Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKeep Your Eye On The Ball: 2012 Will Be A LONG FIGHT To RE-ELECT OBAMA
Just so long as we don't forget this is gonna be a fight."....Lest we forget, the Republicans have been plenty busy since
Obama became president in 2008, and a large part of what has been
occupying their time has been rigging the election of 2012...."
" Day by day, its true, things are looking better and better for the re-election of President Barack Obama. The condition of the economy, which has served as the biggest gun in the Republican anti-Obama arsenal (aside from his race), now appears to be on course for a steady, solid recovery. Nobody likes the leading Republican candidate except for his wife and kids, and that may be just a rumor. The other Republican candidates have provided the best free clown show anyone could ask for. Matter of fact, if they compiled a disc of the Republican candidates Biggest Hits and put it up for sale, Im betting they could raise more money than with the Super Pacs. Im just offering that as a suggestion, because Im all about extending a helping hand to the downtrodden, which right about now appears to be the Republicans.
Except maybe not quite so fast
Because this is not 2008. Lest we forget, the Republicans have been plenty busy since Obama became president in 2008, and a large part of what has been occupying their time has been rigging the election of 2012. Determined that Obama cannot be allowed to return to office no matter what the cost of defeating him might be, Republicans have been busy setting the stage or preparing to blow up the stage using two key explosives; voter disenfranchisement and SuperPACs. According to the Brennan Center for Justice:
* 3.2 million voters could be hampered from voting due to the new photo id laws in certain states
* As many as 240,000 voters could be deterred by laws requiring proof of citizenship
* Between one and two million voters could lose out on chances to vote due to new laws that shorten early voting periods
http://www.brennancenter.org/
Realizing what a key part non-white folks and young folks played in Obamas victory, especially those thousands upon thousands who had not previously been registered voters, the Republicans have made significant inroads in a number of states passing laws making it much more difficult not only to register to vote, but also to make it more inconvenient and more of a hassle proving youre eligible to vote once you show up at the polls. That, in a nutshell, is the disenfranchisement part of it. The Super PACs now weigh in, thanks to the disastrous Citizens United decision of the United States Supreme Court in 2010, by placing the iron thumb of corporate wealth on the campaign donations scale, effectively throwing any resemblance of fairness in the electoral system overboard and offering corporations their best opportunity yet to band together and purchase a presidency. Which is why Obama is now being forced to backtrack his opposition to Super PACs and take the politically risky but financially essential and realistic decision to support a Super PAC for Democrats.
cont'
http://www.politicususa.com/en/warning-fight-reelect-obama
.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 496 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post