Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:04 PM
RandySF (5,291 posts)
Dear Mr. President, Go big or go home.Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:04 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I've been going to wall for you for him for three years, and I am not about to hand over the keys of the White House to Willard Romney. But he has go big starting tonight and through November. If he's not ready, then he might as well save us the trouble and start shipping his stuff back to Chicago.
|
13 replies, 1190 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| RandySF | Jan 2012 | OP | |
| quinnox | Jan 2012 | #1 | |
| gateley | Jan 2012 | #2 | |
| Maven | Jan 2012 | #4 | |
| rhett o rick | Jan 2012 | #10 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Jan 2012 | #3 | |
| WillyT | Jan 2012 | #5 | |
| CakeGrrl | Jan 2012 | #6 | |
| WillyT | Jan 2012 | #8 | |
| quinnox | Jan 2012 | #9 | |
| bahrbearian | Jan 2012 | #7 | |
| Poll_Blind | Jan 2012 | #11 | |
| Raine | Jan 2012 | #12 | |
| joshcryer | Jan 2012 | #13 |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:05 PM
quinnox (15,696 posts)
1. sounds good to me!
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:07 PM
gateley (61,915 posts)
2. What would you consider going Big? nt
Response to gateley (Reply #2)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:13 PM
Maven (7,760 posts)
4. Well, I think he is on the right track by making economic fairness the centerpiece
|
Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:14 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) of this speech.
I guess "going big" would mean following through with aggressive proposals to close loopholes, make outsourcing less attractive and generally make the wealthiest pay their fair share. Maybe even withdraw support from any settlements with big banks that let them off the hook with a relatively small fine. The Buffett Rule was a good start but it's not enough. And if Republicans cry "class warfare," he should call them out by NAME and show how each one of them has waged war against the poor and middle class. |
Response to gateley (Reply #2)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:40 PM
rhett o rick (26,736 posts)
10. WeThePeople are pretty much screwed. If he goes after Wall Street there might be some hope. nm
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:09 PM
Cali_Democrat (14,684 posts)
3. What he needs to do is go on the attack in a big way
|
stop playing pat-a-cake and start kicking some Republican ass.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:15 PM
WillyT (45,592 posts)
5. You Are Not Alone In This Sentiment... See Enclosed Link:
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:24 PM
CakeGrrl (9,034 posts)
6. If he doesn't go big enough tonight, then what?
|
Bye-bye avatar?
|
Response to CakeGrrl (Reply #6)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:26 PM
WillyT (45,592 posts)
8. No... Just Less Support... In General...
|
|
Response to CakeGrrl (Reply #6)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:29 PM
quinnox (15,696 posts)
9. are you trying to make a wager with the OP?
|
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:25 PM
bahrbearian (11,110 posts)
7. Make em squeal
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:42 PM
Poll_Blind (23,231 posts)
11. Maybe more tax breaks for corporations is the answer. I mean, THIS time it could work!
|
I can feel it!
PB |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:49 PM
Raine (20,177 posts)
12. TOTALLY Agree! nt
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:52 PM
joshcryer (39,752 posts)
13. Expect very populist rhetoric. Do NOT expect populist policy.
|
If the populist policy is proposed, then, be surprised.
|

