HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » FISA: Justices Turn Back ...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 10:13 AM

 

FISA: Justices Turn Back Challenge to Broader U.S. Eavesdropping

Tom Tomorrow ‏@tomtomorrow

The Supreme Court's Catch-22 decision. You can't sue gov't over secret domestic spying because of the secrecy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/27/us/politics/supreme-court-rejects-challenge-to-fisa-surveillance-law.html


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday turned back a challenge to a federal law that broadened the government’s power to eavesdrop on international phone calls and e-mails.

The decision, by a 5-to-4 vote that divided along ideological lines, probably means the Supreme Court will never rule on the constitutionality of that 2008 law.

More broadly, the ruling illustrated how hard it is to mount court challenges to a wide array of antiterrorism measures, including renditions of terrorism suspects to foreign countries and targeted killings using drones, in light of the combination of government secrecy and judicial doctrines limiting access to the courts.

“Absent a radical sea change from the courts, or more likely intervention from the Congress, the coffin is slamming shut on the ability of private citizens and civil liberties groups to challenge government counterterrorism policies, with the possible exception of Guantánamo,” said Stephen I. Vladeck, a law professor at American University.

(More at the link. Cross-posted from Occupy Underground.)

3 replies, 439 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply FISA: Justices Turn Back Challenge to Broader U.S. Eavesdropping (Original post)
Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 OP
limpyhobbler Feb 2013 #1
Mojorabbit Feb 2013 #2
PopeOxycontinI Feb 2013 #3

Response to Fire Walk With Me (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 06:50 PM

1. du rec.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fire Walk With Me (Original post)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 11:54 PM

2. k & R cause more people need to see this nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fire Walk With Me (Original post)

Thu Feb 28, 2013, 12:08 AM

3. And all at the hands of...

"Strict construction" "constitutionalist" /"small government" types, no less.
Fucking hypocrites, as usual.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread