HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Obama Tells Dem Caucus He...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 04:28 PM

Obama Tells Dem Caucus He's Still Chasing The Grand Bargain

Source: Crooks and Liars

Here we go again with Captain Obama's search for the Great Grand Bargain. Hopefully, Democrats in the House and Senate are smart enough to know that we're coming for every single Democrat who votes to cut Social Security and Medicare, because as predicted, the president hasn't given up:

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama told congressional Democrats on Thursday he is willing to agree to a "big deal" with Congress on spending cuts and tax reforms to end the fiscal uncertainty over the U.S. deficit, but insisted that new revenues be part of the package.

"I am prepared, eager and anxious to do a big deal, a big package, that ends this governance by crisis where every two weeks, or every two months, or every six months, we are threatening this hard-won recovery," Obama told House of Representatives Democrats attending a three-day retreat.


I don't even think the president believes what he says anymore, because his rationale for the Grand Bargain keeps changing. He wants his Social Security and Medicare cuts, and he will always find a reason he can use to justify it. Remember, he's been talking about this since before he was elected. Don't believe any of it.

More

8 replies, 714 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Obama Tells Dem Caucus He's Still Chasing The Grand Bargain (Original post)
Unknown Beatle Feb 2013 OP
msongs Feb 2013 #1
monmouth3 Feb 2013 #2
bahrbearian Feb 2013 #8
forestpath Feb 2013 #3
GeorgeGist Feb 2013 #4
GeorgeGist Feb 2013 #5
nashville_brook Feb 2013 #6
amandabeech Feb 2013 #7

Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 05:08 PM

1. republician-lite takes flight yet again lol nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 05:27 PM

2. I specifically heard him say the cuts would NOT be on the backs of seniors, so I'm pretty sure SS

is off the table..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to monmouth3 (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 11:03 PM

8. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 05:28 PM

3. His idea of "balanced" is seniors on SS hugry and living in poverty while the rich are still rich.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 06:18 PM

4. It was last seen ...

leaving Vegas heading north.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 06:21 PM

5. The mans profundity ...

never ceases to bore me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 06:43 PM

6. there's actually some dems willing to sign on to this.

it's important to let them know how you feel about that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Unknown Beatle (Original post)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 07:52 PM

7. It seems as though our President has learned nothing about Repuglicans

and cares absolutely nothing about anybody who doesn't have a bunch of money.

Mr. President, older workers have really been hurt in the last few years. We get laid off or we take time to attend to our own sick parents and then we can't get back into the workforce at anything approaching what we were making before.

We have little to no time left for the JOBS portion of the economy to rebound everywhere other than whatever misleading statistics your aides are feeding you.

And the younger folks have little, too.

Why not increase the amount of income subject to the SS tax so that the percentage of income taxed meets (and a little more for catchup) what was expected instead of inevitable cut in benefits for folks who have lost so much?

Why not more of a surtax on the wealthy? It means so little to them and will mean so much to us.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread