Kate Middleton's portrait restored by famous art restorer

Ha.

13 replies, 1053 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

13 replies	Author	Time	Post
Kate Middleton's portrait restored by famous art restorer (Original post)	superpatriotman	Jan 2013	OP
Sort of a lateral move there	RomneyLies	Jan 2013	#1
My word!	Historic NY	Jan 2013	#2
The hair doesn't seem quite right.	Prometheus Bound	Jan 2013	#3
Was this really necessary?	LiberalFighter	Jan 2013	#4
Had you heard about the criticism of her painting?	muriel_volestrangler	Jan 2013	#7
Kate liked it, the critics hated it...who are they to decide...	Historic NY	Jan 2013	#10
It was in the news here	obamanut2012	Jan 2013	#12
The OP is hysterically funny	obamanut2012	Jan 2013	#11
I thought at first it was an ugly Golden Retriever.	BlueJazz	Jan 2013	#5
Good one.........	TheDebbieDee	Jan 2013	#6
The real painting.	trumad	Jan 2013	#8
Yikes! It kind of sucked the vitality out of her, didn't it?	Prometheus Bound	Jan 2013	#9
Wow.	LisaL	Jan 2013	#13

Response to superpatriotman (Original post)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 03:14 PM

RomneyLies (3,333 posts)

1. Sort of a lateral move there

It's not any better, but it doesn't seem to be any worse.

Reply to this post

Response to superpatriotman (Original post)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 03:16 PM

Historic NY (19,745 posts)

2. My word!

Reply to this post

Response to superpatriotman (Original post)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 03:19 PM

Prometheus Bound (3,489 posts)

3. The hair doesn't seem quite right.

Reply to this post

Response to superpatriotman (Original post)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 03:29 PM

LiberalFighter (31,085 posts)

4. Was this really necessary?

Seems juvenile.

Reply to this post

Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #4)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 04:04 PM

muriel_volestrangler (65,367 posts)

7. Had you heard about the criticism of her painting?

It may not have been in the news in the US (it shouldn't be, really, because it's minor). She's just had her first portrait painted, and pretty much everyone says it's an awful picture. So saying it needs to be restored is a joke. Not, I'd say juvenile; just a joke connecting the criticism of the portrait with that of the 'restoration' of the church fresco last year.

Reply to this post

Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #7)

Sat Jan 12, 2013, 09:19 PM

Historic NY (19,745 posts)