HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » WaPo: Ron Paul Signed Off...

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:49 AM

View profile

 

WaPo: Ron Paul Signed Off On Racist Newsletters

WaPo: Ron Paul Signed Off On Racist Newsletters

Associates of Ron Paul are claiming that the presidential candidate signed off on his controversial newsletters in the 1990s, the Washington Post reports:

But people close to Paul’s operations said he was deeply involved in the company that produced the newsletters, Ron Paul & Associates, and closely monitored its operations, signing off on articles and speaking to staff members virtually every day.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/4795


Breaking!



37 replies, 2601 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 37 replies Author Time Post
Reply WaPo: Ron Paul Signed Off On Racist Newsletters (Original post)
ProSense Jan 27 OP
Scuba Jan 27 #1
appal_jack Jan 27 #12
BumRushDaShow Jan 27 #2
karynnj Jan 27 #8
Nuclear Unicorn Jan 27 #3
Spazito Jan 27 #4
Tarheel_Dem Jan 27 #6
fishwax Jan 27 #7
Major Nikon Jan 27 #9
arcane1 Jan 27 #11
nxylas Jan 27 #16
NewJeffCT Jan 27 #13
rurallib Jan 27 #5
barbtries Jan 27 #10
Galraedia Jan 27 #19
barbtries Jan 27 #20
Galraedia Jan 27 #21
caseymoz Jan 28 #24
barbtries Jan 28 #26
bayareaboy Jan 27 #14
Botany Jan 27 #15
Galraedia Jan 27 #17
morningfog Jan 27 #18
abelenkpe Jan 27 #22
JHB Jan 27 #23
ellisonz Jan 28 #25
nxylas Jan 28 #27
ellisonz Jan 28 #29
FarLeftFist Jan 28 #34
ellisonz Jan 28 #36
Rex Jan 28 #28
nxylas Jan 28 #30
Rex Jan 28 #32
nxylas Jan 29 #37
BootinUp Jan 28 #31
ChadwickHenryWard Jan 28 #33
mdmc Jan 28 #35

Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:02 AM

1. Lying, racist, greedy shitstain.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scuba (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:38 PM

12. Yup. Add 'hypocrite' to that list.

View profile

Paul is campaigning to be the Nation's chief executive, yet he refuses to take responsibility for his actions as executive of a friggin' second-rate racist bullshit newsletter.

Fuck him, and his racist homophobic shuck & jive show.

-app

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:05 AM

2. Of course he did

View profile

Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:06 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Just like last night, blurted out amongst all the audience rancor, he outright called the Community Reinvestment Act - "Affirmative Action".

The fact is that this law, as originally intended, was supposed to increase lending in under-served or un-served communities. By not offering equal opportunity, you ignore the fact that you are telling people without bootstraps to pull themselves up by their bootstraps. But the other fact is that this law was corrupted by greedy repukes like Phil Gramm (through Gramm-Bliley-Leach) to use the authority to create a junk investment "product" that milked communities dry and made money off of them.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:26 AM

8. Even so, the loans given under the CRA did not have a greater failure rate

View profile

Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:38 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

- they had a LOWER failure rate.

Here is an excellent explanation - http://www.johnkerry.com/blog/entry/community_reinvestment_act_loans_were_good_investments/

The Republicans, always trying to make any problem benefit their agenda have created a mythology that blames the meltdown on Freddie and Fannie and the community reinvestment Act. In fact, the repeal of Glass/Stegall (thanks Senator Gramm), the non regulation of derivatives and credit swaps (thanks Senator Gramm) and the change in the leverage rate in early 2004 from 1:12 to 1:44 all had more to do with creating the bubble.

It is true that risky loans made it more likely that the house of cards would fall, but a steep recession could have led to the same meltdown as it could have led to same combination of foreclosures and steeply declining house values. They were betting on the combination of the rates being high enough, the percent of houses defaulting being low enough, and the remaining value in the house that the bank got being high enough that there would be a continuing positive income stream. I am sure the mathematicians in the Financial communities simulated the result varying these factors - and probably other factors that I can't think of. If the value of homes did not rapidly fall, this does not seem to fall apart - but home prices fell everywhere.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:07 AM

3. As with Herman Cain it's taking on a

View profile

"none so blind as those who won't see" aire.

Paul needs to resign from public life entirely and shame on the GOP if they don't throw him out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:08 AM

4. Anyone who actually believed he didn't sign off on those letters...

View profile

is naive, to say the least, imo. Ron Paul is a racist, homophobic, antisemitic, misogynistic POS.

Fuck Ron Paul.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:22 AM

6. "Fuck Ron Paul."

View profile

This should be a bumpersticker. And I would add, "his supporters too".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:23 AM

7. yeah, it's laughable

View profile

His name is in the title and all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:35 AM

9. He would be an even bigger shitstain if he didn't sign off on them

View profile

Those newsletters contained his name in the title, contained his signature, and were promoted by him.

If he didn't endorse those newsletters and weren't aware of their content, that means he's a monumental idiot who lent his name and reputation to bigots. How this is somehow better than him actually endorsing those newsletters is beyond my understanding.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Major Nikon (Reply #9)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:15 PM

11. Thank you! I could not have said it better!

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Major Nikon (Reply #9)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:32 PM

16. That's why the lying was so counterproductive

View profile

The most sensible option would be to say "Yes I wrote those things, but they were 20 or 30 years ago and I no longer believe what I wrote back then". I'm not saying that's the truth, but it would have made him look less of an idiot.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spazito (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:32 PM

13. but, he's against the war, so it's all good

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:19 AM

5. Sur-Prise!

View profile

not

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:47 AM

10. of course he did.

View profile

they went out under his name. there was someone who didn't believe that? jeez.

the republican slate is a fucking JOKE.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to barbtries (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:30 PM

19. You haven't met too many Paulbots have you?

View profile

The willful ignorance of the Ron Paul supporter is more like that of a religious fanatic than a political supporter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Galraedia (Reply #19)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:32 PM

20. i don't think i've ever met even one in real life,

View profile

which is a comfort of sorts. it has to be a cult of personality and they do have to engage in some serious denial to support that asshat.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to barbtries (Reply #20)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:45 PM

21. Pray that you never meet one.

View profile

If you’re bitten by a Ron Paul supporter if you don’t become one, you do become a carrier.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to barbtries (Reply #10)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:31 AM

24. Apparently, Ron Paul didn't believe it.

View profile


Because that was his excuse for them. "I never read them. I didn't know what was in them."

I will never understand why repubs could back people with that kind of mendacious denial, and do it over and over. Paul, Cain, Gingrich, Romney.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to caseymoz (Reply #24)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 06:05 AM

26. me either

View profile

i'm old school. lying is still not okay by me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:37 PM

14. after the civil war... ...

View profile

Why did we take back the south?

I ask that question often.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:11 PM

15. Of course Ron Paul was connected to the production of the "Ron Paul Newsletter"

View profile

In one of the articles which had to do w/ birth control or something
to do with ob/gyn issues there was a line that said something like;
"As a doctor I can speak to this issue ..... " very rough quote.

So not unless Ron Paul hired a ghost writer for the Ron Paul Newsletters
who was a Dr. too so he has his fingerprints all over those awful w/out
a doubt.

Hell there is videotape from the 1990s where Paul was bragging about
writing those newsletters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:13 PM

17. Ron Paul is a neo-confederate.

View profile

Ron Paul criticized Lincoln for the Civil War. Apparently he has an altered view of history.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:21 PM

18. Exposure of such a lie (not to mention racism) should end his campaign.

View profile

Of course, the cult-like obsession will continue. The Paulbots think him infallible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:29 PM

22. Ron Paul is a bigoted hate monger

View profile

love that it is confirmed by a former employee and supporter.

Also really loved this from the comments section:

"Face it, one does not send out a news letter, over one's name, without proofreading it. Simply not believable. I also liked his comment during the debate that bringing up his age was against the law, and the questioner should be careful. This statement out of a Candidate who claims Government should not outlaw discrimination, as that is up to the individual. I guess it is different when it applies to him."

Of course the rabid fanboys had to jump all over it though. Ron Paul supporters are scary!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 05:40 PM

23. Of course, but I like how he tried to say he defrauded his subscribers...

View profile

...for years as his defense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:38 AM

25. Fuck Ron Paul.

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #25)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:40 PM

27. OK, that was just weird

View profile

The message was sound, but the presentation was...strange.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nxylas (Reply #27)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:01 PM

29. lol

View profile

strange...like Ron Paul?

I can't get the word timing quite right with it.

The Paulbots hate it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #29)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:51 PM

34. That's good. How do you do it?

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 12:42 PM

28. Ron Paul is SO busted!!!!

View profile

I can't believe he is still in the race! Even Rick Perry had his ONE braincell tell him to 'pack it in' and go back to wasting taxpayer money in Texas. Paul has no shame.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rex (Reply #28)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:16 PM

30. When you have an entire cult telling you you're the chosen one

View profile

It's probably hard not to believe it on some level, even thought I don't think Paul is quite the megalomaniac that Grinch is (mind you, Grinch makes anyone look humble by comparison).

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nxylas (Reply #30)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:31 PM

32. True, I forget he is a Cult Leader.

View profile

Grinch makes Satan look humble by comparison.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rex (Reply #32)

Sun Jan 29, 2012, 04:10 PM

37. His followers sure like to congratulate themselves, though

View profile

Spotted on Facebook:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 03:29 PM

31. This was painfully obvious to anyone that made any effort

View profile

to look at his history. Glad a major news rag decided to get off their ass and do the story.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:11 PM

33. The article says he never believed it and just added it to drum up controversy.

View profile

Is it better to be a racist or to just be cynically manipulative? I don't know that answer to that question.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProSense (Original post)

Sat Jan 28, 2012, 08:51 PM

35. commie pinko rag

View profile

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread