Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
Sun Dec 18, 2011, 09:32 PM Dec 2011

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Deep13) on Sat Apr 5, 2014, 04:34 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) Deep13 Dec 2011 OP
Most excellent Remember Me Dec 2011 #1
Thanks, I appreciate your remarks. nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #5
Or, is OWS a solipsistic post-structural deconstruction of the system... JCMach1 Dec 2011 #9
A couple years ago, I read Foucault for a Political Theory class. backscatter712 Dec 2011 #2
I especially like his treatment of sexuality. Deep13 Dec 2011 #7
I love Foucault's dissections of power n/t RainDog Dec 2011 #3
I see OWS as more Deleuzo-Guattarian than Foucauldian nt tishaLA Dec 2011 #4
Care to eloborate or are you just trying to one-up me? nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #6
I don't try to one-up people on here tishaLA Dec 2011 #10
Thanks. Deep13 Dec 2011 #14
wonderfully said. Burgman Dec 2011 #8
Thanks. nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #19
WOOT! Most Excellent Post. A masterpiece. Congratulations! Zorra Dec 2011 #11
That's an excellent articulation too -- Remember Me Dec 2011 #16
+1 Deep13 Dec 2011 #17
Sharing it Zorra Dec 2011 #28
Thank you for that. nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #18
splendid article! Thanks ! n/t Betty Karlson Dec 2011 #12
Thanks for reading. nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #20
_^_ Zorra Dec 2011 #13
Glad to K & R Aerows Dec 2011 #15
Thanks. nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #21
Very good read. Kaleko Dec 2011 #22
Thanks for your remarks.... Deep13 Dec 2011 #23
Food for thought? hootinholler Dec 2011 #24
Thanks. Deep13 Dec 2011 #25
Seriously, thank you. n/t hootinholler Dec 2011 #27
really wonderful ideas -- thank you for the brain food!! nashville_brook Dec 2011 #26
Thanks for the comments. nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #29
shameless, self-serving kick. Deep13 Dec 2011 #30
Well said. k&r n/t Laelth Dec 2011 #31
thanks nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #32
Hey, there's people on a gun forum debating my blurb. Deep13 Dec 2011 #33
LOL! It seems very clear to me that you were promoting Occupy. Zorra Dec 2011 #34
Thanks, and you explain it very well. nt Deep13 Dec 2011 #35
 

Remember Me

(1,532 posts)
1. Most excellent
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:38 AM
Dec 2011

In fact, this is among the top 3 or 4 essays and analyses of Occupy that I consider the best of the best. And in that company you'd find Chris Hedges and Michael Moore.

Parts I particularly loved:

A person internalizes and naturalizes the values of her or his society and constantly checks her thinking and actions against that standard.

Yes, this is the effect of a patriarchal society on women who've not had their consciousness raised (as the old sayng and reality goes): they take up the patriarchal mantal agaisnt their sisters. Phyllis Schlaffly and all those other rightwing women are perfect examples. Another term for it is "internalized oppression."

Instead of fixing or overthrowing the current system, OWS seeks an organic replacement. At some point, the movement will simply be the nation....

This can't be emphasized -- and repeated -- nearly often enough. People want an agenda? Hardly possible, other than "Change everything, from the bottom up." Another way to look at that reality:

It is absurd for us to decry the immorality of laws that allow banks to commit highway robbery while still fretting over camping regulations.

and:

Again, the idea is not simply to replace leaders or to enact specific reforms. OWS seeks to replace the entire political, social, and economic culture with a wider sense of human community. It already conducts itself in that manner. Rather than leaders with the prerogative to make decisions for the group, OWS operates on consensus.

and (actually a continuation of the previous paragraph, but so important I want to further emphasize it:

It is clear from the past ten or twelve years that there is no political, institutional solution for what ails us. Fortunately, we do not need one.


Get it (I know you do, Deep13)? There is NO WAY TO GET THERE FROM HERE, except via something like Occupy, something from completely outside the system, something from a new paradigm which in turn is capable of creating new paradigms.

And whew! If you take a look at what the incredible numbers are in the bankster scandals, not all that well publicized, it becomes all the more apparent -- and necessary. For example, see: The Wall Street Pentagon Papers: Biggest Scam In World History Exposed – Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Too Big To Comprehend?
http://ampedstatus.com/the-wall-street-pentagon-papers-biggest-scam-in-world-history-exposed-are-the-federal-reserves-crimes-too-big-to-comprehend/

Great essay. Thanks for sharing it.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
5. Thanks, I appreciate your remarks. nt
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 02:42 AM
Dec 2011

JCMach1

(27,540 posts)
9. Or, is OWS a solipsistic post-structural deconstruction of the system...
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 02:53 AM
Dec 2011

If it is only that, it has already suceeded...

Having followed Ad Busters for some years, I think that was probably the original intent of the protests.

What was not expected were some the things the OP talked about.

Hence, people have actually attached deeper meaning to the movement.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
2. A couple years ago, I read Foucault for a Political Theory class.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:47 AM
Dec 2011

Along with his book Discipline and Punish, we read Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth, Herbert Marcuse's One-Dimensional Man and Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation.

Tough reads, but good reads.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
7. I especially like his treatment of sexuality.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 02:45 AM
Dec 2011

It segues well into Judith Butler's discussion of gender as performance.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
3. I love Foucault's dissections of power n/t
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:52 AM
Dec 2011

tishaLA

(14,176 posts)
4. I see OWS as more Deleuzo-Guattarian than Foucauldian nt
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:57 AM
Dec 2011

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
6. Care to eloborate or are you just trying to one-up me? nt
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 02:43 AM
Dec 2011

tishaLA

(14,176 posts)
10. I don't try to one-up people on here
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:15 AM
Dec 2011

I save that for other places. I'll leave aside where I disagree with some of what you say about Foucault for a moment--especially about questions of assujettissement--just to say this: Foucauldian conceptions of power are, in not small measure, derived from those Deleuze and Guattari explored in Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Foucault wrote the preface to the book, which he called (I think I'm remembering this correctly) a "guide to anti-fascist living." In part, it's because of the kinds of metaphors Foucault uses to describe power in Panopticism: he says it's an "physics" or an "anatomy," meaning that it is, on the one hand, something that responds to each action with its own reaction and, on the other, a mode of particularizing, dividing, etc. I don't believe either of those metaphors is apt--and it's why I have always believed, along with Foucault, that Deleuze is the great philosopher of the 20th century while Foucault is a footnote to the Nietzschean oeuvre.

The important thing about the relationship between Deleuzo-Guatarrian thought and OWS (or, for example, ACT-UP), without resorting to a sclerotic understanding of them, is the way nomadism and the importance of assemblaces are to them. Nomadism is about "becoming" in Deleuze and Guattari--it is dynamic, just as power is in Foucault, but it occurs at the differently. I've had a couple glasses of wine, so I'm not able to go into it with great depth here; I need to think with a clear head to articulate it in any kind of depth. For ideas about assemblages in Deleuze and Guattari, which is perhaps the best reason to believe their thinking about the matter more related to OWS than Foucault's, check [link: http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2009/10/08/deleuze-on-assemblages/|here]. It's the strategy of contingent alliances, etc.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
14. Thanks.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:29 PM
Dec 2011

I'll look into that.

 

Burgman

(330 posts)
8. wonderfully said.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 02:45 AM
Dec 2011

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
19. Thanks. nt
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:31 PM
Dec 2011

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
11. WOOT! Most Excellent Post. A masterpiece. Congratulations!
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 04:21 AM
Dec 2011

I need to read it over a few more times and sleep on it, it seems you have assembled some of the various thoughts and ideas about the nature of Occupy that have been swirling around in my mind and given them a relatively stable home.

It's amazing, your post just about proves to me that Occupy is collective consciousness manifesting, and therefore I'm sure you know exactly what I am talking about.

"OWS seeks to replace the entire political, social, and economic culture with a wider sense of human community. It already conducts itself in that manner."

Best. Post. Ever.


 

Remember Me

(1,532 posts)
16. That's an excellent articulation too --
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:12 PM
Dec 2011

of something I've been thinking/observing/(intuiting?) --

...Occupy is collective consciousness manifesting...

And THAT is why, it seems to me, it is unlikely to be defeated; that is also why it is so incredibly creative and resilient.

WONDERFUL observation. Thanks for sharing it.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
17. +1
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:30 PM
Dec 2011

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
28. Sharing it
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 11:20 PM
Dec 2011

is my pleasure, thank you.

And you responding that you are intuiting it also is a much greater pleasure.

Many others have been feeling it also.

The 1% has a great deal of power, but they can't kill an idea.

I also believe that it is unlikely to be defeated.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
18. Thank you for that. nt
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:31 PM
Dec 2011
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
12. splendid article! Thanks ! n/t
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 04:34 AM
Dec 2011

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
20. Thanks for reading. nt
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:31 PM
Dec 2011

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
13. _^_
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 10:13 AM
Dec 2011
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
15. Glad to K & R
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 12:37 PM
Dec 2011

Great post, thank you for making it.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
21. Thanks. nt
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:32 PM
Dec 2011

Kaleko

(4,986 posts)
22. Very good read.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 06:15 PM
Dec 2011

You and I arrived at the same conclusions re: OWS by totally different routes. Fascinating.

As a right-brain centered intuitive person, I instantly knew what OWS was about as soon as the first tent community sprang up in Zucotti Park. Like many others, I sensed the tremendous potential of this emerging movement to bring about the necessary and inevitable step in our collective evolution.

Without going into more detail, I would like to ask, are you familiar with Spiral Dynamics? If not, I highly recommend looking into it. Some of the guiding lights of the OWS movement (not leaders in the top-down sense! but influential visionaries nonetheless) are using the Spiral Dynamics map for their orientation and a deeper insight into the next steps on our journey into ever greater inclusiveness.

http://www.spiraldynamics.net/DrDonBeck/essays/human_capacities.htm

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
23. Thanks for your remarks....
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 06:41 PM
Dec 2011

...I will look into Spiral Dynamics.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
24. Food for thought?
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 07:40 PM
Dec 2011

Geebuz! A feast for thought!

And I opened this thinking what about pendulums is applicable here.

Thank you for this, it is a prime example of why I love DU.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
25. Thanks.
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 09:07 PM
Dec 2011

Yeah, it's a different Foucault. LOL

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
27. Seriously, thank you. n/t
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 10:28 PM
Dec 2011

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
26. really wonderful ideas -- thank you for the brain food!!
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 09:42 PM
Dec 2011

yummy

interesting how OWS caught fire at a time when dozens of "traditional" campaigns were floundering. apathy isn't the problem. meaningful engagement was the problem.

a whole generation of college-age voters put their hope and trust in Obama to be an agent of change. now they're graduated, saddled with student loans, and have no prospects for employment. reform within the traditional liberal system is a luxury this generation cannot afford.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
29. Thanks for the comments. nt
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 01:47 AM
Dec 2011

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
30. shameless, self-serving kick.
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 06:31 PM
Dec 2011

Too late for more "recs" but people can still read it and make comments. Took me a few hours to write, so I hope you all over look the self-promotion.

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
31. Well said. k&r n/t
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 06:59 PM
Dec 2011

-Laelth

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
32. thanks nt
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 07:05 PM
Dec 2011

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
33. Hey, there's people on a gun forum debating my blurb.
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 07:19 PM
Dec 2011
http://www.rugerforum.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=135315&sid=822d24b13becc0a40ec487a456b87f66

I'm famous! Their first post seems to suggest that I am criticizing OWS saying that I caused it to be "laid bare." I hope it is clear that I am trying to promote OWS, not discredit it.

And to anyone over at Ruger forums checking this out: 1. thanks, 2. I also enjoy shooting my Rugers. I have 4: SR9c (Xmas present from Sweetie), 10/22 Deluxe, stainless Single Six (6.5&quot , and Mark III "Hunter".

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
34. LOL! It seems very clear to me that you were promoting Occupy.
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 08:41 PM
Dec 2011

IMO, you did pretty much lay bare the nature of OWS. That nature just happens to totally scare the shit out of people that live by fear, aggression, violence, hate, and greed.

Like you said in your post, "OWS seeks to replace the entire political, social, and economic culture with a wider sense of human community. It already conducts itself in that manner." I would go even further, and say that OWS is already in the process of replacing the entire political, social, and economic culture with a wider sense of human community.

To authoritarian conservative personalities, the tangible aura of collective human compassion and power to bring about inevitable constructive positive change that characterizes the nature of Occupy is terribly confusing, and overwhelmingly frightening.

I feel sorry for them to an extent; but their harmful, hateful, destructive self and mass delusions and illusions are becoming unsustainable and more lethal to everyone and everything with each passing day, and the world as they know it must necessarily drastically change or they will inevitably kill the planet. We simply can't put up with this childish behavior anymore. They are going to have great difficulty coping without someone in authority to tell them what to do, and authoritarian conservatives by nature lack imagination and the capability to comfortably adapt to new circumstances as well. They'll just have to cope with our peace and love, like we've had to cope with violence and hate. From our perspective, this is a no brainer; but prisoners often become fully dependent on their abusive captors, and abuse becomes the comfortable norm for them.

Fortunately, there's nothing they can do to stop this idea whose time has come.

It will take time for the change to fully manifest, but the power of love has already overcome the love of power, and there is no way to stop it now.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
35. Thanks, and you explain it very well. nt
Wed Dec 21, 2011, 01:42 AM
Dec 2011
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...