Wed Jul 10, 2013, 08:33 PM
Blue Bike (65 posts)
Walter Pincus corrects the multiple falsehoods in his own anti-Greenwald/Snowden/Assange hit piece
Earlier, I wrote about Walter Pincus' failed attempt to involve Julian Assange and Glenn Greenwald in some sort of conspiracy along with Eric Snowden regarding the recently leaked NSA documents.
Pincus has now been forced to fact-check his multiple errors:
CORRECTION: This Fine Print column (also published in the July 9 A-section print edition of The Washington Post) incorrectly said that an article by journalist Glenn Greenwald was written for the WikiLeaks Press blog. The article, about filmmaker Laura Poitras and WikiLeaks being targeted by U.S. officials, was written for the online publication Salon and first appeared April 8, 2012. Its appearance on the WikiLeaks Press blog two days later was a reposting.
The Fine Print column also asserted that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, during a May 29 interview with Democracy Now, “previewed” the story that Greenwald wrote for the Guardian newspaper about the Obama administration’s involvement in the collection of Americans’ phone records.There is no evidence that Assange had advance knowledge of the story; the assertion was based on a previously published interview in which Assange discussed an earlier surveillance project involving the collection of phone records.
The column also did not mention Snowden’s past work in the intelligence community. The lack of this context may have created the impression that Snowden’s work for Booz Allen Hamilton gave him his first access to classified surveillance programs.
2 replies, 477 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Walter Pincus corrects the multiple falsehoods in his own anti-Greenwald/Snowden/Assange hit piece (Original post)
|Blue Bike||Jul 2013||OP|
Response to Blue Bike (Original post)
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 08:55 PM
BlueCheese (1,880 posts)
2. To be fair, we should give him credit for what he got right.
For example, there does exist a place called Hong Kong, and a person named Glenn Greenwald. Also, April 8 and May 29 were actual days on the calendar and not some fake made-up days, like October 42nd or Pentember 6th.
So the article was actually more accurate than it looks at first.