HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » TPM re: Scalia: Who does ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 04:45 PM

TPM re: Scalia: Who does he think he is, Chris freaking Matthews?

It’s been clear at least since the Obamacare ruling that Scalia doesn’t believe all that stuff he’s written about the Court leaving lawmaking to the lawmakers. He’d grant that Congress was right to pass Section 5 of the act in 1965, when it was irrefutably necessary to protect the right of African Americans to vote. And presumably he’d say Congress was free to renew the law - for a while. When did that constitutional freedom lapse? Scalia implies that the only person fit to judge that is Scalia, with his unique, personal insight into American culture and racial politics. He’s been checking his watch and tapping his foot for 58 years, and now he’s decided that time is up on the civil rights era.

His choicest line today may have been this: “I don’t think there is anything to be gained by any Senator to vote against continuation of this act.” Who does he think he is, Chris freaking Matthews? Since when is it a Justice’s job to divine when the people’s representatives are acting from pure motives, and when they are moved by crass “racial entitlements,” as he describes the guarantees that allowed millions of African Americans to vote for the first time? Call that what it is, but it sure as hell isn’t originalism. It’s just lawless free-styling.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2013/02/chasing_scalia.php?ref=fpblg

3 replies, 584 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply TPM re: Scalia: Who does he think he is, Chris freaking Matthews? (Original post)
kpete Feb 2013 OP
randome Feb 2013 #1
markpkessinger Feb 2013 #2
Warpy Feb 2013 #3

Response to kpete (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 04:54 PM

1. That stood out to me, too. I think Scalia really is coming unglued.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 05:25 PM

2. When I read that. . .

. . . my first though was, since when is it the Supreme Court's job to shield lawmakers from the repercussions of potentially unpopular legislative votes by acting preemptively?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 05:26 PM

3. He thinks he's the Pope of America

He's getting senile. He has needed to be retired for a long time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread