HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Matt Damon and his teache...

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 04:49 AM

 

Matt Damon and his teacher mom Nancy Carlsson-Paige support the Seattle school testing boycott

Last edited Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:04 AM - Edit history (2)

"We are writing to support all of the teachers at Garfield High School. We admire your strong and unified stand against the district mandated standardized test. Teachers, students, and parents do not have to accept practices that are harmful to them and to the whole meaning and purpose of education. We know it takes courage to risk your jobs in order to stand for what you know is right. But your example holds the promise of inspiring teachers in school districts all over the country to take similar action. Thank you for your strength and courage. We admire you and are behind you all the way.

"Nancy Carlsson-Paige and Matt Damon"

http://www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=3892§ion=Article

She also signed the petition in support of the resisting teachers:








The actor Matt Damon showed his support for the Chicago Teachers Strike of 2012 by wearing his CTU cap while enjoying his fatherly duties in New York City.

8 replies, 1186 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Matt Damon and his teacher mom Nancy Carlsson-Paige support the Seattle school testing boycott (Original post)
HiPointDem Jan 2013 OP
xchrom Jan 2013 #1
HiPointDem Jan 2013 #2
oberliner Jan 2013 #3
HiPointDem Jan 2013 #5
oberliner Jan 2013 #6
HiPointDem Jan 2013 #7
oberliner Jan 2013 #8
cemaphonic Jan 2013 #4

Response to HiPointDem (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 05:07 AM

1. du rec. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HiPointDem (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:01 AM

2. She also signed the petition in support:

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HiPointDem (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:24 AM

3. How else do you measure students across different schools?

How do you compare a student who gets an A at one school to one who gets an A at a very different kind of school.

Those A's do not always reflect the same level of academic achievement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oberliner (Reply #3)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:51 AM

5. Please read *why* they're boycotting.

 

To Whom It May Concern:

We, the Garfield teachers, respectfully decline to give the MAP test to any of our students. We have had different levels of experiences with MAP in our varied careers, have read about it, and discussed it with our colleagues. After this thorough review, we have all come to the conclusion that we cannot in good conscience subject our students to this test again. This letter is an objection to the MAP test specifically and particularly to its negative impact on our students. Here are our reasons:

*Seattle Public School staff has notified us that the test is not a valid test at the high school level. For these students, the margin of error is greater than the expected gain. We object to spending time, money, and staffing on an assessment even SPS agrees is not valid.

*We are not allowed to see the contents of the test, but an analysis of the alignment between the Common Core and MAP shows little overlap. We object to our students being tested on content we are not expected to teach.

*Ninth graders and students receiving extra support (ELL, SPED, and students in math support) are targets of the MAP test. These students are in desperate need of MORE instructional time. Instead, the MAP test subtracts many hours of class time from students’ schedules each year. If we were to participate this year, we would take 805 students out of class during 112 class periods. The amount of lost instructional time is astounding. On average students would EACH lose 320 minutes of instructional time. This is over 5 hours of CORE class time (language arts and math) that students are losing. We object to participating in stealing instructional time from the neediest students.

*In an appeal of the Board’s 2010 decision to renew the MAP contract, a parent group raised concerns about the negative impact of this test “on non-English speakers, Special Education students, and minority and low income children.” These concerns were never addressed nor were the claims refuted... For these students and our students with IEPs, the test does actual harm. The students feel stupid yet are being forced to take a test that has NO benefit to them or their educational goals. We object to a test that may violate the rights of groups of students for whom schooling already constitutes an uphill battle.

*In addition to students losing class time to take the test, our computer labs are clogged for weeks with test taking and cannot be used for other educational purposes. For example, students who have a research project no longer have access to the computers they need to further their exploration into their research topic. This especially hurts students without computers at home. We object to our educational resources being monopolized by a test we cannot support.

*We see that our students do not take the test seriously as they know that it will not directly impact their class grade or graduation status. They approach it less and less seriously the more times they take it. Therefore, we see achievement scores go down after instruction. We object to spending scarce resources on a test that is peripheral to our students’ education.

*The MAP test was originally introduced by then superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson while she was a board member of the Northwest Evaluation Association, the company that sells the MAP. When Dr. Goodloe-Johnson was fired, the MAP somehow survived the housecleaning. We object to having to give a test whose existence in our district is the result of scandal.

*Even the NWEA itself, the parent company to MAP, has advised districts to carefully restrict the use of the test and its results. NWEA also cautions to ensure 100% random selection of students enrolled in any course if the test is used for evaluation and to take into consideration statistical error in designing evaluation policies. NWEA says that problems become “particularly profound at the high school level.” None of these or other criteria urged by NWEA has been met. We object to being evaluated by a test whose author suggests extreme caution in its use and warns against valid legal action if the test is used in personnel decisions.

*The Seattle Education Association passed a resolution condemning the MAP test that reads, “Whereas testing is not the primary purpose of education…Whereas the MAP was brought into Seattle Schools under suspicious circumstances and conflicts of interest…Whereas the SEA has always had the position of calling for funding to go to classroom and student needs first…Be it Resolved that…the MAP test should be scrapped and/or phased out and the resources saved be returned to the classroom.” We object to having to give it after such an opinion from our collective voice has been registered.

We are not troublemakers nor do we want to impede the high functioning of our school. We are professionals who care deeply about our students and cannot continue to participate in a practice that harms our school and our students. We want to be able to identify student growth and determine if our practice supports student learning. We wish to be evaluated in a way that helps us continue to improve our practice, and we wish for our colleagues who are struggling to be identified and either be supported or removed. The MAP test is not the way to do any of these things. We feel strongly that we must decline to give the MAP test even one more time.

Sincerely,

The Teachers of Garfield High School


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HiPointDem (Reply #5)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 07:25 AM

6. I understand

I was just speaking to the broader question of standardized testing. I think, when done right, it can be a very effective tool of measurement.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oberliner (Reply #6)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 07:30 AM

7. You act like schools didn't have standardized tests before Bill Gates forced MAP on Seattle.

 

Students already take a plethora of standardized tests.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HiPointDem (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 10:32 AM

8. I don't know anything about MAP and Bill Gates

I just meant to make a broader point about standardized testing, tangentially related to the OP and in response to the comment you made.

I know nothing about this particular program other than what I have just read thanks to what you and others have provided.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HiPointDem (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:25 AM

4. Garfield is an interesting school, and one where testing would be really distorted

It basically has two student bodies on one campus. For the local kids, it's a somewhat poor inner city (though a rapidly gentrifying one) school with a high minority population and many of the typical problems that such schools tend to have. And, as far as testing goes, there are a lot of Hispanic and recent East-and-Southeast Asian students, so it has a fairly high proportion of ELL students. But it also hosts the highest tier of Seattle's public school system of gifted programs. so there is a second population of extremely bright and motivated kids from all over the district (about a quarter of the student body). So you have two distinct sets of students that don't share many their classes. And you can't really draw any conclusions about its higher-than-average test scores in previous years, since that is largely a result of being a magnet school for gifted kids. Since it has both a high profile and good reputation, the teachers and administrators probably feel they can weather the political fallout of protesting.

It also has a really strong music program. Jimi Hendrix and Quincy Jones went there, and their jazz band and orchestra win awards all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread