Thu Mar 28, 2013, 12:50 AM
MrScorpio (62,920 posts)
Congress Saves Busted $380 Million Missile Program the Pentagon Won't Buy
Conservatives are throwing a hissy fit about a few hundred thousand dollars spent on a scientific study about duck sex, but over at the Pentagon, Congress is spending $380 million on a missile program that has no funding authorization, doesn't work, and the Department of Defense doesn't plan on buying. So why are we still paying for it? Because Germany and Italy are making the US feel awkward, and when you back out of a defense contract, you have to sell your first-born child. Also, jobs.
The Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), contracted to Lockheed Martin, is a joint project with Italy and Germany intended to produce a weapon that will intercept ballistic missiles. If you read Lockheed Martin's website, MEADS sounds really cool. This "hit-to-kill" missile will "defeat tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles and aircraft, full 360-degree engagement." Woah! (Shhh, forget about the fact that Lockheed Martin's program is basically a duplicate of the "Patriot" missile program that the US is already paying for. This one sounds cooler, okay?)
Unfortunately, according to the Office of Secretary of Defense, MEADS has had serious technical, management, schedule, and cost problems since it was introduced in the mid-1990's" and has been unable to "meet schedule and cost targets." The Department of Defense decided in 2011 it didn't want the system because it couldn't afford to pay for two missile programs, and it was not helping US national security. For once, Congress actually agrees: Last week, an amendment proposed by Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) that stripped funding from this "missile to nowhere" passed 94-5 with blinding bipartisan support.
That didn't last long: Congress then passed a "stop-gap spending measure" that said that the $380 million needed to be used to complete the project, not pay termination fees. (According to Politico Pro, Sen. Ayotte has placed a hold on a top Pentagon acquisitions nominee until the Pentagon explains why it isn't scrapping the program.)
1 replies, 462 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Congress Saves Busted $380 Million Missile Program the Pentagon Won't Buy (Original post)
Response to MrScorpio (Original post)
Thu Mar 28, 2013, 01:49 AM
dballance (5,756 posts)
1. Hmmm, Lockheed Martin and Serious Technical, Management & Schedule Problems??? Where Have I Heard...
that before??? Could it be F-35 fiasco? Why yes, yes it could.
Sounds like Lockheed Martin needs to be sequestered away from government contracts. Of course, it'll never happen. I'm sure they have more than enough people on the inside to keep them in business and our tax dollars flowing.