Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:11 PM Feb 2012

Don't smoke pot, drive -- you're twice as likely to crash

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/46343686/ns/today-today_health/t/dont-smoke-pot-drive----youre-twice-likely-crash/


snip
Experts at Dalhousie University in Canada reviewed nine studies of more than 49,000 people involved in accidents on public roads involving one or more motor vehicles, including cars, trucks, buses and motorcycles. Marijuana use was confirmed by blood tests or self-reporting.

Researchers found drivers who had used marijuana within three hours of beginning to drive had nearly double the risk of causing a collision, especially those that were fatal.

Marijuana is the most widely used illegal drug worldwide and rates of its use in drivers are increasing. A 2007 study in Scotland found 15 percent of 537 drivers aged 17 to 39 had used marijuana within 12 hours.

Some experts said education campaigns about the dangers of doing drugs before driving wouldn't work.

snip
94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Don't smoke pot, drive -- you're twice as likely to crash (Original Post) BlueToTheBone Feb 2012 OP
Oh, MAMA! This is going to be GREAT! Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #1
Pass some over... stevenleser Feb 2012 #5
personally, at home fine. on the road no. In the air, no. I dont want roguevalley Feb 2012 #13
You don't really think very highly of your fellow DUers, do you... Electric Monk Feb 2012 #8
On the contrary, I love a good weed thread. nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #9
There are worse alternatives to weed and weed threads most certainly ;o). PufPuf23 Feb 2012 #60
ROFL!! That is EXACTLY what I said when I saw this!! renie408 Feb 2012 #38
I know I'm a bit late to the party, but fishwax Feb 2012 #51
My jaws are sore with BlueToTheBone Feb 2012 #71
Just hire a driver like I did. Plus you get to stretch out in the back seat and stuff. Fuzz Feb 2012 #2
No shit. TheWraith Feb 2012 #3
is this controversial Enrique Feb 2012 #4
Just wait for the Sample of One crowd to show up. Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #6
I've smoked weed every hour since 1914, when I wasn't shooting up... Noodleboy13 Feb 2012 #18
that would be me, but I don't extrapolate to include everyone else DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #28
before I drive, I smoke a bowl fascisthunter Feb 2012 #48
depends on the person like everything else...75 year old gramma or 18 year old son shouldn't snooper2 Feb 2012 #78
My mentality is you should not do any types of drugs or alcohol while driving LynneSin Feb 2012 #7
People shouldn't drive if they don't truly understand the rules of the road. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #24
Nice add! LynneSin Feb 2012 #29
Hopefully their next study will RedstDem Feb 2012 #10
Anyone have the figures for driving while on prescription narcotics? tridim Feb 2012 #11
Shouldn't this be a "duh"? LadyHawkAZ Feb 2012 #12
Took the words right outta my mouth! piscesnewmoon Feb 2012 #67
Did this "study" confirm the use of other substances? Like alcohol? nt SteveW Feb 2012 #14
Wow. Took 'til post #14 for someone to show up....I wonder if it's msanthrope Feb 2012 #17
So much crap science uses the "ER" approach: Find what you're looking for... SteveW Feb 2012 #23
That is a good point. Lasher Feb 2012 #59
I'm pretty sure you could guess that even if you were stoned. n/t LoveIsNow Feb 2012 #15
doesn't the "marijuana test" only test for the metabolites, from use up to *weeks* before the test? eShirl Feb 2012 #16
That is correct. And they sampled by self reporting or blood tests. EOTE Feb 2012 #22
but these people self-reported a 3 hour time frame RainDog Feb 2012 #30
self-reporting has its own problems, of course eShirl Feb 2012 #32
this confirms another study RainDog Feb 2012 #33
Now that would put the end to the BlueToTheBone Feb 2012 #72
Pot really opens someone up for DUI flexnor Feb 2012 #19
drive sober mdmc Feb 2012 #20
Days after smoking pot, you are sober. But not on a drug test. nt SteveW Feb 2012 #25
true mdmc Feb 2012 #35
I only smoke pot in the privacy of my own home, generally right before bed. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #21
I hear you. Green Cross/Green Shield. nt SteveW Feb 2012 #26
I used pot to quit smoking tobacco. ZombieHorde Feb 2012 #56
I used pot just so I wouldn't start smoking tobacco. TexasTowelie Feb 2012 #83
Actually, it depends on your tolerance level DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #27
What the fuck is the point of this? theaocp Feb 2012 #31
The tortured logic of the marijuana advocate Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #34
Are you ok with that hypocrisy? theaocp Feb 2012 #36
So you are NOT in favor of legalization. nt Dreamer Tatum Feb 2012 #37
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. theaocp Feb 2012 #40
Not much room there for confusion fascisthunter Feb 2012 #46
put the big bong down, dudester. You're not making any sense. provis99 Feb 2012 #50
Here's a strategy or three for you. theaocp Feb 2012 #53
Peace, Love, Dope, Man! provis99 Feb 2012 #54
Does it hurt living with a mind unable to make a logical argument? EOTE Feb 2012 #75
Peace Out! BlueToTheBone Feb 2012 #73
LOL. The tortured logic of a single-source believer. tabasco Feb 2012 #47
Unfortunate that everything is seen as having an angle. Quantess Feb 2012 #61
Much like studies illustrating that driving while intoxicated are to make people reiterate... LanternWaste Feb 2012 #80
I do have an opinion that is not validated by this, yes... theaocp Feb 2012 #94
"...reiterate the concept that bud should remain illegal?" That's it. nt SteveW Feb 2012 #81
Wow, stay oh so classy with your language, dear chap... yup its me Feb 2012 #86
When you can't argue the message, no matter how it's presented, theaocp Feb 2012 #93
Peace Out, Pal, BlueToTheBone Feb 2012 #88
It's ok though because you'll only be going 5mph NightWatcher Feb 2012 #39
Bill Hicks FTW n/t theaocp Feb 2012 #41
LOL...hahahahaha fascisthunter Feb 2012 #42
okay I will call bullshit the other one Feb 2012 #43
I had always heard that pot didn't make you drive worse, Vattel Feb 2012 #44
that's a shame fascisthunter Feb 2012 #45
okay here are some studies that disagree the other one Feb 2012 #49
Never crashed sylvi Feb 2012 #52
And 3X as likely to see military helicopters overhead in the middle of LA pinboy3niner Feb 2012 #55
Well - duh! Taverner Feb 2012 #57
Well no fucking shit. I say this as a former Super-Toker. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2012 #58
As a current super toker, I agree Taverner Feb 2012 #65
And here is a study by the DOT which refutes that. renie408 Feb 2012 #62
I read that study, and part of it makes sense Taverner Feb 2012 #66
good point ... How many were also drinking? ThomThom Feb 2012 #74
no, man, pot ENHANCES your reaction and driving skills - dude, 'they' are lying to you... Zax2me Feb 2012 #63
in my younger/stupid days... Maine-ah Feb 2012 #64
Don't 'anything' drive that would even slightly... Tikki Feb 2012 #68
It seems to me that DRIVING is the problem. babydollhead Feb 2012 #69
Driving just isn't that safe to begin with killbotfactory Feb 2012 #70
I have NEVER crashed a vehicle while high. AngryAmish Feb 2012 #76
Kind of obvious, isn't it? Jennicut Feb 2012 #77
Most of the collisions I've seen or been involved with raouldukelives Feb 2012 #79
i call bullshit on this. I drive safer while high. Slower, more alert whats around me, etc n/t JesterCS Feb 2012 #82
Don't let this happen to you deutsey Feb 2012 #84
That study has to be bullshit - one reason ArcticFox Feb 2012 #85
my age is 71....born in 41../been stoning forever/not one crash yet... opihimoimoi Feb 2012 #87
reefer madness in all itself idiocy fascisthunter Feb 2012 #89
LOL, Come, we go from here to "WHEEEeeeeeeewwwwwww" like the piggie in the Ads opihimoimoi Feb 2012 #90
I am more than half your age fascisthunter Feb 2012 #91
Watch out for them GOPer assholes...they will bust ya if given 1/2 the op....but, yes, the smokes opihimoimoi Feb 2012 #92

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
13. personally, at home fine. on the road no. In the air, no. I dont want
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:28 PM
Feb 2012

even the idea of impairment anywhere where someone can kill someone else. Booze, drugs, anything.

shoot me.

PufPuf23

(8,741 posts)
60. There are worse alternatives to weed and weed threads most certainly ;o).
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:37 AM
Feb 2012

alcohol - tobacco - common addictive Rx drugs.

One should not smoke pot and drive in general.

Alcohol and certain rx drugs are worse, but all such driving is putting others and oneself at more risk.

No arguement.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
38. ROFL!! That is EXACTLY what I said when I saw this!!
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:02 PM
Feb 2012

Ok, not the 'mama' part...

edited to correct typo. Maybe you shouldn't smoke and type, either.

 

Fuzz

(8,827 posts)
2. Just hire a driver like I did. Plus you get to stretch out in the back seat and stuff.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:13 PM
Feb 2012

Ah, good times.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
3. No shit.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:14 PM
Feb 2012

Any kind of mind-altering chemical fucks with your ability to drive, proportional to how much it alters your normal brain chemistry.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
6. Just wait for the Sample of One crowd to show up.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:19 PM
Feb 2012

"Why, I've smoked weed every hour since 1927, and I've never had an accident!"

Noodleboy13

(422 posts)
18. I've smoked weed every hour since 1914, when I wasn't shooting up...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:42 PM
Feb 2012

And I ....

Just kidding.
Intoxicated driving of any sort is a dumb idea.


peace,
Noodleboy

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
28. that would be me, but I don't extrapolate to include everyone else
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:02 PM
Feb 2012

See my post below, if interested, but no, I don't wish to create legislation or driving rules based on my own experience.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
78. depends on the person like everything else...75 year old gramma or 18 year old son shouldn't
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:31 AM
Feb 2012

More than likely something bad would happen LOL

If I didn't smoke before going out on Saturday to Lowes at 1:30 in the afternoon I may have had a breakdown or ended up shooting someones laptop

All kinds of idiots on the road...almost as bad as church morning around my area. Sure, don't stop at that sign and go ahead and cross over into the left lane without looking

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
7. My mentality is you should not do any types of drugs or alcohol while driving
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:21 PM
Feb 2012

But that's just me.

Oh and you shouldn't drive when you're sleep deprived either.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
24. People shouldn't drive if they don't truly understand the rules of the road.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:56 PM
Feb 2012

That's this country's BIGGEST driving problem. That, and the effin' cell phones and texting.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
11. Anyone have the figures for driving while on prescription narcotics?
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:27 PM
Feb 2012

For the record I never drove while medicated when I was legal. Not that it wasn't possible, I just chose not to.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
12. Shouldn't this be a "duh"?
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:28 PM
Feb 2012

Why not just boil it down to "don't drive on ANYTHING that alters your mental state, stop end of sentence"?

I'm all for legalization. I'm all for legal Nyquil too, but I don't recommend driving while on it.

 

piscesnewmoon

(10 posts)
67. Took the words right outta my mouth!
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 05:20 PM
Feb 2012

If you cannot wait until you get home to fire one up, get thee to a Pot Anon meeting. People who drive whilst intoxicated on ANYTHING are raging penis tips!

SteveW

(754 posts)
23. So much crap science uses the "ER" approach: Find what you're looking for...
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:56 PM
Feb 2012

...and conclude whatever you wanted in the first place.

Various anti-drug organizations have done this for years. They review the records of emergency room intakes, and find those who used ____________, then conclude, post hoc ergo propter hoc, that substance_____________ caused whatever problem they point to. Left aside are indications for meth, Heroin, Cocaine and -- the Big One -- alcohol use.

There are studies which evaluate the effect of pot smoking -- and nothing BUT pot smoking -- on driving tests. Beyond the "common sense" rationales, does anyone know the outcomes of these studies?

Lasher

(27,532 posts)
59. That is a good point.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:12 AM
Feb 2012

The same rationale is used to conclude that alcohol consumption is responsible for every auto accident where a driver has been drinking even slightly.

eShirl

(18,477 posts)
16. doesn't the "marijuana test" only test for the metabolites, from use up to *weeks* before the test?
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:33 PM
Feb 2012

or is there a new test now that I'm unaware of?

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
22. That is correct. And they sampled by self reporting or blood tests.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:52 PM
Feb 2012

So it seems to me that they are drawing very unprovable conclusions from this study.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
30. but these people self-reported a 3 hour time frame
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:09 PM
Feb 2012

so I don't think that argument works for this one.

to me it's just common sense, tho - don't drive if you're tipsy or high.

eShirl

(18,477 posts)
32. self-reporting has its own problems, of course
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:16 PM
Feb 2012

"to me it's just common sense, tho - don't drive if you're tipsy or high. "
no shit.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
33. this confirms another study
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:21 PM
Feb 2012

that shows the issue of impairment really falls into a 3 hour window. the other study indicated 2 hours as the time that would lend itself to impairment.

so, what's really needed is not a metabolite test, but a saliva test that also, it just so happens, seems to fall within this 3 hour window.

 

flexnor

(392 posts)
19. Pot really opens someone up for DUI
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 06:45 PM
Feb 2012

with alcohol, as imperfect as the tests are, a person can calculate how much they've had and how much time has gone by. in a matter of hours, it's out of your system

but with pot, it's in your system for a very long time, even if the effects have worn off, and a person could get a DUI even if they are sober

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
56. I used pot to quit smoking tobacco.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 02:24 AM
Feb 2012

I was about ready to give after a few days, so I got some pot.

It worked really well.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
27. Actually, it depends on your tolerance level
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:00 PM
Feb 2012

Right up front, people shouldn't drive stoned. It's a good blanket approach to the issue. But, if you're an everyday smoker, driving just isn't that big of a deal. I'm sure that reaction times are slowed by a small but conceivably critical amount, even if the stoner in question feels completely in control, but the remedy for that is to not tailgate people. When I've driven high (lots and lots of times), if you were observing me, you'd see a normal driver--not too slow, not aggressive, not taking chances.

I didn't scan the entire thread, so someone has probably already said this, but it's much more difficult to drive drunk than it is to drive high, and more dangerous all around.

thanks.

theaocp

(4,231 posts)
31. What the fuck is the point of this?
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:13 PM
Feb 2012

My guess is to make people reiterate the concept that bud should remain illegal? This is not a reason to continue to tell criminals that they have free reign to regulate the cannabis market! Even if I take what these people are saying seriously, the obvious conclusion is that alcohol should be a fucking Schedule I substance! Prohibition rules, FTW!

Fuck. this. bullshit. UNREC.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
34. The tortured logic of the marijuana advocate
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:26 PM
Feb 2012

EVERY SINGLE THREAD on weed has at least one post of the following type:

"Alcohol is just as bad or worse, and it's legal. Therefore, weed should be legal, or alcohol should be illegal."

Which is pretty much equivalent to adding an extra bullet to the chamber when playing russian roulette, because after all,
that first bullet is there, isn't it?

(as per usual, I have to stress that I am in favor of legalization)

theaocp

(4,231 posts)
36. Are you ok with that hypocrisy?
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 07:51 PM
Feb 2012

I'm not, especially when the fedz themselves have been and continue to grow and supply MMJ to patients while busting state operations. While prohibition has been tried and fucking FAILED as a Constitutional Amendment, I do not want to hear from anyone about anything relating even tangentially negative to cannabis until they tell why they aren't in favor of banning alcohol and tobacco as the Schedule I substances they so richly deserve to be. The Russian Roulette argument does not hold water. It means we leave one bullet in the gun. Take the damn bullet out of the gun! Or, at least stop making the false equivalency between alcohol and cannabis. Their proposed scheduling would only be equivalent due to the narcs' ridiculous "attempts" at labeling control. Oh, wait, maybe alcohol should be Schedule II, since it is a pretty fucking good disinfectant.

Regulation can be done by the government to many degrees, but telling the criminals of the world to have at it is unbelievably negligent and inexcusable. Drug "control," my ass. They don't even control their own talking points, but like good conservatives, narcs don't fucking care. They lie and contradict themselves as a habit.

theaocp

(4,231 posts)
40. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:06 PM
Feb 2012

Either the government controls cannabis or criminals do. I choose the government. For some inane reasons related to money, the government thinks criminals can do it better. Fucking FAIL.

However, the same government is quite willing to regulate alcohol and its inherent peddlers. Fucking double fail. Nobody gets to honestly claim cannabis prohibition is anything other than letting criminals regulate the market. Cowardice of the highest order.

Regulate now. Clear enough?

theaocp

(4,231 posts)
53. Here's a strategy or three for you.
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:58 PM
Feb 2012

Reread, ask clarifying questions, make connections, and engage in discussion. Failing all that, why not make insulting suppositions, call me names, and project lack of comprehension at me. Oh, wait.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
75. Does it hurt living with a mind unable to make a logical argument?
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:20 AM
Feb 2012

I deal with children all the time who are completely unable to utilize logic and instead often lash out with insults when they can't make their case. It must really suck being an adult while still having the logical facilities of a child.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
73. Peace Out!
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 10:22 AM
Feb 2012

I don't want to make any of it illegal. It doesn't need to work that way. Somewhere upthread, I saw that there is a way to saliva test if the inhalation is within 2-3 hours, which would take the argument away of not being able to test...metabolic is 2-3 month window.

We are all on the same side here. Maybe you need some good stuff, you seem stressed. Visit the Emerald Triangle, you should be happier.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
61. Unfortunate that everything is seen as having an angle.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 04:48 AM
Feb 2012

But then, it's a political discussion board so I suppose it comes with the territory. But, it gets tiresome in my opinion. How about we just discuss whatever seems to be a legitimate source?

I'm going to call your argument a slippery slope, because it's a stretch from weed impairs driving to don't legalize it.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
80. Much like studies illustrating that driving while intoxicated are to make people reiterate...
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 01:11 PM
Feb 2012

"My guess is to make people reiterate the concept that bud should remain illegal?"



Much like studies illustrating that driving while intoxicated are to make people reiterate the concept that alcohol should be illegal? Six of one, half a dozen of the other...

I imagine we draw the conclusions that better validate our own opinions, regardless of the conclusion of the study itself.

theaocp

(4,231 posts)
94. I do have an opinion that is not validated by this, yes...
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:27 PM
Feb 2012

however, I defy the idea that you can compare alcohol and cannabis here. Either prohibition does more good than harm, or it doesn't. A study on the effects of alcohol on driving has a different impact because alcohol is legal and regulated. There's a different stigma attached that allows people to make more informed decisions about their habits. Who the hell is going to be convinced to change their driving habits because of this posted information? The stigma for cannabis is that it is a Schedule I substance and therefore already verrrrry bad and scary! Thus, the information on driving is going to have no impact on those that already use it ... they're already doing something they know is illegal, so who cares?

So, I come back to my original post: what the fuck is the point of this? Pie-in-the-sky dreaming about convincing poe-theeds to not smoke and drive OR reinforcing the meme that cannabis is baaaaad and the people that use it are baaaaad. I believe it to be the latter. And that sucks.

 

yup its me

(17 posts)
86. Wow, stay oh so classy with your language, dear chap...
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:05 PM
Feb 2012

Man, you must just win over everyone with your eloquence...

theaocp

(4,231 posts)
93. When you can't argue the message, no matter how it's presented,
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 12:17 PM
Feb 2012

you either oppose the message or are ignoring the message. I guess it's academic since you choose to focus on my cursing. How pure of you, dear chap. In the real world, people get hurt and I get angry about that.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
88. Peace Out, Pal,
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 11:20 PM
Feb 2012

This is sort of one of those "fun" threads. Smoke cannabis and love it, don't and love that you don't, don't and hate that others do, seems to me to be the point. Too bad we don't have unrecs anymore.

Perhaps a small toke on the pipe to ease the pain?

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
39. It's ok though because you'll only be going 5mph
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:04 PM
Feb 2012

Dude did we hit something?
Aw man I forgot to open the garage door.

 

the other one

(1,499 posts)
43. okay I will call bullshit
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:10 PM
Feb 2012

cannabis is detectable in your system for days. its presence doesn't prove impairment. relationship doesn't prove causation .

cannabis is the most widely use illicit drug. these numbers may just show a larger number of users then was believed.

there is press but i can't find the actual study
y, but similar studies have discounted the importance and presence of alcohol in the system, and might be biased

clever propaganda.



 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
44. I had always heard that pot didn't make you drive worse,
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:10 PM
Feb 2012

which was surprising because in my personal experience I drive much worse after smoking pot.

 

the other one

(1,499 posts)
49. okay here are some studies that disagree
Fri Feb 10, 2012, 08:20 PM
Feb 2012

ccguide.org/driving.php

read the studies. not the press releases

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
57. Well - duh!
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 02:26 AM
Feb 2012

Don't drink and drive either!

Or take Oxycontin and drive, or Morphine Sulfate and drive, or Vicodin and drive, or any number of fully legal drugs that can actually kill you...

When you self medicate - stay home. Trust me on that one.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
58. Well no fucking shit. I say this as a former Super-Toker.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 02:33 AM
Feb 2012

The point of this post I have trouble with though is the number of hours after smoking.

Do you want to ride with a drinker who left the bar at 2 a.m. in the morning stumbling, snot-slinging drunk, or someone who took a couple of bong hits at midnight?

THAT'S the kicker... get high and wake up refreshed, or take shots and wake up drunk.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
62. And here is a study by the DOT which refutes that.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 05:01 AM
Feb 2012

This study might be a little more to the point because it actually gave people THC and then evaluated their driving performance. The study you have cited looked at driving records.

I wouldn't drive baked, that just isn't smart. It wouldn't surprise me if smoking effected driving skill.

One thing that I did notice...if the accidents had nearly the double the risk of fatality, how could the drivers have self-reported smoking within three hours of the crash? Were the people in the study ONLY smoking or were they also doing something else? I also doubt that whole 'education campaign' thing. WHY would an education campaign about smoking and driving not work, but an education campaign about drinking and driving supposedly would?

http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/misc/driving/driving.htm

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
66. I read that study, and part of it makes sense
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 05:19 PM
Feb 2012

One thing I have noticed about 420 is that it makes me much less impulsive than when I'm not high...

ThomThom

(1,486 posts)
74. good point ... How many were also drinking?
Sun Feb 12, 2012, 10:45 AM
Feb 2012

I think people that smoke every day would have less problem with driving than the week-end partier. I am not a big drinker and I know if I have one drink I am in no condition to drive, where someone else who drinks daily would not be anywhere as messed-up as me after the same drink. So I conclude it must be the same for pot. Thoughts?

Maine-ah

(9,902 posts)
64. in my younger/stupid days...
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 09:51 AM
Feb 2012

I drove once while stoned. I waited for the stop sign to turn green so I could go. 25 mph, felt like 50. I still smoke, I don't drive though.

Tikki

(14,548 posts)
68. Don't 'anything' drive that would even slightly...
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 05:38 PM
Feb 2012

impair your driving skills when you get behind that wheel.

You need to be a skillful driver because if it isn't you impaired it could
be someone else on the road. Drive defensively.

The reason we have to keep going over this time and time again, is because
the penalties for driving while under the influence are a joke and impaired drivers
cross all social and economical lines.




Tikki

babydollhead

(2,231 posts)
69. It seems to me that DRIVING is the problem.
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 06:43 PM
Feb 2012

I've had too many loved-ones die in car accidents. Cars cars cars, moving that quickley through space, in metal, is a bad thing to run into other things.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
70. Driving just isn't that safe to begin with
Sat Feb 11, 2012, 07:04 PM
Feb 2012

And not enough drivers realize that.

About 370,000 people died in traffic accidents between 2001 and 2009, nearly 46,250 people a year. This doesn't include injuries.

The people at the following website mapped them all: http://map.itoworld.com/road-casualties-usa

Does any other commonly used tool or device come with such a staggering human cost?

 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
76. I have NEVER crashed a vehicle while high.
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:23 AM
Feb 2012

Then again I have never been high while operating a vehicle.

I was never a regular user but I would have been a menace. I would have fallen asleep or driven at ten miles per hour.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
77. Kind of obvious, isn't it?
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 11:30 AM
Feb 2012

Don't drink, do pot, drop acid, take lots of prescription drugs, do crystal meth, etc. Also, don't drive with low blood sugar if you are a diabetic. I did that once without knowing it and almost passing out behind the wheel is scary. Always check your levels before you drive. Lesson was learned.
And don't get in the car with stoned/drunk people. That lesson was quickly learned in college. Tell your kids a thousand times until it seeps into their heads. I did my share of pot in my early 20's, it was just in a basement with my brother. No cars.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
79. Most of the collisions I've seen or been involved with
Mon Feb 13, 2012, 12:54 PM
Feb 2012

Have involved people under the influence of a being an asshole who don't have an inch of common courtesy for their fellow man.
If we really want to limit driving accidents I'd think addressing assholes is a good start. We can work our way down from there to pot and red bull.

ArcticFox

(1,249 posts)
85. That study has to be bullshit - one reason
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 06:03 PM
Feb 2012

How do these researchers know how many people high on marijuana do NOT cause accidents?

 

fascisthunter

(29,381 posts)
91. I am more than half your age
Wed Feb 15, 2012, 11:44 PM
Feb 2012

and I can say with what little experience I have had, it has made me into a more productive human being. I do not expect it to be this way everyone else, in fact, the opposite can be true, but for me it has been a miracle.

opihimoimoi

(52,426 posts)
92. Watch out for them GOPer assholes...they will bust ya if given 1/2 the op....but, yes, the smokes
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 06:32 AM
Feb 2012

can be a life inspiring thingy...good luck

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't smoke pot, drive --...