General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Is Everyone on the Internet So Angry?
Why Is Everyone on the Internet So Angry?
A perfect storm engenders online rudeness, including virtual anonymity and thus a lack of accountability, physical distance and the medium of writing
By Natalie Wolchover and Life's Little Mysteries
A perfect storm of factors come together to engender the rudeness and aggression seen in the comments' sections of Web pages, Markman said. First, commenters are often virtually anonymous, and thus, unaccountable for their rudeness. Second, they are at a distance from the target of their anger be it the article they're commenting on or another comment on that article and people tend to antagonize distant abstractions more easily than living, breathing interlocutors. Third, it's easier to be nasty in writing than in speech, hence the now somewhat outmoded practice of leaving angry notes (back when people used paper), Markman said. [Infographic: A Typical Day on the Internet]
[Niceness Is in Your DNA, Scientists Find And finally, Edward Wasserman, Knight Professor in Journalism Ethics at Washington and Lee University, noted another cause of the vitriol: bad examples set by the media. "Unfortunately, mainstream media have made a fortune teaching people the wrong ways to talk to each other, offering up Jerry Springer, Crossfire, Bill O'Reilly. People understandably conclude rage is the political vernacular, that this is how public ideas are talked about," Wasserman wrote in an article on his university's website. "It isn't."
Communication, the scholars say, is really about taking someone else's perspective, understanding it, and responding. "Tone of voice and gesture can have a large influence on your ability to understand what someone is saying," Markman said. "The further away from face-to-face, real-time dialogue you get, the harder it is to communicate."
In his opinion, media outlets should cut down on the anger and hatred that have become the norm in reader exchanges. "It's valuable to allow all sides of an argument to be heard. But it's not valuable for there to be personal attacks, or to have messages with an extremely angry tone. Even someone who is making a legitimate point but with an angry tone is hurting the nature of the argument, because they are promoting people to respond in kind," he said. "If on a website comments are left up that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-is-everyone-on-the-internet-so-angry
kairos12
(12,851 posts)The anonymity of both the car and the computer give people license to act in very ways.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)It could be a video of kittens and the comments will degrade into the nastiest name calling.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)It's kind of awful..
elias7
(3,997 posts)The tone here has become appalling over the past two years. Just plain nastiness from many who probably don't even realize they're being rude...
AndyA
(16,993 posts)I'm to the point where if I do respond, it's usually once and then I don't even read anything else they post.
Some try really hard to twist your words to make them something they can get outraged over.
fujiyama
(15,185 posts)relatively civilized compared to the others. I think the educational level of Times readers is a bit higher.
Yahoo and youtube are by far the worst and seem to bring out the absolute worst in humanity. But any news site that has responses on facebook are also really bad and display a lot of ignorance.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)For example, just a while ago I read some comments of Justin Bieber's "Baby" video, just for the Hell of it, and it was like a magnet for bigoted slurs. A video doesn't even have to be about anything political; on most videos I read the comments on (especially comments on rap videos or videos of fights), there are always people getting called "n*gger", "coon", "f*ggot", "b*tch", etc. YouTube really does a shitty job at moderating its comments.
fujiyama
(15,185 posts)Facebook comments sections are also full of idiotic responses.
4nic8em
(482 posts)from the 8 year reign of Dimson and his teabilly policies...
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Since the inception of the chat room I have see vile posts, and that is Clinton era.
Nine
(1,741 posts)zbdent
(35,392 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,580 posts)People are frustrated in their daily lives and often do not have an outlet for their feelings. The internet is widely available, and so people use it to vent on.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)People who are on the internet are angry, for reasons noted in the OP.
But people who are angry are on the internet. Since before there even was an internet, it was noted that people were more inclined to speak up about what displeased them than about what pleased them. ("The purpose of language is to complain," or words to that effect, from Jane Wagner, The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life in the Universe.) The internet doesn't fundamentally change this. People are more likely to post when they're moved to do so to express their negative, angry thoughts. On days when they're happy, they just read stuff, and leave the commenting to the people who happen to be ticked off at that time.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Not necessarily in that order.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I had to laugh at that one. It hasn't been on for, like, ten years.
I miss it, damn it! (I'm expressing appropriate anger now, having merely thought of that nasty show.)
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...as there is on the web.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)places I like to visit on the web. And, yes...one can always avoid the comments, but many times there are informative comments that further discussion but mixed in are those by the angry, mean, misinformed or just plain trolls who make it difficult to separate the informative comments from the trash.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I try to be nicer on the internet. My words are there for so many more people to see in just a typical exchange between me and another person. They may not be forever, but they hang around for a lot longer than the few minutes it takes me to type a response. I am also well aware there is another person who made the post I am responding to as well as I don't know how many other eyes.
It's affected my real life exchanges as well, I am a bit more gruff in real life, but I try to take other people's feelings into consideration. That is not my strong suit at all.
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)WE JUST SEEM ANGRY BECAUSE WE TYPE IN ALL CAPITALS AND USE A MILLION EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Just kidding.
theKed
(1,235 posts)What are you, the cops?!
Festivito
(13,452 posts)It's worth hiring political hacks to hack and hack and hack.
Not to discuss and understand, but, rather to state improbabilities in order to get people to perform atrocities while the money is stolen off camera.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)simple.