HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Oh, no effin' way! ABC W...

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 05:09 AM

Oh, no effin' way! ABC WWN: Rahm Emanual contemplating running for President next round.

That is, if Hillary doesn't run. No way would I ever vote for a ticket headed by him. Just putting that out there right now.

63 replies, 3545 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 63 replies Author Time Post
Reply Oh, no effin' way! ABC WWN: Rahm Emanual contemplating running for President next round. (Original post)
Skidmore Feb 2013 OP
graham4anything Feb 2013 #1
pinboy3niner Feb 2013 #2
Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #41
Nay Feb 2013 #51
Le Taz Hot Feb 2013 #3
cali Feb 2013 #4
blkmusclmachine Feb 2013 #5
mnhtnbb Feb 2013 #6
JI7 Feb 2013 #7
Democracyinkind Feb 2013 #8
deutsey Feb 2013 #9
demwing Feb 2013 #10
Nay Feb 2013 #53
silvershadow Feb 2013 #11
Zorra Feb 2013 #12
MannyGoldstein Feb 2013 #13
dotymed Feb 2013 #16
graham4anything Feb 2013 #33
dotymed Feb 2013 #50
graham4anything Feb 2013 #59
AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #29
ananda Feb 2013 #31
Demo_Chris Feb 2013 #63
tclambert Feb 2013 #14
Skidmore Feb 2013 #15
Coolest Ranger Feb 2013 #17
customerserviceguy Feb 2013 #18
rosesaylavee Feb 2013 #19
HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #20
PassingFair Feb 2013 #48
rateyes Feb 2013 #21
MadHound Feb 2013 #22
OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #23
countmyvote4real Feb 2013 #24
Buzz Clik Feb 2013 #25
dembotoz Feb 2013 #26
Autumn Feb 2013 #27
southernyankeebelle Feb 2013 #28
CanonRay Feb 2013 #30
bemildred Feb 2013 #32
Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #34
LWolf Feb 2013 #35
KharmaTrain Feb 2013 #36
davidpdx Feb 2013 #37
Fire Walk With Me Feb 2013 #38
Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #39
Starry Messenger Feb 2013 #40
Dragonfli Feb 2013 #47
Starry Messenger Feb 2013 #49
sadbear Feb 2013 #42
FSogol Feb 2013 #43
tritsofme Feb 2013 #44
City Lights Feb 2013 #45
Dragonfli Feb 2013 #46
datasuspect Feb 2013 #52
TwilightGardener Feb 2013 #54
bigwillq Feb 2013 #55
Arugula Latte Feb 2013 #56
Greybnk48 Feb 2013 #57
fredamae Feb 2013 #58
Arctic Dave Feb 2013 #60
Hell Hath No Fury Feb 2013 #61
trublu992 Feb 2013 #62

Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 05:16 AM

1. No one has to worry. Hillary45 is definite IMHO and a done deal. She won. Take it to the bank.

 

Rahm will be mayor or gov. but noone needs to worry about him running or not running.

BTW, if he were the nominee, as a democratic person, I will 100% vote for anyone who is.

But I want to win, and it takes a Clinton to beat a Bush

and after the other days news about Rubio, I am convinced it shall be

Hillary45/Biden vs. Jeb Bush/Rubio(as Rubio is moving to the DC area and will no longer be an official Floridian come 2016, so he can indeed be on the same ticket as Jeb legally).

With HIllary45 winning 425 to 475 electoral votes in 2016 smashing forever the Bush name.

It takes a Clinton to defeat Jeb Bush.

and continue unabated, the President Obama agenda
and to nominate and elevate President Obama to the US Supreme Court in 2018(like Taft).

imho and I am sticking to this one no matter what.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 05:18 AM

2. Just got an email...



Chicago mayor and former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel will be hosting a tele-town hall this Saturday on the President's plan to create jobs and strengthen the middle class -- and how folks like you can help make it happen. You should be a part of it.

Want to hop on the phone this Saturday and join the call?

During the town hall, you'll get a chance to hear exactly what the President's jobs plan includes -- proposals, numbers, everything you need to know.

And most importantly, you'll hear how you can take action in your community -- and at a national level -- to help make sure Congress passes it now.

You'll be joined by thousands of other supporters like you across the country. It's an important conversation, so I hope you can join.

RSVP for the tele-town hall on Saturday at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time, and you'll get the info to dial in:

http://my.barackobama.com/Tele-Town-Hall

Thanks,

Stephanie

Stephanie Cutter
Organizing for Action


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pinboy3niner (Reply #2)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:57 AM

41. RE is ex Goldman Sachs. It is no wonder he is attacking the Chicago school system, health care, etc.

 

Please see my post #38 regarding Goldman Sachs installing personnel in Greek and Italian government, the European Central Bank, etc.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022378865#post38

There is now no trauma center on the poor side of Chicago and people are dying in transit to the ones remaining. He shut down several health care and mental health care clinics even when nurses Occupied and said they'd work for free, to keep them open. The Chicago teacher's union had to go on strike to get him to listen, and even now there are plans to close many schools. Don't forget him sending riot cops 15 deep to attack Occupy and Veterans during the Democratic National Convention.

These would make for an excellent set of questions during the conference call!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fire Walk With Me (Reply #41)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:53 AM

51. Add me to the list of people who would NEVER EVER vote for Rahm for anything. This man is

toxic. It would be like voting Republican, and I refuse to do that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 05:19 AM

3. And he'd get the nod from the Party Bosses, too.

Ugh! Then again, they always hedge their bets and have more than one candidate. I just don't see him winning in the primaries. He's just not a likeable guy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 05:23 AM

4. I don't think he stands a chance

with Hillary in it or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 05:36 AM

5. Umm, no.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:04 AM

6. No. Please. Just no.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:09 AM

7. i wouldn't worry about him, watch his Speech at the Dem Convention last year

he just doesn't have the appeal to get such wide support. he can run if he wants but he wont win the nomination. he would be one of those who drops out weeks/months before Iowa even votes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:15 AM

8. lol.

I wouldn't vote for that fucker and I wouldn't care if I got PPRed for it.

Rather norhibg than Rahmthing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:17 AM

9. If he somehow slithered onto the ticket I would not vote

or would vote Green or write-in.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:26 AM

10. If Rahm thinks he can inspire the liberal vote

he must be fucking retarded

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #10)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:00 AM

53. LOL!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:37 AM

11. Rahm you say? Is Mitt unavailable? Or is he gonna run as a Democrat? nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:44 AM

12. I could never vote for a republican, even a moderate one like Emanuel. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:57 AM

13. I think Americans are ready for an FDR Democrat

like Elizabeth Warren.

No more Wall Street crypto-Republicans!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #13)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:10 AM

16. We really need to run our own candidate.

We would need to start real soon.Graham would vote for anyone on the d ticket, NOT me. I am sick of (and so is America) corporate candidates.
Warren/ Sanders would make a real peoples ticket. Of course we would need to start immediately to raise grassroots money.
Sadly, it's not happening. That is the only way that I envision an FDR Democrat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dotymed (Reply #16)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:16 AM

33. You do realize neither Rahm, Elizabeth, Alan will run if Hillary45 runs.

 

btw, have you or anyone who mentions Alan ever seen him vetted for anything?

btw2-have you read,seen or whatever the Elizabeth Warren is doing(copying the most successful tactic) that Al Franken also copied- Hillary Clinton's first term as senator in NY.

Once elected, she like the other two are doing/did has decided to actually do the job they were hired for, silently, quietly doing the job. (unlike republicans who come in and don't actually do anything(John Edwards was also like that) and immediately run for higher office.

Elizabeth Warren will NOT run in 2016 because hillary is running.
Elizabeth Warren is 100% bonafide teamObama member working with them not against them.

Do not forget that.
Do not forget that it was President Obama and his asking her to be in his cabinet that started the ball rolling, President obama ropeadoping the opposition when she wasn't given an up and down vote, and giving her the opening to become Senator, with his coattails.

As for Bernie from Brooklyn-he was 100% heavily helped and financed by Charlie Schumer(one of his fellow friends from Brooklyn, same area), and Bernie is and always was a Democratic
agreer with.

as for Alan, no congressperson is going to leap to the national ticket(especially after Ryan).

and again, vetting would be needed.

I don't like tearing democratic candidates down myself, as I would vote enthusiastically for Alan were he on my ballot, HOWEVER, he has three major major major problems that would eliminate him from any REAL progressive liberal's wanting to be on the ticket.
One of them would (should) bother 52% of the democratic party.
And a few weeks ago, it took me all of two seconds to find out about that.And I wasn't even looking.(and if I did, Karl Rove already has a dossier 100 times bigger).

I don't like 3rd party presidential candidates whatsoever, however if the same person were running AS A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE, I would vote for them.
That includes Ralph Nader, whom you know I have very bad things to say about him.

There is a process, and he could have run AS A DEMOCRATIC candidate, and if he won, I would have voted FOR him.(which he didn't and later we all found out he was heavily financed and promoted by the republicans/Bush machine to do what he did).

Just not for an outside party (outside of the name Democratic party nominee).

Elizabeth Warren is in THE JOB she is perfect for. Why would you want someone else NOT doing the job WE HOPE SHE EXCELS at.
To think she should take 3 years OFF of her job to campaign for President and not do the job she is perfect for, I do not understand.
As no one else in her job was known for doing what she will do, why go back to someone not as good as her in that post?

Don't you realize it is ONE TEAM? And that they are all working for the same long term goals?

as to Rahm, he isn't running, I seriously doubt he said it seriously,but yes, I would vote for him if he were the head of the presidential ticket, because, well I don't want jeb Bush to be president.

And I seriuosly think after this weeks announcement of Rubio moving to the DC area,
that the republican ticket shall be jeb/Rubio. ANd I for one do not want that.

Fracture in 1968,1980,2000,2004 showed what happens.

I not only want Hillary to cream Bush, but HIllary to be the one and only major candidate to seirously run (I want Joe to run, finish second, flank her defensively, and be the VP for one more term. And let all the others continue in the jobs they are in, serving the public beautifully.

but yes, I would vote for Elizabeth, Alan, Al Franken, Rahm if Hillary didn't run.
AS democratic NOMINEE. (and that would also include Mike as a democratic nominee).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to graham4anything (Reply #33)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:50 AM

50. IMO, it is terrible that people vote party before candidate.

That is why we get only corporate "choices."
I have seen many of your posts, there is not much we agree on.
If we want to break the corporate control of "our" politicians, then we need to vote for a non-corporate candidate.
You may argue with yourself if you like. I myself am tired of voting the lesser of two evils.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dotymed (Reply #50)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:14 AM

59. I like President Obama and his agenda. Therefore I want ZERO change from it.

 

I don't consider it a lesser of two evils.

I consider it an honor to vote for President Obama's agenda forever more.

I never in my life thought I would see a President Obama and I sure as hell don't want to change from it now that I got it.

He is directly the same in 2013 terms as my other favorites before him.

2000 showed what happened to sitting on ones hands, voting 3rd party and not voting for the choice in SCOTUS alone.
And no matter all the lines heard, Gore would not have nominated Alito and Roberts and Scalia and Thomas.

So it made bogus any other claim from anyone.

IMHO.

Because the other side is worse, and nothing will ever be perfect.

and corporations are not bad. A Bad corporation is good. A good corporation is good.
again

IMHO and the majority amount of nationwide voters, and a landslide of democratic voters.

If there are bad CEOs, get rid of those CEOs.
Bad bankers(whatever a banker means, because tellers are bankers too and they make $11 an hour) should be fired, good bankers hired.
And corporations have shareholders.

If shareholders complain enough or see enough, then they change.

Has nothing to do with the democratic party whatsoever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #13)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:58 AM

29. Which Americans?

 

The Americans who control international corporations, ship manufacturing jobs to foreign countries, and support endless wars to the detriment of ordinary Americans, apparently want Wall Street crypto-Republicans.

To them, any opposition that we might offer is just a speed bump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #13)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:00 AM

31. Agree. Warren is so great!

..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MannyGoldstein (Reply #13)

Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:49 AM

63. I know I am n/t

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 06:59 AM

14. I'm for Elizabeth Warren.

Or Alan Grayson.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tclambert (Reply #14)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:05 AM

15. I'd vote for a ticket headed by Warren in a heartbeat.

She has the interests of the people at heart. On, the other hand, the Emanuel clan are in it for themselves because, believe me, we would get Rahm's brother in the package too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:11 AM

17. Oh heck no I will not be voting for this clown

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:13 AM

18. What an ego

This story tells more about what passes for thought processes in his head than it does about his actual chances of being President.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:13 AM

19. No vote here.

Not so sure Chicago is all that pleased with him either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:16 AM

20. OMG! Get out the garlic!

Who in the hell pulled the stake out of the DLC's heart?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #20)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:44 AM

48. Obama did, when he choose his cabinet.

Clinton and Obama/Obama and Clinton

No difference.

Must have been a personal smack in the face for Hillary, though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:28 AM

21. Rahm is a sure loser. I, for one, sit out any election where that asshole is the nominee.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:29 AM

22. And the hits just keep coming,

 

Let's see, Hillary or Rahm, Hillary or Rahm. How about shoot me now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:31 AM

23. Too many negatives...that's a loser from the word "go". nt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:46 AM

24. No. Not even VP.

He will be a vote killer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:48 AM

25. Which party? Certainly not Democrat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Buzz Clik (Reply #25)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:51 AM

26. yea that is my thought too

the republican ticket remains open

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:55 AM

27. I'm voting for the other guy, And I don't care who it is.

No way in hell I will ever vote for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 07:57 AM

28. I wouldn't vote for him either. He has a temper and just like the NJ governor you

 

don't need someone in there that has a bad temper.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:00 AM

30. Just what we Don't need

another corporate "Democrat"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:08 AM

32. As long as he runs as a Republican, I'm OK with it. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:17 AM

34. I can't stand the man and will work hard to see him not in the running

Could you imagine, the choice between him and a republican? I
d be sick to my stomach

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:22 AM

35. Rahm Emanual

is not capable of earning my vote for any office.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:29 AM

36. Rahm's Got Plenty To Keep Him Busy In Chicago...

Firstly...I can't think of any President who stepped up from being Mayor to President. Roooodeee tried in '04 (others have as well)...the media loved him and he thought he was far more popular than he actually was. Political opponents can and will pick apart a Mayor's lack of experience...even with Rahm's WH and Congressional experience, he doesn't have the "executive" experience...something that usually works in the favor of a sitting or former governor (and why most of the nominees over the past century have served as governors).

Rahm's got a lot of plates spinning in Chicago that will make or break him in the next two years. He'll face re-election in '15 and he'll have his hands full trying to keep his own base together...he's not a Daley and I see him being challenged in the primaries.

This kinda reminds me of when Blago floated his own Presidential ambitions,,,most of us in Chicago laughed. I'd say that's the same thing with any dreams Rahm may have of running...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:31 AM

37. He would be one of the ones I'd definitively be against

I hope he doesn't run no matter who else ends up running.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:49 AM

38. He used to work for Goldman Sachs. Now Goldman Sachs have power in Greece and Italy

 

and it is building within the US. Trend, anyone?

2010:

Voila! Greek Gov't Appoints Ex-Goldman Exec As New Debt Chief

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/02/19/838682/-Voila-Greek-Gov-t-Appoints-Ex-Goldman-Exec-As-New-Debt-Chief#


2011:

Arrest the Criminals at Goldman Sachs and in the Greek Government (video: Greg Palast)

http://www.v2load.com/videos/aQp22WN0cpg/


Also Italy's Prime Minister; the former attorney general of Ireland during the bailout; the head of the European Central Bank; and more:

http://acampadabcninternacional.wordpress.com/2011/12/09/what-price-the-new-democracy-goldman-sachs-conquers-europe-acampadabcn-takethesquare-acampadasol-15m-occupy/

What's not to love about an Oligarchy. Vampire Squid!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:54 AM

39. Emanuel/Bloomberg

That would be my stay at home election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 08:54 AM

40. LOL.

 

Who does he think will vote for him?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #40)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:38 AM

47. he'd get the anti-labor vote. Also a solid lock on the privatization profiteers

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dragonfli (Reply #47)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:45 AM

49. Well, unions are pretty key to GOTV.

 

So if he wants *any* votes, he'll have to get them himself. He just lost a key battle in the stupid fight he picked with CTU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:29 AM

42. If he somehow gets the nomination, I'd vote for him.

And if I won the lottery, I'd give it all to charity.

Why are we talking about this?

Santorum ran on their side. Did he win?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:32 AM

43. Vanity candidate. He just want to raise some bucks. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:33 AM

44. If Hillary doesn't run I would support him in a heart beat.

But my guess is that this is just from his PR machine. I doubt he is seriously considering a WH bid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:33 AM

45. Oh gawd no!



No way I'd vote for him either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 09:35 AM

46. What chance does he have of taking the Republican primary?

He is anti labor enough, pro corporate enough and has a solid and consistent contempt for liberals and liberal policies, but I think they want an Hispanic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:53 AM

52. that guy is a scumbag motherfucker

 

i can't describe forcefully enough how much i viscerally hate that north shore shit ass.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:01 AM

54. Wha? Good Lord, why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:02 AM

55. I would never vote for him

But 2016 is too far away to really worry about it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:03 AM

56. He'd probably be booed the way Joementum was.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:05 AM

57. He's an anti-labor, anti-public school "Democrat"

I'd NEVER vote for.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:06 AM

58. I'd vote for Rmoney before Rahm!

And that'll never happen....If the dems move on this? No good for Anyone will come of it! Period.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:14 AM

60. Can we make this the "official", rahm can go fuck himself, thread?

 

I would call him a shitstain or shitbag but I wouldn't want to offend those.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:23 AM

61. As previously said here --

this sounds like a vanity run and way to fundraise huge amounts of money that can then be "played" with a la the Colbert Super Pac.

With that said, if Rahm were anywhere near the Democratic presidental ticket it would guarantee a Green vote by me. There isn't a chance in hell I would cast a vote for the shit-stain fucker that did more to destroy the Democratic Party of my youth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skidmore (Original post)

Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:40 AM

62. Not sure if this asshole will get another term as mayor were not in love here in Chicago

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread