doesn't continue that type of rhetoric during the campaign if Hillary runs. It might backfire on him.
arthritisR_US
(7,286 posts)obliviously
(1,635 posts)You ain't been around much.
arthritisR_US
(7,286 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)necessity to stop and "recover," as it were.
Un-neutered dogs are quite promiscuous; what with all the spaying and neutering in USA now, children don't get those rather shocking "countryside" lessons that used to be common even in more settled and urban communities.
I can remember neighbors "turning the hose on" dogs engaged in coitus in their front yards when I was a kid, and telling the curious chidren gawking to "Run along now, go play---pay no attention to that...." Now, with leash laws and spay/neuter, children don't see that kind of thing anymore.
arthritisR_US
(7,286 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)Your hardest work was sweating and lying about where your dick was, for a year long nonsense that didn't have to happen.
Dickhead.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)personality/ambition etc doesn't cut it, a certain amount of right place/right time is necessary
i dont know what this big controversy is but then again i think you add the word clinton before any sentence and some people will find something incredibly objectionable about that sentence
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Some of the vitriol in this thread comes from the fact a Clinton said it. Some comes from a knee-jerk reaction to a southernism. And some from the fact President Obama WAS lucky in how certain things broke his way and how Romney and the GOP kept shooting themselves in the foot. No amount of political skill could make those things happen.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)they would be laughing.
This place might as well be called "Almost Democratic Underground, unless you support anyone named Clinton".
Nine
(1,741 posts)He didn't say it as a put-down. He was trying to help Obama's team, and he gave some good advice:
Though the first debate brought the incumbents streak of good fortune to a crashing halt, Clinton was insistent that the Obamans not overreact.... Clinton huddled with Obama and repeated the instructions.
Dont try to make up the ground you lost, the Big Dog said. Just be yourself.
It's because some folks just NEED a cage match, even if it is invented in their own heads. It's possible that there are two good guys, as well as two lucky guys, in this story line.
Bill Clinton is an astute politician. He's also a good guy, notwithstanding his intemperance in his younger years. If he weren't a good guy, HRC wouldn't continue to put up with him.
He's no saint, but who is? The minute you canonize someone they're bound to disappoint you...!
penultimate
(1,110 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)The doctor says, "Do you realize that you have five penises?"
The guy says "Yeah".
The doctor asks "How do your pants fit?"
"Like a glove."
PragmaticLiberal
(904 posts)Personally, I was much more interested in how this piece "humanized" the President.
HipChick
(25,485 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)oh well, live and learn
Deep13
(39,154 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)on the campaign trail again.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)And why we're lucky to have him as our president.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)God, I love Michelle!
Uben
(7,719 posts)He's luckier than a dung beetle in a room full of republicans.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)but I don't get why a dog would want more than 1 genitalia.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)....
Beyond that... I'm just not feeling the outrage, sorry.
Hobo
(757 posts)of haters for the "Big Dog". I didn't see the outrage when the "Big Dog" went to the convention and saved the president's campaign.
Hobo
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)I'm so tired of this bullshit!!!!!!!!!
If there's anything that anyone thinks that X person said, let's tar and feather that person without an iota of proof. Of course there's an added incentive if that person happens to be a Clinton.
This damn place feels like a RW site most of the time when there's a whiff of anything Clinton in the air.
Sickening............
MADem
(135,425 posts)"He caught a lucky break, he could have faced a worse opponent, he dodged a bullet" and twist it mercilessly to try to make it seem like he is saying "The guy was stoooooopid, good thing he got a lucky break, otherwise he wouldn't have prevailed."
It is sickening. It's shameful. It's pretty obvious, too.
Oh well. The admins have some meat to sink their teeth in, once election season starts.
If Bill did say it, he meant that Obama got a break, not that he wasn't capable or smart. Everybody knows perfectly well that to be successful one needs not just to be knowledgeable and hard working, but also to have a modicum of luck. I think that Bill felt sorry for Romney, he felt that he shouldn't be in politics. Of course Obama was the superior politician, Romney always sounded stiff and unnatural.
I'm tired of reading in a Democratic site so much crap against a couple who have wide support nationally. They are treated here as if they were members of the Tea Party. An 8 page article and he finds the quote about a joke that Bill supposedly said. Their words and actions are always twisted to give them the worst interpretation. I'm fed up with it!!!!!!
MADem
(135,425 posts)That the primary continues, some how....
Of course, one has to ignore that HRC was Obama's SECSTATE, and Bill Clinton really helped energize POTUS's 2nd term campaign.
And then, there's this: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/11/03/obama-virginia-campaign-terry-mcauliffe-ken-cuccinelli/3412767/
McAuliffe is a Clinton stalwart from way-back-when, yet here's Obama, stumping for him....
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I just went to the article and it's called "Intervention". It's also a very long piece, 8 pages to be precise. Out of all that the one thing you chose to post is an alleged joke made by Clinton?
If he did say it, it's a version of a Southern colloquialism:
"Happier than a puppy with two peters."
http://www.joe-ks.com/archives_sep2011/Redneck_Quotes.htm
Comment on this, it's far more consequential than Clinton's joke:
'I'm really good at killing people': New book claims President Obama bragged to aides about using drone strikes
President Barack Obama bragged to his aides that he's 'really good at killing people,' according to explosive claims in a new book about the 2012 presidential campaign.
The revelation comes at a time when Obama, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, has faced increasing criticism for his use of drones to target insurgents and terrorist suspects, particularly in Pakistan and Yemen.
The London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimates that Obama has authorized 326 drone strikes. Since 2004, CIA unmanned aerial vehicles have killed 2,500 to 3,600 people - including up to 950 civilians.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2486809/Double-Down-Game-Change-2012-Obama-bragged-Im-really-good-killing-people.html
Walk away
(9,494 posts)I am actually thinking of dropping my DU contribution for the year and checking out until after the primaries. It got pretty crappy around here the last time Mrs Clinton ran.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)they are disgraceful.
Please don't leave, otherwise this place would be even more barren of Clinton supporters. Far too many left in 2008 and never returned.
bigtree
(85,986 posts)I challenge you to find more than a handful of folks here who have been as steadfast in my support of BOTH Clintons in my posting history here.
It's actually snap judgments like you've made here that contribute to and fuel the reactionary and divisive atmosphere that regularly infects our discussions.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)you are doing a terrible job at fandom if this is your idea of being supportive. I'm sure you were sooooo surprised at the little mess you made!
And if you think that my calling your post a hateful attempt to stir up the old meme of "the Clintons are at it again dissing Obama", is some kind of outlier then check your responses.
bigtree
(85,986 posts). . .and it's just pure bullshit to make up your own 'shitstirring' premise about why I posted this to call it 'hateful'.
Who made the statement? It's been defended, derided, laughed at, and celebrated in this thread. What did Clinton mean for folks to think when HE made it?
Is it your intention that folks should put their heads in the sand and ignore such profanity from a former president? Maybe you want me to ignore the fact that he's describing our president as a dog.
Fine. I did. I addressed the premise directly - several times here. Obama hasn't been 'lucky' as Clinton contended, as much as he's been an adept and often adroit politician. Clinton's statement is demeaning and self-serving to his own ego. It's also reflective of the worst of his politics and the worst of his personality.
Now, if you can't accept the myriads of supportive posts I've made on behalf of the Clintons, and, accept my criticisms of them, as well, then it's just going to be tough shit for you.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)The Clinton haters almost break their fingers running to their keyboards the minute there's a Clinton thread that gives them a chance to trash them. Why give them the opportunity?
BTW, I didn't contribute to the "reactionary and divisive atmosphere that regularly infects our discussions". I responded to the nasty crap that others wrote about Bill.
bigtree
(85,986 posts). . . I didn't invent it.
It's a bit of acrobatics for you to both defend the statement and then claim it's divisive to post it.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)IF he said it, which you and everybody has no clue whether he did say it, it was a joke. Nothing to cause this flurry of activity.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)and what Bill said could possibly be untrue.
Taken as one incident, what Bill said is not a big deal - there are all sorts of strange sayings in different parts of the world and different countries. But Bill has a problem with Obama, it's been shown many times that his 'big dog' status is threatened because the President is truly admired and respected in a way Mr. Clinton can never be. Ego is what it's mostly all about for Bill. He is getting pushed off the king of the hill and he doesn't like it.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)What Obama allegedly said about being good at killing people is far more disturbing than Clinton's lame Southern joke.
Bill doesn't have a problem with Obama. On the other hand, you have problems with the Clintons. You spend a considerable time here bashing them.
bigtree
(85,986 posts)― Harriet Beecher Stowe
Beacool
(30,247 posts)bigtree
(85,986 posts)I don't personally believe Obama has been 'lucky', but I'm sure someone will take pains to defend that pov of Clinton's. I didn't happen to think it was such a big deal that he 'lost' that first debate, and I think all of the handwringing from the campaign and others was unnecessary and absurd. Politically, Pres. Obama has far surpassed Clinton's self-sabatoged presidency in accomplishment and dexterity. Attributing that success, generally, to luck is just sophistry; as false as his comment is lurid.
That's what compelled me to post this, aided, of course, by the very profane analogy Clinton was trying to make between a deformed dog and our nation's first black president.
The rest that you're detracting from his comments with deserves it's own thread. Silly really to assume that one comment or one part of that tainted article should deserve a response, and that pointing out one part of Clinton's blather should be viewed as 'divisive.'
It will be a long campaign for Hillary if she has to spend her time dealing with these types of offensive remarks. If this is some kind of defense of the Clintons (from a longtime Clinton supporter), then save it. Not even THEY expect these types of statements to be taken as benign and without guile.
And, remember, we're not politicians or the press here. It's inevitable that someone will draw your attention to trivialities like this one, because we don't spend all of our time dealing with policy and politics. Most folks look at a statement like that and wonder why a former president would have the temerity to publicly speak that way about a peer.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Second, even if he did make it, it was precisely that....a joke. In politics, as in life, luck plays a part in one's success (aside from knowledge and hard work). Bill was not trying to put down Obama, that's your interpretation. He would be the first one to admit that he too was lucky when he ran for president.
As for Obama surpassing Clinton, only time will tell. That's for historians to decide.
c588415
(285 posts)what sealed the deal for Pres Obama's reelection in 2012. And I'm sure that when Hillary runs in 2016, Pres Obama will campaign for her. Why people are making such a big deal over Obama and Bill Clinton's little disagreements is beyond me.
polichick
(37,152 posts)fried eggs
(910 posts)I have no idea what the dog with 2 dicks reference is all about, but there is some truth about President Obama having some luck on his side.
Since January 2008, when the primaries began, look at how every so called scandal or crisis has turned out: With naysayers having egg all over their faces. It's quite remarkable.