HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Great job Obama. 7 innoce...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:51 AM

 

Great job Obama. 7 innocent Americans might soon lose their lives because you messed with Mali

Let us pray for the lives of these Americans and the many other people kidnapped by Islamists, in reaction to the invasion of Mali by the French, aided by the USA.

Same goes for the French, who apparently have not learned their lessons from Vietnam and Algeria.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/16/algeria-gas-field-attacked_n_2485903.html

70 replies, 3916 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 70 replies Author Time Post
Reply Great job Obama. 7 innocent Americans might soon lose their lives because you messed with Mali (Original post)
Welcome_hubby Jan 2013 OP
TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #1
obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #60
RomneyLies Jan 2013 #2
pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #16
obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #61
sharp_stick Jan 2013 #3
LineLineReply ?
Dpm12 Jan 2013 #59
steve2470 Jan 2013 #62
Dpm12 Jan 2013 #65
muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #4
Welcome_hubby Jan 2013 #5
muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #17
renie408 Jan 2013 #30
Jazzgirl Jan 2013 #33
OKNancy Jan 2013 #9
OKNancy Jan 2013 #6
CalFresh Jan 2013 #7
geek tragedy Jan 2013 #11
11 Bravo Jan 2013 #29
leftynyc Jan 2013 #39
muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #48
leftynyc Jan 2013 #49
ieoeja Jan 2013 #54
aquart Jan 2013 #57
CalFresh Jan 2013 #55
muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #58
obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #63
leftynyc Jan 2013 #64
obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #68
leftynyc Jan 2013 #70
renie408 Jan 2013 #66
obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #67
Sherman A1 Jan 2013 #8
Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #10
SidDithers Jan 2013 #12
Blue_Tires Jan 2013 #13
Rex Jan 2013 #14
Sheepshank Jan 2013 #15
HangOnKids Jan 2013 #19
Sheepshank Jan 2013 #42
HangOnKids Jan 2013 #43
HangOnKids Jan 2013 #44
pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #47
Cha Jan 2013 #69
alcibiades_mystery Jan 2013 #18
HangOnKids Jan 2013 #20
ProSense Jan 2013 #24
Kingofalldems Jan 2013 #25
ellisonz Jan 2013 #23
ellisonz Jan 2013 #21
lamp_shade Jan 2013 #22
Agnosticsherbet Jan 2013 #26
RKP5637 Jan 2013 #27
lpbk2713 Jan 2013 #28
Scurrilous Jan 2013 #31
pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #32
Jeff In Milwaukee Jan 2013 #38
mokawanis Jan 2013 #34
pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #35
ellisonz Jan 2013 #36
WI_DEM Jan 2013 #37
pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #40
Comrade Grumpy Jan 2013 #41
jeff47 Jan 2013 #45
pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #46
OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #50
lunatica Jan 2013 #51
spanone Jan 2013 #52
Mr Dixon Jan 2013 #53
stevenleser Jan 2013 #56

Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:55 AM

1. Uh huh. Well, you're obvious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #1)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:49 PM

60. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:55 AM

2. See post 87. eom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RomneyLies (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:10 PM

16. Ermahgerd...









Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RomneyLies (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:49 PM

61. Alas, no more post 87s for you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:59 AM

3. Have a nice day n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sharp_stick (Reply #3)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:48 PM

59. ?

I know this is off-topic, but what the hell does n/t mean?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dpm12 (Reply #59)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:50 PM

62. no text

It means someone can read the subject line and not have to click the link for the post, because there is no text in it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to steve2470 (Reply #62)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 02:52 PM

65. ...

Kinda makes sense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:59 AM

4. If the USA had done nothing to support France, do you really think the Islamists would say

"it's OK, the USA has done nothing wrong in Mali this time, you Americans can go free?". Be honest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:02 PM

5. Probably

 

If there is no US support for the even that triggered this retaliative act, that scenario is possible.

By the way, you are going to say I'm not honest on the grounds that I disagree with you, but I'm not concerned.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Reply #5)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:15 PM

17. On the contrary, this entire thread oozes concern.

You're oh-so concerned that Obama has done something which others can use to blame anything that happens on him. But OKNancy points out there are Japanese hostages too.

According to the spokesman who did not give his name to the two media outlets -- publishers of reliable communiques from the Al Qaeda-linked rebels -- the attack was "a reaction to Algeria's flagrant interference in allowing French planes into its airspace to launch raids on northern Mali."

He called Algeria's attitude "a betrayal for the blood of Algerian martyrs slain by the French colonists."

The kidnapping was claimed by a group recently formed by Mokthar Belmokhtar, a notorious one-eyed jihadist nicknamed "the uncatchable", who has been sentenced to life imprisonment in absentia on several occasions in his home country Algeria.

He is one of the founding members of the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC), which later became known as Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), but left the group at the end of 2012.

Belmokhtar is also one of the most prolific kidnappers of foreigners for ransom in the Sahel.


They're not saying they've sorted the victims by nationality, depending on their involvement in Mali at the moment. Al Qaeda is not exactly friendly to the USA; you cannot seriously say they'd let Americans go, right now. And there's still a chance they'll just demand a ransom anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #17)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:46 PM

30. Sorry

I know this is a terribly serious subject, but the phrase "Mokthar Belmokhtar, a notorious one-eyed jihadist nicknamed "the uncatchable"" struck me as oddly funny.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to renie408 (Reply #30)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:52 PM

33. Me too renie.

It sounds like a character from an old spy novel. It isn't funny but......it is oddly funny.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:04 PM

9. the article says there are Japanese hostages too

I'm pretty sure they haven't given support to the French.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:02 PM

6. I think the kidnappers are the people who are endangering their lives n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:02 PM

7. Back to the old playbook.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Resolution

The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (officially, the Southeast Asia Resolution, Public Law 88-408) was a joint resolution that the United States Congress passed on August 7, 1964, in response to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

It is of historical significance because it gave U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson authorization, without a formal declaration of war by Congress, for the use of "conventional'' military force in Southeast Asia. Specifically, the resolution authorized the President to do whatever necessary in order to assist "any member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty". This included involving armed forces.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CalFresh (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:05 PM

11. MIRT alert--conspiracy loon making a mess in Aisle 7. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to geek tragedy (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:41 PM

29. And bring extra mops, the shit's getting deep!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CalFresh (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:32 PM

39. For Heaven's Sake

That troll stench is getting unbearable today. Where are the moderators?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftynyc (Reply #39)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 08:39 AM

48. I alerted, with ToS checked ,and the jury left it 1-5.

YOUR COMMENTS:

By calling this 'the old playbook', and referring to the Gulf of Tonkin (which didn't involve Islamists), this poster is clearly saying that this is a 'false flag' operation, by Obama, to be used as an excuse to invade North Africa. This is a troll; please hide - ToS box is checked for MIRT to deal with them.

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Wed Jan 16, 2013, 11:18 AM, and voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Post is factually true. What's the problem?
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Boy, the alerter sure read (inferred) much more into this post than I did. And unless the alerter (or someone else) has more evidence than simply a low post count that the poster is a troll, I'm not just going to assume this. I once had a low post count, too, as did we all at one point. And for someone who's been at DU for nearly 10 years, I might still be deemed as a low-count poster. Now, I might think this whole thread is kinda silly (just another "blame Obama" thread), but this individual post, to me, doesn't seem to rise to the level of outrageousness that merits hiding.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given


I don't know how I could have worded the alert more clearly. What else can "the old playbook" be, apart from an accusation that the US has engineered this to have an excuse to escalate, as Tonkin is held to be? Neither France or Islamists were involved in Tonkin, but this thread has tried to make it about the USA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #48)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 08:48 AM

49. Sometimes the system works

and sometimes it doesn't. The troll is looking to make Democrats look like lunatics and there are those here who don't give a shit or, even worse, agree with the troll. I'm as tough on left wing trolls and I am on right wing trolls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #48)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 11:36 AM

54. Yesterday I alerted on "this is a Republic, not a Democracy" as a well known RW meme.


The jury let that stand by 4-2 vote. While my reply calling the poster of that RW meme a "fucking moron" was hidden by a 6-0 vote.

Something has gone wrong at DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ieoeja (Reply #54)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 11:55 AM

57. You can't say "fucking moron" directly to someone.

I would have hidden it, too.

Instead say, "THAT IS A FUCKING MORONIC STATEMENT. I can't believe an intelligent DU member such as yourself would have said that."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #48)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 11:50 AM

55. I see we have a old boys club here.

 

President Obama is pulling our troops out of two war zones. He's talking about the savings of billions of dollars in our defence budget. The savings will come from not buying tanks from general dynamics, fighters from lockheed matin and attack helicopters from boeing. Look at all of the wars over the last 60 years. I find it funny that this war in Mali hits the front page of every paper just when we hear our kids are coming home. My post was about the military industrial complex that President Eisenhower talked about in his farewell address. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military–industrial_complex

We have troops and ships all over the world. War is big business and business has been good for the last 50 years. We as a nation have nothing to do with Mali, but throw in American hostages and al Qaeda and we have new hot spot to send troops.

Again. I'm not saying that President Obama is trying to get us into ground war in Mali. I just don't like the way this thing went down just when we see things coming to a end in that part of the world.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CalFresh (Reply #55)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:09 PM

58. So " back to the old playbook" really was an accusation of an Obama false flag operation?

You're accusing someone of mounting a false flag operation. You posted it in a thread that tried to pin the hostages on Obama. Not one of the news threads about Mali. You didn't mention the military-industrial complex at all; you mentioned Congress and the President. Trying to retroactively insert the MIC, now you realise you've been noticed, won't work.

"This thing went down" in Mali over the past year. ECOWAS was the main proposed outside involvement, until France (under a socialist president) stepped in at the (non-democratic) Mali regime's request. The US involvement is minimal. But to you, this is the Gulf of Tonkin 'playbook'. Yeah, you're here to drum up an atmosphere of blame for Obama.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftynyc (Reply #39)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 12:51 PM

63. They are no mods, there are hosts

I am a GD Host. We can only lock for SOP violations.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #63)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 01:00 PM

64. So common sense

has no place in moderation? I truly had no idea that was the case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftynyc (Reply #64)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:14 PM

68. There is no moderation on DU3

Zero. Except for the Admins. It has nothing to do with common sense or no common sense. ONLY SOP violations. Become a host and see.

Forum Hosts ARE NOT ALLOWED to lock for anything by SOP violations, AS PER THE ADMINS. Period. Group Hosts have much more latitude. We can lock for anything, and block posters from the group for whatever reason we want.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #68)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 04:57 AM

70. I think that although

wonderful from a free speech perspective, a lot crap is going to seep through the cracks. Some things should just be shut down.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #63)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 02:58 PM

66. Well, we need Mods back, then.

We need somebody with some critical thinking skills who can say, "Gee, realistically this person is a troll or a CT freak and needs to be shut down even though they have not egregiously violated the TOS." and then lock the threads and chunk the freaks out. Cause, really, this place has been a freak show since the election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to renie408 (Reply #66)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 06:12 PM

67. Thatr's what the jury system is for

I think juror protocols need to be tweaked, but every moderated-board system I have ever been a part of has sucked -- too many cliques.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:02 PM

8. .....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:05 PM

10. I am critical of Pres. Obama at times, but this is a stretch in my opinion (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:05 PM

12. Uh huh...



Sid

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:06 PM

13. You're trying too hard...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:07 PM

14. SO you are saying we should give in to terrorists out of fear?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:07 PM

15. omg!!! Omg!!!! OMG!!!!!

OMFG!!!!!!

Is that sufficient outrage for you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #15)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:17 PM

19. A jury let this stand

3-3 really stinking sad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HangOnKids (Reply #19)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:07 PM

42. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=293527&sub=trans

.......you were saying? lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #42)


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #42)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:14 PM

44. You Need To Put The Link In The Body!

I see now that you were saying fuckoff hubby is now PPRed! Thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HangOnKids (Reply #44)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 06:21 PM

47. "fuckoff hubby," lol

But I fear DU will see more trolls on the Mali issue. Just like on Benghazi, and on the Libyan Revolution. C'est la vie...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #42)

Fri Jan 18, 2013, 03:02 AM

69. For being "a returning disruptor".. wonder who it was

in a previous life?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:17 PM

18. Come on, MIRT

How long will this nonsense go on?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #18)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:19 PM

20. Indeed. Come on MIRT.

A jury just let the OP stand on a 3-3 vote. I did not get the total results as I was not the first alerter. Very sad.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HangOnKids (Reply #20)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:25 PM

24. Perfect example of ODS.

Seriously.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HangOnKids (Reply #20)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:28 PM

25. Another one of 'those' juries.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #18)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:24 PM

23. It went on for about 8 months...

...with the Gaddafi crowd before pizzas were issued.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:23 PM

21. ...

Don't be a wingnut (right-wing or extreme-fringe).

Democratic Underground is an online community for politically liberal people who understand the importance of working within the system to elect more Democrats and fewer Republicans to all levels of political office. Teabaggers, Neo-cons, Dittoheads, Paulites, Freepers, Birthers, and right-wingers in general are not welcome here. Neither are certain extreme-fringe left-wingers, including advocates of violent political/social change, hard-line communists, terrorist-apologists, America-haters, kooks, crackpots, LaRouchies, and the like.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:23 PM

22. ????

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:34 PM

26. Did you read "7 Americans Reportedly Among 41 Foreigners Held Hostage?"

And how about this statement in your link:
Algeria Gas Field Attacked By Islamists Militants, 7 Americans Reportedly Among 41 Foreigners Held Hostage
The raiders were also reported to have killed three people, including a Briton and a French national.

Why aren't you saying "shame on David Cameron" whose citizen was actually killed? Or are only the Americans innocent?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:36 PM

27. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:40 PM

28. Finally moving on from Benghazi are we?








Hullo Capt Obvious.





Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:47 PM

31. This went well...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 12:52 PM

32. Official White House response:






Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pinboy3niner (Reply #32)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:31 PM

38. Freaking LOL!

Perfect!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:00 PM

34. Worst post I've seen today

but I just got out of bed an hour ago, so maybe I'm judging a little too harshly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:23 PM

35. ***** OP AUTHOR HAS BEEN PPR'D BY SKINNER *****

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pinboy3niner (Reply #35)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:28 PM

36. Surprise, Surprise!

"Returning Disruptor"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:29 PM

37. Oh, good grief.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WI_DEM (Reply #37)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:41 PM

40. Which suggests another response to the OP...






Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 01:48 PM

41. OP is over the top, but this is probably blowback from the Mali intervention.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 03:19 PM

45. How many dead Mali-ians is a US life worth?

Just wondering what the exchange rate is. How many of them need to die before we consider acting at all?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 06:00 PM

46. I fear this is just the beginning of the Mali trolls

BTDT with Libya.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 08:49 AM

50. Wow. How is it you've managed to survive at DU for as long as you have? nt.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 09:04 AM

51. I see drones in the future of the Al Qaeda kidnappers

I notice you didn't mention Al Qaeda, which is what they are, but instead you said Islamists.

Oh boy! Was that !!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 09:09 AM

52. piss off.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 09:11 AM

53. SMH

This is just a repeat of history and those hostages are almost certainly going to be used as a justification to Bomb that country, once their dead of course. Now days they don’t even try to cover up this staged outrage…..SMH also I will assume OBAMA was added to the title to garner a response well played.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Welcome_hubby (Original post)

Thu Jan 17, 2013, 11:55 AM

56. Your concern is noted, and you have been PPR'd, troll. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread