General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStudy debunks notion that men and women are psychologically distinct
Analyzing 122 different characteristics from 13,301 individuals in 13 studies, the researchers concluded that differences between men and women were best seen as dimensional rather than categorical. In other words, the differences between men and women should be viewed as a matter of degree rather than a sign of consistent differences between two distinct groups.
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1zmVE)
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Because men are not psychologically equipped to appreciate the outcome of this study.
ashling
(25,771 posts)That's why I posted it
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Starting early today are we?
I gotta couple of slow pitches right over the plate all over this place.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)people hold onto these beliefs because it works for them. regardless of facts and evidence.
Orrex
(63,088 posts)Because, you know, you're one of them psychologically different wimmin.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and actually see the reactions instead of people answering a questionairre in the 80's as gender was expected to answer proves otherwise. not to mention reality.
It is considered an almost forgone conclusion across research disciplines, among pop psychologists of all stripes, and in the general population that men are more visual than women when it comes to the way they get turned on. Men, were told, are visually aroused, whereas women just need a good sense of humor, and possibly a strong jaw, and they're on board.
This misguided, but pervasive belief can be linked to a host of other gender stereotypes which are further complicated by sexual politics and differences in social power. So arguments which should be challenged, such as the fact that men leer more than women do, that they objectify womens bodies more than women do mens bodies, and that they just cant stop watching porn, are explained as somehow being related to a mix of genetics, patriarchy, and simple mindedness.
*
As they hypothesized, the brainwave activity of participants was markedly different when viewing erotic images versus non-erotic images. But a finding they didnt expect was that female participants response was similar to men. In a prepared statement, lead author Andrey P. Anokhin explained:
The authors propose that previous findings from other studies which found men to have a stronger response to erotic images than women may have as much to do with research methods, as an actual response by men or women.
________________
and yes, since i did not fit the stereotypes women are given, i did challenge and have learned that it is bullshit. does that make me "psychologically different"? or just a person that does not buy into the conditioning and embraces who i am not meeting the criteria society places on me?
i also see how the men and boys in my life are not defined by the societal conditioning of males. i guess i can pretend it is not in my face, but the truth of it does not bother me.
Orrex
(63,088 posts)How does anyone still believe that Women Think One Way and Men Think Another Way?
Regardless of the mountains of data showing that we're all on a big psychological spectrum, the stratified Us-n-Them model doesn't even come anywhere near first-hand experience!
Baffling.
And retrograde.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)but, thank you for going further on this so i clearly understand what you are saying. i look around at everyone in my world and see the contradictions to this social conditioning. so it is baffling for me, also.
Orrex
(63,088 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...where you go when you die.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)dawg
(10,610 posts)It's actually only about 4 and a half.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)And John Hancock? That signature tells it all.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)leaders. That's how they justify telling women they have no place in the workforce or in combat. Women are only capable of having babies. Men are capable of anything especially making money and fighting wars because they are born leaders.
TM99
(8,352 posts)would disagree with this.
The key quote is this one: That is, there are not two distinct genders, but instead there are linear gradations of variables associated with sex, such as masculinity or intimacy, all of which are continuous.
In practice, we still must deal with this gradations of variables that can and are unique enough at times within social and relational contexts in order to constitute apparent differences. Physicality is still unique and requires unique solutions to any problems that may arise based upon gender. And dimensional rather than categorical differences in psychological functions still require unique solutions that address any problems as well.
So, I absolutely have no problem with this study. It confirms what I know from professional experience and still allows me to do my job working with both men and women in unique ways that benefit them both individually, relationally, and culturally.
Uncle Joe
(58,122 posts)Thanks for the thread, ashling.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)For instance, the different effects of testosterone and estrogen on the brain demands a different set of behavior. It makes males in most species more aggressive than females. So when the article states this:
That just isn't true or is highly misleading.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)There are no lines to be drawn between "races".
That said, is Muhammad Ali "black", yes. Is Kevin Bacon "white", yes. But apart from individuals whom one might casually characterize as being one "race" or another, there is no definition which will accurately categorize all individuals as one or the other.
It's an n-dimensional multivariate space which, at all points, is occupied by someone or another.
There are clusters in that space which, for a lot of individuals, you could make a casual characterization, but it breaks down the same way if you try to apply a categorization scheme which will assign all individuals to one cluster or the other.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Thank you for that.
Maybe I should try to read the study. I must have misunderstood the article to mean there are no behavioral differences between men and women.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)The popular belief that testosterone contributes to aggressive behavior in humans may be just that a belief according to a new study in the journal Nature. The paper suggests that the hormone may in fact lead to fair, and more altruistic, behavior in some situations, causing aggression only when people believe they are under its influence.
Authors of the new study theorize that the actual effects of testosterone, a hormone produced by the male testes and female ovaries that is linked to brain development and sexual behavior, may be somewhat neutral in nature, leading to what researchers call "status-seeking behavior." Under certain conditions, status-seeking could lead to increased aggression in prison populations, for instance, where studies have shown that inmates in high-security prisons have elevated levels of the hormone when fighting seems the only way to the top.
But in other situations, a surge of testosterone may prompt people to engage in more cooperative behavior. For the new study, researchers enrolled 121 women to play what economists call the "ultimate bargaining game": one participant is given a certain amount of money and instructed to offer a portion to another participant. The recipient of the offer gets to accept or reject. If the offer is rejected, neither participant gets any money. Before allowing the women to propose their offer, researchers gave them either a dose of testosterone or a placebo.
Read more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1946632,00.html#ixzz2K4Jybkx9
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/12/091208132241.htm
Tired of hormone as cultural myth, as shorthand for swagger and machismo, ferocity and obnoxiousness, the bearskin beneath the three-piece suit?
Do the ubiquitous references to "testosterone poisoning" and "testosterone shock," to "testosterone-fueled heavy metal" and 'testosterone-crazed oppressors" make you feel a bit, well, testy? Do you think it unfair to blame one lousy little chemical for war, dictatorships, crime, Genghis Khan, Gunga Din, Sly Stallone, the N.R.A., the N.F.L., Stormin' Norman Schwarzkopf and the tendency to interrupt in the middle of a sentence? Ready to give the so-called male hormone a break and retire all testosterone cliches with a single pound of Iron John's drum?
Retire away. As it turns out, testosterone may not be the dread "hormone of aggression" that researchers and the popular imagination have long had it. It may not be the substance that drives men to behave with quintessential guyness, to posture, push, yelp, belch, punch and play air-guitar. If anything, this most freighted of hormones may be a source of very different sensations: calmness, happiness and friendliness, for example.
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/20/us/does-testosterone-equal-aggression-maybe-not.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
3- Testosterone Causes Uncontrollable Violent Behavior
There is absolutely no reliable evidence that testosterone causes roid rage or any type of violent, aggressive or uncontrollable behavior. No violence, aggression or unpredictable behavior has been seen in studies where men were administered testosterone, even at extremely high doses. In fact, the opposite appears to be true; many men with low T describe being more irritable, or having a short fuse, and this often improves with normalization of testosterone levels. A recent patient treated with testosterone told me that his wife found him unbearable to be around before he was diagnosed with low T and subsequently treated; Im a nicer guy now, he said.
http://m.askmen.com/sports/health_200/222_mens_health.html
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)it's still a difference in behavior. The aggression from testosterone is exhibited in nearly all mammal species. Looks like mental gymnastics to avoid the obvious. Not sure how they'll politicize animal behavior and redefine animal aggression as "constructive inter-personality blah blah blah", but I know soon enough they will
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)honest, grounded.... or any of the other things testosterone attributes toward.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)The article states
That's obviously not true for the reasons I just gave. This just seems like an attempt to redefine how testosterone influences mammals to act, to use methods and language to avoid admitting there are differences.
If you believe differently, that's fine. We had studies that showed 8 glasses of water a day was good until we had studies showing it was bad. We had studies showing men get less sex if they do housework, and people got angry. In the argument about whether there exists behavioral differences differences between men and women, I'll just go with Mother Nature rather than continue to argue. Will probably turn into a shitstorm with lots of reported posts so
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and ya, backacha. hold on to your myths for your personal reasons.
sigmasix
(794 posts)This study serves to underline the fact that men can be feminists- heck men can even be leaders in the feminist movement- instead of morally inferior allies. The results of this study throws cold water on the sexist aspirations of extremists on the right and the left.
Poor right wing sexists and neofeminist sexists dont get to pretend that thier chosen bigotry and hatred towards the opposite sex is warranted. But, don't worry- I'm sure there's still enough sexist hatred from both sides to keep them warm at night.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)themselves feminists. what an hoot.
first, where are you seeing "neo feminist man-haters" and what exactly is that? secondly, the issue with men calling themselves feminist has nothing to do with our similarities as people, but the issue is about our experiences in life of patriarchy and male entitlement. which is all conditioning and has nothing to do with who we are as people. hence the terms entitlement and privilege.
lastly, this study really has absolutely nothing to do with your supposed argument on this thread and the discussion in the OP
sounding like an awful lot of hate in your post.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)"Although gender differences on average are not under dispute, the idea of consistently and inflexibly gender-typed individuals is,"