Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thirty years ago, we all discovered how hard the Metric system sucked (Original Post) Blue_Tires Jul 2013 OP
Not so much about how the metric system sucked... Agschmid Jul 2013 #1
I know...Just putting a bad joke in the headline... Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #2
The easy way of converting to the metric system: kentauros Jul 2013 #3
Absolutely right Cirque du So-What Jul 2013 #35
It is interesting that the Royal Baby was announced as 8 pounds, 6 ounces FarCenter Jul 2013 #4
From Wikipedia bobclark86 Jul 2013 #6
I always wondered why Top Gear continued to use standard measures. kentauros Jul 2013 #19
Because for non-scientific endeavors, it doesn't matter krispos42 Jul 2013 #43
I've Driven in the UK ProfessorGAC Jul 2013 #44
Cheese isn't sold in pounds any more muriel_volestrangler Jul 2013 #45
The UK is, we are not nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #10
I checked the Daily Telegraph news story and it was 8 lb, 6 oz. FarCenter Jul 2013 #12
Yup you are correct nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #15
14 pounds / stone, but 16 ounces / pound -- why do they use so many different ratios? FarCenter Jul 2013 #16
Must be troy pounds nadinbrzezinski Jul 2013 #17
Hospitals do use metric for children Horse with no Name Jul 2013 #21
I like metric. bobclark86 Jul 2013 #5
Google makes all the conversions easy FarCenter Jul 2013 #8
Interesting documentary. John1956PA Jul 2013 #7
That video was adrenalin inducing. RC Jul 2013 #9
There's one domain in which the imperial units are slightly more convenient metalbot Jul 2013 #11
300,000 km/s seems more convenient than 186,000 miles/s FarCenter Jul 2013 #20
The thing is, we're halfway there, kentauros Jul 2013 #24
I have to use part of the metric system ismnotwasm Jul 2013 #13
Kilometers and Miles (the easy way) Sentath Jul 2013 #28
WAY too hard for most people, the easiest way... Rstrstx Jul 2013 #34
Location dependent Sentath Jul 2013 #38
Here is why the metric system DOESN'T suck...... blue sky at night Jul 2013 #14
but 3.6666666 is pretty darn close to hfojvt Jul 2013 #22
ya... blue sky at night Jul 2013 #36
"I want to divide a piece of sandpaper into thirds to fit my sander." snooper2 Jul 2013 #46
:) laundry_queen Jul 2013 #18
Celsius is one of my all-time biggest pet hates. Nye Bevan Jul 2013 #23
best advice sweetapogee Jul 2013 #26
That would be true if it wasn't for "weird physics" kentauros Jul 2013 #29
Winters in Minnesota; summers in Phoenix. longship Jul 2013 #27
I agree - the Fahreheit scale is perfectly suited for temperate-zone weather. reformist2 Jul 2013 #31
Glad you think so. Where I live -40 is a realistic temperature with wind chills below that. TrogL Jul 2013 #33
Thread Killer Doc_Technical Jul 2013 #25
That only kills the thread kentauros Jul 2013 #30
The CBC did a twenty minute documentary on the gimli glider last night. 20 minutes Here it is: applegrove Jul 2013 #40
Thanks! kentauros Jul 2013 #41
Drug dealers have done a lot to promote the use of Metric System in USA. nt SDjack Jul 2013 #32
Metric doesn't suck. It is how science and medicine and engineering operate globally. kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #37
For navigation, nautical miles and knots is much easier. GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #39
The metric system makes sense and is easier to learn than the crap we have here. Apophis Jul 2013 #42
European Liberal Pansies use the Metric System.... WCGreen Jul 2013 #47

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
1. Not so much about how the metric system sucked...
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 09:45 AM
Jul 2013

But more about how we don't teach math, and how to do conversions anymore.

Glad the plane made it... And flew for many more years.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
2. I know...Just putting a bad joke in the headline...
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 09:47 AM
Jul 2013

A remarkable. world-class bit of airmanship under those circumstances...

Cirque du So-What

(25,922 posts)
35. Absolutely right
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:22 PM
Jul 2013

What is the point of converting metric-to-English anyway? Just teach metric all the way and avoid unnecessary redundancy. In the natural sciences, calculations are taught all-metric - and rightfully so. Doing otherwise would handicap young scientists, many of whom spend a good deal of their time poring over abstracts from international researchers, and I guarantee not a mother's one of them uses the English system.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
4. It is interesting that the Royal Baby was announced as 8 pounds, 6 ounces
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 10:13 AM
Jul 2013

Instead of (8+6/16)/2.2 = 3.8 kilograms.

Apparently the UK is not fully converted.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
19. I always wondered why Top Gear continued to use standard measures.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:59 AM
Jul 2013

Then again, all too often they'd got someone as a guest from Wales or Scotland talking about how many stone they used to weigh

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
43. Because for non-scientific endeavors, it doesn't matter
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:29 PM
Jul 2013

You just need a consistent and universally-understood measurement system.


Somewhere out there a guy will hop into his car to go hunting. He'll be driving a vehicle with a 4.6 liter, 240-horsepower V-8, and tires that are 225mm wide on 16-inch rims. He'll go hunting with a rifle that shoots 140-grain, 7mm ammunition from a 24-inch barrel and a 4x power scope with a 40mm objective lens. On the way back, he'll swing by a convenience store for a liter of cola and a quarter-pound cheeseburger.



We mix and match all the time. While, scientifically speaking, it would be much easier to calculate the ballistics of the rifle bullet and the thermodynamics of the engine's combustion in metric units, for the non-scientific uses, you just need a number, any number, for comparison.


The metric system shines with the easy convertibility into scientific notation, and for the consistency of derived units.

1 Newton of force applied to one kilogram of mass equals one meter per second, per second acceleration. Yay!

One pound of force applied to 32.174 pounds of mass equals one foot per second, per second acceleration. Derp?


But units of convenience can be far easier and more informative than scientific units, as long as there is a clear definition of what the convenience unit is.

ProfessorGAC

(64,988 posts)
44. I've Driven in the UK
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:36 PM
Jul 2013

It's all miles per hour, one will see signs like "Shoulder Narrows in 200 yards", they still drink pints of beer, cheese is sold by the pound (i don't know about meat and produce, never bought any), and people at the site i visited would say things like "it's the door 20 feet down the hall on the right."

But, gas is in liters, milk is sold in liters (although it's clearly a gallon jug), and the garden place near the hotel where i stayed sold mulch by the kilo.

They go back and forth and don't seem to have any confusion.
GAC

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
45. Cheese isn't sold in pounds any more
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 03:03 PM
Jul 2013

You might be able to ask in pounds, and some shops may be able to convert, but the scales will be calibrated and tested in kilos - when the trading standards officers started only using metric for shop weights, a few people were prosecuted for refusing to have scales in kilos.

It is still miles on the roads (though the unobtrusive markers by the side of motorways mark off 100 metre intervals, and have done so for decades).

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. The UK is, we are not
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:26 AM
Jul 2013

and as pointed above, some journos still have not, since they are actually working with an American audience.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
12. I checked the Daily Telegraph news story and it was 8 lb, 6 oz.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:31 AM
Jul 2013

I think that the actual announcement from the hospital was pounds and ounces. A hospital is a bad place to be using the English system of units, since calculations are more complicated and errors more likely.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
15. Yup you are correct
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:39 AM
Jul 2013

it is.

They still use Stones (now talk of this ) so maybe they have not done it completely or they did that for the media.

I grew up with metric... I get metric

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
16. 14 pounds / stone, but 16 ounces / pound -- why do they use so many different ratios?
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:52 AM
Jul 2013

And without further clarification, we must assume Avoirdupois pound (mass)?

Or, like precious metals, are Royal babies measured in Troy pounds and ounces?

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
21. Hospitals do use metric for children
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:00 PM
Jul 2013

because all of the conversions are mg/kg...however, we also write it out in pounds and ounces for everyone else.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
5. I like metric.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 10:39 AM
Jul 2013

For non-critical work, it's super-simple to convert. A kilometer is 0.6 miles. A meter is a yard and a few inches (like a bit over three). Why is my soda in a 16.9 oz bottle? Oh, it's 500 mL. A gallon of milk is just shy of 4 liters.

For super-critical work, just start there, and to change to a different label, move a decimal point. NASA learned to stick with it after the Mars Climate Orbiter wrecked and lost them their project and $125 million.

There's a reason every country uses it except like Liberia and Burma -- you know, really crappy places to live. Oh, and the U.S.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
8. Google makes all the conversions easy
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:20 AM
Jul 2013

Just type "6 furlongs in meters" into the google search box, and you get back "6 furlongs = 1 207.008 meters".

1 btu = 0.29307107 watt hours

1 btu = 1.05505585 kilojoules

John1956PA

(2,654 posts)
7. Interesting documentary.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:09 AM
Jul 2013

Thanks for posting.

The aircraft should not have taken off with its fuel gauge being inoperative. The ground crew pumped only about half of the required amount of fuel because its calculations became muddled between the traditional "pounds to gallons" calculation procedure and the newly-implemented metric calculation procedure.

I think that the ground crew's pump measured the flow in gallons rather than liters.

1 kg = 2.2 lbs;
1 gal of fuel weighs 6.8 lbs, or 3.1 kg;
The weight of fuel required by the flight was 24,000 lbs, or 10,900 kg;
The volume of fuel required by the flight was: 24,000 lbs ÷ 6.8 lbs/gal = 3,530 gal;
Alternatively: 10,900 kg ÷ 3.1 kg/gal = 3,520 gal;

The flight crew did not catch the ground crew's error.

Regardless, if the fuel gauge circuit had been operating, thee shortage of fuel would have been apparent.

metalbot

(1,058 posts)
11. There's one domain in which the imperial units are slightly more convenient
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:26 AM
Jul 2013

The speed of light really close to 1 foot per nanosecond, so teaching/learning special relativity is commonly done using feet because it makes the math simpler.

I'd love to see the US shift to metric, but I don't see that happening anytime soon.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
20. 300,000 km/s seems more convenient than 186,000 miles/s
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:00 PM
Jul 2013

Fortunately, electrical engineering developed late enough that there is only the metric system of units. There is no English system equivalent to the Volt, Ampere and Ohm in use anywhere.

Most scientific work seems to be done exclusively in metric. If journals think the English equivalent would be informative, it is included parenthetically.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
24. The thing is, we're halfway there,
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:22 PM
Jul 2013

and most people don't even know it. They use the metric system on a daily basis, and have no idea that they are!

Electricity = kilowatts
Large soda bottles = 2 liters
Medicines (solids) = milligrams
Computers = Megabytes, Gigahertz
All money = base-10

I know there's plenty of others, including distances run in track & field and other sports, I just can't think of them all at the moment.

I think what they've had to do in our country is to slip metric in there in little bits, so people either accept it or just learn to ignore it. It takes longer because so many people are so insanely stubborn for their antiquated measuring system, but it's getting there

ismnotwasm

(41,975 posts)
13. I have to use part of the metric system
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:37 AM
Jul 2013

I think in Celsius and and milliliters, liters centimeters and kilograms, for instance. I work as a nurse and we use metric for measurement of various things.

It's easier I think, and I've learned one or two conversions for patients. Celsius to Fahrenheit, (I either ballpark it or use a calculator) and kilograms to pounds. (2.2 pounds is one kilogram)

I just picked it up with repetition. I don't use kilometers, so I still think in miles though. I'm trying not to, might as well go all the way.

It's not that bad.

Sentath

(2,243 posts)
28. Kilometers and Miles (the easy way)
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:46 PM
Jul 2013

Convert at a lovely 5mi=8km ratio.

So, just divide your miles by 5 and multiply that by 8 for km's.

35 mph 35/5=7 7*8=56 56 km/h

The official number from Google is: 56.372 , which I find to be an acceptable margin of error for most purposes. At 100 mph the error is almost exactly 1 km/h (160.934)

Rstrstx

(1,399 posts)
34. WAY too hard for most people, the easiest way...
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:18 PM
Jul 2013

is to look on your speedometer if you have the needle type, just under mph it's listed in km/hr. So if you're going 55mph it'll also read 88 km/hr

blue sky at night

(3,242 posts)
14. Here is why the metric system DOESN'T suck......
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:38 AM
Jul 2013

Practical use of a ruler. I want to divide a piece of sandpaper into thirds to fit my sander.

Divide 11 inches by 3 ='s 3.6666666666666666666666666666667 or 3 6/10, ok try finding 6/10 of an inch on the ruler.

Now divide 280 mm by 3 ='s 93.333333333333333333333333333333 or 93mm. Easy to find on the metric side of the ruler.

by the way, if you want to fold a letter into thirds just use the 93 mm we found above...it will work!





hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
22. but 3.6666666 is pretty darn close to
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:04 PM
Jul 2013

3 and 11/16ths. It's a lot closer to THAT than it is to 3 and 6/10ths.

3.6875
3.66666666
3.6

blue sky at night

(3,242 posts)
36. ya...
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:43 PM
Jul 2013

its fun to do that math in your head.......just an example, I deal in ML of liquid, ever try doing 10% of a quart?

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
46. "I want to divide a piece of sandpaper into thirds to fit my sander."
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 03:06 PM
Jul 2013

You could just fold it twice and tear like everyone else LOL

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
18. :)
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 11:56 AM
Jul 2013

I can't see the embedded video (since I'm in Canada) but I've seen a couple documentaries on the Gimli glider, and it's a scary/great story.

As a Canadian, we learn metric in school, but still often talk about our heights and weights in feet, inches and pounds. But we are used to using Celsius, km/h and litres for temp, speed and liquid volumes.

When my children were born, they gave me the weights in grams in the delivery room, and I asked them to convert to pounds and oz please, lol.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
23. Celsius is one of my all-time biggest pet hates.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:06 PM
Jul 2013

1. Forces people to use negative numbers;

2. Compresses realistic temperatures into an unnecessarily small range. Fahrenheit is such a perfect system, given that temperatures below zero or above 100 are very uncommon, but possible.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
29. That would be true if it wasn't for "weird physics"
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jul 2013
Negative Temperature

That stuff is way over my head; I simply knew it existed from something I'd read, probably on the Science group here

longship

(40,416 posts)
27. Winters in Minnesota; summers in Phoenix.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 12:44 PM
Jul 2013

Plenty of negatives and over 100's in those places. So you might want to stay away.

My suggestion? San Francisco or Hawaii but avoid high altitudes where those evil negative numbers might creep up on you.

Celsius is fine, but science uses the Kelvin scale.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
31. I agree - the Fahreheit scale is perfectly suited for temperate-zone weather.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:09 PM
Jul 2013

100 means it's hella hot. And zero means it's hella cold. Anything outside that range and you know you're in freakish-weather territory.

What are these numbers in Celsius... 40 and -20? Doesn't have the same impact.

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
30. That only kills the thread
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:01 PM
Jul 2013

if where you happen to work doesn't block all YouTube videos

That said, describe the video to me

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
37. Metric doesn't suck. It is how science and medicine and engineering operate globally.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 01:43 PM
Jul 2013

What sucks is how the US clings to such an unwieldy, irrational system. I wish we'd just convert and be done with it, even though I personally struggle to this day with metric, in spite of using it in my veterinary practice part of the time. The converting back and forth is where problems occur.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
39. For navigation, nautical miles and knots is much easier.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:07 PM
Jul 2013

One nautical mile is almost exactly one minute of latitude, or one minute of longitude at the equator.

 

Apophis

(1,407 posts)
42. The metric system makes sense and is easier to learn than the crap we have here.
Tue Jul 23, 2013, 02:25 PM
Jul 2013

I use metric in my archaeology work.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thirty years ago, we all ...