Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Lance Armstrong was armed with guns he wouldn't have needed to take steroids
to win the Tour De France.
#NRAlogic
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1122 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Lance Armstrong was armed with guns he wouldn't have needed to take steroids (Original Post)
TeamPooka
Jan 2013
OP
whistler162
(11,155 posts)1. You know someone once said....
"Better to keep your mouth closed and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
You should have listened!
TeamPooka
(24,155 posts)6. You know someone once said....
nobody cares what you think.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)2. This is true..
he coulda shot all the competition. Just in case, I am not advocating that Lance should have done this.
Yavin4
(35,356 posts)3. Well, That's One Sure Way To Get Americans To Watch The Tour De France n/t
GeorgeGist
(25,294 posts)4. Good one.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)5. That would be a new spin on "blowing away the competition." n/t
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)7. Good grief!
#ScrapingBottomofBarrel