General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFrom Jezebel: Sexism Fatigue...
Full title being Sexism Fatigue: When Seth MacFarlane Is a Complete Ass and You Dont Even Notice
What are you supposed to do when someone asks you to "prove" that feminism isn't a massive conspiracy theory in a country where we've only had 39 female senators in the nation's entire history, and 20 of them are serving right now? What kind of a stupid fucking question is that? What are you supposed to say when the 8,000th faux-incredulous jackass throws you the same argument about the wage gap or the draft or bumbling dads in Tide commercialsas though holding each of their hands individually through the empirical facts of the world around us is a worthwhile use of my time. As though feminist academics haven't filled books (decades of books) with answers to that shit already. As though they believe that if they can keep you occupied refuting their flimsy trump cards over and over forever, they can stave off any changes to the culture that keeps them on top. I am so fucking fatigued by this anti-intellectual repetitive shell game that all I could do on Sunday night was write jokes about Barbra Streisand's hella goth choker.
For fucking REAL. Great read.
More: http://jezebel.com/5987118/sexism-fatigue-when-seth-macfarlane-is-a-complete-ass-and-you-dont-even-notice
Response to alcibiades_mystery (Original post)
Post removed
niyad
(113,259 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)Anyone who thinks this fact is in no way related to the constant degradation of women using common language and stupid ideas which denigrate women as being less-than is kidding themselves.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I remember checking out how many female and non-white governors there had been on Wikipedia (about 30 women total, over 5 of them serving right now, and even fewer persons of color - only 4 black governors total.) And people think sexism and racism is done with? Are they living in the real world?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Maybe they're living in the world imagined in that book The Secret. However you imagine reality to be, that's how it is! Manifest it! Just ignore all the racism and misogyny and it will simply fade away, like a bad dream.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)Is that what we encounter on most of these threads - men refusing to believe women's own words because they haven't seen any instances of sexism? Because, of course, no experience is valid unless it gets the male seal of approval.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)That phenomenon is so depressingly common.
LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Precisely because they cannot relate to a different perspective.
Ugh. Stuck at a toddler's emotional level.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)But she has a very uphill battle.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)I admit I don't pay as much attention to the governors as the senators. It really, really shocked me to learn that there'd only been 4 African American governors, tho' - this was in December, when it was 140 years since Governor Pinchback was the first, serving for 35 days. That there'd been only 3 since was eye-opening.
Currently, 5 of the serving Governors are non-Hispanic Whites, according to Wikipedia, and only one is black. So the numbers are atrocious.
20% of senators are women, and for the first time ever they have 2! African Americans serving at the same time. 10% of Governors are persons of color, 14% are women, and I don't even want to start with sexual orientation minorities - there's been what, one openly gay senator, no transgender ones.
All in all, while there's been progress, there's a looooong way to go with regards to minorities in power.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)Taking on the challenge of running against Chris "noun, verb, Sandy" Christie.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)How many total Senators has our country had?
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)So, all told, just about 2% of all senators have been women.... and I'm sure if we get to counting years served, the math will be even worse. 8 of those 1,931 were African American.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)would seem to indicate that things are much better since 1993 than they were in the 1940s, 1960s, and 1970s in that regard.
Although, I might wish there were a few less. I could do without Kelly Ayotte and Deb Fischer.
In fact, if you figure that Olympia Snowe, Jean Carnahan, Hillary Clinton, Carol Mosely Braun, Blanche Lincoln, Elizabeth Dole, and Kay Bailey Hutchinson are all fairly current too. There's only about 12 who date from before 1992, and many of them served for a very short time. Even Gladys Pyle who went to my church when I was a kid was only a Senator for 55 days.
Response to redqueen (Reply #3)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)It is too fucking real.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)It's not that we don't want to hear it, it's that most of us don't care. But please, do continue. The reaction is far more amusing than the joke itself.
cali
(114,904 posts)Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)They make it quite obvious - congratulations on your little club. You must be so proud.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)That was a dumb comment with all the depth of a puddle in the parking lot.
MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Whatever you do, don't stop. Boobgate mustn't end.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)It is a bit more complex than "boobgate" as you refer to it. Stuffing your face with popcorn is quite amusing.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)It's a rant on various topics provoked by MacFarlane's jokes.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)I can see you gleaned a great deal from the piece.
dogknob
(2,431 posts)It ends a discussion and disparages the person you feel uncomfortable with.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)the writer wants people to stop questioning the idea of a "gender wage gap" which she regards as settled fact, and I regard as a widely held false myth, or at least one that is typically over-stated and compares apples to oranges and then claims women are paid less for "the exact same job".
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Wow.
Sad.
myrna minx
(22,772 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)that this is all meaningless.
From the Vulture:
And from Salon:
countryjake
(8,554 posts)gives a pretty clear picture of what went on Sunday night, to those of us who don't even watch the Oscars. Seems that boob song and dance was only the intro to all of the other bigoted and sexist shit that ABC provided for some 40 million viewers throughout the rest of the evening.
I liked the way Salon laid out some of the movies that MacFarlane chose for his little display, explaining the dire and violent circumstances portrayed in each scene by the people on his list. His supposed "parody" reminds me of a bunch of clueless little kids, paying no attention and goofing around while parents watch a movie at home, and they only stop playing long enough to go "Woo woo!" when nakedness appears on the screen.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)People all over the world are getting fed up with this shit.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)And the Guardian, too. Here's one from them:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/feb/26/seth-macfarlane-onion-oscars-misogyny
His targets over the course of the night were women and minorities, which was par for the course seeing as he told the New Yorker last year that mocking women and minorities is his "guilty pleasure" and that "some people say stereotypes exist for a reason". MacFarlane, for the record, is 39 years old.
I had no idea this guy was even that old; what could possibly be his excuse? He actually thinks that insensitivity and outright idiocy is cutting edge? I've not watched any of those cartoon shows since I was acquainted with a man who turned out to be sex offender...that was ALL that he watched on tv. Turned me off, totally, to such gratuitous humor.
It only embarrasses me that the world sees the lows our nation has reached in garnering respect toward minorities. This is the example we now provide of a country which has long battled for "equality"? Is this what we fought so hard for, when we struggled for women's liberation, freedom of speech, civil rights?
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Many others just don't like it when people complain about any feminist issues they personally have no problem with. It's tiresome, you'd think they'd just ignore the threads if they're not interested, but no.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)remember back during the Clinton campaign of the early nineties, when they all claimed how they "loved baking cookies" to go after Hillary, totally and concertedly misconstruing her original point. I've never even liked her much, but I did have to give her plus points back then for plugging women's lib. The vengeance with which the right knocked her down after that cookie comment was the same strategy they've always used to hold women's movements back, turning equality around to insinuate less freedom for others, we're just seeing the newer, improved version of it now. As tho we're the ones who are the prudes, that feminists can't handle any nakedness, that somehow we're restricting "choice" by condemning blatant misogynist kerap.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)It's like that research that shows that, if in a group, women speak close to 50% of the time, the men feel like women have dominated the conversation totally and that the men have been denied their right to speak.
countryjake
(8,554 posts)if they were forced to pay a decent wage for "women's work". Corporations have rights, too, don't ya know? Back in my day, they called it "pin money", which is how the bastards got away with running their sweatshops, claiming they just couldn't afford to give us enough to actually live off of. During the early seventies, one of the small plants I worked for put out leaflets saying that us wild women's libbers were trying to shut the factory down, simply because we were striking for Union recognition (and a ten-cent raise). Of course, that's not all that they called us on those flyers.
Then, there's all of those sublimely satisfied women who somehow manage to sit so comfortably in their subjugation, proclaiming that they're in control, got it good, couldn't be happier, but who will throw a shit-fit, shivering and shaking, at the mere mention that other women might see a need to upset the fruit basket.
And always, there's that simmering supreme infraction that women who struggle for equality are accused of, where conservatives claim we are snatching the very rights of the "unborn" out of our own uteri.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)And I've got such Sexism Fatigue trying to make retrograde men see from a woman's perspective that I can't say anymore....I'm talked out.
I so totally got the article. She was El. O. Quent.
ETA. Ok I got mixed up. Confused Seth Rogen, who starred in KU
KU is still incredibly sexist, though.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Thanks redqueen! I needed that! ha, I've done so many deconstructions of Knocked Up, I could puke!
I got a rebuttal thread locked and moved to meta yesterday....so I'm just feeling worn down in the consciousness raising efforts. Ha I gotta find a good smiley for that.
leftstreet
(36,106 posts)OceanEcosystem
(275 posts)Is that point not valid - that men are being made to look ridiculous in many TV commercials?
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)WHAT ABOUT THE MEN???!?!?
OceanEcosystem
(275 posts)MattBaggins
(7,904 posts)who claim that everything is A-OK because of commercials that show men as bumbling nincompoops.
OceanEcosystem
(275 posts)That it's equally wrong for men to be unfairly portrayed as bumbling fools, just like it's wrong for women to be at a disadvantage.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)LOL!
Response to MattBaggins (Reply #29)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)I am still laughing over this exchange!
gollygee
(22,336 posts)that men can't handle laundry so women will keep having to do all of it isn't great for women either. And the suggestion that a few commercials with men who are shown to have trouble with housework or parenting (thereby reinforcing that those things are women's work) doesn't erase the sexism women are faced with. It's a false equivalency.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Guy's toilet is mega-scummy. He can't handle it. His sister (!) magically appears and cleans it for him.
But it's OK!, because she enjoyed the opportunity to feel smugly superior to him. In a lovingly amused way, of course.
spooky3
(34,438 posts)Any one can see that for every ad that portrays a man as bumbling, there are five that show very clearly that it is the woman's job to use (and be thrilled and fulfilled by) the right kind of mop and cleaner, to get the kids to eat breakfast or take the right medicine, to keep track of where the keys are, etc. And all the while, looking young and attractive, even if hubby is an average Joe.
On edit: and, how about the ad that has Sis visiting Sis and making fun of her spots on her dishwashing detergent and her less than spotless windows? What ad parallels that with men in the lead roles, and when have you EVER witnessed a scene anything like that in real life, involving any women you know? I never have.
Response to spooky3 (Reply #61)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
spooky3
(34,438 posts)Response to spooky3 (Reply #69)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)That's bad. A famous man making sexist jokes on a primetime awards show watched by millions of people is so banal and status-quo in our culture, that to mea woman professionally committed to detecting and calling bullshit on sexismit just feels like a drop in the bucket. Luckily, there's nothing better than a depressing dose of apathy to remind you to FUCK THE BUCKET. If I'm not fatigued, I'm not caring enough. So fuck that stupid bucket.
KitSileya
(4,035 posts)Apparently, he joked about a May/December romance between her and George Clooney that just had me vomiting in my mouth a little. How disgusting! He couldn't have turned it around and joked about say Emmanuelle Riva (the oldest nominee) and someone of legal age? If what McFarlane was trying to do was be all critical of established Hollywood and all, as I've seen people defending him claim, that would have worked just as well (or better, because let's face it, he was joking about romancing a 9-year old....with said 9-year old in the audience!) There are some limits you don't cross, regardless of how shocking you want to be.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Let's imagine if a female host had sang the same song, but about about men and switching the word "boobs" with "balls".
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)At first I was like
Then I realized the title and opening paragraphs could easily be misconstrued.
gaspee
(3,231 posts)I am so sick and tired of it that I don't say much on DU. How many times do women have to ask people (men and women) not to use sexist language when talking about women (even conservative ones.) I've decided they enjoy it and I'm not about to get onto that merry go round.
LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Why, in India, that's the men's euphemism for sexual harrassment to sexual assault to rape! "Eve Teasing"
Because sexually overpowering women is FUN. Seeing women Get Upset is even funnerer!
(Like little boys in grade school punching girls and sneaking looks up their skirts, and laughing when she cries)
Makes them get all tingly and funny down there.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)And If it's at the pool, a good chomp in the shoulder will turn that frown upside down. yours, that is.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)'You might as well wear a sandwich board that says, "Yell at Me With Bad Grammar."'