HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » no, it was in his 2nd ter...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sat Apr 13, 2013, 02:40 AM

no, it was in his 2nd term

I was just being sarcastic, because that is always the excuse conservadems use when one of their sell-outs betrays the working class and gives big bonuses to the rich, then they say "but, but, but, he/she needs to be re-elected."

Here's CTJ's analysis of it. A tax hike for the bottom 20% and 46.4% of the benefits going to the richest 5% and 77.9% (!!!) going to the richest 20% http://ctj.org/html/desc97.htm

1 replies, views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Reply to this thread