Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:48 PM Aug 2013

Obama makes case for punishing Syria over gas attack

Obama makes case for punishing Syria over gas attack

WASHINGTON | Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:53pm EDT

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama vowed on Wednesday that the Syrian government would face "international consequences" for last week's deadly chemical attack, but made clear any military response would be limited to avoid dragging the United States into another war in the Middle East.

Casting the need for action based on U.S. national security interests instead of humanitarian grounds, Obama made his case to a war-weary American public for what is looking like an all-but-certain use of force in Syria, where he has long been reluctant to intervene.

While saying he and allied leaders had not yet made a decision on military strikes against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's loyalists, he left little doubt that the choice was not whether to act but when.

"We have concluded that the Syrian government in fact carried these out, and if that's so, then there need to be international consequences," Obama told "PBS Newshour" in a televised interview.

There were growing signs, however, that the timeline for launching any military strike on Syria could be complicated not only by the U.N. weapons inspectors' continued presence there but by the Obama administration's efforts to coordinate with international partners and growing demands for consultation with U.S. lawmakers.

On top of that, Britain - a key player in any air assault on Syria - changed its stance on Wednesday, saying the U.N. Security Council should see findings from weapons inspectors before any military action is taken and that the British parliament should vote on the matter twice.

...

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/29/us-syria-crisis-idUSBRE97K0EL20130829


As Matt Diaz put it "We have concluded Syria in fact..., and if that's so,..." Is this all but certain? No doubt? Certain doubt?"... "chemical weapons that could threaten us"... Who doe they think they're talking to? Bush/Palin voters?

[hr]

Here's 5 minutes of the PBS segment

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama makes case for punishing Syria over gas attack (Original Post) Catherina Aug 2013 OP
Well..he's not clued in to the pushback from UN and Labour in GB pushing KoKo Aug 2013 #1
Sending Kerry out was a terrible decision Catherina Aug 2013 #3
I wish he would have never uttered that stupid phrase Vinnie From Indy Aug 2013 #2
That wasn't our finest moment Catherina Aug 2013 #4
Actually, I think it was the president himself who came up with it. razorman Aug 2013 #5

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
1. Well..he's not clued in to the pushback from UN and Labour in GB pushing
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:54 PM
Aug 2013

it off to the UN and causing delays.

Thanks for his speech or statement. SOMETHING IS UP....but, not sure how it plays out.

He drew the Red Line..sent Kerry Out...and everyone's ready to GO...YET...GB backs off and sends it to UN and UN says they need much more time to complete inspection and to do the Testing of Results.

Catherina

(35,568 posts)
3. Sending Kerry out was a terrible decision
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 10:11 PM
Aug 2013

They boxed themselves into something and now they're realizing they better back their way out, at least I hope they're realizing that and not playing us because they weren't expecting such a backlash.

And like you said, Cameron appears to back off and announced it on twitter, of all places. Then says


"Cameron said the resolution would condemn “the chemical weapons attack by Assad” and authorize “necessary measures to protect civilian lives.” He also stressed that any intervention in Syria would have to be “legal, proportionate” and aimed at minimizing further loss of life.

http://rt.com/news/uk-resolution-syria-security-council-099/


They're still playing off old scripts. They don't seem to understand that no from the voters, and the international community, means no. I had to take care of other business today and I'm way behind, just trying to catch up now. Did anything happen at the UN today?

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
2. I wish he would have never uttered that stupid phrase
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:55 PM
Aug 2013

about "red lines". That was stupid.

I simply do not see how he can ignore the American people on this. 9% in favor of bombing Syria??? WTF?

If he does go against that many Americans, I wish he would have had the courage to go for single payer.

razorman

(1,644 posts)
5. Actually, I think it was the president himself who came up with it.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 06:05 PM
Aug 2013

As I recall, it was an off-the-cuff remark during an interview. If I am mistaken, perhaps someone else here can give us the correct info.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama makes case for puni...