HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Senator Asks For Proof Of...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 10:53 AM

 

Senator Asks For Proof Of Evolution, Discovers He Doesn't Actually Understand What It Is

Wikipedia defines evolution as "the change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations." Essentially, we all have one common ancestor that split off into a billion different directions over time. Creationism, on the other hand, is a bunch of people making stuff up.

In Louisiana, a movement to help get creationism taught in science classes hit a snag when someone decided to stand up and explain how it isn't actually science. A state senator on the wrong side decided to learn about this whole "science" thing everyone has been talking about and asked a question that explained why it's even a debate. It turns out that they don't actually know how evolution works...



For those playing the home game, the senator had evolution backwards. His theory of evolution is that all creatures eventually turn into humans, whereas in reality, it's that one common ancestor split off in a billion directions, with humans just becoming one arbitrary and quite "advanced" direction of many billion potential outcomes.

http://www.upworthy.com/senator-asks-for-proof-of-evolution-discovers-he-doesnt-actually-understand-what?c=la3

29 replies, 3077 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 29 replies Author Time Post
Reply Senator Asks For Proof Of Evolution, Discovers He Doesn't Actually Understand What It Is (Original post)
HarveyDarkey Jan 2013 OP
eShirl Jan 2013 #1
Glitterati Jan 2013 #3
demwing Jan 2013 #8
Glitterati Jan 2013 #9
demwing Jan 2013 #12
tosh Jan 2013 #7
Blue_Tires Jan 2013 #19
Coyotl Jan 2013 #2
Fumesucker Jan 2013 #5
Coyotl Jan 2013 #16
DreamGypsy Jan 2013 #17
ananda Jan 2013 #22
tblue37 Jan 2013 #23
DreamGypsy Jan 2013 #27
Doctor_J Jan 2013 #4
HarveyDarkey Jan 2013 #18
JNelson6563 Jan 2013 #6
99Forever Jan 2013 #10
Scuba Jan 2013 #11
Brickbat Jan 2013 #13
cali Jan 2013 #14
Solly Mack Jan 2013 #15
MindPilot Jan 2013 #20
wackadoo wabbit Jan 2013 #21
tblue37 Jan 2013 #24
GoCubsGo Jan 2013 #29
flobee1 Jan 2013 #25
mike_c Jan 2013 #26
GoCubsGo Jan 2013 #28

Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:02 AM

1. I don't understand how people this ignorant of basic science ever managed to graduate high school.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eShirl (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:09 AM

3. It's called home schooling

Mommy gave him his diploma

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Glitterati (Reply #3)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:25 AM

8. You know that for a fact?

Or are you just playing the "let's shit on the home school" game?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demwing (Reply #8)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:27 AM

9. Puuuulease, move on to a new outrage

Because, quite frankly, I don't have time.

*plonk*

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Glitterati (Reply #9)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:32 PM

12. Yeah, another "Shit on home school" nonsense

You had time to play the game, sorry you're so damn busy now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eShirl (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:20 AM

7. That...

and what it says about those who ELECT THEM TO OFFICE!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to eShirl (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 02:42 PM

19. The scary part is this assclown's views are still supported by at least some of his electorate...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:09 AM

2. I'm sorry Senator, but you will have to wait another year or two for E. coli

to turn into a person

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Coyotl (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:10 AM

5. I kind of think it already may have done so a few years back

If you catch my drift

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fumesucker (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 01:09 PM

16. "I'm sorry Senator, but were you E. coli a few years back?"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fumesucker (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 01:28 PM

17. And microscopic life may do so again...

Once global warming and it's consequences, and collisions with massive asteroids, and famine, plague, pestilence, and the outrageous behaviors of Man wipe out all the macro fauna and flora of the planet, then our remaining prokaryote cousins will have another 4 to 5 billion years before the nova of the sun to try a second experiment in evolution. They will have a head start over the last time around as they will build on existing genetic mechanisms and not have to wait for the building blocks to congeal from a molecular soup. However, the hugely different initial conditions and a distinct sequence of planetary changes will ensure that no product from this second evolutionary experiment will have more than a passing similarity to the products of the first.

Ok. I've posted the following quote in several other threads that touch on the hubris of man, but I just can't resist repeating it here.

From Richard Dawkins', The Ancestors Tale:

Look at life from our perspective, and you eukaryotes will soon cease giving yourselves such airs. You bipedal apes, you stump-tailed tree-shrews, you desiccated lobe-fins, you vertebrated worms, you Hoxed-up sponges, you newcomers on the block, you eukaryotes, you barely distinguishable congregations of a monotonously narrow parish, you are little more than fancy froth on the surface of bacterial life. Why, the very cells that build you are themselves colonies of bacteria, replaying the same old tricks we bacteria discovered a billion years ago. We were here before you arrived, and we shall be here after you are gone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DreamGypsy (Reply #17)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:45 AM

22. You know, I've always imagined that humanity would last as long as the sun.

It was a harsh realization to see us imploding as fast as we did, dooming all the large life forms to extinction much sooner than later.

I would like to see how the next round of evolution goes, but I'm sure it will proceed exactly as it will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DreamGypsy (Reply #17)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:54 AM

23. My favorite Dawkins comment is about how if you

go back to your grandfather, then your grandfather's grandfather, then his grandfather, then his grandfather, and keep going back far enough, eventually the next grandfather is a fish.

That one made me chuckle.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tblue37 (Reply #23)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:04 PM

27. Definitely an important concept...in fact, the whole plot premise of the Ancestor's Tale...

...is the journey backward in time to meet these distant relatives and understand what they might have been like, based on current physical and genetic evidence and on the consensus of evolutionary biologists.

However, the remark as stated is slightly misleading and might cause our brilliant legislative friend, Senator Walsworth, to ask a question like "Oh, what kind of fish was my great, great, ..., great grandfather? A ling cod, a snapper, a tuna?".

An edited, completely correct version of Dawkin's comment would be "...eventually the next grandfather is the least common ancestor of humans, mammals, etc. and of all living species of fish." This creature would probably look more like a present day fish than a present day human, but no living human or living fish could pick out a specimen in a crowd and exclaim "That's my great grandpa!".

Some info about that least common ancestor (concestor), from The Ancestor's Tale, Rendezvous 22: LAMPREYS AND HAGFISH

Rendezvous 22, where we meet the lampreys and hagfish, occurs somewhere in the warm seas of the early Cambrian, say 530 million years ago, and I would very roughly guess that Concestor 22 was our 240-million-greats-grandparent. The lampreys and hagfish survive as pivotal messengers from the dawn of vertebrates. Although it is convenient to treat them together, as the jawless and limbless fish, I have to admit that many morphologists think that lampreys are closer cousins to us than they are to hagfish. According to this school, we should greet the lamprey pilgrims at Rendezvous 22, and the hagfish at 23. On the other hand, molecular biologists are equally insistent that both join us at one rendezvous, and this is the opinion I am provisionally adopting here. In any case, it is fair to say that neither lampreys nor hagfish do justice to the jawless fish as a whole, most of whom are extinct.


The statement about our fishy least common ancestor would be even more accurate and humorous, I think, if it included all two hundred and forty million repetitions of "then his grandfather,".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:10 AM

4. Read the frre book "The Authoritarians"

It is gripping reading, and Prof. Altmeyer goes into great detail to explain that ring nuts often don't have a clue about the issues they believe/don't believe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Doctor_J (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 02:37 PM

18. Thanks for the suggestion

 

I was not familiar with him or this book. I downloaded it & will give it a read.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:15 AM

6. That is frightening.

Wow!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 11:29 AM

10. Willful ignorance is an...

... ugly thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:13 PM

11. "I didn't take science or debate, at least that I remember. I was the class clown."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:35 PM

13. OMG, that poor woman. I think she doesn't quite realize the absolute depth of stupidity she's having

to deal with there. Holy shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:38 PM

14. I don't even know how to react to this massive stupidity

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 12:41 PM

15. Wow. Damn. Yikes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 03:36 PM

20. I admire that woman's restraint.

Were I confronted with stupidity like that, it would have likely resulted in my arrest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:27 AM

21. That was laugh-out-loud funny . . .

and, at the same time, one of the most frightening things I've seen in some time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 10:57 AM

24. I LOVE the look on her face at 59 seconds and following, when

she turns her head in clear disbelief at the level of ignorance on display.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tblue37 (Reply #24)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:57 PM

29. I love the reaction of the woman in the white jacket behind her.

A lot like what mine would have been had I been in that room.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:55 AM

25. Mr Senator!

Do you look more like your mother or more like your father?

THAT is evolution!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 01:45 PM

26. science illiteracy is absolutely rife in the U.S....

Even among the college educated, I'm sorry to say.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HarveyDarkey (Original post)

Sat Jan 19, 2013, 02:53 PM

28. Oh, my god.

Oh, my god. Oh, my god.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread