Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:36 PM

Bonobo (20,566 posts)

The speech STARTED with two big lies

#1. The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation.

#2 The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world.

Discuss.

69 replies, 5257 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

69 replies	Author	Time	Post
The speech STARTED with two big lies (Original post)	Bonobo	Jan 2012	OP
That's classified information.	FarLeftFist	Jan 2012	#1
Actually, more like false information, since he never said either of those things.	TheWraith	Jan 2012	#53
It is what it is and it's done. Did not detract from anything else he said. Why rehash bushitler?	lonestarnot	Jan 2012	#2
Now that we are basically out of there.....	FrenchieCat	Jan 2012	#3
Continuing the lie is NOT acceptable.	Bonobo	Jan 2012	#4
+1	Scuba	Jan 2012	#12
No it isn't, and should be acceptable... because it sets up a precedent	fascisthunter	Jan 2012	#24
hmph	chervilant	Jan 2012	#65
Why do you hate America?	guitar man	Jan 2012	#5
I questioned that as well.	grasswire	Jan 2012	#6
Remember, it's not a lie if you believe it.	limpyhobbler	Jan 2012	#7
George Costanza for president!	Initech	Jan 2012	#8
Serenity now!!! Serenity now!!!	FLyellowdog	Jan 2012	#9
100% accurate.	donheld	Jan 2012	#10
Except	ProSense	Jan 2012	#11
Damn you and your facts ProSense!!1!	JNelson6563	Jan 2012	#13
Prosense is way off on this one. But staying with her/his theme.	Logical	Jan 2012	#29
Actually,	ProSense	Jan 2012	#32
I would never trust your "analysis" of anything Obama said. Nothing against you but too biased.	Logical	Jan 2012	#33
Well,	ProSense	Jan 2012	#35
Your opinion of course is not the truth. But I think you know that already! n-t	Logical	Jan 2012	#36
The heroes the President mentioned were the troops who were sent to Iraq.	sabrina 1	Jan 2012	#59
And why are people who sign up for the military automatically heroes?	Arugula Latte	Jan 2012	#62
Wait, you bolded the exact point if the OP! How did Obama not say that?	Logical	Jan 2012	#14
Damn you and you logic, Logical!!!!!	Nye Bevan	Jan 2012	#17
"this generation of heroes" was what he said	hfojvt	Jan 2012	#50
While I don't often agree with what you say	Bohunk68	Jan 2012	#16
How did the troops in Iraq make this country safer and more respected?	sabrina 1	Jan 2012	#60
That's exactly the point.	Bohunk68	Jan 2012	#68
Well, I do understand it, Bohunk. I also understand that no president can	sabrina 1	Jan 2012	#69
And how exactly is that different in a meaningful way?	Bonobo	Jan 2012	#19
Because he said the _ending_ of the war made us safer, not the war. (nt)	jeff47	Jan 2012	#23
Ridiculous. nt	Bonobo	Jan 2012	#25
Did it realy make us safer?	MinervaX	Jan 2012	#26
How many more would be created by continuing the war? (nt)	jeff47	Jan 2012	#28
How is the original text essentially different from the Campbell's condensed version?	leveymg	Jan 2012	#22
Bigger lie "The Taliban’s momentum has been broken"	FarCenter	Jan 2012	#40
"safer and more respected"	progressoid	Jan 2012	#52
Agreed.	mmonk	Jan 2012	#15
USA! USA! Mission Accomplished! Did we find the Ho Chi Minh Trail? Are the Sioux on the run?	Tierra_y_Libertad	Jan 2012	#18
LOL	mmonk	Jan 2012	#20
By the same reasoning, wouldn't another couple wars make us even more "secure" and "respected"?	leveymg	Jan 2012	#21
I feel Obama is wrong	bigwillq	Jan 2012	#27
You are correct, Bonobo.	hifiguy	Jan 2012	#30
Discuss? No	DeathToTheOil	Jan 2012	#31
the desperation grows as it becomes clear he will be in office for 4 more years.	dionysus	Jan 2012	#34
So does his pandering to the Right-wing - "Mission Accomplished," in other words	leveymg	Jan 2012	#37
The Cult of Hero Worship for the military is a permanent part of American politics	DefenseLawyer	Jan 2012	#38
What, you mean there aren't enough anti-war voters to elect him?	redqueen	Jan 2012	#41
I have no idea what your point is here.	DefenseLawyer	Jan 2012	#44
I meant that you're right.	redqueen	Jan 2012	#45
Well said	Cali_Democrat	Jan 2012	#55
OP manufactures a lie about things not said.	madamesilverspurs	Jan 2012	#39
No, it didn't...	SidDithers	Jan 2012	#42
Bingo. n/t	wakemewhenitsover	Jan 2012	#43
The SOTU had some good stuff last night,	bvar22	Jan 2012	#46
I don't come around here much anymore. When I pop in and read arguments like this	tranche	Jan 2012	#47
your listening skills are lacking	Motown_Johnny	Jan 2012	#48
Good catch n/t	librechik	Jan 2012	#49
But Obama did NOT say "the ending".	moodforaday	Jan 2012	#56
I was sitting in a group of people for this speech,	woo me with science	Jan 2012	#51
And that very spin may actually weaken our safety...	countryjake	Jan 2012	#54
And both lies got standing ovations	Toucano	Jan 2012	#57
And, continued that way. K&R (nt)	T S Justly	Jan 2012	#58
The US proudly remains number one in all things military.	sad sally	Jan 2012	#61
It's a rhetorical trick	rudycantfail	Jan 2012	#63
Good analysis. nt	Bonobo	Jan 2012	#66
Who won the Iraq war anyway?	Prometheus Bound	Jan 2012	#64
Well...	chervilant	Jan 2012	#67

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:37 PM

FarLeftFist (6,161 posts)

1. That's classified information.

Reply to this post

Response to FarLeftFist (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:44 PM

TheWraith (24,331 posts)

53. Actually, more like false information, since he never said either of those things.

What he said was that:

1. The Iraq War is over.

2. The US is now more secure and more respected around the world than it used to be.

He in no way implied that number two was BECAUSE of the Iraq War. You could more easily read it that he was saying it was because the war was OVER and US troops are out of Iraq. b

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:38 PM

lonestarnot (71,135 posts)

2. It is what it is and it's done. Did not detract from anything else he said. Why rehash bushitler?

He's dead to me.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:40 PM

FrenchieCat (67,336 posts)

3. Now that we are basically out of there.....

we are more secure and respected......

That's the part Pres. Obama had something to do with,
and recognizing the Armed Forces at the end of a war
is something smart to do.

Should he had said the Armed Forces of the United States
have made us less safe and less respected.....
Because last I look, that was what Bush did.....not so much
most of the soldiers.

Reply to this post

Response to FrenchieCat (Reply #3)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:49 PM

Bonobo (20,566 posts)

4. Continuing the lie is NOT acceptable.

He did not do a service to the country in any way by stating those two untruths. he could have simply not said them -he did not have to say that it made the US less respected and less safe.

Continuing the lies is consistent, however, with the idea that we should not "look back" -in other words, we really should not reconsider our actions with regards to the illegitimate and the immorality of what we did in Iraq.

Let me ask you this: If we do not look back and ask those tough questions while it is happening OR after it is over, when will we do so?

And if we NEVER consider our actions, how will there ever be any progress made?

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 06:40 AM

Scuba (26,783 posts)

12. +1

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:19 AM

fascisthunter (28,608 posts)

24. No it isn't, and should be acceptable... because it sets up a precedent

that war is somehow an answer... it isn't. It has just about bankrupted our nation.

Reply to this post

Response to FrenchieCat (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:18 PM

chervilant (4,016 posts)

65. hmph

If we are to continue our grand experiment in democracy, we must hone and USE our critical thinking skills. We must discern when we are hearing propaganda, and when we are hearing outright lies. We must refuse to play sycophant to those we entrust with leadership roles.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:55 PM

guitar man (15,996 posts)

5. Why do you hate America?

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:02 PM

grasswire (36,707 posts)

6. I questioned that as well.

It wasn't clear to me if he meant that people of the world respect America because we stopped killing Iraqis? Or what, exactly.

I'd like to see some substance to back up those assertions.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:15 PM

limpyhobbler (6,681 posts)

7. Remember, it's not a lie if you believe it.

Reply to this post

Response to limpyhobbler (Reply #7)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:20 PM

Initech (38,922 posts)

8. George Costanza for president!

Reply to this post

Response to Initech (Reply #8)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:25 PM

FLyellowdog (3,846 posts)

9. Serenity now!!! Serenity now!!!

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:41 AM

donheld (21,132 posts)

10. 100% accurate.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:44 AM

ProSense (98,270 posts)

11. Except

The speech STARTED with two big lies

#1. The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation.

#2 The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world.

...that's not what he said.

Last month, I went to Andrews Air Force Base and welcomed home some of our last troops to serve in Iraq. Together, we offered a final, proud salute to the colors under which more than a million of our fellow citizens fought - and several thousand gave their lives.

We gather tonight knowing that this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world. For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq. For the first time in two decades, Osama bin Laden is not a threat to this country. Most of al Qaeda’s top lieutenants have been defeated. The Taliban’s momentum has been broken, and some troops in Afghanistan have begun to come home.

http://news.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/01/obama-i-intend-to-fight-obstruction-with-action.php

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 06:43 AM

JNelson6563 (24,773 posts)

13. Damn you and your facts ProSense!!1!

Reply to this post

Response to JNelson6563 (Reply #13)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:51 AM

Logical (8,083 posts)

29. Prosense is way off on this one. But staying with her/his theme.

Reply to this post

Response to Logical (Reply #29)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:54 AM

ProSense (98,270 posts)

32. Actually,

"Prosense is way off on this one. But staying with her/his theme."

...no I'm not.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002218581

Can someone point the quote that states: "The Iraq War made the USA more secure as a nation" or "The Iraq War made the USA more respected around the world."

This is inaccurate paraphrasing. Ironic that it's being used to claim a lie was told.

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #32)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:22 AM

Logical (8,083 posts)

33. I would never trust your "analysis" of anything Obama said. Nothing against you but too biased.

Reply to this post

Response to Logical (Reply #33)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:31 AM

ProSense (98,270 posts)

35. Well,

I'm not a fan of paraphrasing that distorts.

If that's your thing, I'm not the person you should agree with.

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #35)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:33 AM

Logical (8,083 posts)

36. Your opinion of course is not the truth. But I think you know that already! n-t

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #32)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:36 PM

sabrina 1 (34,089 posts)

59. The heroes the President mentioned were the troops who were sent to Iraq.

How did sending them to Iraq make America safer and more respected?

Or are you saying he's talking about some other troops who returned from somewhere else?

Reply to this post

Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #59)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:42 PM

Arugula Latte (40,188 posts)

62. And why are people who sign up for the military automatically heroes?

It would be more heroic if they refrained from aiding the military-industrial shakedown and bombing of brown people for no good reason.

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 06:46 AM

Logical (8,083 posts)

14. Wait, you bolded the exact point if the OP! How did Obama not say that?

Last edited Wed Jan 25, 2012, 06:47 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Reply to this post

Response to Logical (Reply #14)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 07:21 AM

Nye Bevan (10,876 posts)

17. Damn you and you logic, Logical!!!!!

Reply to this post

Response to Logical (Reply #14)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:15 PM

hfojvt (31,317 posts)

50. "this generation of heroes" was what he said

not "the Iraq war"

The first is more open ended than the second, and it is about the PEOPLE, rather than a specific action.

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 07:20 AM

Bohunk68 (513 posts)

16. While I don't often agree with what you say

because often it is rather, shall we say, pedantic. I agree with what you are saying here because you have stated what he said IN CONTEXT. And the context of that statement is very important. He was talking about the ending has made us safer and more respected, not that the war has.

While I have disagreements with the Prez often, I will not twist what he states just to disagree. Thanks, ProSense.

Reply to this post

Response to Bohunk68 (Reply #16)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:38 PM

sabrina 1 (34,089 posts)

60. How did the troops in Iraq make this country safer and more respected?

I read the statement and that is what the president said. We are 'safer' and 'more respected' because of the troops who were in Iraq. The exact opposite is true, actually.

Reply to this post

Response to sabrina 1 (Reply #60)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 08:09 AM

Bohunk68 (513 posts)

68. That's exactly the point.

It's exactly the withdrawal that makes us safer and more respected. Sabrina, of all people, I would expect that you would understand that. You surprise me. BTW, I almost always agree with you and like very much what you say and look forward to your entries. Maybe I was unclear in what I said. I don't think we are in disagreement on this.

Reply to this post

Response to Bohunk68 (Reply #68)

Thu Jan 26, 2012, 02:12 PM

sabrina 1 (34,089 posts)

69. Well, I do understand it, Bohunk. I also understand that no president can

come out and say that the war was a waste of lives and money. But the statement was open to interpretation and probably on purpose, so many people heard 'the war in Iraq has made us safer'.

I long for the day when a president can just speak the truth instead of having to gloss over major crimes committed by those in office.

That he, who opposed the war and for all the right reasons, one main reason why I supported him, has to be careful how he talks about it now, is a sad statement on where we are.

Thank you for your kind words, and no problem re sometimes not seeing things in the same way. I think in this case it's not so much a reflection on the president that he has to be careful when he speaks about our overseas adventures, but on our whole system.

You may be right in your interpretation and I would like to think that he was making a statement as subtly as he could. Still, none of the warmongers have chastised him for speaking against the war, so either he fooled them completely, or they heard what some of us heard.

And I look forward to your posts also, Bohunk

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 07:51 AM

Bonobo (20,566 posts)

19. And how exactly is that different in a meaningful way?

Explain to me the difference. He was talking about the Iraq War. You know it and I know it.

So what knew Spin-ditry is this?

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Reply #19)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:17 AM

jeff47 (7,452 posts)

23. Because he said the _ending_ of the war made us safer, not the war. (nt)

Reply to this post

Response to jeff47 (Reply #23)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:19 AM

Bonobo (20,566 posts)

25. Ridiculous. nt

Reply to this post

Response to jeff47 (Reply #23)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:20 AM

MinervaX (169 posts)

26. Did it realy make us safer?

Isn't that a question that only time will answer. How many new Bin Ladens are being born into poverty in Iraq right now and being taught about the Great Satan America. Quite a few I would imagine.

Reply to this post

Response to MinervaX (Reply #26)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:38 AM

jeff47 (7,452 posts)

28. How many more would be created by continuing the war? (nt)

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:08 AM

leveymg (26,366 posts)

22. How is the original text essentially different from the Campbell's condensed version?

Looks and tastes pretty much the same to me, stripped of the niceties of applause lines, formal language, and rousing rhetoric.

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:50 AM

FarCenter (13,085 posts)

40. Bigger lie "The Taliban’s momentum has been broken"

Not true.

And the blockade of supplies to the troops in Afghanistan by Pakistan continues.

Reply to this post

Response to ProSense (Reply #11)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:41 PM

progressoid (27,335 posts)

52. "safer and more respected"

Exactly what the OP said.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 06:56 AM

mmonk (47,307 posts)

15. Agreed.

But the US has a population infatuated with lies.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 07:25 AM

Tierra_y_Libertad (36,281 posts)

18. USA! USA! Mission Accomplished! Did we find the Ho Chi Minh Trail? Are the Sioux on the run?

Reply to this post

Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #18)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 07:54 AM

mmonk (47,307 posts)

20. LOL

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:03 AM

leveymg (26,366 posts)

21. By the same reasoning, wouldn't another couple wars make us even more "secure" and "respected"?

The Man shows signs of Speaking Under the Influence of Kool-Aid. I want to see him take a Breathalyzer before he's allowed back behind the wheel.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:30 AM

bigwillq (59,599 posts)

27. I feel Obama is wrong

on those two points.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:52 AM

hifiguy (13,029 posts)

30. You are correct, Bonobo.

That is all.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:54 AM

DeathToTheOil (1,124 posts)

31. Discuss? No

Disgust. GWB wrecked the U.S.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:23 AM

dionysus (22,263 posts)

34. the desperation grows as it becomes clear he will be in office for 4 more years.

Reply to this post

Response to dionysus (Reply #34)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:43 AM

leveymg (26,366 posts)

37. So does his pandering to the Right-wing - "Mission Accomplished," in other words

It's a good thing to honor and help the returning troops, its quite another thing to proclaim, in so many words, "Mission Accomplished."

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:45 AM

DefenseLawyer (8,399 posts)

38. The Cult of Hero Worship for the military is a permanent part of American politics

Everyone in the military is a "hero", regardless of what they do. Anyone who doesn't support the military 100% (especially their unlimited budget) hates the troops and hates America. It's just good business.

Reply to this post

Response to DefenseLawyer (Reply #38)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:52 AM

redqueen (102,456 posts)

41. What, you mean there aren't enough anti-war voters to elect him?

Well color me shocked.

I swear I never stop being surprised at how many people seem not to have the first clue about how politics actually works.

Reply to this post

Response to redqueen (Reply #41)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:05 PM

DefenseLawyer (8,399 posts)

44. I have no idea what your point is here.

I'm merely pointing out the reality of the American culture, not suggesting that the President is making a mistake politically by jumping on that train. He is most certainly a politician and a very good one. Of course he's going to pander to the "hero" meme, even if it means saying something ridiculous like "our heros in Iraq made us safer and more respected".

Reply to this post

Response to DefenseLawyer (Reply #44)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:15 PM

redqueen (102,456 posts)

45. I meant that you're right.

We (the royal we, USicans, not you and I) fairly worship the military. Fail to pay sufficient homage to the military, and you will not be elected. It really is as simple as that.

Reply to this post

Response to DefenseLawyer (Reply #38)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:51 PM

Cali_Democrat (14,689 posts)

55. Well said

"cult of hero worship for the military"

This is also perpetuated by the media day after day. It's sickening.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:48 AM

madamesilverspurs (6,764 posts)

39. OP manufactures a lie about things not said.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:54 AM

SidDithers (27,127 posts)

42. No, it didn't...

Discussion over.

Sid

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:01 PM

wakemewhenitsover (1,585 posts)

43. Bingo. n/t

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 02:18 PM

bvar22 (29,551 posts)

46. The SOTU had some good stuff last night,

but starting with the Failed Nightmare in Iraq,
and ending with the flag wrapping WAR/Killing glorification turned my stomach.
The only thing missing was the band playing Ride of the Valkyries.

I had some hopes that this President would lead us to Peace,
and was Praying for a
"now that we have gotten Bin Laden, it is time to bang the swords into plowshares" moment.

So sad.

You will know them by their WORKS.
Solidarity99!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 02:21 PM

tranche (928 posts)

47. I don't come around here much anymore. When I pop in and read arguments like this

I think to myself, "These people are fucking crazy."

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 02:42 PM

Motown_Johnny (15,462 posts)

48. your listening skills are lacking

the ENDING of the Iraq war made the USA more secure and more respected

Reply to this post

Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #48)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 02:44 PM

librechik (25,031 posts)

49. Good catch n/t

Reply to this post

Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #48)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:48 PM

moodforaday (1,860 posts)

56. But Obama did NOT say "the ending".

He said "this generation of heroes has made the United States safer and more respected around the world". "This generation of heroes" (what a sick lie in itself!) refers to the troops. The troops were there to fight the war, they did not end the war. Obama is praising them - the tools of Bush's and his own murderous spree. There is nothing about ending the war in this sentence, so please do not argue that there is.

The notion of ending the Iraq war comes in the sentence that follows, but it really belongs in a separate paragraph, as it is not connected to the one we are discussing.

And then at the end he threatened a war with Iran.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:17 PM

woo me with science (19,663 posts)

51. I was sitting in a group of people for this speech,

and when he said those things, there was spontaneous groaning and scoffing.

There was spontaneous applause at the "less teaching to the test" line.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 03:47 PM

countryjake (4,779 posts)

54. And that very spin may actually weaken our safety...

and it certainly does little to build any admiration for a military that has continually been held unaccountable for any of the atrocities committed during the past decade.

Al Qaeda's presence in Iraq appears to be growing, as bombings, mass killings, and terror against minorities has steadily increased since the USA officially "ended" that occupation. The weakness of any functioning leadership in a nation that our government effectively destroyed, all of the "instability" that is being reported since our pullout and the total havoc that is apparent in most of our daily evening news coming from Iraq, makes what the prez said about no more Americans fighting there seem like a cruel joke...a "wink, wink" to the rest of world. His remarks on safety and respect may seem like a slap in the face to any Iraqis who just might view our troops more as criminals rather than any generation of heroes.

I cry for Haditha and only hope that the SOTU was not available there.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 09:50 PM

Toucano (11,583 posts)

57. And both lies got standing ovations

Which made the whole event look like a picnic at the mental ward.

Washington is completely detached from reality.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:13 PM

T S Justly (884 posts)

58. And, continued that way. K&R (nt)

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:40 PM

sad sally (2,627 posts)

61. The US proudly remains number one in all things military.

As this "great" nation falls farther behind other nations in education, energy, infrastructure, health, life expectancy, infant mortality, poverty, retirement security, and happiness, we proudly remain number one in all things military.

What a hokus-pokus math claim when he said the military would be cutting half a trillion dollars from the military, but forgot to mention this was over 10 years, which is $50 billion a year from a total budget of over a trillion a year.

Reply to this post

Response to Bonobo (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:13 PM

rudycantfail (300 posts)

63. It's a rhetorical trick

that's designed to appeal to two groups: First, the neocons because it bolsters their false claims that these wars are keeping us safe and second, the great middle of America that wants to feel good and hopeful about something and generally supports the U.S. military. At the same time it discourages criticism from the left by hiding failed and harmful policies behind the troops.

It's a close cousin to 2003's SUPPORT OUR TROOPS.

Reply to this post

Response to rudycantfail (Reply #63)

Wed Jan 25, 2012, 11:18 PM

Bonobo (20,566 posts)