HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » why did Cantor walk in wi...

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:55 PM

why did Cantor walk in with President

not sure

28 replies, 2223 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 28 replies Author Time Post
Reply why did Cantor walk in with President (Original post)
demtenjeep Jan 2012 OP
SunsetDreams Jan 2012 #1
Skittles Jan 2012 #2
SunsetDreams Jan 2012 #7
DevonRex Jan 2012 #13
BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #14
Skittles Jan 2012 #18
Hugabear Jan 2012 #20
Skittles Jan 2012 #22
Hugabear Jan 2012 #23
Skittles Jan 2012 #24
Hugabear Jan 2012 #25
DevonRex Jan 2012 #26
Ikonoklast Jan 2012 #27
DevonRex Jan 2012 #28
TheWraith Jan 2012 #3
demtenjeep Jan 2012 #6
madamesilverspurs Jan 2012 #4
Honeycombe8 Jan 2012 #8
Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2012 #21
jberryhill Jan 2012 #5
opihimoimoi Jan 2012 #9
Turbineguy Jan 2012 #10
JI7 Jan 2012 #11
Lint Head Jan 2012 #12
Voice for Peace Jan 2012 #15
gateley Jan 2012 #16
Skittles Jan 2012 #19
bigwillq Jan 2012 #17

Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:56 PM

1. He wanted to remain relevant

or at least pretend that he was

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:58 PM

2. because they are joined at the hip

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #2)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:59 PM

7. Not

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:08 AM

13. Oh dear lord.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:12 AM

14. Oh gawd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:35 AM

18. such ELOQUENT responses

yeah, I am SO CONVINCED. NOT!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #18)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:40 AM

20. No less eloquent than your post

Saying that Cantor and Obama are "joined at the hip" is just pure knee-jerk bullshit hyperbole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hugabear (Reply #20)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:44 AM

22. you sure like to throw HYPERBOLE around

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #22)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:46 AM

23. What else would you call trying to equate Obama and Cantor?

If that isn't the definition of hyperbole, I don't know what is.

Do you honestly think that there is not much difference between Cantor and Obama? You think they're the same?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hugabear (Reply #23)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:47 AM

24. it's a dog and pony show

WAKE THE FUCK UP

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #24)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:49 AM

25. such ELOQUENT responses


yeah, I am SO CONVINCED. NOT!!!


(see what I did there)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hugabear (Reply #25)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:54 AM

26. I saw what you did there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #18)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 02:00 AM

27. What are you, twelve?

Put forward in more than ten words not in all caps your proof that Obama and Cantor both have the same political, economic, and foreign policy goals for this country.

No opinions, use actual facts to support your thesis.

I know you won't, because you cannot do so.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #27)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 02:02 AM

28. It's hard work typing cliches.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:58 PM

3. Because he's the House Majority Leader.

Leadership gets to walk in with the POTUS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TheWraith (Reply #3)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:59 PM

6. thats what I thought

thanks

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:58 PM

4. He's a bipartisan stalker.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madamesilverspurs (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:00 AM

8. lol. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to madamesilverspurs (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:43 AM

21. LOL

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:58 PM

5. Ranking Republican after Boehner

And, boy, he's just waiting to finally stab Boehner in the back but good.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jberryhill (Reply #5)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:02 AM

9. ++ 99999

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:05 AM

10. Because he

can't throw a knife in a crowd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:06 AM

11. anyone remember the days Bill Clinton had to hold on to Strom Thurmond ?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:07 AM

12. Because Obama has him by the balls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lint Head (Reply #12)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:19 AM

15. ding ding ding winner!!!

best answer

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lint Head (Reply #12)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:21 AM

16. Yes! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lint Head (Reply #12)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:39 AM

19. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to demtenjeep (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:23 AM

17. It's a boys club after all!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread