HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Federal Judge Orders Orly...

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:28 PM

Federal Judge Orders Orly Taitz to Prove She Didn’t Lie to the Court

http://www.politicususa.com/stern-judge-orders-birther-orly-taitz-prove-lie-court.html


Federal Judge Orders Orly Taitz to Prove She Didn’t Lie to the Court

By: Sarah Jones
Jan. 25th, 2013


While Orly Taitz is trying to get President Obama arrested in Connecticut, a California federal judge in Orange County’s Ronald Reagan Federal Courthouse ordered her to show cause for why the failed Senate candidate should not be sanctioned for lying to the court. The court thinks Taitz may have failed to report any “pending ethical, disciplinary, or related matters.”

Taitz wasn’t quite up front about pending issues, claiming that she only faced a minor discovery sanction. But it turns out that “Taitz is being sued for allegedly making a series of false, defamatory statements about private individuals as well as for planting invasive spy software on the computers of visitors to her various websites.”

So, U.S. District Court Judge Andrew J. Guilford ordered:

On October 22, 2012, the Court ordered the parties to “inform the Court immediately of any actions taken on pending ethical, disciplinary, or related matters.” On January 14, 2013, the Court was alerted to a possible unreported sanction against Orly Taitz. Taitz said in Court that the sanction was for discovery. The parties have since subjected the Court to a flurry of papers, which the Court dismisses as irrelevant except for the sole issue now of whether Taitz lied to the Court when she said the sanction was for discovery. Some evidence has been presented to the Court that the sanction involved far more than discovery.

The Court therefore now ORDERS Taitz to show cause in writing why she should not be sanctioned for lying to this Court. Taitz, and any other party, may file by February 4, 2013, papers on this order to show cause not exceeding 10 pages each in total. Particularly helpful would be documentary proof of the nature of and reasons for the subject sanction previously ordered against Taitz.


Taitz has to respond by February 4th and she must provide proof of her innocence. Guilford has a reputation for being stern and strict. He isn’t taking Orly’s crazy in stride as others have done and if she can’t prove that she didn’t lie, she may find herself in real trouble.

snip//

All “Dr.” Taitz needs is for the easily fooled to shell out a few of their Social Security dollars for her mission, and their dreams will come true! If only Orly isn’t arrested in California first. Tick tock, birthers.

12 replies, 1215 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 12 replies Author Time Post
Reply Federal Judge Orders Orly Taitz to Prove She Didn’t Lie to the Court (Original post)
babylonsister Jan 2013 OP
Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #1
malaise Jan 2013 #3
Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #6
malaise Jan 2013 #7
Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #8
jberryhill Jan 2013 #2
Ikonoklast Jan 2013 #5
1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #11
freshwest Jan 2013 #12
we can do it Jan 2013 #4
nyquil_man Jan 2013 #9
Faux pas Jan 2013 #10

Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:32 PM

1. off to prison with her

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:41 PM

3. You stole my post

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #3)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 01:01 PM

6. I am sorry, should I delete my post??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 01:05 PM

7. Of course not

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #7)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 01:07 PM

8. ...........

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:38 PM

2. Minor problem there....


if she can’t prove that she didn’t lie


The order is not a demand that she show she didn't lie.

The order is for her to show cause:

why she should not be sanctioned for lying to this Court

The question is "Why shouldn't you be sanctioned for it?" not "Did you lie?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:56 PM

5. Yeah, that kinda got me, too.

It would seem that the court has already decided that Oily taint was lying, the court now wants her to give a valid reason as to why she should not be sanctioned.

The fact that she was lying has already been established.

She would have to show proof that what the court already discovered is not true.

Fat chance that's going to happen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 01:54 PM

11. True ...

The "Sow Cause" Order indicates that the Court has already concluded that she lied, by ommission or misrepresentation. Now it is telling her to tell why it should impose sanctions (something that I don't think she will be able to do).

After reading many of her previous filings, I think I can sum up her response in 5 words (I don't need the 10 pages the Court granted her):

It is all Obama's fault!


I'm wondering if this is going to end with her losing her license to practice law in California?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #11)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 03:42 PM

12. You gotta be kidding me! She still has professional credentials of any kind? Unbelievable...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 12:52 PM

4. They need to make the flaky bitch pay back the taxpayers for wasting the courts time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 01:10 PM

9. She has had four years to prove something. Anything.

She has produced exactly squat.

She is wasting the court's time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to babylonsister (Original post)

Fri Jan 25, 2013, 01:32 PM

10. oooo what goes around comes around....

and if you're really lucky, you live long enough to see it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread