Should Americans on the President's secret kill list be reviewed

[MannyGoldstein]

by a court?

3 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Yes, always.
	2 (67%)
	Yes, unless they're an imminent threat, then the court reviews after the kill.
	1 (33%)
	No.
	0 (0%)
	Other (please explain below).
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[RKP5637]

1. I voted yes, because the president could be, for example, a crackpot. We have no idea of the

mental condition of those we elect.

[RBInMaine]

2. This just feeds into Rand Paul's crazyland narrative. It is a completely hyped issue.

[MannyGoldstein]

4. So I take it you're a "no"?

This has been an issue for more than a year. Please don't couch it as a referendum on Paul.

[Egalitarian Thug]

9. What else would you expect from the Democratic Reich? n/t

[cthulu2016]

17. It feeds into a rather unexceptional view of our government

I am not going to reject common sense (option #2) just because Rand Paul might favor something.

Secret national security court already (is supposed to) issue warrants for tapping phones for national security reasons.

Why isn't a similar level of oversight for a military assassination in the USA reasonable, as specified in the poll. (A 'hot pursuit' type situation like 9/11 wouldn't count, but would be reviewed after the fact.)

[ProSense]

3. Hey,

respond to this poll (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022480661), and I'll respond to yours.

[MannyGoldstein]

5. Done. nt

[ProSense]

18. No. 2 n/t

[MannyGoldstein]

19. Hey,

we agree!

[JaneyVee]

6. I chose choice 2.

[MannyGoldstein]

8. Me too. nt

[Egalitarian Thug]

7. Answer #2 with the added proviso that the qualification of imminent also be proved. n/t

[MannyGoldstein]

11. Agreed, in the review after the kill. nt

[cthulu2016]

10. I would favor notification by registered mail...

"Greetings. A panel of your friends and neighbors has selected you to be blown up by the government..."

[MannyGoldstein]

12. "Candygram for Mongo"

How about doing it that way?

Forgive me if that makes no sense.

[Egalitarian Thug]

20. LMAO!

A completely inappropriate, juvenile, dated, politically incorrect. and brilliant film.

[MannyGoldstein]

21. Funniest film ever.

[cbrer]

13. If we have another 767 headed for a building, take it out.

Yes I'm aware of possible collateral damage.

No I do not take that lightly.

[Arctic Dave]

14. No, we just need to like, just trust our president and stuff.

[spanone]

15. how about everyone on the CIA list....first.

[MannyGoldstein]

16. Is that different from the President's list? nt

[Peter cotton]

22. #2.

[randome]

23. Yes but not by the general public.