HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Isn't over-security actua...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Mon May 13, 2013, 08:25 PM

Isn't over-security actually a sign of insecurity?

How can one feel secure while over-compensating for a perceived lack of security?

It would be clear that, as long as we feel as if we always have to maintain and increase our level of security, we'll never truly believe that we're secure at all.

In doing this, we create a self-perpetuating security apparatus, whose first duty is to justify its own existence. For if it were to actually create security independent of its own presence, then it would work itself out of a job.

As the security apparatus maintains its own legitimacy and provides the example of a lucrative model, then that would inspire an ever increasing and ever expanding need for its own application, even in ways that wasn't applied before.

Security, in itself, becomes the main reason for its own existence.

So unless we figure out how to diminish the need FOR security, doesn't that mean that we're NOT actually secure at all?

2 replies, views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Isn't over-security actually a sign of insecurity? (Original post)
MrScorpio May 2013 OP
kentuck May 2013 #1
MrScorpio May 2013 #2

Response to MrScorpio (Original post)

Mon May 13, 2013, 08:26 PM

1. Sometimes you make too much sense...

MrScorpio...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Reply #1)

Mon May 13, 2013, 08:33 PM

2. I'm just asking questions

I'm really interested in what answers come out of them.

Who knows? I just might learn something new.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread