Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:26 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
"In sourcing" - GM to build new plant for electric cars in Maryland!
Good news!
http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-gm-plant-visit-20120215,0,7402134.story Workers peered through safety goggles as they fitted together parts of the electric motors they were building on a General Motors assembly line in White Marsh, MD. For now, the parts are made in a factory in Mexico and then shipped to Baltimore County, MD for assembly. But not for long. By the end of the year, motors for cutting-edge electric vehicles will be built from scratch in a sprawling $244 million plant under construction next to GM's factory, now called General Motors Baltimore Operations. About 189 workers will be hired to build the motors for a new generation of plug-in electric and hybrid vehicles, joining the 220 employees at the existing plant. The new plant's first order of business will be building motors for the Chevrolet Spark, a five-door mini-car with a hatch that GM plans to roll out in 2013, according to a company spokeswoman.
|
46 replies, 2533 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | OP | |
| Motown_Johnny | Feb 2012 | #1 | |
| Zalatix | Feb 2012 | #2 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | #5 | |
| Motown_Johnny | Feb 2012 | #24 | |
| dixiegrrrrl | Feb 2012 | #27 | |
| Motown_Johnny | Feb 2012 | #30 | |
| nolabels | Feb 2012 | #40 | |
| Motown_Johnny | Feb 2012 | #42 | |
| nolabels | Feb 2012 | #46 | |
| appleannie1 | Feb 2012 | #3 | |
| elleng | Feb 2012 | #4 | |
| jwleute | Feb 2012 | #6 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | #7 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Feb 2012 | #8 | |
| Old and In the Way | Feb 2012 | #10 | |
| NBachers | Feb 2012 | #9 | |
| Auggie | Feb 2012 | #11 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | #20 | |
| madrchsod | Feb 2012 | #12 | |
| BumRushDaShow | Feb 2012 | #13 | |
| Tesha | Feb 2012 | #14 | |
| IDemo | Feb 2012 | #17 | |
| Tesha | Feb 2012 | #18 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | #22 | |
| Johnny Noshoes | Feb 2012 | #25 | |
| IDemo | Feb 2012 | #26 | |
| Motown_Johnny | Feb 2012 | #38 | |
| Tesha | Feb 2012 | #39 | |
| demosincebirth | Feb 2012 | #15 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | #21 | |
| lunatica | Feb 2012 | #16 | |
| jwirr | Feb 2012 | #19 | |
| Uncle Joe | Feb 2012 | #23 | |
| ffr | Feb 2012 | #28 | |
| FarCenter | Feb 2012 | #29 | |
| madrchsod | Feb 2012 | #33 | |
| FarCenter | Feb 2012 | #37 | |
| gkhouston | Feb 2012 | #31 | |
| valerief | Feb 2012 | #32 | |
| Stop n think | Feb 2012 | #34 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | #36 | |
| UCmeNdc | Feb 2012 | #45 | |
| Bonobo | Feb 2012 | #35 | |
| ProSense | Feb 2012 | #41 | |
| iandhr | Feb 2012 | #43 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Feb 2012 | #44 |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:29 PM
Motown_Johnny (12,738 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
1. It looks like the race is finally on
|
Ford is starting to get into the electric car business and now GM seems to be expanding beyond The Volt. We are about 30 years late but I suppose that even in this case "better late than never" still applies. |
Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #1)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:49 PM
Zalatix (4,267 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
2. 189 jobs, 5 million left to go!
|
They say that the journey of a thousand miles begins with one step...
|
Response to Zalatix (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:02 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
5. Yes, it's a start
Response to Zalatix (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:24 AM
Motown_Johnny (12,738 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
24. This is more about electric vehicles for me
|
I know it is not many jobs and even if this does take off it will just reduce the sale of internal combustion driven vehicles.
I am just happy to see that EVs are finally starting to move out of the novelty niche and into the mainstream. |
Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #1)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:47 PM
dixiegrrrrl (24,395 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
27. Now if we can only create car tires that don't need 7 barrels of oil to make.
Response to dixiegrrrrl (Reply #27)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 02:12 PM
Motown_Johnny (12,738 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
30. 7 gallons, not 7 (42 gallon) barrels
|
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/alternative-fuel/news/bioengineers-turn-trees-into-tires
^snip^ Making Rubber from Plants About 250 million tires are sold yearly in the United States. Each one is roughly one-fourth synthetic rubber (the rest consists of natural rubber, steel, nylon, polyester, assorted reinforcing chemicals, waxes, pigments and oils). Synthetic rubber production dates back to the early 1900s and mushroomed into an industry during World War II. Today it takes about seven gallons of oil to make a standard tire—five gallons as feedstock for chemicals that make up synthetic rubber, plus two for the energy required to power the manufacturing process. But recycling the old tires into new ones would be a good thing if a viable process were developed. |
Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #30)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 07:11 AM
nolabels (10,861 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
40. They already have recycle used tires, they are called recaps
|
Last edited Tue Feb 21, 2012, 07:11 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) On cars not too many people want or use them (and never put them on the front axle if you have them). On trucks or other larger vehicles the tire casing might get recapped two or three times before it gets scraped.
|
Response to nolabels (Reply #40)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 08:43 AM
Motown_Johnny (12,738 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
42. that is kinda like putting new soles on a pair of shoes
|
not really recycling.
I don't know anyone who has ever used them on a car. The recap can separate from the tire if it gets to hot. Not the safest thing in the world. |
Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #42)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 09:32 AM
nolabels (10,861 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
46. Subjective argument maybe
|
I have been a truck mechanic for 34 years and on the whole i can say recaps have became well worth the money over the years. They are just not stylish for ones car. The company i work for uses them on smaller local delivery vans and gets good use out of them. The problem of being for recycling them is extracting the cord from the rubber
Try this Recycling And Disposal of Scrap Tires http://www.ct.gov/dep/cwp/view.asp?A=2714&Q=324902 Tire Shredders http://www.americanrecycler.com/june2003/spotlight.html or for fun "Automobile new and retread tires were carefully controlled and strictly rationed." World War II Deprivations in the United States http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~grannyapple/INFORMATION/World%20War%20II%20Deprivations.html |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:58 PM
appleannie1 (2,003 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
3. And to think. Two years ago they were going belly up.
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 11:59 PM
elleng (30,887 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
4. GREAT NEWS!
|
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:04 AM
jwleute (7 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
6. GM and Romney
|
Wasn't it Romney who didn't want to bail out the car companies?
|
Response to jwleute (Reply #6)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:07 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
7. Yes, he's an enemy of the workers
Response to jwleute (Reply #6)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:07 AM
Cali_Democrat (11,476 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
8. Yes....he wrote an op-ed titled: "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt"
Response to jwleute (Reply #6)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:59 AM
Old and In the Way (35,662 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
10. Bummer for all Republicans.
|
(1) Creates new US jobs + jobs feeding these plants.
(2) Electric energy - doesn't help their Big Oil buddies and creates a cleaner environment. (3) It's not in one of their Right-to-Work States - guess an educated union labor force still has value to GM. |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:30 AM
NBachers (2,604 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
9. Chevy Spark
Response to NBachers (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 03:38 AM
Auggie (13,903 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
11. Great little car for export too
|
Thanks for the link
|
Response to NBachers (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:11 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
20. Thanks, I was trying to find the cost of it?
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 06:01 AM
madrchsod (53,091 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
12. why would any company invest 100`s of millions in war torn mexico?
|
gm and china are at war over chinese companies ripping off gm`s technology.
usa is still the most stable country in the world with the best workers in the world. |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 06:13 AM
BumRushDaShow (7,492 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
13. K&R
|
And some of the parts suppliers need to start re-opening their facilities in Ohio so they can give credit where credit is due - and boot the head Cheeto the hell out of office.
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 06:29 AM
Tesha (20,577 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
14. After the bad publicity about exploding Volts, I'll bet that car *DOESN'T* ship as the "Chevy Spark"
Response to Tesha (Reply #14)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:19 AM
IDemo (10,935 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
17. True, sparks are generally not desirable in electric motors or controllers
|
Last edited Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:30 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) Or in petroleum powered vehicles. <- edit - except where needed, of course!
"Joule" would be a good name for an electric car - it's a unit of energy and sounds like "jewell". |
Response to IDemo (Reply #17)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 10:04 AM
Tesha (20,577 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
18. Much better!
|
"Erg" probably isn't in the running either.
Tesha |
Response to IDemo (Reply #17)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:13 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
22. Joule is a good name
Response to IDemo (Reply #17)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:34 PM
Johnny Noshoes (1,292 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
25. From an advertising point
|
Joule would be a great name to build an ad campaign for the car.
|
Response to IDemo (Reply #17)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:41 PM
IDemo (10,935 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
26. Taken already, I see
|
and not a bad looking car...
![]() |
Response to Tesha (Reply #14)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 09:01 PM
Motown_Johnny (12,738 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
38. There were no "Exploding Volts" that is just more RW bullshit
|
Please look into these things before posting
http://www.driveforinnovation.com/the-volt-and-the-battery-fires-furor ^snip^ To recap, we know of three fires in which Chevy Volts were involved or nearby: 1. A fire destroyed a garage in northwestern Connecticut. The owner–a volunteer firefighter named Storm–had a Volt and a home-converted Suzuku Samurai EV (pictured, right); here's his blog on the fire, where he writes "definitely not the Volt." (Here's local TV coverage.) No cause has been determined. 2. In Mooresville, N.C., a fire in a three-car garage that housed a Volt spread to and destroyed a luxury home. Initial suggestions identified the 240V charging station as the possible cause. That's been rejected since then, as fire officials have said the fire started away from the vehicles and charging station. But no cause has been determined. 3. The National Highway Transportation Safety Board crash-tested a Volt, pushing it into a pole at 20 miles an hour. The car performed well and was stored outside in the cold. Weeks later, the car caught fire. The fire apparently was caused by a short when the punctured coolant system leaked into the LiOn cells. There was only one fire and that was caused by a vehicle that was crashed and then just left to sit for weeks. Any privately owned vehicle would not have been neglected the way this one was. |
Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #38)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 04:58 AM
Tesha (20,577 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
39. I understand exactly what happened; that's why I said "all the *PUBLICITY* about exploding Volts".
|
It doesn't matter what *REALLY* happened; the publicity
is what will stick in people's minds. And that's why "Spark" is a lousy name for the up- coming car. Tesha |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 06:59 AM
demosincebirth (7,588 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
15. Best part is that they are good union jobs
Response to demosincebirth (Reply #15)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:11 AM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
21. Yes!
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:09 AM
lunatica (22,262 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
16. Smart fucking move
|
At least some of them have seen the writing on the wall. They've figured out how to go green and create jobs and fulfill a real demand. May others follow post haste. We have some serious changes to make.
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 10:14 AM
jwirr (19,673 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
19. Great on two levels. American made and electric.
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 11:20 AM
Uncle Joe (23,269 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
23. That is good news for GM, Maryland, the U.S. and the world at large.
|
Thanks for the thread, Rosa Luxemburg.
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 12:59 PM
ffr (119 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
28. Awesome!
|
It only took a near on global depression and government take-over for them to start building cars people actually want. I may soon be one of them.
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 01:46 PM
FarCenter (9,981 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
29. What are the advantages of this versus buying motors from an electric motor manufacturer?
|
Does GM build all the other motors that go into their cars?
Electric cooling fan? Electric steering? Power windows? Ventilation fans? |
Response to FarCenter (Reply #29)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 03:18 PM
madrchsod (53,091 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
33. they can control the production/cost and technology of these motors
|
building them in china is no longer a wise thing to do for companies that want to protect their technology.
|
Response to madrchsod (Reply #33)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 08:51 PM
FarCenter (9,981 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
37. There are a number of companies in the US that make electric motors
|
Everything from motors for appliances up to rolling mills. General Electric, A O Smith, Baldor, Emerson Electric, etc.
I would think that they have more production experience, lower costs, and better electric motor technology than GM? |
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 02:14 PM
gkhouston (15,655 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
31. Has someone finally figured out that stuff built out of the country by people working long hours
|
in lousy conditions for crap pay doesn't lend itself to a quality product? No one could have expected that.
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 02:18 PM
valerief (30,693 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
32. Great. I wonder if they'll be sold in the U.S. nt
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:40 PM
Stop n think (10 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
34. DONNY DOWNER
|
Glad they're makin it here and it's a step in the right direction BUT what the hells gonna happen when there's thousand's on the road and the electric grid is maxed out not to mention the fuel that creates the electricity. More nuclear waste, more fracking to get the gas for power plants, maybe more oil to run some of these power plants, did you know there's power plants that use rubber tires to supplement their fuel?
|
Response to Stop n think (Reply #34)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 08:49 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
36. Republicans are spreading myths about the grid
Response to Stop n think (Reply #34)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 05:48 AM
UCmeNdc (93 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
45. Solar Energy
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 07:43 PM
Bonobo (17,300 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
35. Wonderful what can happen when you turn your currency into kleenex! nt!
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 08:07 AM
ProSense (83,906 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
41. Great news. n/t
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 11:48 AM
iandhr (1,190 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
43. "Bin Laden is dead GM is alive" Joe Biden
|
Great news.
|
Response to iandhr (Reply #43)
Tue Feb 21, 2012, 03:44 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (18,816 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

