Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,963 posts)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:55 PM Jan 2012

Welfare Drug Testing Bill Withdrawn After Amended To Include Testing Lawmakers

Welfare Drug Testing Bill Withdrawn After Amended To Include Testing Lawmakers

A Republican member of the Indiana General Assembly withdrew his bill to create a pilot program for drug testing welfare applicants Friday after one of his Democratic colleagues amended the measure to require drug testing for lawmakers.

"There was an amendment offered today that required drug testing for legislators as well and it passed, which led me to have to then withdraw the bill," said Rep. Jud McMillin (R-Brookville), sponsor of the original welfare drug testing bill.

The Supreme Court ruled drug testing for political candidates unconstitutional in 1997, striking down a Georgia law. McMillin said he withdrew his bill so he could reintroduce it on Monday with a lawmaker drug testing provision that would pass constitutional muster.

"I've only withdrawn it temporarily," he told HuffPost, stressing he carefully crafted his original bill so that it could survive a legal challenge. Last year a federal judge, citing the Constitution's ban on unreasonable search and seizure, struck down a Florida law that required blanket drug testing of everyone who applied for welfare.

more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/welfare-drug-testing-bill_n_1237333.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Welfare Drug Testing Bill Withdrawn After Amended To Include Testing Lawmakers (Original Post) kpete Jan 2012 OP
Man I love Google. This smarmbucket is just exposed raw re: his own little sins and brushes w/the CurtEastPoint Jan 2012 #1
Good grief! What a PIG this guy is. TheDebbieDee Jan 2012 #7
If it's unconstitutional to drug test political candidates then think Jan 2012 #2
Good question. n/t ProSense Jan 2012 #3
Since when does a bill's constitutionality or lack thereof matter to Republicans? LonePirate Jan 2012 #4
The answer is quite simple etherealtruth Jan 2012 #5
Yeah, that would fuck things up. People in the six figure zone should be allowed to do drugs. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #6
They ought to be REQUIRED to do pot. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #8
Yeah, gym sock weed. Not the good stuff. HopeHoops Jan 2012 #9
I love this story. woo me with science Jan 2012 #10
HAHAHaHaHaaa Quantess Jan 2012 #11
 

think

(11,641 posts)
2. If it's unconstitutional to drug test political candidates then
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:00 PM
Jan 2012

why would it be constitutional to drug test welfare recipients?

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
4. Since when does a bill's constitutionality or lack thereof matter to Republicans?
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:04 PM
Jan 2012

They only make that argument for Democratic sponsored and passed bills.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
5. The answer is quite simple
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:05 PM
Jan 2012

Most political candidates are middle class (I despise class terms but for the sake of expediency...) or UMC ... the poor do not deserve the same rights as the rest of us ... or so I've heard.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Welfare Drug Testing Bill...