Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:27 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
*****GOP RESPONSE OFFICIAL THREAD*****
Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana. Mitchell Elias "Mitch" Daniels, Jr. (born April 7, 1949) is the 49th and current Governor of the U.S. state of Indiana. A Republican, he began his first four-year term as governor on January 10, 2005, and was elected to his second term by an 18-point margin on November 4, 2008. Previously, he was the Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget under George W. Bush. He was formerly Senior Vice President of Eli Lilly and Company, Indiana's largest corporation, where he was in charge of the corporation's business strategy. He is cited as a rising star in the Republican Party, and was widely speculated to be a candidate for President of the United States in 2012 before choosing not to run. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitch_Daniels SOTU Threads: Thread 1: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002215317 Thread 2: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002215718 Thread 3: http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002216128
|
100 replies, 4925 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | OP | |
| sakabatou | Jan 2012 | #1 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #3 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #2 | |
| Beaverhausen | Jan 2012 | #4 | |
| Old and In the Way | Jan 2012 | #5 | |
| davekriss | Jan 2012 | #88 | |
| Old and In the Way | Jan 2012 | #93 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #6 | |
| rocktivity | Jan 2012 | #25 | |
| lonestarnot | Jan 2012 | #7 | |
| amuse bouche | Jan 2012 | #8 | |
| Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jan 2012 | #9 | |
| El Supremo | Jan 2012 | #9 | |
| NRaleighLiberal | Jan 2012 | #11 | |
| Safetykitten | Jan 2012 | #12 | |
| Moosepoop | Jan 2012 | #13 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #14 | |
| NYC Liberal | Jan 2012 | #29 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #40 | |
| NYC Liberal | Jan 2012 | #52 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #83 | |
| coalition_unwilling | Jan 2012 | #78 | |
| Spazito | Jan 2012 | #61 | |
| barbtries | Jan 2012 | #97 | |
| graywarrior | Jan 2012 | #15 | |
| deutsey | Jan 2012 | #16 | |
| graywarrior | Jan 2012 | #18 | |
| deutsey | Jan 2012 | #44 | |
| graywarrior | Jan 2012 | #58 | |
| Stinky The Clown | Jan 2012 | #17 | |
| npk | Jan 2012 | #30 | |
| Stinky The Clown | Jan 2012 | #45 | |
| bullwinkle428 | Jan 2012 | #19 | |
| mindwalker_i | Jan 2012 | #80 | |
| Eid Ma Clack Shaw | Jan 2012 | #20 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #31 | |
| Hepburn | Jan 2012 | #84 | |
| tblue37 | Jan 2012 | #87 | |
| Old and In the Way | Jan 2012 | #21 | |
| lonestarnot | Jan 2012 | #22 | |
| Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin | Jan 2012 | #42 | |
| lonestarnot | Jan 2012 | #79 | |
| one_voice | Jan 2012 | #23 | |
| Hepburn | Jan 2012 | #86 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #24 | |
| Terra Alta | Jan 2012 | #26 | |
| Fuzz | Jan 2012 | #27 | |
| Safetykitten | Jan 2012 | #28 | |
| Moosepoop | Jan 2012 | #32 | |
| HipChick | Jan 2012 | #33 | |
| Safetykitten | Jan 2012 | #34 | |
| Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin | Jan 2012 | #35 | |
| bullwinkle428 | Jan 2012 | #36 | |
| Rosa Luxemburg | Jan 2012 | #81 | |
| one_voice | Jan 2012 | #37 | |
| El Supremo | Jan 2012 | #38 | |
| Saving Hawaii | Jan 2012 | #39 | |
| smoochpooch | Jan 2012 | #41 | |
| Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jan 2012 | #43 | |
| Cognitive_Resonance | Jan 2012 | #46 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #51 | |
| Moosepoop | Jan 2012 | #47 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #48 | |
| barbtries | Jan 2012 | #98 | |
| highplainsdem | Jan 2012 | #49 | |
| Hepburn | Jan 2012 | #90 | |
| Safetykitten | Jan 2012 | #50 | |
| Moosepoop | Jan 2012 | #57 | |
| Honeycombe8 | Jan 2012 | #53 | |
| Safetykitten | Jan 2012 | #54 | |
| jberryhill | Jan 2012 | #62 | |
| Safetykitten | Jan 2012 | #73 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #55 | |
| vercetti2021 | Jan 2012 | #56 | |
| Terra Alta | Jan 2012 | #59 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #64 | |
| npk | Jan 2012 | #72 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #60 | |
| lonestarnot | Jan 2012 | #82 | |
| jberryhill | Jan 2012 | #96 | |
| Old and In the Way | Jan 2012 | #63 | |
| ellisonz | Jan 2012 | #69 | |
| npk | Jan 2012 | #65 | |
| Old and In the Way | Jan 2012 | #75 | |
| Liberal_Stalwart71 | Jan 2012 | #66 | |
| onethatcares | Jan 2012 | #67 | |
| tblue37 | Jan 2012 | #95 | |
| Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin | Jan 2012 | #68 | |
| Moosepoop | Jan 2012 | #69 | |
| highplainsdem | Jan 2012 | #71 | |
| barbtries | Jan 2012 | #99 | |
| Hatchling | Jan 2012 | #74 | |
| arely staircase | Jan 2012 | #76 | |
| highplainsdem | Jan 2012 | #77 | |
| LongTomH | Jan 2012 | #85 | |
| craigmatic | Jan 2012 | #89 | |
| Hepburn | Jan 2012 | #92 | |
| DCBob | Jan 2012 | #91 | |
| onethatcares | Jan 2012 | #94 | |
| ecstatic | Jan 2012 | #100 |
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:28 PM
sakabatou (29,097 posts)
1. I can already hear the talking points and BS.
Response to sakabatou (Reply #1)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:29 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
3. "He cannot claim the last three years have made America anything but worse."
|
There you go.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:29 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
2. Speaking from Indianapolis...
|
Lip service to Obama - "strong family commitment"
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
Beaverhausen (20,525 posts)
4. Blah blah blah. Liar
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
Old and In the Way (36,257 posts)
5. Mitch - the architect of George W. Bush's budgets.
|
You can't make this shit up.
|
Response to Old and In the Way (Reply #5)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:58 PM
davekriss (2,767 posts)
88. That's his MO, making stuff up
|
Remember, this is the man who told us the Iraq invasion would cost us $60 billion. He was only off by a f**kin' $trillion!
|
Response to davekriss (Reply #88)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:05 PM
Old and In the Way (36,257 posts)
93. I remember Harold Natsios, another Bush spokesman in 2002, on Nightline.
|
He told us the invasion/occupation would cost $2BB, $3BB tops...the Iraqi people would be happily paying us for offing Hussein. They had no friggen' clue.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
6. "The Presidents grand experiment in trickle down government"
|
"has held back rather than sped up recovery."
|
Response to ellisonz (Reply #6)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:33 PM
rocktivity (36,630 posts)
25. Trickle down goverment?
|
As in the kind that Gingrich and Reagan invented?
rocktivity |
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
7. Oh my gawd this obstructionist fucking liar! Blaming him for all their shit... We broke it but it's
|
your fault and you have fixed it yet meme. What bullshit.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
amuse bouche (1,710 posts)
8. Blah..blah..blah
|
Duh and blah
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
Liberal_Stalwart71 (13,853 posts)
9. Full of lies at the gate! LIES!!!
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:30 PM
El Supremo (13,156 posts)
9. Fail!
|
Trickle-down government?
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:31 PM
NRaleighLiberal (28,645 posts)
11. DOOM.....GLOOM.....DOOM.....GLOOM.....
|
And the pugs think that this kind of negativity will sell?
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:31 PM
Safetykitten (3,682 posts)
12. "Bossy government"....hilarious!
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:31 PM
Moosepoop (1,486 posts)
13. "A government as big and bossy as this one..." ??? n/t
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:31 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
14. "We do not accept that ours will ever be a nation of haves and have-nots."
|
"Our nation will aways be a nation of haves and soon to haves."
|
Response to ellisonz (Reply #14)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:33 PM
NYC Liberal (15,600 posts)
29. Is "soon to haves" the new right-wing euphemism for poverty?
Response to NYC Liberal (Reply #29)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:35 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
40. Horatio Alger non-sense and what-not...
|
:
|
Response to ellisonz (Reply #40)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:38 PM
NYC Liberal (15,600 posts)
52. True, but at least he never denied there were poor people!
|
Seems like the Republicans are just going to start denying anyone is poor at all!
|
Response to NYC Liberal (Reply #52)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:51 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
83. You're poor because you want to be poor...
|
...if only you worked harder you could be part of the "soon to haves."
|
Response to NYC Liberal (Reply #29)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:46 PM
coalition_unwilling (14,180 posts)
78. Mark Twain called them "temporarily embarrassed millionaires" - n/t
Response to ellisonz (Reply #14)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:41 PM
Spazito (26,463 posts)
61. Geez, that sounds just like bush's appalling comment...
|
about his supporters "the haves and the have mores".
|
Response to ellisonz (Reply #14)
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:13 AM
barbtries (15,012 posts)
97. he said that?
|
i sometimes wonder why they aren't struck by lightning right there, where they lie. and lie and lie and lie and lie.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:31 PM
graywarrior (57,076 posts)
15. Z-z-z-z-z-z-z-z
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:31 PM
deutsey (16,810 posts)
16. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz n/t
Response to graywarrior (Reply #18)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:36 PM
deutsey (16,810 posts)
44. Great minds snooze alike
|
|
Response to deutsey (Reply #44)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:40 PM
graywarrior (57,076 posts)
58. This is a Snooze Fest
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:32 PM
Stinky The Clown (51,325 posts)
17. Haves and Soon To Haves
|
That made coffee run out of my nose.
|
Response to Stinky The Clown (Reply #17)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:33 PM
npk (2,828 posts)
30. The soon to haves
|
Are the children of the haves.
|
Response to npk (Reply #30)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:36 PM
Stinky The Clown (51,325 posts)
45. Hahahaha
|
And if they're with child they're soon to have a soon to have.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:32 PM
bullwinkle428 (11,384 posts)
19. Prediction : Freepers will find themselves falling in love with him by the end of the night!
Response to bullwinkle428 (Reply #19)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:48 PM
mindwalker_i (1,473 posts)
80. With them bailing on Ann Coulter
|
What's a guy to believe about them?
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:32 PM
Eid Ma Clack Shaw (105 posts)
20. Has there ever been a more charisma deprived politician?
|
Fucking hell...
|
Response to Eid Ma Clack Shaw (Reply #20)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:33 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
31. "Scarred Face"
|
|
Response to Eid Ma Clack Shaw (Reply #20)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:56 PM
Hepburn (19,014 posts)
84. Boy, does that describe him to a "T"! n/t
Response to Eid Ma Clack Shaw (Reply #20)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:58 PM
tblue37 (11,702 posts)
87. Yeah, there has--his name is Mitt Romney. nt
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:32 PM
Old and In the Way (36,257 posts)
21. What a loser.
|
Sorry, he's reading this for the 1st time. It sucks, he has no sense of delivery. Perfect responder and response from the republicans.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:32 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
22. Just how many jobs have you created there motherfucker? We know we know ZERO!
|
ZERO JOBS! In fact, you have obstructed any idea of creation of even a single fucking job. NOT ONE FUCKING JOB CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO YOU OR YOUR IDJIT PARTY.
|
Response to lonestarnot (Reply #22)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:35 PM
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (6,600 posts)
42. He's the asshole who's trying to make Indiana a right to work state
|
|
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Reply #42)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:47 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
79. Yes one in the same union buster fuckwad.
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:32 PM
one_voice (11,040 posts)
23. He sounds like one of those guys...
|
that try and sell commemorative coins on the telly. Yours for only $39.95...
|
Response to one_voice (Reply #23)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:58 PM
Hepburn (19,014 posts)
86. Don't you mean...
|
..."3 easy payments of $39.95...but if you call RIGHT NOW, we will make that 2 easy payments..."
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:33 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
24. "Contrary to the President's constant disparagement of those in business"
|
Asshole.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:33 PM
Terra Alta (3,412 posts)
26. talking about how young people have a less brighter future than their parents
|
perhaps we do.. but it's because of DUMBYA and the Repukes you moron.. not Obama!
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:33 PM
Fuzz (8,827 posts)
27. There hasn't been one this funny since Jindall.
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Safetykitten This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:34 PM
Moosepoop (1,486 posts)
32. Crying about the XL pipline n/t
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:34 PM
HipChick (9,421 posts)
33. yawn...trying to stay awake..
|
these guys are so boring
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:34 PM
Safetykitten (3,682 posts)
34. What's the deal with that shirt and tie?
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:34 PM
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (6,600 posts)
35. Daniels is a human sleeping pill.
|
He makes Phil Graham sound exciting.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:34 PM
bullwinkle428 (11,384 posts)
36. Bring back Bobby Jindal - at least he was entertaining (in his own way).
Response to bullwinkle428 (Reply #36)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:48 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (22,020 posts)
81. Who?
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:34 PM
one_voice (11,040 posts)
37. This is the guy they want...
|
to draft to go against Obama?!?!?
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:34 PM
El Supremo (13,156 posts)
38. Valor dollars?
|
Who is this dumbass?
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:35 PM
Saving Hawaii (441 posts)
39. Why isn't this titled "The STFU Thread"? /nt
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:35 PM
smoochpooch (710 posts)
41. "Pro-poverty" WTF?
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:35 PM
Liberal_Stalwart71 (13,853 posts)
43. I don't know how much I can stand this. I'm fucking falling asleep!
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:36 PM
Cognitive_Resonance (985 posts)
46. Ha Ha, he's terrible. Doom and gloom rambling...and boring. nt
Response to Cognitive_Resonance (Reply #46)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:37 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
51. Emperor Palpatine-esque. n/t
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:36 PM
Moosepoop (1,486 posts)
47. We Democrats are the "mortal enemies" of SS and Medicare!
|
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:37 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
48. "No feature of the Obama presidency has been sadder than its constant efforts to divide us."
|
|
Response to ellisonz (Reply #48)
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:17 AM
barbtries (15,012 posts)
98. he said THAT?!
|
omigawd! this is...saul alinsky? karl rove? gingrich? "accuse them of the crime you are committing."
fucking bastards. i'm really glad right now that i didn't watch it because i have high blood pressure already. thankful for DU so i can get the gist, but this shit. omigawd. |
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:37 PM
highplainsdem (11,110 posts)
49. The commentary on Twitter is brutal, and hilarious.
|
Shannyn Moore @shannynmoore
Oh, yep, Mitch. State of Delusion Address. Does he know there are fact checkers. #SOD #SOTU David Corn @DavidCornDC Did someone tell Daniels that his right side is his better side? #SOTU David Corn @DavidCornDC Mitch Daniels. I'm bored already. #SOTU Andy Borowitz @BorowitzReport Couldn't the GOP find someone to make their official response who doesn't seem exactly like a serial killer? #SOTU |
Response to highplainsdem (Reply #49)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:00 PM
Hepburn (19,014 posts)
90. That last comment...
|
...
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:37 PM
Safetykitten (3,682 posts)
50. I am waiting for him to squeeze a roll of Charmin.
Response to Safetykitten (Reply #50)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:40 PM
Moosepoop (1,486 posts)
57. LOL!!! n/t
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:38 PM
Honeycombe8 (18,006 posts)
53. Better than Jindal.
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:39 PM
Safetykitten (3,682 posts)
54. Light bulb hating bossy government.
Response to Safetykitten (Reply #54)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:41 PM
jberryhill (29,897 posts)
62. Light bulbs... Always with the freaking light bulbs
Response to jberryhill (Reply #62)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:44 PM
Safetykitten (3,682 posts)
73. Such an odd fetish symbol for the republicans. Must be their toilet training issues.
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:39 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
55. "We'll allow ourselves to be pitted, one against the other."
|
Even a cave man can do it...
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:39 PM
vercetti2021 (409 posts)
56. Hmm...
|
Anyone think he looks like a old Ed Grimley?
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:41 PM
Terra Alta (3,412 posts)
59. what, no "God bless America" at the end of his speech?
|
interesting...
|
Response to Terra Alta (Reply #59)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:42 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
64. Oh noes...
|
He forgot God!!! Now God will be angry!!!
|
Response to Terra Alta (Reply #59)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:43 PM
npk (2,828 posts)
72. It's only God Bless America when the Republicans are in charge of the country
|
When it's a Democrat God does not love us anymore.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:41 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
60. Rachel Maddow: "The city on the hill did not shine."
|
|
Response to ellisonz (Reply #60)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:49 PM
lonestarnot (71,135 posts)
82. I know.
|
That was great. Took the tingly out of Mathew's leg.
|
Response to ellisonz (Reply #60)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:56 PM
jberryhill (29,897 posts)
96. Because it doesn't have incandescent light bulbs!
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:41 PM
Old and In the Way (36,257 posts)
63. Short and boring.
|
No one will remember this in 15 minutes.
|
Response to Old and In the Way (Reply #63)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:43 PM
ellisonz (26,319 posts)
69. Agreed.
|
It was full of fail. Delivery sucked, rhetoric sucked, speaker sucked.
GOP = Party of the Ignorant Old and Fearful. |
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:42 PM
npk (2,828 posts)
65. So let me get this straight
|
The man responsible for spending this country into it's largest deficit EVER, is giving s speech attacking the President on how he has failed to fix the economy. This is why the GOP is so fucked up. They don't even see the irony in this response. WOW just wow.
|
Response to npk (Reply #65)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:45 PM
Old and In the Way (36,257 posts)
75. Blew me away, too. This is the best and brightest to give the rebuttal?
|
He had to have drawn the short straw.
He should have been introduced as George W. Bush''s budget director. What a joke. |
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:42 PM
Liberal_Stalwart71 (13,853 posts)
66. REPUBLICAN RESPONSE = MITCH DANIELS = EPIC FAIL!!!!
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:42 PM
onethatcares (6,639 posts)
67. I think they took all of *s
|
speeches, bundled them and made this guy pick out the high notes.
at the end he got * and his daddy mixed up with that city on a hill bullshit. |
Response to onethatcares (Reply #67)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:22 PM
tblue37 (11,702 posts)
95. No, that was Reagan. Daddy Bush was the thousand points of light. nt
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:42 PM
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (6,600 posts)
68. Yet Tweety's falling all over this guy.
|
Nutless wonder
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:43 PM
Moosepoop (1,486 posts)
69. Tweety liked his speech??
|
Glad Rachel vehemently disagreed and told him why Daniels' speech was idiotic.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:43 PM
highplainsdem (11,110 posts)
71. Rachel's right -- this was a "Be afraid! Be afraid! Run to Republicans!" speech
Response to highplainsdem (Reply #71)
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:19 AM
barbtries (15,012 posts)
99. hell yeah
|
it's all they've got, and it's bullshit.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:44 PM
Hatchling (1,961 posts)
74. It's like that old cartoon of a man scolding his dog.
|
He says: Bad dog, Ginger!
I hear: Blah, blah, Ginger! |
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:45 PM
arely staircase (4,189 posts)
76. wow, that guy was riveting. nt
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:45 PM
highplainsdem (11,110 posts)
77. Josh Marshall: Mitch Daniels speech is kind of like the Triptofan kicking in after the TG dinner.
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 10:57 PM
LongTomH (3,999 posts)
85. Oh, God! Do we have to look forward to listening to this guy's campaign speeches in 2016?
|
Hermann, come baaaack! |
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:00 PM
craigmatic (3,215 posts)
89. The rebuttal was boring, lifeless and a waste of time.
Response to craigmatic (Reply #89)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:02 PM
Hepburn (19,014 posts)
92. Yeah, and those where the good points about it. n/t
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:02 PM
DCBob (14,773 posts)
91. it seemed he didnt actually respond to the things the President said.
|
It seemed disconnected.
|
Response to DCBob (Reply #91)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:08 PM
onethatcares (6,639 posts)
94. he thought he was at the debates
|
where the other assholes stood around and said things that were disconnected to reality too.
|
Response to ellisonz (Original post)
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 10:25 AM
ecstatic (18,600 posts)
100. THIS guy is their great hope?
|
I hate to say this, but there's no way an elf-sounding guy spouting right wing ideas while standing at 5'4 could beat Obama. He would fizzle just like Perry did.
|

