Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:48 PM
ProSense (113,041 posts)
Senate Republicans filibuster Democratic sequester replacement (updated)
Last edited Thu Feb 28, 2013, 07:14 PM - Edit history (1)
Senate Republicans filibuster Democratic sequester replacement
by Jed Lewison
A majority of United States senators voted this afternoon to replace the sequester with a combination of revenue increases and spending cuts, but thanks to a Republican filibuster, the legislation was blocked. Fifty-one votes were cast in favor of the measure. (Among the 49 no votes was Harry Reid, who voted no for procedural reasons.)
A Republican proposal also failed, but that gained just 38 votes. Meanwhile, House Republicans have failed to pass anything during the current Congress to address the sequester.
So, to wrap up, a majority of senators voted to avoid the sequester, but Republicans (joined by 3 Democrats who opposed the measure—Sens. Kay Hagan (D-NC), Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and Mark Pryor (D-AR)) blocked them from taking action. Republicans did this despite failing to offer a plan of their own that could pass the Senate or the House. Their Senate plan got just 38 votes and the House Republicans did nothing.
Or, as Bob Woodward would say, it's all Obama's fault.
Please ask Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to reopen filibuster reform.
Updated to add roll call:
8 replies, 1038 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Senate Republicans filibuster Democratic sequester replacement (updated) (Original post)
|liberal N proud||Feb 2013||#1|
Response to ProSense (Original post)
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 11:47 PM
robinlynne (15,398 posts)
8. wait. If they voted, and 51 were in favor, didn't it pass?
not being sarcastic. I thought a filibuster could prevent a vote. But when they vote on a bill is it not a simple majority?