Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:28 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
Does anyone really think the Pope's resignation is about anything other than child abuse?Last edited Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:28 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I don't.
|
65 replies, 1777 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | OP | |
| NightWatcher | Feb 2013 | #1 | |
| Drale | Feb 2013 | #14 | |
| onehandle | Feb 2013 | #2 | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | #8 | |
| yellowcanine | Feb 2013 | #27 | |
| yellowcanine | Feb 2013 | #26 | |
| Jackpine Radical | Feb 2013 | #55 | |
| WinkyDink | Feb 2013 | #3 | |
| duffyduff | Feb 2013 | #4 | |
| JaneyVee | Feb 2013 | #9 | |
| yellowcanine | Feb 2013 | #30 | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | #19 | |
| SomethingFishy | Feb 2013 | #35 | |
| proud2BlibKansan | Feb 2013 | #22 | |
| backscatter712 | Feb 2013 | #41 | |
| Zoeisright | Feb 2013 | #42 | |
| morningfog | Feb 2013 | #62 | |
| proud2BlibKansan | Feb 2013 | #5 | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | #15 | |
| proud2BlibKansan | Feb 2013 | #49 | |
| el_bryanto | Feb 2013 | #6 | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | #12 | |
| el_bryanto | Feb 2013 | #17 | |
| OregonBlue | Feb 2013 | #7 | |
| we can do it | Feb 2013 | #10 | |
| randome | Feb 2013 | #11 | |
| HERVEPA | Feb 2013 | #29 | |
| randome | Feb 2013 | #13 | |
| Recursion | Feb 2013 | #16 | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | #24 | |
| yellowcanine | Feb 2013 | #31 | |
| lovuian | Feb 2013 | #18 | |
| Taverner | Feb 2013 | #20 | |
| MicaelS | Feb 2013 | #21 | |
| Cleita | Feb 2013 | #23 | |
| JVS | Feb 2013 | #25 | |
| yellowcanine | Feb 2013 | #32 | |
| JVS | Feb 2013 | #37 | |
| yellowcanine | Feb 2013 | #39 | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | #56 | |
| DonCoquixote | Feb 2013 | #28 | |
| cali | Feb 2013 | #33 | |
| morningfog | Feb 2013 | #63 | |
| niyad | Feb 2013 | #34 | |
| garybeck | Feb 2013 | #57 | |
| niyad | Feb 2013 | #60 | |
| Kalidurga | Feb 2013 | #36 | |
| librechik | Feb 2013 | #38 | |
| lynne | Feb 2013 | #40 | |
| backscatter712 | Feb 2013 | #45 | |
| LeftInTX | Feb 2013 | #43 | |
| backscatter712 | Feb 2013 | #44 | |
| Demo_Chris | Feb 2013 | #46 | |
| mainer | Feb 2013 | #47 | |
| LibertyLover | Feb 2013 | #48 | |
| LiberalAndProud | Feb 2013 | #50 | |
| southernyankeebelle | Feb 2013 | #51 | |
| hedgehog | Feb 2013 | #52 | |
| hrmjustin | Feb 2013 | #53 | |
| Zen Democrat | Feb 2013 | #54 | |
| kiva | Feb 2013 | #58 | |
| SmileyRose | Feb 2013 | #65 | |
| treestar | Feb 2013 | #59 | |
| Zoeisright | Feb 2013 | #61 | |
| SmileyRose | Feb 2013 | #64 |
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:29 PM
NightWatcher (20,421 posts)
1. He couldn't take another Lent without chocolate
|
And that pushed him over the edge?
|
Response to NightWatcher (Reply #1)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:36 PM
Drale (7,306 posts)
14. I personally think he's telling the truth
|
He's resigning because of the stress and old age. But the Stress is coming from the constant scandals, denial of rights and more and more people turning against the Church and the Pope. Its has to be stressful knowing you are helping to kill the Church which you have served most of your life.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:32 PM
onehandle (35,419 posts)
2. Those cases started long before him and will continue long after him. So, I don't. nt
Response to onehandle (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:34 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
8. it's not about when it started or ended. it's about personal involvement.
|
he was personally involved in the coverup.
|
Response to garybeck (Reply #8)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:48 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
27. Yes. See Cardinal Law in particular.
|
Only blindness induced by misplaced loyalty to the Catholic Church could prevent seeing the connection.
|
Response to onehandle (Reply #2)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:45 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
26. And many of the cases played out while Ratzinger was Prefect of the
|
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. As such he clearly had a role in providing the disgraced Cardinal Law with a cushy ceremonial position at the Vatican in 2004. There was even talk at the time of Ratzinger's elevation to Pope that it was a way to keep a lid on the Cardinal Law situation - as Pope it would be harder to raise questions about his role in the protection of Cardinal Law. So I do think there is a connection. Ratzinger is up to his neck in the pedophile scandal.
|
Response to yellowcanine (Reply #26)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 03:00 PM
Jackpine Radical (36,574 posts)
55. Probably not true: "Ratzinger is up to his neck in the pedophile scandal."
|
His involvement may not rise above his midsection.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:33 PM
WinkyDink (37,038 posts)
3. IF it is other than health, he must be getting pushed out, so watch who's NEXT.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:33 PM
duffyduff (974 posts)
4. Yeah. His health.
|
The RCC is a huge church; the child abuse scandals have NOTHING to do with this.
|
Response to duffyduff (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:34 PM
JaneyVee (3,809 posts)
9. Are you really sure? He is the Inquisition.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #9)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:56 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
30. Yep - he knew what was going on and played a DIRECT role in the Cardinal Law coverup.
|
There can be no question about that. Ratzinger basically whisked Law out of Boston and gave him sanctuary in the Vatican as a way of putting him beyond the reach of U.S. prosecutors and victims seeking answers.
|
Response to duffyduff (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:37 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
19. other popes have been a lot more sick and frail than this and they stayed on until the end. n/t
Response to garybeck (Reply #19)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:13 PM
SomethingFishy (2,054 posts)
35. Yup.. The last Pope was barely coherent at most of his final appearances..
|
Something else going on here.
|
Response to duffyduff (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:40 PM
proud2BlibKansan (96,374 posts)
22. He was the point person in Rome in charge of this
|
before he became pope.
I think there has to be a connection between the pedophile scandal and his resignation. Seems very obvious to me. |
Response to duffyduff (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:59 PM
backscatter712 (19,815 posts)
41. LOL! Popes have stayed in office through illness and died in the saddle for centuries.
|
John Paul II was the classic example - he was ailing for years, spend more of his final days in the hospital than not, and died of an extended illness in office.
Maladict's the first pope to resign in centuries. Though I'm wondering if the real reason for his resignation is actually the financial scandal - he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar. That would be a dark and depressing statement about the Roman Catholic Church and society in general - that while the church's systemic problems with priests RAPING CHILDREN wasn't enough to unseat him (even though Maladict himself was complicit in the Church's efforts to cover for these pedophile priests), messing with the money was. |
Response to duffyduff (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:00 PM
Zoeisright (7,823 posts)
42. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!
|
And unicorns are playing in your back yard, right?
|
Response to duffyduff (Reply #4)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:46 PM
morningfog (4,145 posts)
62. Riiiiight. Bucking 600 years of history has nothing to do with pedophile cover ups.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:33 PM
proud2BlibKansan (96,374 posts)
5. No doubt in my mind.
|
I was shocked when he was named pope.
|
Response to proud2BlibKansan (Reply #5)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:36 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
15. do you think that perhaps
|
he was named pope in part because so many people owed him favors for his participation in covering up child abuse?
|
Response to garybeck (Reply #15)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:30 PM
proud2BlibKansan (96,374 posts)
49. I don't know.
|
I suppose that's a possibility.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:34 PM
el_bryanto (3,692 posts)
6. He could just be old.
|
But if it happens one figures there will be a big story in the next few months.
Bryant |
Response to el_bryanto (Reply #6)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:35 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
12. every other pope since the 1400's has been "old" and didn't resign.
|
n/t
|
Response to garybeck (Reply #12)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:37 PM
el_bryanto (3,692 posts)
17. I'm just saying I don't think the existence of the scandal is enough for him to retire
|
The scandal has been around a few years now. I think . . . maybe there's a story coming out.
Bryant |
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:34 PM
OregonBlue (4,026 posts)
7. I read somewhere last Friday that the latest investigation includes the Pope. He was aware of the
|
problems and complicit in moving priests rather than defrocking them.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:34 PM
we can do it (4,657 posts)
10. I don't either poop dracula is just plain creepy.
|
I wouldn't be surprised if he was guilty of child molestation as well.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:35 PM
randome (12,646 posts)
11. He's resigning to spend more time with his family.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:36 PM
randome (12,646 posts)
13. He's resigning to run as chairman of the Tea Party.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:36 PM
Recursion (25,495 posts)
16. Yes. I don't think there's any evidence the See is terribly concerned about that
|
I think he's getting sick.
|
Response to Recursion (Reply #16)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:41 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
24. Popes don't normally resign because they're "getting sick."
|
if you don't see evidence that the pope is concerned, look around some more. there are lawsuits all over the place. he's been specifically named in several of them.
|
Response to Recursion (Reply #16)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:00 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
31. First Pope to resign since the 1400s. It is not because he is sick.
|
Popes serve until they die. It has generally been a lifetime appointment. They don't resign unless there is pressure coming from somewhere for them to resign.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:37 PM
lovuian (18,363 posts)
18. I think it is about Money laundering too
|
and the Vatican Bank
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:39 PM
Taverner (53,277 posts)
20. I usually don't side with the Pope, but I think he retired for the reasons he said
|
At his age, I don't blame him
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:39 PM
MicaelS (4,386 posts)
21. "Anything other"? Yes, I do.
|
I think the man is gravely ill. Child abuse might be part of it, but I wouldn't be surprised to find out he has a terminal illness, or maybe he has been diagnosed with Alzheimers.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:40 PM
Cleita (64,490 posts)
23. I think he's getting pushed out.
|
It's either leave or get killed. I do believe that Popes get assassinated when they make the rest of the clergy look bad, and the pedophile scandal really makes them look bad.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:44 PM
JVS (60,525 posts)
25. I do. He is ill and they cannot afford another long term feeble pope like JPII who did nothing to..
|
address problems like the child abuse scandal. I think that he is hoping to prevent the papacy from being in a Brezhnev-Andropov-Chernenko type leadership problem.
|
Response to JVS (Reply #25)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:03 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
32. JPII did nothing to address the pedophile scandal because Ratzinger was actively directing the
|
coverup. His elevation to Pope was compensation for services rendered. I truly believe that.
|
Response to yellowcanine (Reply #32)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:34 PM
JVS (60,525 posts)
37. Are you saying JPII knew nothing from 1979 to 2005?
|
Because if you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.
|
Response to JVS (Reply #37)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:40 PM
yellowcanine (24,444 posts)
39. Not what I said. Look again. NT
Response to yellowcanine (Reply #32)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 06:59 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
56. I agree Ratzinger was elevated for his services of covering up. n't
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 12:48 PM
DonCoquixote (5,630 posts)
28. Hell no
|
The fact is, Johann Ratzinberger was named and documented as one of the people who personally protected pederasts.There is a great documentary making the rounds in HBO "mea maxima Culpa" that speels it out in clear detail.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:06 PM
cali (80,172 posts)
33. There are other plausible possibilities: Alzheimer's, for instance.
|
He's 85 years old.
|
Response to cali (Reply #33)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:47 PM
morningfog (4,145 posts)
63. Never stopped any other geriatric popes. Not for 600 years.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:10 PM
niyad (24,111 posts)
34. certainly his resignation right after the release of that 12,000 page report is interesting.
Response to niyad (Reply #34)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 07:00 PM
garybeck (8,765 posts)
57. got a link to that report? certainly not a coincidence. n/t
Response to garybeck (Reply #57)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:42 PM
niyad (24,111 posts)
60. google "12,000 page report on church pedophilia scandal"
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:19 PM
Kalidurga (4,820 posts)
36. If they say it's not about the child abuse...
|
It's about the child abuse.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:37 PM
librechik (25,001 posts)
38. he's resigning to spend more time with
|
his altar boys
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 01:43 PM
lynne (2,954 posts)
40. Don't think child abuse has anything to do with it -
|
- as that was going on long before he became Pope. I think it has to do with his age and health. Can't be an easy job and kudo's to him for breaking with tradition and standing down when he knows he can no longer do the job.
|
Response to lynne (Reply #40)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:04 PM
backscatter712 (19,815 posts)
45. He wasn't up to dying in the saddle like all of his predecessors for centuries?
|
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:02 PM
LeftInTX (2,212 posts)
43. Why is he resigning during Lent?
|
Health problems can wait till after Easter.....
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:04 PM
backscatter712 (19,815 posts)
44. It may have been the financial scandal, not the child-molestation scandal.
|
My theory would be a dark and depressing statement about the Church and society in general.
Maladict might have gotten away with covering for priests that were raping children... ...but when he was caught stealing or defrauding money from powerful people and organizations, that did him in. |
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:20 PM
Demo_Chris (2,352 posts)
46. Abuse scandal of some kind
|
I think they know something involving this jackal is about to go public and they don't want it to be the current Pope that's named.
Just a guess of course. |
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:25 PM
mainer (6,650 posts)
47. Is the timing related to THIS?
|
This documentary has JUST premiered on HBO, and it pretty much points the finger at Ratzinger as being directly involved with suppressing all info about priests abusing children. The timing is interesting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mea_Maxima_Culpa:_Silence_in_the_House_of_God |
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:27 PM
LibertyLover (4,127 posts)
48. While I think the child abuse scandal is part
|
of the reason, it is not, in my opinion, the only reason. Popes have survived scandals before and, the Prophecy of St. Malachi not withstanding, popes in the future will survive them as well. Nor do I think that Ratty Boy feels much institutional or personal remorse over the pedophile priests. However, the brouhaha that has resulted from the abuse and the Church's response to it has caused a great deal of stress among the ranks, including Benny. Given his age and his obviously indifferent state of health, I think he is telling the truth - that physically he is no longer up to the demands of the job.
Several posters have said that basically being pope is for life. In the past, I would have agreed with them and been somewhat shocked by this news. However, the demands of the papacy in the late 20th and now the 21st centuries have increased to the point to where the shoes of the fisherman require a younger, more able bodied successor to St. Peter. By way of example, for popes prior to Paul VI, travel did not mean jetting all over the world. Prior to Paul, papal travel meant staying in Europe. Sure Pius XII visited London in 1908 and was papal nuncio in Germany during the 20s, but even so, traveling was different and going by train or ship was slower, with less wear and tear on the body. Heck, it wasn't until Paul VI that a pope visited the US. Papal travel these days means long trips overseas with lots of hours on airplanes, and no matter how well-appointed the plane is, that type of travel takes a toll and the older the traveler is, the higher that toll is. Having said all that, I also suspect that there are major health issues involved - possibly dementia or Alzheimer's - and neither Benny nor the Church officials want an aged and senile pope being photographed, filmed or recorded. They remember only too well J2P2's last days, which were not pretty. |
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:30 PM
LiberalAndProud (9,899 posts)
50. I do think it is about something else.
|
Maybe the timing is just coincidental. If the pope did not know about Tedeschi's shady dealings, perhaps he should have.
http://www.gazzettadelsud.it/news/english/32836/Rome-prosecutors-open-probe-into-MPS-financial-scandal.htm
Rome, January 31 - Rome prosecutors said Thursday that they have opened a probe into the financial scandal at troubled Italian bank Monte dei Paschi di Siena (MPS). ... MPS was thrown in crisis last week when it emerged that a shady series of derivative and structured finance deals produced losses of 720 million euros. ... The former head of the Vatican bank, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, was questioned on Thursday by prosecutors investigating suspect operations at MPS. The prosecutors wanted to talk to Gotti Tedeschi about MPS's nine-billion-euro acquisition of Antonveneta in 2008 from Spanish bank Santander. Gotti Tedeschi was in charge of Santander's operations in Italy before becoming president of the Vatican Bank, the Institute for Religious Works (IOR), in 2009. The IOR's board ousted him from that post last year. |
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:33 PM
southernyankeebelle (10,692 posts)
51. Funny you should say that because that is what I thought.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:40 PM
hedgehog (30,400 posts)
52. I think there is a huge amount of behind the scene plotting and
|
intrigue involved with this. I don't think the child abuse scandals is even on the radar with this one.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:48 PM
hrmjustin (9,026 posts)
53. I think it was his age, because the Vatican does not care what people think of the scandal.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 02:53 PM
Zen Democrat (4,595 posts)
54. I wonder if this has something to do with the Pope's butler releasing documents.
|
Otherwise, it has to be the coverup of pedophiles in the church. For the reasons given - old age and ill health - it's simply not believable.
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 08:31 PM
kiva (2,759 posts)
58. Personally I think he was nothing but a placeholder.
|
John Paul II was an immensely popular pope and none of the major contenders looked anywhere near as beloved by Catholics. So put in Benedict for a few years - he was one of the oldest popes to take office, so even if he didn't resign he'd be gone soon; besides, Benedict is/was such an ass that whoever follows him will be popular just by comparison.
So, Benedict got to be pope; the College of Cardinals got to pick another pope, which has got to be pretty exciting; and people will be happy with Pope NotBenedict...win/win. |
Response to kiva (Reply #58)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:54 PM
SmileyRose (4,852 posts)
65. very good point
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:00 PM
treestar (40,459 posts)
59. Why?
|
Is there anyone who would possibly obtain the position of Pope who you would consider innocent in that matter?
|
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:44 PM
Zoeisright (7,823 posts)
61. Nope. Not even a little bit.
Response to garybeck (Original post)
Mon Feb 11, 2013, 09:52 PM
SmileyRose (4,852 posts)
64. I think it's about money.
|
Donations dropped like a rock when they put pope pedophile in. Plus whispers of shenanigans in the Vatican money wise started day 1. He's being forced out. We'll know by whom when they pick the next one.
|

