Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,954 posts)
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:23 PM Apr 2013

WTF!?! - Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?

Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?



http://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_3_8699.html



The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has had a "no fly zone" in place in Mayflower, Arkansas since April 1 at 2:12 PM and will be in place "until further notice," according to the FAA website and it's being overseen by ExxonMobil itself. In other words, any media or independent observers who want to witness the tar sands spill disaster have to ask Exxon's permission.

Mayflower is the site of the recent major March 29 ExxonMobil Pegagus tar sands pipeline spill, which belched out an estimated 5,000 barrels of tar sands diluted bitumen ("dilbit&quot into the small town's neighborhoods, causing the evacuation of 22 homes.

The rules of engagement for the no fly zone dictate that no aircraft can fly within 1,000 feet of the ground in the five-mile radius surrounding the ExxonMobil Pegasus tar sands pipeline spill. The area located within this radius includes the nearby Pine Village Airport.

The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette revealed that the FAA site noted earlier today that "only relief aircraft operations under direction of Tom Suhrhoff" were allowed within the designated no fly zone.


MORE:
http://www.desmogblog.com/2013/04/03/exxon-s-skies-why-does-exxon-control-no-fly-zone-over-arkansas-tar-sands-spill

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FirstLight

(13,355 posts)
14. Yep...
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:54 PM
Apr 2013

because the OIL Companies control it ALL...

When the oil corporations make more than a Nation, what else can be expected.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
12. I hate to sound like I'm defending them, but it's their planes, people, and equipment
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:44 PM
Apr 2013

They are "overseeing" it (whatever that means) because (hopefully!) the priority is to clean this damned mess up!

Like I said, I am NOT defending them, but I don't consider this to be all that suspicious, if what they are saying is true. It does, however, warrant close scrutiny. As mentioned in another post, they could use this as an excuse to chase off the press, and we are right to suspect it, but it remains to be seen if that is what's happening.

yourout

(7,524 posts)
7. Yep....pretty much the same as any small town or populated area.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:29 PM
Apr 2013

Remember that from my student pilot days.

Also remember having to check for TFRs before every flight.

Never finished up and got my Private Pilot. It just got to expensive.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
4. 1000 foot cut off is not a no-fly zone.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:28 PM
Apr 2013

It likely represents an attempt to free up low flying aircraft used in the clean up.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
8. It seems they do just like the rest of their consortium does (international oil).
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:33 PM
Apr 2013

I have no idea how we are going to stop them without an army because our military seems to work for them.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
9. In a way I can understand this, though I don't have to like it.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:33 PM
Apr 2013

I'm sure they need the airport to efficiently fly people and supplies in, and want to avoid it and the immediate area becoming too crowded, and 1,000 feet isn't that much. Planes could still fly over, and take pictures and video, without interfering with the urgent clean-up efforts.

I just don't want this to be used as an excuse for a media blackout

Kablooie

(18,603 posts)
10. Why shouldn't they? Exxon owns this country.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 10:36 PM
Apr 2013

Granted they have to share it with other corporations but they are legitimate owners of the US government so they can do anything they want as long as the other owners don't complain.

You and other voters don't own this country so you have no right to say anything against it.

Webster Green

(13,905 posts)
15. Heh! BP was giving the orders to the fucking US Coast Guard after the gulf disaster.
Wed Apr 3, 2013, 11:19 PM
Apr 2013

The Coast Guard (as well as law enforcement) was used by BP to keep the media away. I remember it well.

That's one of the big reasons I don't care that much for the president. His handling of the gulf disaster was horrible.

Petroleum corporations are pretty much in charge of everything, including our government.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WTF!?! - Why Does Exxon C...