HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Grover Norquist: impeach ...

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:18 PM

View profile

 

Grover Norquist: impeach President Obama if he doesn't extend tax cuts for the rich

Norquist Looks Ahead

By Ed Kilgore

As screwed up as things are in Congress right now, it’s natural that nobody much wants to contemplate how much more screwed up things might be after the November elections unless one party or the other emerges with united control and something of a mandate. So it was interesting to read an interview Nancy Cook of National Journal conducted with everybody’s favorite right-wing commissar, power-broker and demagogue, Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform, about post-election scenarios:

NORQUIST: If the Republicans have the House, Senate, and the presidency, I’m told that they could do an early budget vote—a reconciliation vote where you extend the Bush tax cuts out for a decade or five years…. then they pass the (Paul) Ryan plan (on Medicare).

NJ: What if the Democrats still have control? What’s your scenario then?

NORQUIST: Obama can sit there and let all the tax (cuts) lapse, and then the Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach.

Yes, “impeach.”

Now you have to appreciate that Grover is probably feeling a little long in the tooth lately, and perhaps impatient. With all the back-and-forth over who said and did what during the administration of St. Ronald Reagan, it’s bound to make him think back to his salad days in the early 1980s, when he as swaggering around Washington with a bumper sticker on his briefcase that read “I’d rather be killing commies,” an allusion to his pastime of hanging out with “freedom fighters” being backed by South Africa’s apartheid regime. Or perhaps he’s fondly remembering the later period when he was famous for harassing state legislatures and city councils to name things after Reagan.

Some of Grover’s more recent projects haven’t gone so well, most notably his effort to turn Muslim-Americans into a pro-Republican voting bloc (viz. the recent candidate debate in Florida, when a question from a Palestinian-American voter launched several of the would-be presidents into a lather of Muslim-bashing).

- more -

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_01/norquist_looks_ahead035063.php



Here's the actual title of the National Journal piece:

    Impeach Obama?
    Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion if President Obama wins reelection and doesn’t extend the Bush tax cuts.


41 replies, 1612 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 41 replies Author Time Post
Reply Grover Norquist: impeach President Obama if he doesn't extend tax cuts for the rich (Original post)
ProSense Jan 28 OP
stopbush Jan 28 #1
FreakinDJ Jan 28 #2
abelenkpe Jan 28 #3
edhopper Jan 28 #12
abelenkpe Jan 28 #30
malaise Jan 28 #4
tabatha Jan 28 #15
RC Jan 28 #34
onenote Jan 28 #35
TheMastersNemesis Jan 28 #5
tabatha Jan 28 #6
newspeak Jan 28 #32
MadHound Jan 28 #7
tabatha Jan 28 #16
MadHound Jan 28 #17
BumRushDaShow Jan 28 #19
MadHound Jan 28 #24
BumRushDaShow Jan 28 #28
hobbit709 Jan 28 #38
Dragonfli Jan 28 #39
Dragonfli Jan 28 #40
BootinUp Jan 28 #41
paulk Jan 28 #26
Arkana Jan 28 #27
SammyWinstonJack Jan 28 #8
Bohunk68 Jan 28 #9
HopeHoops Jan 28 #10
Beaverhausen Jan 28 #11
Guy Whitey Corngood Jan 28 #13
Paladin Jan 28 #14
Zorra Jan 28 #18
barbtries Jan 28 #20
nobodyspecial Jan 28 #21
opihimoimoi Jan 28 #22
mmonk Jan 28 #23
Buns_of_Fire Jan 28 #25
sarcasmo Jan 28 #29
yurbud Jan 28 #31
julian09 Jan 28 #33
Ship of Fools Jan 28 #36
Rex Jan 28 #37

Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:22 PM

1. Norquist's influence is shrinking down enough to a size where it may soon drown in a bathtub.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:25 PM

2. Grover Norquist: from the mouth of an Iran's Lobbyist

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:26 PM

3. Does he really think that would go over well with voters

View profile

given that polling suggests between 70-80 percent of all Americans favor increasing taxes on the rich?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to abelenkpe (Reply #3)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:40 PM

12. Do you really think

View profile

he gives a shit?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to edhopper (Reply #12)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:01 PM

30. LOL! no

View profile

But I do think the reps he would need to pursue impeaching the president might.

Ask congress to impeach the president because he refuses to continue coddling the 1% while the rest suffer? Suicide if one wants to be re-elected.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:26 PM

4. Grover should have been tried for treason ages ago

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #4)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:52 PM

15. Yes, making congress people sign pledges for what HE wants

View profile

and to go against the electorate, is treason.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabatha (Reply #15)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:20 PM

34. His pledge also goes the Pledge of Office everyone in Congress took.

View profile

How is that not treason?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabatha (Reply #15)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:33 PM

35. You might want to get a copy of the Constitution

View profile

Norquist is a doofus but what he does isn't "treason" as that term is narrowly defined in the US Constitution. Indeed, its not even illegal.

Its just bad policy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:29 PM

5. Heal Thyself

View profile

If Norquist ever got sick, he should NOT receive any healthcare. Since he believes that everyone should take care of himself. He has been responsible for the deaths a lot of Americans. He is complete GOP scum.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:29 PM

6. "Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion if President Obama wins reelection and doesn’t extend.."

View profile

In his dreams.

By whom?

The vast majority of the electorate wants the rich to pay their fair share.

But to Norquist, the electorate and democracy do not matter.

POS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabatha (Reply #6)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:52 PM

32. no, the only electorate norquist believes exists

View profile

are the wealthy and corporations. Reagan lowered taxes and then had to raise them twice; however, he still caused a massive deficit. The rich do not create jobs; unless they get mega bucks for it. So, most jobs are going to countries that love slave labor and little regulations. They can keep repeating the shite like a mantra, it's still a fabrication.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:33 PM

7. Don't worry Grover, Obama's got this covered

View profile

There will be some sort of kabuki theater, some sort of "hostage"situation, and then in the name of bipartisanship, Obama will again preemptively cave and extend tax cuts for the rich for years longer.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MadHound (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:52 PM

16. No, he will not.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabatha (Reply #16)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:54 PM

17. Really?

View profile

That's exactly what he did last time. What makes you think anything, any damn thing, will be different the next time around?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MadHound (Reply #17)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:07 PM

19. So you are allied with Norquist?

View profile

Answer = yes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #19)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:29 PM

24. Why do you think that I'm allied with Norquist?

View profile

Because I point out the fact that Obama has already extended the tax cuts for the rich, and based on that fact it is likely he will extend them again.

Sorry that reality is such a disappointment for you, but it is reality nevertheless. Unless you can point out to me where Obama didn't extend the tax cuts for the wealthy

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MadHound (Reply #24)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:50 PM

28. You're problem

View profile

is citing skewed "assumptions" as fact. That is the sort of thing that Faux Snooze does.

Too many here on DU were adamant that DADT would not be repealed based on their "assumptions-as-fact", yet here we are today without it.

Sorry but the misery squad has become irrelevant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #28)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:02 PM

38. And what does DADT have to do with extending the tax cuts?

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hobbit709 (Reply #38)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:18 PM

39. Nothing, I think the poster is a Norquist ally that wants those taxes to stay low!!

View profile

Why else would the poster try to divert discussion away from the ever continuing tax cuts that were voted for by conservatives in Dem clothing as well as the "honest about what they are" Republicans.

The extensions were also signed By a Democratic (at least party affiliation wise if not Progressive policy wise) President.

I just learned that calling a long time progressive on this board a "Norquist ally", even when it is obviously being leveled against a DUer that is rabidly anti-Bush/Obama tax cuts by one that sees the continued tax cuts as something that was good or at least something we must not rally against.

Ass backwards accusation, reeks of projection by the pro tax cut poster calling people names.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #28)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:20 PM

40. Extending the Bush/Obama tax cuts was no assumption, it actually happened. Read a paper some time nt

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #28)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:25 PM

41. misery squad?

View profile

lol.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MadHound (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:47 PM

26. I don't know

View profile

I think there's been enough pressure that Obama is, at least, starting to change his rhetoric on this. I'm not convinced it's all theater.

The proof, as they say, is in the pudding, however, and Obama's past actions don't lead one toward hope.

Hope is all I have, though, so I need to hang on to it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MadHound (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:48 PM

27. He didn't do it for nothing.

View profile

He did it so that millions of unemployed people could continue receiving the help they need.

He made the best of a really shitty situation, and I have to tell you--your denigration of him says a lot more about you than it does about him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:33 PM

8. What a rotten thing he is.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:36 PM

9. Calling all Teanderthals!!!

View profile

I've got an idea if you want to exercise your 2nd amendment rights against treasonous bastards who hate the Constitution.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:37 PM

10. Grover - There's a tiny little orifice I would invite you to lick, but I don't want your germs.

View profile

What an idiot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:38 PM

11. Impeach him for what?

View profile

Seriously why the hell does anyoneistem to this guy?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:40 PM

13. Blow me, you sack of shit. nt

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:43 PM

14. Impeachment? Hold Your Breath, Norquist..... (n/t)

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:58 PM

18. Thanks. What a hoot! "Grover Norquist predicts a rebellion

View profile

if President Obama wins reelection and doesn’t extend the Bush tax cuts."!1!1!


Who's gonna rebel? It sure won't be the 99%.

And if it ain't the 99%, that leaves

1%.

Good luck with that, Grover...does the name Custer mean anything to you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:11 PM

20. i'm somewhat surprised

View profile

that the republicans haven't tried to impeach him yet. they'll do that for political reasons as proven by history

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:12 PM

21. I didn't realize not bowing to the wants of the 1%

View profile

were sufficient grounds for impeachment.

And newsflash Norquist, the rebellion happens if those tax cuts are extended. Millions should not be made to suffer just so multimillionaires and billionaires can amass more money than they could possibly spend in a lifetime.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:13 PM

22. The dude needs to STFU and crawl back under from which he came...he is so over it

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:25 PM

23. Posted this on my Facebook page with my usual derisive comments.

View profile

Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:45 PM

25. Little furry Grover is sounding a bit shrill, isn't he?

View profile

That tends to happen when people like him realize that people aren't marching to their tune anymore. Yeah, Grover, I'm real afraid of the 1% "rebelling" -- I'm shaking all over. What're they going to do -- leave the country? "Go Galt" on us? Big deal. What are they going to do to the country that they haven't already done?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:58 PM

29. Grover you sound like a mouth piece for the 1%.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:41 PM

31. this is why we need polls back: to vote on whether this is more frivolous than Clinton impeachment

View profile

It's ironic that like the filibuster, Republicans use impeachment when it's entirely inappropriate and Democrats won't use either when it's essential to protect our democracy and stop ongoing crimes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:19 PM

33. The law was to sunset after ten years congress extended it two years. nt

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:50 PM

36. Barack Obama: Impale Grover Norquist if he doesn't sit down and STFU.

View profile

An unofficial, unelected fuckwad nobody. How I'd like to take the Roves, Palins, and Norquists of the
world and bang their empty little heads together.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:54 PM

37. Grover Norquist is a piece of crap.

View profile

Any more questions?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread