General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid Zimmerman self inflict his wounds?
Follow me on this. Zimmerman confronts Trayvon, pushes him around, knocks him down, hits him a few times, then shoots him. After all, he doesn't want this one 'getting away'.
Realizing he needs to make it look like his life was in danger, he bangs his own head against the concrete to bloody the back of his head.
This would match the evidence so far. There was absolutely no physical evidence on Trayvon's hands were bruised, or had been used in the manner the defense is saying.
Zimmerman had several minutes between the shooting and when the police arrived at the scene. Plenty of time for him to stage his 'self defense' story.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)according to the testimony
other than that - self-inflicted is quite a stretch
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)like it did. I think it's quite possible he ran into a small tree branch.
premium
(3,731 posts)I dealt with head injuries often during my career and the blood will follow the natural curvature of the skull whether sitting up or lying down.
brush
(53,743 posts)his early statement to police that he saw TM on top raining down blows onto ol' zimmy.
He had to admit that he had not actually seen Martin throw any punches. This witness obviously lied. His testimony was just the opposite of the woman who testified early in the trial that she saw zimmerman on top and Martin screaming.
Pls use you head. If Martin was "raining down punches" his hands and knuckles would have all kinds of bruises from the beating they just administered.
Not so. There were no bruises on Martin's hands, or even dna from zimmy.
Also remember that there was no blood on the sidewalk that zimmerman claimed his head was being bash repeatedly against (that sidewalk bashing story is what I call a stretch no concussion, no loss of consciouness, no cracked skull, no evidence of wooziness, 30 minutes later in the police video he was walking around fine with no ill effects of having his head repeatedly bashed against concrete. IMHO, that didn't happen).
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Good said the person on top during the fight was wearing a black top like the black hoodie sweatshirt Martin had on that night, and the person on the bottom was wearing red. Zimmerman was wearing a similar color that night.
Good said it seemed like the person on the bottom was yelling for help. Good said he saw the person on top straddling the person on the bottom and the person on top was moving their hands in a downward striking motion that looked like what he called a ground and pound, a term associated with MMA or mixed martial arts fighting.
It looked like that position was a ground-and-pound-type position, but I couldnt tell 100% that there were actually fists hitting faces, Good said.
http://wqad.com/2013/06/28/witness-puts-zimmerman-on-bottom-of-fight/
**********************************************
of course TM might not have thrown punches, but this witness suggests TM was on top, not Z.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Who set up the confrontation?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)I know that runs counter to the groupthink here - but I have not heard second degree murder proven yet
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Where were the bruises on his hands?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)CatWoman
(79,293 posts)even tho at least two others testified differently.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)brush
(53,743 posts)Some one is either confused or lying.
Seems like Good might be the one confused, or lying, since he had to recant his "raining down blows" comment he made to the police.
And you can't get around the fact that there were no bruises on Martin's hands of knuckles.
Ever been in a fist fight? Believe me, your hands don't fair so well, especially if you're raining down blows. There would be bruises, possible broken knuckle bones, gashes from hitting teeth. There would definitely be evidence of a fight.
And there was none of zimmy's dna on Martin's hands, yet zimmy had the bloody nose and head. Blood is definitely dna. Where is that evidence on Martin's body?
There was none. Ol' zimmy may have done some self-inflicting to cover his ass for killing the kid so he could claim stand your ground.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)close to that?
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)And there is absolutely no evidence that Trayvon inflicted those wounds. In fact, the evidence strongly suggests that he DIDN'T.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)There wasn't any time to bash his head upon concrete after the gunshot, if he did, a witness would have reported it.
ecstatic
(32,653 posts)Trayvon should not have been killed. PERIOD
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Personally, I think his face met with a tree branch. Here's a link to Georges re-enactment of the murder.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023129223
B2G
(9,766 posts)I think we can wait that long, don't you?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)way too many folks here have it all figured out - even with testimony remaining
yardwork
(61,539 posts)It is greatly in their interest for Zimmerman to be acquitted. If Zimmerman is found guilty, then the HOA is going to face lots more lawsuits.
Very strong financial incentive for witnesses who are members of the HOA to help Zimmerman get off. Just saying.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Aren't all of the witnesses members of the HOA?
yardwork
(61,539 posts)That doesn't change the fact that they all have a conflict of interest.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Confused thinking on my part. Good's testimony would be the only one (I think) inconsistent with self-interest on the part of the HOA, if I'm understanding it correctly.
yardwork
(61,539 posts)If Zimmerman is convicted, the HOA and all it's members become even more vulnerable to lawsuits by Martin's family.
That gives all the witnesses associated with the condo association a very good incentive to testify in ways that support Zimmerman.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Homeowners association is thought to have paid more than $1 million
April 5, 2013|By Rene Stutzman, Orlando Sentinel
SANFORD Trayvon Martin's parents have settled a wrongful-death claim for an amount thought to be more than $1 million against the homeowners association of the Sanford subdivision where their teenage son was killed.
Their attorney, Benjamin Crump, filed that paperwork at the Seminole County Courthouse, a portion of which was made public Friday.
In the five pages of the settlement that were available for public review, the settlement amount had been marked out. Lower in the agreement, the parties specified that they would keep that amount confidential.
When asked during an earlier interview whether the amount was more than $1 million, Crump said: "I have no comment on that subject I know you did not get that from me."
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2013-04-05/news/os-trayvon-martin-settlement-20130405_1_trayvon-martin-benjamin-crump-george-zimmerman
yardwork
(61,539 posts)Each individual member of the HOA is potentially at risk for liability, especially if Zimmerman is found guilty. The condo association board knew that he was unofficially patrolling the private community while armed with a gun. This could be perceived as negligent or even reckless behavior on the part of the condo association board.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Any testimony that makes Z's actions appear justified under the law is helpful to the HOA.
Don't know why I had such a hard time getting that straight.
Thanks for your patience.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)Trayvon Martin's parents have already settled with the Homeowner's Association (approx 1M) and the Homeowner's Association is intending to sue George Zimmerman once this trial is over...
http://my.firedoglake.com/mason/2013/04/05/trayvon-martins-parents-settle-lawsuit-against-hoa-for-more-than-1-million/
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)Zimmerman trains in MMA fighting three times a week, presumably practicing things like "ground and pound."
chillfactor
(7,573 posts)but could not identify a uniformed cop..sorry but Good's testimony had plenty of holes....
premium
(3,731 posts)Good seemed very credible to me, bottom line is that the prosecution had a bad day yesterday.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)you are dealt and hope the jury buys your case.
Plenty for the jury to weigh, that is for sure.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)From the 911 call with the screams and the gunshot, it is clear there were far more than two cries (screams, wails, whatever you want to call them).
I really don't trust most of the eye witnesses' evidence. Eye witnesses are notorious for being incorrect.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Who (or is it whom - I always forget that rule) you and I trust means nothing - only who the jury trusts.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)But he didn't hear the cries recorded over the phone when his neighbor was upstairs in her bedroom on the phone with 911? That really affects his credibility.
And you're correct - the only thing that matters is who the jury trusts. Whatever those of us who have followed the case on the internet believe will have no effect on the final verdict.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)dark. Try it tonight. Go out where there is no light and try it. It is impossible to tell colors at night in the dark. Since this was happening in the dark, he could physically not see red.
And it makes more sense that the person TRAINED in MMA (Zimmerman) would be the one doing it, doesn't it?
DrDan
(20,411 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)the question for the jury is whether there was enough for that color to be recognized.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)The position of Trayvon's body appears that they are correct and that guy who said differently, was wrong since Trayvon was face down on the lawn and his hands were underneath him when the first police officer arrived at the scene, according to said police officer.
I'm just sayin' ... if Zimmerman gets off, there's going to be hell to pay.
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)I think it completely consistent that some witnesses would see GZ on the bottom and some would see him on the top. He was both places, at different times.
To me, the most important piece of evidence is the powder marks on TM's body and clothing. They seem to indicate that his clothing was falling away from his body at the time of the shot, that his shirt AND sweatshirt were falling with gravity away from his skin.
I think TM was trying to hold GZ down on the ground.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)That doesn't make sense to me - unless GZ was trying to rob TM.
The fact remains that two witnesses say that GZ was on top just before they heard the gunshot. I believe it's highly unlikely that GZ turned the body around after he shot him unless, of course, he was trying to search his back pockets.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Only one witness said they saw Trayvon on top. So far the others have said it was the larger guy on top.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)brush
(53,743 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)I don't think that's ever been in dispute
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)like Zimmerman's.
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)but only after the shot was fired. Nobody has testified to seeing GZ on top of TM throwing punches or shooting.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)Or maybe his father.
But I wouldn't be at all surprised if one of the responding officers were willing to help him receive some appropriately convincing wounds.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Conspiracy after conspiracy seems to be the order of the day, would be interesting to see if people want the truth of what happened or just want the result that they want.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)rather than listening to the testimony and forming an opinion based on facts
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Kinda hard to "rain down blows" on someone without getting your hands bruised in the process.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Forensics next week as someone said will probuably tell us more.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Are you suggesting that bruises should have formed in a few seconds, while Martin was still alive?
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)That is, if he was actually doing so
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)The norm seems to be between 1 hour and 1-2 days.
Being as how they're formed when capillaries get broken and blood flows from them, bruises do not form after the heart has stopped beating.
This leads me to believe that the immediacy of Trayvon's death inhibited any bruising.
The following link pretty much sums up what I've read at others.
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/91369
Ian David
(69,059 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Cant see how he could self inflict without someone seeing it.
Ian David
(69,059 posts)... have been injured in the fight, or very quickly injured himself.
Or he was already beaten-up by someone else before he encountered Trayvon.
Looking for someone to take out his frustrations on, after someone bigger than him kicked his ass.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)katmondoo
(6,454 posts)even before they found no evidence on Trayvon's hands
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)If you just want to make stuff up, why not aim higher?
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Just saying...
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Inter-resting. unicorns are known for their history of violence - that horn is not there just for decoration - just saying.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)uponit7771
(90,304 posts)pipi_k
(21,020 posts)is possible.
Is it probable? I really doubt it.
He had just shot a young man. I really don't think his mind would be planning ahead like that.
Especially if he really and truly believed he had a "right" to shoot someone because he felt his life was in danger. I don't know for sure, but I would imagine that a person wouldn't actually need to have injuries to prove he thought his life was in danger.
So unless and until a witness comes forth to state without question that he saw Zimmerman bash his own head, I think people should just stop trying to find him guilty without the full evidence.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)but were neither present nor know/knew either Martin OR Zimmerman are absolutely CERTAIN they know what happened? That's the thing I'm puzzled about the most; That very intelligent people would claim to know beyond a shadow of a doubt how an event they didn't see went down and what each participant's motivation was.
No matter how hard I try I can't wrap my mind around this.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)not surprised, if you know what I mean.
There are people who were actually there that night who either saw or heard something who can't even agree.
And here on DU what do we have...people who weren't there arguing with each other...
even calling each other names!
I just shake my head.
I wonder if they realize that even the jurors will have to decide Z's fate based on what they think happened.
No one will ever really know for sure...
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Whether he actually did or not, or whether he got someone to do it for him, that's speculation.
But I can certainly see Zimmerman wounding himself or having himself wounded after he killed Trayvon so he could plea self defense.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it normally is a duck.
Someone BESIDES Mr. Martin did it, of that I am sure.
(ASSUMING there was anything done at all, because the police said THERE WAS NO BROKEN NOSE AT ALL).
Perhaps zim just had a nose bleed.
B2G
(9,766 posts)but couldn't state for sure without xrays.
Just had a nosebleed....sure. You saw the pictures, right?
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I thought zim should have been charged with premeditated first degree murder and when found guilty given Florida's top
sentence.
I am more convinced than ever.
that's just my opinion and I am sticking to it.
B2G
(9,766 posts)How they came to that conclusion when court testimony specifically states otherwise.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Jackie Robinson was forced to flee a mob 70 years ago making it out without being killed
70 years later, Trayvon Martin was asssasssinated in cold blood
without a gun and bullet
reinterpret the 2nd so that vigilante Paul Blart's cannot in any way have a gun.
zim would have been smart to take a deal
I have heard some talking head say that the defense might ask for one at this late point
Wonder, is that allowed in the state of Florida?
B2G
(9,766 posts)Or much else for that matter. Buh bye.
just more word salad from G4A.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)in his report wrote: "Mucous Membrane Normal".
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/05/17/zimmerman.fdems.report.pdf
Also, the on-scene photo taken by the police of Zimmerman's face.
When a nose is broken, it causes trauma to blood vessels. Typically, some blood flows out the nostrils. Invariably, when the bleeding through the nostrils is stopped, bloods builds up in the area near the lower part of the eyes and causes that area to swell up.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Obviously, the blood was from an external source, the small cut on the skin of his nose.
The EMT's report written contemporaneously with the event did not say "that the nose was likely broken."
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)She referred him to an ear nose throat guy, which he declined to go to. She also testified that the scratch on the head was minor and the bandage on it was for looks (she didnt apply it). And she testified that he trained three days a week in MMA.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)(until they got into cross examination,
with their utterly annoying questions & manner.)
pintobean
(18,101 posts)between the gun shot and when the first person arrives on the scene - Jonathan Manalo, resident and witness for the prosecution, who took photos of the bloody Zimmerman.
The obese Mr. Zimmerman possesses more super powers.
CokeMachine
(1,018 posts)the creative speculation group. I choose to wait for the testimony. If proven guilty he should be put away for a long time!!
pintobean
(18,101 posts)just aren't paying attention to the trial. Getting "news" from talking heads isn't really getting news. I've been watching the on-line stream, without comments. I'm seeing what the jury sees. All of the baseless speculation here doesn't mean shit to the outcome of this trial.
CokeMachine
(1,018 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)It's a beautiful day, here.
egduj
(805 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)But we will see the actual forensics next week.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)There was a very small cut on Trayvon's left knuckle.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)exaggerating the information before they even
had the facts. Prosecutor said one small cut
on his left hand, nothing more. No tearing,
bruising, no Z dna.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)dpibel
(2,826 posts)The Medical Examiner's report has been out and about for months.
Why add that word? It hasn't been secret.
You're pretty good, but you go overboard at times. Suggest you tighten the act.
Just Saying
(1,799 posts)Him trying to physically detain Trayvon and the fight. Zimmerman either tried to order Trayvon to stay put, started questioning him as if he had some authority or tried to stop him (put hands on him.). I do think it's very possible Trayvon struck him it I believe it was in self-defense. Zimmerman was the aggressor from beginning to end.
I just hope the prosecution can take apart Zimmerman's story. Trayvon's friend, the female neighbor and the medical witnesses helped.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)doubt about their abilities and willingness to make things go away (for the betterment) of the community.
Personally, I avoid the place when possible.
DeschutesRiver
(2,354 posts)scratches were present on his head. No one, not him, nor the cops were all that concerned from their appearance on the video. This tape was all over the news and nobody thought it showed a guy who needed medical treatment.
If he had any injuiries more severe the next day, I figured he had his friends or family inflict them, so that he could pretend the next day that they were inflicted by the kid he deliberately killed to bolster his self defense claim.
That said, according to the medical person who examined him, he had no serious injuiries, as one would expect to see from getting ones head pounded repeatedly on concrete to the point that one felt in danger of dying at the hands of the kid one was stalking. Just some little bitty scratches, probably quite the bleeders as all head scractches can be. I do a ton of outdoor stuff and farm chores on my ranch - we don't go to a doc for that kind of stuff, nor does anyone we know.
Neither did Zimmerman, until a while day later, though he didn't get any value from the trip, defense wise from what I heard of the med testimony.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Some people are claiming that it says things which it clearly does not.
As verified by the report, Zimmerman didn't have any serious injuries.
DeschutesRiver
(2,354 posts)That report is about as clear cut as it gets.
prole_for_peace
(2,064 posts)They certainly do not look like someone who's head was "smashed" into the sidewalk multiple times.
http://jacksonville.com/slideshows/trayvon-martin/see-evidence-photos-george-zimmermans-injuries-shooting-scene#slide-1
DeschutesRiver
(2,354 posts)Honestly, I have shaved my legs too quickly with a sharp brand new razor and scraped my shin badly, which looked about like those scratches on Zimmermans head in those photos.
I didn't die from it, though they were quite the bleeders. Zimmerman wasn't about to die from those little scratches either, nor could he possibly have thought so at the time.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)So its hard to imagine him getting the worse of it in a fight with the skinny black kid.
I think Zimmerman faking his injuries by causing them himself is a very real possibility.
I do love the gasps of amazement though by some Zimmerman defenders, as if its something that is so outlandish or unheard of. I guess they never watched reality shows about true crimes, because guilty people try shit like this on a regular basis.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I really don't think I would be able to do it.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Not really, no.
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)that would quickly show up if you had your head slammed into concrete.
It looks like an abrasion at worst that was allowed to bleed down.
Small swollen scrape on bridge of his nose looks like the worst injury. Could be a headbutt from a kid fighting a prowler over his gun. Then a little cut on the end of his nose that looks like it was allowed to bleed out for effect.
Zimmerman looked like someone that lost a wrestling match. Not someone that just had his head and face bashed in.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)The confrontation didn't break Zimmerman's nose. His nose was reportedly already shaped that way from his MMA practice activities. To give himself a little self-defense credibiity, all he needed was a slight swelling to the nose (without any change in the eyes) and a small amount of blood.
Zimmerman defenders may misinterpret the photo as providing more than what it actually shows. (1) It doesn't establish that Martin was the aggressor. (2) It also doesn't establish that Martin is the one that hit Zimmerman to cause Zimmerman's nose to be swollen.
I'm one who is willing to suspect that Zimmerman, while being aware of homicide charges that could be filed against him, had sufficient time to create his own injuries. Just look at the photo at #43. Did Zimmerman hit himself on the right side of his nose with an object such as his gun? Did he cause a small cut that produced sufficient blood that would be smeared, by him with his right hand, on the tip of his nose, his upper and lower lips, and the right side of his mustache? How could he have so much blood, and a lot of blood on his lips, and yet not have any blood beyond the lower lip?
B2G
(9,766 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)I'll take words (under oath) of the professionals who treated him and others who were actually there, over wild internet speculation.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Old broken noses are not.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)She treated him the next day and says he had 2 black eyes.
Jump to the 27:10 mark and watch until the 28:35 mark.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)which negated any on-scene indication of a broken nose, and since Zimmerman needed a "self-defense" theory and had MMA friends who could help him by breaking his nose, it appears that the broken nose occurred between the time of the shooting and the time that the witness examined him.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Here's the EMT testimony, in case you're interested in reality.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)See didn't seem to testify about a meterorite.
Did you hear her say that he had been struck by a meteroite?
The EMT report (the one reported "Mucous Membrane Normal" was prepared near the time of the incident at a time when the EMT had no motive to provide anything other than the truth.
Zimmerman was known to have been favored by one or more influential members of the police department and/or the district attorney's office. Initially, he wasn't even going to arrested for a homicide.
Now, with your "in case you're interested in reality" statement, I take it that you mean that the origional words in the EMT report must be disregarded and that any words to the contrary by the EMT must be unquestionably accepted as true.
And I take it that if someone does not accept the latest version without question, you mean to say that they must believe that Zimmerman was struck by a meteorite.
That doesn't seem logical. Or at least not to me.
You should not be overly concerned. The prosecutor seems to have left his game at home and is not even objecting to questions that call for speculation. It looks like the defense attorney might win this case. That's really what you want, isn't it?
pintobean
(18,101 posts)breaking his nose in a CYA move, either. I responded to your ridiculous speculation by being ridiculous.
The report you mentioned is in evidence, as is the testimony. Maybe you should contact the prosecution about getting your MMA buddies theory into evidence.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Contact the prosecutor? The one allowing speculative questions to be asked without objection? The one allowing the defense attorney to present a defense with speculative questions?
If the defense attorney asks about a meterorite theory, then we'll all know that you are on the defense team.
forthemiddle
(1,375 posts)Mucous Membranes Normal is a standard documentation within the ENT exam. ENT is "Ears, NOSE, and Throat". When the standard documentation states MMN (or mucous membranes normal) it can also refer to the lips and pharynx. All of these structures have mucous membranes.
Reading this documentation there is no indication that it is the nasal mucous membranes they are referring to.
That does not mean it isn't, but you can not state, Mucous Membrane Normal and state there was not injury to the nose, or that the nose was not broken. One does not preclude the other.
I am not taking a side, (I haven't been following the story closely enough), but for you to state because the dictation state "Mucous Membrane Normal" means that GZ didn't have a broken nose is just flat out misleading.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)but interprets a report different from you is not "misinterpreting" a report but is "misleading"? Is that your position?
If you truly are "not taking a side," why use the pejorative term "misleading"?
Excuse me, but your use the pejorative term "misleading," instead of misinterpreting, indicates that you are "taking a side."
I also think that you are wrong in the sense that your answer is illogical.
Your explanation that you are an expert and that the phrase "Mucous Membranes Normal" includes mucous membranes in addition to those lining the nose ("lips and pharynx" , that does not mean that the mucous membranes in the nose were any thing other than normal.
In fact, to the extent that the EMT intended to include the mucous membranes of the lips and pharynx with the mucous membranes of the nose, that indicates that all of the mucous membranes were normal. He used the word NORMAL. Unless it takes a special expertise to understand that the word "normal" in a medical report to mean "normal," he meant "normal."
forthemiddle
(1,375 posts)I was telling you that when they state Mucous Membranes normal, it does not automatically preclude a broken nose. Sorry to point out a FACT!
I am not prejudging in any case, I was just stating that I read on average 100 medical encounters a day, for the federal government, by the way to audit for charges. In that case what I do is read, and literally count the number of systems a provider exams for a physical exam (along with the history of present illness, and medical decision making - which does not come into play for this post). When "counting for the exam, MMN (mucous membrane normal) that can include oral, nasal, or lips. It would not automatically mean - OH this person doesn't have a broken nose, which you seem to be implying.
This case inflames passion, and opinion of all sides, so I will stay out of it from now on. I only post when I see mistaken (sorry for the words misleading, but that is what you were doing. Misleading people to assume because the mucous membranes where normal, George Zimmerman was lying, and must have broken his nose on his own.
I will not post on the subject again, but for others reading this, please know that just because the mucous membranes were normal, that doesn't mean shit.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Boxers, MMA practitioners, and others involved in the personal combat sports commonly have broken noses at one time or another.
The trauma is accompanied by trauma to blood vessels and the symptoms include black eyes. In fact, the eyes start to show it immediately with some swelling, but the full color develops as time goes by. The pulse rate also goes up with the result that the body's temperature increases.
I don't know why you say that "the EMT on the scene agreed" with your belief that Zimmerman's nose was recently broken.
In his report, http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/05/17/zimmerman.fdems.report.pdf
he did not observe a recently broken nose but expressly wrote: "Mucous Membrane Normal". Although Zimmerman had a small laceration to his skin, the EMT also observed that his temp was within normal limits.
When you say that "the EMT on scene agreed" with your belief that Zimmerman had a broken nose from the encounter, it is clear that he did not.
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)it looks like he has 2 very small cuts on the tip of his nose
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)To the extent that Zimmerman had a broken nose on the day of the incident, it was a fully healed old one.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)prole_for_peace
(2,064 posts)if his nose was broken, how did the swelling go down so fast?
connecticut yankee
(1,728 posts)1. Trayvon had absolutely none of Zimmerman's blood or DNA on him. If he had bloodied Z's nose, some of it would have gotten on him.
2. The body was on the grass, quite a distance from the concrete. If the fight took place on the grass, how could Trayvon hsve repeadedly banged Z's head into the concrete?
I think Z beat himself up in order to give himself an alibi (if that's the correct term). Justification for the "Stand your ground" defense.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)I think not, hope I haven't missed it.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)His story about being pounded in the face 25-30 times is complete garbage. He'd be dead.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Was there enough time between the gunshot and the moment the first witness saw what was happening? The cops were't the first ones to observe what was happening.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)I think that's a bit ridiculous. I do think Zimmerman got his injuries in some other way than what he described. I don't believe Martin pounded his head on the walkway. No one saw this occur, and his injuries aren't consistent with having one's head repeatedly slammed into concrete.
I also don't think that Martin punched Zimmerman either. I think that Martin was on top of Zimmerman when he was shot but Zimmerman already had his gun out giving Martin every reason to be violently defending himself and scream for help. However, if in fact at the time of the gun shot it was Zimmerman on the bottom then he got his injuries from the recoil of the gun whacking him in the face and at least one of his head injuries from the whiplash of the gun recoil hitting him in the face causing his head to snap back and whack the pavement. But, if his gun was already out, it is entirely reasonable for Martin to violently defend himself and scream for help.
I think the big crux of this altercation is not who was on top and when but whether or not Zimmerman had his gun out and when, and I believe that anyone who has a gun when getting into a physical altercation with someone would draw that gun in order to stop the altercation so as not to become injured. I don't believe for a minute that Zimmerman didn't draw his gun until he was being pummeled or even struck once. When someone has a gun they would draw that gun in order to keep from being assaulted or to stop an altercation not necessarily to shoot it but to use it as a deterrent. And once that gun came out Martin had every right to defend himself however he could. I think that Zimmerman expected that by drawing his gun Martin would stop contributing to the altercation and do whatever Zimmerman wanted. But I also believe that when the gun came out that Martin believed he would be shot and defended himself as best he could.
I absolutely believe that once the physical altercation first started that Zimmerman pulled out his gun. Why would someone who has a gun when that gun gave them the courage to pursue someone and confront them would not draw that gun even to use as a deterrent rather than allow themselves to be hurt in any way and would expect that by drawing that gun on someone would cause that person to halt any attempt at further altercation? NO WAY do I believe that Zimmerman had this gun and allowed himself to get as injured as he did BEFORE drawing it. He would have drawn it the moment he felt threatened in any way. And if that is what happened it is reasonable that Martin would have believed he would be shot and done whatever he could to keep that from happening.
I also believe that it was Martin who was screaming whether he was the one on top or not because Zimmerman threatened him with his gun. The screams for help abruptly stopped with the gun shot, there's no reason to believe that someone with a gun pointing it at someone and pulling the trigger would be the one screaming for help, and there's no reason to believe that the person screaming for help would abruptly stop doing so at the moment they pulled the trigger. It's not so much what the screams sounded like whether coming from Zimmerman or Martin but the rest of the context of those screams as I mentioned. It's THAT that tells me it was Martin screaming for help, and he was screaming for help because Zimmerman had pulled his gun on him.
yardwork
(61,539 posts)If Zimmerman shot Martin while they were tussling - which seems likely - then isn't it possible that the gun kicked back and hit Zimmerman in the nose? That might have knocked Zimmerman's head back and caused the scalp injuries too.
In that case, the injuries were self-inflicted, although not deliberately.
premium
(3,731 posts)the gun would've had to have been within 1-2 inches of his nose, that doesn't compute with the evidence, if it were so, then Zman would've had Trayvon's blood all over his face.
Here's the bottom line, it matters not what we here believe or not believe, what matters is whether or not the prosecution is able to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury, and, judging by what I saw yesterday, I have serious doubts on that.
yardwork
(61,539 posts)If it wasn't accidental, it was probably deliberate self-infliction of wounds, done after Zimmerman murdered somebody, to give himself a justification. He probably believes it himself now.
premium
(3,731 posts)without waiting for all the testimony, prosecution and defense, myself, I'm waiting for all the evidence to be presented, I'm leaning towards guilty, but I'm open to not guilty depending upon future evidence.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)Because that's exactly what I think happened. Even what his injuries look like appears to me is what happened. As I understand it, Zimmerman's gun also had his own blood on it which could be explained by the recoil causing it to smack his own face. If that is what happened, then his head probably snapped back onto the pavement. But given that there were several slight abrasions to the back of his head I think he probably more likely got those from rolling his head about on the pavement during the tussle or even on the grass where there was likely small rocks, bits of tree branches or whatever.
But it could be that Martin inflicted the injuries in a fight but that level of violence from him was because Zimmerman drew his gun on him and Martin was terrified that he was going to be shot. If Zimmerman drew his gun at that moment Martin had every right to believe it would be used on him and violently protect himself as best he could.
yardwork
(61,539 posts)Sounds like we agree.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)Can't use lethal force to respond to non-lethal force. Martin was unarmed.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Unarmed people kill more Americans every year than rifles.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Deep13
(39,154 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)than possibly falling down, getting hit in the face from gun recoil, or something like that.
Personally, I hope Martin did get in a few good punches in self-defense before being murdered by the gun toting bigot.
premium
(3,731 posts)who are only waiting to shoot someone.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Lack of diversity is a dead give-a-way.
premium
(3,731 posts)Thank you for proving my point.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)premium
(3,731 posts)I know plenty who do. Just because the MSM doesn't show that, doesn't mean they don't.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Heck, gun, ammo, accessory sales, etc., would plummet Zimmerman would not have grabbed his gun and shot Trayvon Martin. The NRA -- and what is essentially a white supremacist board, including Norquist, Bolton, Nugent, Ollie North, gun manufacturers, etc. -- would not be a factor in our elections and in promoting the right wing's agenda.
And, yet you gun guys want to criticize the friend of Trayvon Martin as being stupid. . . . . . . .
premium
(3,731 posts)keep on going.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 29, 2013, 09:45 PM - Edit history (1)
whites killing whites, blacks killing blacks.
How is that possible giving that all those racist gun owners are buying guns to kill people of a different color?
premium
(3,731 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I can produce plenty more. Like I said, go to any gun store or gun show.
premium
(3,731 posts)You're on a roll Hoyt.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Do try to keep up.
There might be a a few African Americans and Latinos at gun shows, but the overwhelming majority of gun show enthusiasts are white males
premium
(3,731 posts)I did say gun shows in Las Vegas, Reno, Carson City, there were a significant number of AA at all those shows.
And so what if the majority are white, what does that prove?
RichardPatrick
(27 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)freerepublic
Response to RandiFan1290 (Reply #158)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)Response to RandiFan1290 (Reply #160)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RandiFan1290
(6,221 posts)Let us know what your new screen name is today!
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)or former home invader? I forget which.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Why shouldn't we believe your origional statement?
Were you telling the truth then or are you telling the truth now?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)And you are still too obtuse to get it.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Confession is good for the soul.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)moondust
(19,962 posts)Could even involve witnesses and/or cops. "Hey, it's just some unknown black kid, not one of us."
Which would explain not arresting GZ at the scene. And make this whole trial a sham.
prole_for_peace
(2,064 posts)They certainly do not look like they are from his head being "smashed" into the sidewalk like his team saying.
Warpy
(111,169 posts)when he came home and told Papa what he'd done that night.
The lack of defensive injury means there was a reason he wasn't fighting back.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)using palm-heel strikes.
uponit7771
(90,304 posts)...was a linemen and couldn't block used fingers so had to use palm heel...
My thumbs would come out of socket some times because of initial contact
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)at the scene of the crime. I have no doubt in my mind he was fine and didn't want that on the record. Further bolstering that is the fact that he didn't cough up "proof" of injuries until days later.
grok
(550 posts)Not being facetious, and somebody that knows medicine should answer,,
Martin died within a couple minutes after the fight started. since the gunshot went the the heart, blood flow should have stopped immediately
My understanding is that bruises and swelling form after the damage is done obviously but it takes time, not much, but still time.
A partial answer....
http://www.ask.com/question/how-long-does-it-take-for-a-bruise-to-form
kudzu22
(1,273 posts)that would make this a slam-dunk case. I don't think you're going to see any such evidence though, and the prosecution doesn't seem to be building toward that argument. Rather, they seem to be arguing that GZ's wounds were not that severe and therefore his life was not in danger, and therefore he's guilty of 2nd degree murder. It's still a shaky case, though.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)he would have had to get up,realize his situation,and beat himself up in less than 25 seconds
yardwork
(61,539 posts)Or he could have wacked himself upside the head with the gun. That would only take a second.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)He just shot someone and you think he was that calculating that fast?
yardwork
(61,539 posts)What I find silly is the suggestion that Zimmerman is in any way the victim here. I find it silly to suggest that his murder of an unarmed teenager was justified in anybody's mind as self-defense.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)I just think people making shit up on the fly with zero evidence and stating it as the indisputable truth is silly.
Lets wait on all the evidence to come out and see where things are
yardwork
(61,539 posts)He acknowledges that he shot and killed an unarmed minor. Zimmerman's only defense is that he was being beaten to death by that teenager, that he was in fear for his life, and that he had no choice but to shoot and kill.
The only evidence so far that Zimmerman was injured are the minor injuries to his nose and the back of his head. Since those injuries are absolutely central to the entire case, it's reasonable for people to speculate on what caused them.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)and it's also reasonable to believe Zimmerman was being beaten and was in fear for his life.You don't have to wait until you have life threatening injuries to be in fear for your life.
It's also possible that Zimmerman was a stone cold killer looking to shoot someone
NOBODY knows for sure.That's why we have to wait on the testimony to come out
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)He may have hit his head on his car door frame while trying to get out so fast, and I think his facial marks comes from the gun kick back.
backwoodsbob
(6,001 posts)the invisible NRA fairies working with the ghosts of KKK past who shot Martin for him paralyzed him momentarily and beat him up so they could push their NRA agenda and sell some guns for the advantage of the martians who have implanted mindcontrol chips in all the guns that were sold
That makes as much sense as some of the other made up shit I have read