General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCurious About Current Events... Are You... FOR Or AGAINST The Death Penalty ???
Seen polls here before... and definitely before the Drone White Paper story broke.
So I wonder where DU stands now.
20 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes... I am Pro- Death Penalty. | |
3 (15%) |
|
No... I am AGAINST the Death Penalty. | |
16 (80%) |
|
Obligitory Other. | |
1 (5%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
bayareamike
(602 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Loudly
(2,436 posts)to a length of rope and a sturdy overhanging pipe or beam.
Every incarcerated person needs to be offered an opt-out consisting of those elements.
Embrace it. It's entirely just, humane, and capable of garnering popular and political support.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Of course there is a tough criteria that must be met first but I'm firmly in favor.
Cases like the Aurora movie shooter and the asshole that shot Gabby Giffords are no-brainers. Those scummers should have been hanged the day after. Other cases are obviously more difficult.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)WOW.... just, wow.
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)Some of you guys just love to jump the gun. They'd get a trial, it would just be over in ten minutes. There is no question of their guilt, there is no defending their actions. Open and shut cases don't really require much time or money.
I never said they wouldn't get a trial.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)What more should there be than that?
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)what could be fairer than that?
MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)When there is no doubt about the facts of the case, it's merely a formality. It's best for all involved that it come to a swift conclusion.
Permanut
(5,602 posts)subsequent to development of DNA evidence. The system is not good enough except in rare cases.
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/28/nation/la-na-nn-louisiana-death-row-released-20120928
djg21
(1,803 posts)one can commit a crime so heinous that it warrants a death penalty, but so long as we have an imperfect justice system and there is even a remote possibility of an innocent person being wrongfully convicted, we should not have a death penalty.
For this reason alone I am opposed to the death penalty.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)I always have trouble with this question. I can't answer yes or no. Too many variables....then I say if there are too many variables then I have to say no, I'm against it.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)more with life without parole. Every day they will have to face people...even the other prisoners...who know of their heinous acts.
And sane or insane...legally it's pretty much a guessing game. But morally, anyone who can do these things is doubtless insane, at least at the time.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)Justitia
(9,316 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I guess I worked in the legal biz too long...
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Apophis
(1,407 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)The same holds true for the state, for that matter the state with all its' knowledge, experience and resources should have a higher threshold of conscious awareness and responsibility.
Some people may deserve to be executed, but no doubt innocent people will be and have been executed as well, you can't have one without the other and one innocent person executed is one too many.
Thanks for the thread, WillyT.
mnmoderatedem
(3,724 posts)too many have been exonerated after being sent to death row. And one wrongfully convicted death row inmate is one too many.
Invariably, death penalty supporters, usually republicans, will use a particularily heinous crime to jump on their soapbox. They never have an answer to what happens to the wrongfully convicted, except for rather tacitly claiming a certain percentage of error is acceptable for the greater good.