HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Romney’s Tax Return Night...

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:16 PM

Romney’s Tax Return Nightmare Worsens After Errors Found In Financial Disclosure Statements

Mitt Romney released his tax returns to put to bed discussions of his wealth and lack of transparency. Instead, they have only spawned more unanswered questions.

Thursday afternoon, the LA Times reported that Romney’s tax returns listed 23 funds and partnerships that did not appear on Mitt Romney’s personal financial statements — the disclosure forms candidates are required by federal law to file with the Federal Elections Commission. Romney filed his disclosure forms in August 2011. The timing of this revelation couldn’t be worse. Hours before a GOP debate and days before the crucial Florida primary, Democrats now have new fodder for demanding additional tax return information from the Romney campaign.

Democrats are using the discrepancies to call on Romney to release all his tax returns from years in which he filed public financial disclosure statements. On a conference call with reporters, DNC spokeswoman Melanie Roussell stressed the importance of these newest revelations, saying they show what Mitt Romney was trying to hide on his regular disclosure forms. Roussell’s charge that the LA Times “found what it looks like he was trying to hide” is based on the fact that the of the 23 funds and partnerships left off the disclosure, 11 were overseas investments in funds in the Cayman Islands and Bermuda as well as the already-notorious Swiss bank account the Romney’s closed in 2010.

Further, Romney staked his credibility on these forms. As Roussell pointed out on the conference call: “This is the form that Mitt Romney has been using for months, and years in fact, since he ran for the Senate, as an excuse not to release his tax returns in the first place.” It’s a potent argument; why trust that one year of Romney’s tax returns are sufficient if they revealed new information? That’s the crux of Democrats’ argument that they now need all returns corresponding to past disclosures.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/democrats-make-hay-of-romneys-financial-disclosure-errors----demand-more-tax-returns.php?ref=fpa

35 replies, 4799 views

Thread informationRemove bookmarkTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 35 replies Author Time Post
Reply Romney’s Tax Return Nightmare Worsens After Errors Found In Financial Disclosure Statements (Original post)
RandySF Jan 2012 OP
blm Jan 2012 #1
bluestate10 Jan 2012 #7
roguevalley Jan 2012 #21
madokie Jan 2012 #23
elehhhhna Jan 2012 #2
Quantess Jan 2012 #3
PassingFair Jan 2012 #27
Quantess Jan 2012 #29
Cognitive_Resonance Jan 2012 #4
TBF Jan 2012 #5
Thrill Jan 2012 #6
Tx4obama Jan 2012 #8
NBachers Jan 2012 #16
Art_from_Ark Jan 2012 #17
PassingFair Jan 2012 #28
tabatha Jan 2012 #9
James48 Jan 2012 #10
fire_guy266 Jan 2012 #11
rocktivity Jan 2012 #12
DallasNE Jan 2012 #13
flamingdem Jan 2012 #14
raouldukelives Jan 2012 #15
Dyedinthewoolliberal Jan 2012 #18
DallasNE Jan 2012 #19
JJW Jan 2012 #20
liberal N proud Jan 2012 #22
PassingFair Jan 2012 #24
snagglepuss Jan 2012 #26
malthaussen Jan 2012 #25
magical thyme Jan 2012 #30
oldhippie Jan 2012 #31
Maineman Jan 2012 #32
fire_guy266 Jan 2012 #35
Hubert Flottz Jan 2012 #33
DippyDem Jan 2012 #34

Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:20 PM

1. Gee - but he's such a STAR businessman with excellent attention to detail, so how did he let

something like this get past his attention?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blm (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:49 PM

7. The disclosures make his claims of being a topnotch bussinessman a joke.

Romney can lead raiders in a battle to destroy functioning american companies, while stuffing his pockets, but Romney knows nothing about how to build and sustain jobs that pay living wages and benefits. President Obama has shown that he can create jobs.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blm (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:46 AM

21. he's over. they have no one. romney is over because this stuff is resonating even with hardcore

around me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blm (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:23 AM

23. Just a typical swindler

nothing more or nothing less.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:24 PM

2. What's the penalty for filing fraudulent financial disclosure forms?

Bust him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:31 PM

3. Why on earth would anyone vote for this smarmy time-share-salesman?

Sorry, that's an insult to time-share salespeople.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Quantess (Reply #3)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:44 AM

27. Because the alternatives are Newt and Ron and Rick?

If I were a yellowdog republican (or what ever they call themselves), I'd vote for Romney.

Just because he appears to be less CRAZY than the others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PassingFair (Reply #27)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 11:27 AM

29. Wow, they must really not want Obama, to be so desperate.

I have a facebook acquaintance (-R) who said that she doesn't like any of the candidates, so she'll probably pick Ron Paul.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:32 PM

4. Where there's smoke there's usually fire. He needs to release at least 12 years worth. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:36 PM

5. Well I for one am shocked.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 07:38 PM

6. He's a Crook. Anyone surprised?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 11:43 PM

8. Mitt should have done what his daddy did and remembered his daddy's words

which are now going to come back to haunt him


SNIP

In 1967, Michigan Gov. George Romney set the bar high for tax disclosure by presidential candidates. While running for the Republican nomination, he was "badgered" by a writer for Look magazine to release his most recent tax return.

Romney refused. Releasing a single return wouldn't prove anything, he told the magazine's senior editor, T. George Harris. It could be a fluke, or even a cynical manipulation designed to make the candidate look good. What really mattered was how a candidate managed his personal finances over the long haul.
Why Mitt Romney pays 15%

"Stumped by his argument," Harris wrote in the magazine, "I was not prepared for the move that it eventually led him to make: He ordered up all the Form 1040's that he and Mrs. Romney had filed over the past 12 years -- including those profitable ones when he saved the American Motors Corp. from bankruptcy and became a millionaire on the company's stock options."

SNIP


http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/18/news/economy/romney_taxes/index.htm

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tx4obama (Reply #8)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:59 AM

16. Actually, I kind of always liked George Romney.

He came from back in the day when Republicans could actually be respectful, and respected. I know a militant Democratic Detroiter who actually has good things to say about George Romney.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NBachers (Reply #16)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:18 AM

17. I remember hearing hearing about Romney

At that time, Arkansas had a pretty decent Republican governor of its own-- Winthrop Rockefeller-- and in those days, when I was just becoming politically aware, I automatically thought Romney was like "WR".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NBachers (Reply #16)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:45 AM

28. We loved Milliken here, too.

Even my father loved Bill Milliken.

Romney, not so much.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 11:48 PM

9. I hope he goes to jail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 11:59 PM

10. On the third day of Mitt's tax returns, we finally get to see..

23 missing funds and partnerships ...
2 Caymen Islands tax havens...
and an
...undeclared SWISS BANK ACCOUNT

in a treeee. ♪♪♫♪ ♫


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:34 AM

11. I think it's more of a broken system and Willard is just a part of it

What Bain does should be illegal. Look at Dunkin Brands (Dunkin Doughnuts and Baskin Robbins). There was an IPO last year and I bought some of the stock. I then found out that Bain is the lead in the private equity consortium that bought Dunkin Brands in 2006. Private equity can be a sleazy business and is one of the problems with this country. You would think Dunkin Doughnuts is a good company right? They are expanding and they have good coffee. Bain was the lead in the consortium that bought it in 2006 with borrowed money for 2 billion dollars. They put the 2 Billion on the balance sheet of Dunkin Brands. All of a sudden a company that sells to franchisees and gets franchise fees was 2 billion in debt. They took the company public with an IPO last year. They put the cost of the IPO on the Dunkin Brands balance sheet. Recently they paid themselves a half a billion dollar dividend and put that on the Dunkin Brands balance sheet. Because of Bain the company is deep in debt and all the profits and used to pay down the debt. I sold my position. My experience gave me a clear picture of why Bain does. They just bleed these companies and suck everything they can out of them. Dunkin Brands would have been better off if the family that originally founded the company brought it public instead of selling it to leaches like Bain. You have people working very hard in those Dunkin Doughnut stores for low wages and you have millionaires like Willard that borrow money from the company to line their pockets while screwing common stock holders. Perry was correct when he called Mitt a vulture.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:37 AM

12. ONE missing financial disclosure is an "oops."

Last edited Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:34 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

TWENTY-THREE missing financial disclosures is an "EEEEEK!" And it doesn't speak well of his fiscal competence.


rocktivity

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:39 AM

13. That Can Only Mean One Thing

Romney is even more wealthy than has previously been disclosed. Perhaps, substantially more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:47 AM

14. This should be the TOP STORY today, I don't see it

and i'm watching the debate on CNN but it hasn't been mentioned (I tuned in late though)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:48 AM

15. Haha! This is rich. Not as rich as Romney but rich. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:24 AM

18. Put a fork in him.

He's done. Kaput. Finis. History. Buh-Bye!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:27 AM

19. Romney: Gingrich Should Exhibit ... "Sobriety"

I gleaned that from a TPM link within the TPM link. What does Romney mean in this context? That Gingrich is a drunk? That is a serious charge. Or, is this a dog whistle thing when that is the impression Romney wants to leave. Now Romney did not actually name Gingrich, saying nominee instead, but when paired with "honesty" and "integrity" and Gingrich's status as his chief opponent the clear implication is that Romney was referring to Gingrich.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 01:47 AM

20. Willard, Your FIRED!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 06:49 AM

22. OOPS?

My ass!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:34 AM

24. Why are they stigmatizing success? Why?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PassingFair (Reply #24)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:37 AM

26. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 08:58 AM

25. I'm not sure what's worse

The mendacity or the incompetence? I suppose I should also throw in the obvious contempt for both the law and the perceptiveness of the American people. This guy is just one self-inflicted wound after another.

-- Mal

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malthaussen (Reply #25)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:02 PM

30. mendacity is worse

incompetence can be overcome by a really good backup team. Mendacity is bone deep.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 12:19 PM

31. It could be ......

.... that the Mitt was not required to disclose every single fund or partnership on the form.

I used to have to fill out an annual financial disclosure form since I was a "contracting official" for the US Govt. OGE Form 450. The form required disclosure of all stocks and bonds, but not mutual funds or other entities that were of a "generic" nature. The only funds I had to disclose were "sector" funds that may have had some connection to issues I was dealing with as a govt official.

I don't know the details of the form that presidential candidates have to fill out, but I would expect there to be similar exemptions. What would be the purpose of having to disclose ownership of an S&P 500 Index Fund? It would be hard to show a conflict of interest with such a broad index.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:24 PM

32. Romney has done the opposite of JFK's "Ask not what your country can do for you..."

This seems like a pretty good example of being unAmerican or unpatriotic. Great orientation for a potential president!

As noted on The Young Turks, Romney gave more money to the Mormon church than he paid in taxes. So, avoiding taxes and the Mormon church are more important to him than his country. Great values for a potential president!

Romney says corporations are persons, absolutely. Great perspective for a potential president.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Maineman (Reply #32)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 07:16 PM

35. Awe Come on!

They would say we just envy them. Not everyone can take advantage of tax loopholes and pay 15% tax. Not everyone has what it takes to do leveraged buyouts of companies and milk them for all they are worth; put those companies in debt and then bankrupt them. Bain didn't put Dunkin Doughnuts in bankruptsy, but they managed to get the company two billion in debt and pay themselves a half a billion dollar dividend while the common stock holder got nothing. It's nice to be Mitt. I would like to think that if I was wealthy I would do things to better society; like Bill gates trying to wipe out Aids. With Mitt, we get Swiss bank accounts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 03:58 PM

33. Laws are for "little people" and other

democrats.

1% republicans are "entitled" to be above the laws the rest of us live by.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Original post)

Fri Jan 27, 2012, 04:33 PM

34. Huh-oh..... So the Price Waterhouse tax accounting powerhouse f'ed up eh?

Fire the accounting powerhouse, Mitty boy and have fun firing, remember it's your favorite hobby. Go do your own taxes with Turbotax Online with your idle time. Save a few bucks, hmm? After all you don't have a job to preclude doing your own taxes. Get it done right the first time. Then you can claim that you will have the experience to do the Fed budget!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread