HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » SC Gov. Nikki Haley Named...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:25 AM

SC Gov. Nikki Haley Named As Other Woman In Divorce Case

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/sc-gov-nikki-haley-named-other-woman-

SC Gov. Nikki Haley Named As Other Woman In Divorce Case
By Susie Madrak


Here's Nikki, denying infidelity rumors three years ago.

I honestly don't care who's cheating with who -- unless that person sets themselves up as some kind of moral arbiter of other people's behavior. So yeah, I'm curious how much fire there is behind this smoke:

S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley is one of three “other women” named in a divorce lawsuit filed in Richland County, S.C. earlier this month.

According to court documents obtained exclusively by FITS, Jennifer Marchant – wife of prominent S.C. State House lobbyist Larry Marchant – is suing her husband for divorce on the grounds of infidelity.


snip//

The lawsuit was filed in Richland County family court on February 6 . A preliminary hearing in the case has been scheduled for 11:00 a.m. on February 20.

Marchant submitted an affidavit in October 2010 - swearing that he and Haley had a one night stand in Salt Lake City, Utah in June 2008.


snip//

“We’ve had representatives go on the record that said we were in a group setting all the time,” Haley told former Columbia, S.C. radio host Keven Cohen at the time.

Other sources who went on the Salt Lake City trip have disputed Haley’s claim, however.

“They left the W lounge together,” one of these sources confirmed to FITS, referring to a dance club located three blocks away from the Marriott hotel where the South Carolina delegation was staying.

Another source also confirmed seeing Haley and Marchant on the corner of Broadway and Southwest Temple streets in downtown Salt Lake City at around 2:25 a.m. as the pair walked back to their hotel room.

Marchant’s affidavit was dismissed at the time by Haley’s lawyers because it was not submitted in connection with a court case. Meanwhile Haley refused to submit an affidavit attesting to her version of events.

“It’s up to them to prove it,” Haley told WSPA TV 7 reporter Robert Kittle. “It’s not up to me to prove that I’m telling the truth. It’s up to them to prove that is true.”


Nikki is famous for saying "women don't care about contraception." Au contraire, Madame Governor. I would guess that if you're running around on your hubby, you care very much about contraception!

87 replies, 11265 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 87 replies Author Time Post
Reply SC Gov. Nikki Haley Named As Other Woman In Divorce Case (Original post)
babylonsister Feb 2013 OP
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #1
babylonsister Feb 2013 #3
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #4
babylonsister Feb 2013 #8
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #11
ProfessionalLeftist Feb 2013 #20
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #32
caseymoz Feb 2013 #38
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #41
paleotn Feb 2013 #48
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #50
Bohunk68 Feb 2013 #67
Sekhmets Daughter Feb 2013 #52
caseymoz Feb 2013 #62
lunatica Feb 2013 #12
aquart Feb 2013 #23
Bohunk68 Feb 2013 #68
aquart Feb 2013 #73
Bohunk68 Feb 2013 #82
DFW Feb 2013 #31
dorkulon Feb 2013 #33
WinkyDink Feb 2013 #59
gateley Feb 2013 #29
johnnyreb Feb 2013 #54
babylonsister Feb 2013 #55
calimary Feb 2013 #75
hobbit709 Feb 2013 #5
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #10
grantcart Feb 2013 #40
xilify Feb 2013 #7
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #9
spanone Feb 2013 #17
hobbit709 Feb 2013 #18
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2013 #77
trumad Feb 2013 #21
cheapdate Feb 2013 #81
aquart Feb 2013 #22
valerief Feb 2013 #34
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #35
olegramps Feb 2013 #70
DallasNE Feb 2013 #42
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #43
OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #45
Bucky Feb 2013 #46
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #51
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2013 #79
ljm2002 Feb 2013 #57
Nanjing to Seoul Feb 2013 #84
ZRT2209 Feb 2013 #2
spanone Feb 2013 #6
SummerSnow Feb 2013 #13
KharmaTrain Feb 2013 #14
XanaDUer Feb 2013 #15
aquart Feb 2013 #16
rurallib Feb 2013 #19
BlueStreak Feb 2013 #25
rurallib Feb 2013 #27
BlueStreak Feb 2013 #28
Bucky Feb 2013 #47
no_hypocrisy Feb 2013 #24
Paladin Feb 2013 #36
MotherPetrie Feb 2013 #53
barbtries Feb 2013 #26
Shankapotomus Feb 2013 #30
Stinky The Clown Feb 2013 #37
grantcart Feb 2013 #39
bucolic_frolic Feb 2013 #44
TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #49
Angry Dragon Feb 2013 #56
TeamPooka Feb 2013 #58
alp227 Feb 2013 #60
bunnies Feb 2013 #61
Cha Feb 2013 #63
Yavin4 Feb 2013 #64
madinmaryland Feb 2013 #65
nxylas Feb 2013 #66
1-Old-Man Feb 2013 #69
nxylas Feb 2013 #71
JI7 Feb 2013 #86
VA_Jill Feb 2013 #72
Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #74
jollyreaper2112 Feb 2013 #76
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2013 #78
jsabrown3 Feb 2013 #80
47of74 Feb 2013 #83
zorro1 Feb 2013 #85
Squaredeal Feb 2013 #87

Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:28 AM

1. Are we ever going to evolve past the point where this is an issue?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:30 AM

3. I'm all for anything that takes this witch down and am

pretty damned tired of the rethug hypocrisy that seems to be tolerated so well by some .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Reply #3)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:34 AM

4. The GOP tries to make morality an issue. We help them with that when we react to their dalliances.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #4)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:40 AM

8. Maybe it should be an issue. It certainly is

when a Dem is involved.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Reply #8)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:43 AM

11. I guess I disagree -- it should not be an issue.

We spend so much time and energy figuring out who went where with whom and sifting through all the specifics. We're like a bunch of adolescent children who are just discovering sex.

I guess I'd like to see a more mature approach: nail them to the wall for their hypocrisy and let the rest go.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #11)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:33 AM

20. "nail them to the wall for their hypocrisy"

That's exactly the point of bringing attention to Ms. Haley's "dalliance" - to nail her to the wall for her hypocrisy both for her Republican beliefs in general and her assinine statement about contraceptives in particular.

I could care less who sleeps with whom. But when these holier-than-thou pretentious, hypocrite Repukes proselytize to the rest of us about "morality" and "family values" when they themselves are as immoral as anyone else if not moreso (usually moreso), then they need to be brought down upon the sharp edge of their own hypocrisy and whittled to a pile of sawdust with it.

That is the entire point here, not "who slept with whom". Nobody much cares about that - it's the hypocrisy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProfessionalLeftist (Reply #20)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:08 AM

32. Exactly. Focus less on the affair and more on the hypocrisy. I'm all for that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #32)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:44 AM

38. No, I think it's important to note it.


Since they make sexual morality the cornerstone of their political platform and agenda, it's important that people know and see how their moralism works in practice. We'll never get them to stop unless they're consistently shamed about it.

The shame doesn't come from the acts themselves, but from the hypocrisy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to caseymoz (Reply #38)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:48 AM

41. Really? So you just loved the Ken Starr investigation, cigars and all?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #41)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:16 AM

48. What?

Why is this so damn hard for you to understand? WE don't get all in a twist about such things, they do. They're the ones who love to taught their superior morality, thus the whole Ken Starr affair.....all the while a certain Idaho senator was hiding his orientation..well, except in airport men's rooms that is. Seriously, what part of HYPOCRISY do you now understand???

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to paleotn (Reply #48)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 12:19 PM

50. Read the subthread that I started, and settle down.

I have totally endorsed holding up the hypocrisy.

However, I have also suggested toning down the lurid discussions about the details of the affairs. That, however, is being shouted down. I guess we like talking about extramarital affairs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #50)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 08:49 AM

67. Just a couple of posts

up, you were the one who brought up Starr and cigars and now you're griping about lurid discussions? Take the plank out of your own eye before trying to remove splinters from others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #41)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 12:26 PM

52. There is a difference...

Clinton never ran as a 'moral' arbiter the way every republican does today. While I understand your desire to get past this fascination with another's sexual behavior, the GOP has made sexuality a major plank in their platform...they must be called out every time someone takes a saw to that plank.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #41)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:02 PM

62. Straw manning, a bit?


First, Clinton never made "family values" and things like abstinence only education the centerpiece of his policies.

Second, I never brought prosecution into it.

Third, talking about somebody's sex life doesn't bother me, and it seems the only mature thing to do when it's exactly our sex lives are what Conservatives are demanding the right to regulate, due to their righteousness. Avoid the topic, heap shame on it, and you play right into Conservative hands.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #4)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:46 AM

12. Running on being morally superior to Democrats and family values

tends to get these people elected. It's an issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #4)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:48 AM

23. Then don't argue her shitty morality.

Ask what precautions she took to protect the health of her family and the public at large. Is she SURE she is not currently infected with an STD?

Rule 1: Never play by THEIR rules.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aquart (Reply #23)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 08:53 AM

68. Just a matter of information.

In the past 6 months I've been doing volunteer work as a Peer Associate for the Aids Council of NE NY. They are no longer referred to as STD's. They are more properly called STI's now. "I" as in infections.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bohunk68 (Reply #68)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 12:59 PM

73. Really.

"Infection." Sounds localized and curable. Pretty pink lipstick for some really nasty pigs.

No one's afraid of an infection. Just soak it in hot salt water.

I'll call up my dead friends and tell them not to worry. It's only an infection.

The PR genius who thought of this can go to Hell.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to aquart (Reply #73)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 06:20 PM

82. Dude,

pull yourself together. HIV is not the same as an STI and you well know it. It is a whole lot easier to get people to take testing if it is an "infection" rather than a disease. Social stigma etc. I seriously doubt if you deal with any of your infections in hot salt water. If you can call up dead friends, then they must not be dead. I give you a piece of current information and you act as if the information came from Hell. Over the years, I've seen you write much more sensible stuff.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #4)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:08 AM

31. All we need to do is help them react to their own dalliances.

The rest will take care of itself. The IOKIYAR syndrome is not one of permanent duration when it comes to sex.

Republican "youthful indiscretions" are gotten away with if that youth was 40 years ago, not 4 years ago.

South Carolina supports the Republican every time EXCEPT if sex is involved--not because they are as pious as they make themselves out to be, but because the private lives of their public officials ARE expected to conform to their pious norm.

"The flag is flying high over the courthouse
The wheels of justice never stood a chance.
The judge is down at Charlie's on his launch hour
Checking out the picture show from France.
Carrying a fifth of whiskey in a dirty paper bag
Threw the ball to home but they always missed the tag.
Faded old glory hanging like a rag
Defenders Defenders on the flag."

--Bruce Hornsby ("Defenders of the Flag")

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #4)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:16 AM

33. It's called exposing their hypocrisy.

The point is not that they are immoral; it's that they are full of shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #4)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:15 PM

59. Nooooo.....It's actually "Calling them out on their HYPOCRISY."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Reply #3)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:00 AM

29. Oh, I so agree!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Reply #3)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:00 PM

54. Thank you so much babylonsister

We need all the help we can get down hyeah.

There are plenty of indications on the street, in our history, in the backrooms, in The State Newspaper comments and so forth, that all we need is a nudge here and there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnnyreb (Reply #54)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:04 PM

55. Hey, neighbor!

Welcome to DU, and you're welcome. I live in GA now, so she irks me particularly, along with the stellar GA reps, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to johnnyreb (Reply #54)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 03:00 PM

75. Welcome to DU, johnnyreb!

Well, I'm as Machiavellian as the next guy when it comes to stuff like this. Let's help this one get noisy! She's being touted as one of the "I Love You Wimmmmmmmmmennnnnnnnnn!" GOP bright lights for the future. I would like to see her knocked out of contention - and certainly out of the governor's mansion!

And yes, before anyone goes on about double standards and ken starr and all that - the difference in Bill Clinton's case was indeed that he NEVER held himself up as some sort of moralizing straight-arrow role-model. He never made morals one of his talking points. It never came up with him. It was the busybodies and holier-than-thou's on the CON side that did. It's ALWAYS the busybodies and holier-than-thou's who yap about morality. And they're usually among the biggest amoralists around.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:36 AM

5. Hypocrisy is the issue.

Maybe if the Rs would STFU about "moral values", their lapses wouldn't be pointed out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #5)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:41 AM

10. Agreed on all points. And, we should focus entirely on the hypocrisy and ...

... avoid wallowing in the sordid details.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #5)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:46 AM

40. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:39 AM

7. infidelity will always be an issue especially if its committed by a woman.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xilify (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:40 AM

9. Male or female. It makes no difference.

This is NOT a gender issue. If you want to disagree, go ahead, but I will respond to further.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xilify (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:23 AM

17. especially if it's committed by a governor.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xilify (Reply #7)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:25 AM

18. I guess "Hiking The Appalachian Trail" wasn't an issue?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to xilify (Reply #7)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 04:03 PM

77. You're right

John Edwards and Bill Clinton got a total pass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:34 AM

21. Put your foot on their necks every chance you get.

This is fucking war.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to trumad (Reply #21)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 05:11 PM

81. Hell Yeah!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:43 AM

22. Ever heard of Sexually Transmitted Disease?

Nikki Haley was one of THREE. The public has a right to know how many people were endangered by this self-indulgent carelessness.

Sometimes a spouse has no idea a spouse is cheating until an unexplained itch or rash necessitates a visit to the doctor. I knew one woman whose husband got treatment but didn't tell her so the disease he gave her was able to make her infertile.

This is not a private failing. This is a community health issue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:38 AM

34. When religion stops making it an issue. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to valerief (Reply #34)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:40 AM

35. It's a more noble goal to separate religion from politics.

Morality has been a part of religion since its inception, and that won't change.

And, in this particular case, I don't see how religion fits into the equation at all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #35)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 10:54 AM

70. I totally agree they should be separate issues. HOWEVER:

To not acknowledge that the GOP has attempted to not, only make this major issue but, the absolute critical issue in which they appeal to Bible Thumping Evangelicals as grand protectors of morality To deny this is not consistent with the facts.

When they are exposed for their hypocrisy they immediately invoke that these are private matters. However, what is private about their demands to impose their religious teaching on school children ranging from creationism to abstainest sex education without any regard from the the desires of the parents. In fact this is the very tactic that they invoke in their determination to impose their moral teaching on the students when they flood school board meetings with people screaming that if their beliefs are no imposed then the kids are doomed to hell in a hand-basket. I can onlly wish that this wasn't the case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:58 AM

42. The Reasons Are Many

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DallasNE (Reply #42)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:59 AM

43. Yeah, we hold that shit up as an example of horrible judgment, but ...

... is that really pertinent here?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:12 AM

45. Not as long as the GOP Tea-Nazis fly the flag of Morality and try to dictate....

....to Americans how they should live their lives, to include the right of women to make choices about their own bodies.

The rampant hypocrisy of the GOP Tea-Nazis knows no bounds...why shouldn't we hold them to the same standards they want to dictate to us?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:13 AM

46. Thank you. Hypocrisy is bad on any side.

Dems who say it shouldn't be an issue shouldn't call it any issue when Republicans do it. They've got plenty of their own over there to gin up the bogus moralism. Not that I approve of marital infidelity, but I disapprove of making someone else's sex life an issue even more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #46)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 12:20 PM

51. Damn! Somebody who actual understands what I am trying to say. Thank you!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bucky (Reply #46)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 04:11 PM

79. Yes, let's call a truce

I'm sure Republicans will agree to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:07 PM

57. Why should we?

If she can use her position to promote the wrong side of women's issues, such as availability of contraception, then she damn well better be squeaky clean in her personal conduct or we can, should, and will use it against her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #1)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 09:59 PM

84. when the gop stop making it an issue and then get caught with their hands on the cooke jar

 

then it will stop being an issue. until then, they pounce on democrats doing it. . .something like "pots" and "kettles" and "black" and "geese" and "ganders" come into my head.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:30 AM

2. ruh roh

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:36 AM

6. k&r....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:50 AM

13. Nikki Nikki Nikki

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 08:51 AM

14. Her Star's Pretty Much Faded...

...you rarely hear her name mentioned as a future "face" of the party like she was when she was first elected. Besides being a lazy and ineffective governor (kinda reminds us of a certain "pretty face" from up north...you betcha!) she's a walking soap opera. Just one more "paragon of family values"...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:04 AM

15. Heh. Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:21 AM

16. One of THREE?

Oh, Nikki.

On edit: Nikki's paramour's promiscuity raises a significant health issue for all the spouses involved and THIS SHOULD BE DISCUSSED.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:29 AM

19. Doing it in Utah no less. That's has to be a slap at Mittsy and the Mormons

O dear God, they must be having the vapors!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rurallib (Reply #19)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:54 AM

25. How do you figure? I thought they were OK with men having

lots of partners -- even marrying lots of them.

Nikki should use the "When in Utah, do like a Utah-an" defense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStreak (Reply #25)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:57 AM

27. marrying - got to get married first - even if you already are married.

maybe they got a temporary license?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rurallib (Reply #27)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:00 AM

28. Utah should go into partnership with Nevada

Then she could have slipped over the border to get a quick multiple marriage, do the nasty in SLC, then go back to Nevada to get it annulled.

That would work, wouldn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BlueStreak (Reply #25)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:15 AM

47. I think they're called Utites.

Or at least that's the kind of question they like to ask.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:48 AM

24. Unapologetic Schadenfreude.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to no_hypocrisy (Reply #24)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:42 AM

36. My Feelings, Exactly. (nt)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to no_hypocrisy (Reply #24)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 12:27 PM

53. Ditto

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 09:57 AM

26. my thoughts exactly

"I honestly don't care who's cheating with who -- unless that person sets themselves up as some kind of moral arbiter of other people's behavior."
it's the fucking hypocrisy that drives me apeshit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:03 AM

30. That makes it two in a row

Sanford, now Haley.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:42 AM

37. That motherfucker known as Karma. Hahahahahaha

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:44 AM

39. When Floyd Mayweather told Larry Merchant that everyone knew about him and Nikki



he was surprised, to say the least.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to grantcart (Reply #39)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:06 AM

44. I can see the parodies already

Knockin' Nikki

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:19 AM

49. Ha ha! Sweet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:04 PM

56. She is screwing the whole state, why should we care about identifying one person??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 01:12 PM

58. the only real issue here is GOP hypocrisy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 06:55 PM

60. For the TL;DR crowd here's a quick photo version

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 07:24 PM

61. heh.

Oughtta be fun watching this play out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:10 PM

63. Another fucking Hypocrital republiCON and their FAKE family

"values".. What Values?

Let her parade this around when she's pumped up like Rubio.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:34 PM

64. Three Words Why This Story Is Relevant: Sanctity of Marriage

This is the right's big argument against Marriage Equality, and when they violate their vows, they are hypocrites.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Sun Feb 17, 2013, 10:49 PM

65. Another Repuke campaigning on "family values" shows their hypocrisy.

Go to hell, Haley.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 07:50 AM

66. Let's not automatically assume that the story is true

There are a lot of South Carolina Republicans out to get Haley, for precisely the opposite reason that DUers might want her gone - she's a woman, and a non-white one at that. To them, she should be barefoot, pregnant and chained to the kitchen sink. In India. The allegations may be true, but alternatively, it could just be good ol' SC dirty politics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nxylas (Reply #66)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 09:07 AM

69. I don't think she is that kind of Indian

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1-Old-Man (Reply #69)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 11:44 AM

71. What kind of Indian is she?

Her parents were immigrants from the Punjab, though she was born in Bamberg, SC.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nxylas (Reply #66)

Tue Feb 19, 2013, 12:03 AM

86. in this case the Man himself has claimed the Affair with her , it's not just the wife making

the allegations out of nowhere.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 12:48 PM

72. Must be endemic in SC

After all, there is a precedent with ex-gov. Mark Sanford.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 01:05 PM

74. Republicans generally score high in hypocrisy but low in discretion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 03:37 PM

76. Hah

I have no problem with a vegetarian or tea-totaler or no-government libertarian or whatever but if someone is militant and h compromising in their position and is then compromised in following it, well, that raises questions. It'd be just like catching a militant gay guy in bed with a woman. Does it matter to me? I don't care who he sleeps with. But if it turns out he was the sort who called out bisexuals as being uncommitted and not letting them have any peace, the hypocrisy is the issue. Same with a vegetarian having a steak. I wouldn't care unless the same person was saying meat isn't a choice it's murder and getting in my face about their own dietary choices.

This is also why I love Ron Paul using the government to expropriate a fan site instead of resorting to free market means. Hypocrite!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 04:06 PM

78. No shock

Even before she got elected, people in the know frequently mentioned she and more than one male lobbyist were doing more than making business deals.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 04:51 PM

80. What is it About SC Governors

and their enthusiasm for the Appalachian Trail?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 09:55 PM

83. Another case of do as I say, not as I do?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Mon Feb 18, 2013, 11:59 PM

85. News Flash! People have sex all the time.

I'm sure this makes some folks happy that an attractive woman having sex with someone other than her husband can be used to do what? Huh? You half wits leave this stuff alone already. Nothing more childish than trying to shame someone for being sexual from either side of the political spectrum. Leave it alone!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Tue Feb 19, 2013, 07:31 AM

87. Righteous SC Rebpulican Chirstians Will Look The Other Way

IOKIYR

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread