HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Capitalism vs. Socialism
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 11:00 AM

Capitalism vs. Socialism


http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/red-guy-blue-guy

3 replies, 1038 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Capitalism vs. Socialism (Original post)
kpete Jan 2013 OP
1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #1
JReed Jan 2013 #2
truebluegreen Jan 2013 #3

Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 11:05 AM

1. I agree with all of this, except ...

the final frame. The portrayal of fascism should depict the "People" (the Blue characters) lying on the ground with the one Red character standing and holding the gun.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Tue Jan 8, 2013, 11:13 AM

2. No socialist

 

I've ever met would have bags of money being held to represent an egalitarian society if that is what is suppose to be represented.

Pretty silly graphic overall.



Why Socialism?
Albert Einstein


...

The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor—not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules. In this respect, it is important to realize that the means of production—that is to say, the entire productive capacity that is needed for producing consumer goods as well as additional capital goods—may legally be, and for the most part are, the private property of individuals.

...

Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones. The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society. This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature. The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population. Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education). It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights.

The situation prevailing in an economy based on the private ownership of capital is thus characterized by two main principles: first, means of production (capital) are privately owned and the owners dispose of them as they see fit; second, the labor contract is free. Of course, there is no such thing as a pure capitalist society in this sense. In particular, it should be noted that the workers, through long and bitter political struggles, have succeeded in securing a somewhat improved form of the “free labor contract” for certain categories of workers. But taken as a whole, the present day economy does not differ much from “pure” capitalism.

...

I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals. In such an economy, the means of production are owned by society itself and are utilized in a planned fashion. A planned economy, which adjusts production to the needs of the community, would distribute the work to be done among all those able to work and would guarantee a livelihood to every man, woman, and child. The education of the individual, in addition to promoting his own innate abilities, would attempt to develop in him a sense of responsibility for his fellow men in place of the glorification of power and success in our present society.

...

http://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JReed (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 9, 2013, 09:40 AM

3. Enstein was even smarter than I thought. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread