HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Dim Sum Surprise: Why the...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 03:47 AM

Dim Sum Surprise: Why the Hong Kong Model Won't Save Tibet

TPR
By the Editorial Board of The Tibetan Political Review

Proponents of the Middle Way policy have recently been placing increased hope on Chinese law. Exhibit A in this argument is Article 31 of the Chinese Constitution, which allows for the creation of Special Administrative Regions such as Hong Kong. The claim is that Chinese law already provides for the type of autonomy that Tibetans demand, and what’s missing is only political will from China to implement its own law.

There is a major problem with this view, unfortunately, and it is not the obvious ones of China’s lack of political will or the legal non-enforceability of the Chinese constitution.

Rather, the missing factor is that even for Hong Kong, autonomy under China’s Article 31 has always been understood to be only temporary. Hong Kong’s freedoms are scheduled to expire after a transitional period, when the territory will then be absorbed into the Chinese political system. Strangely, this factor is wholly ignored in the public analysis of whether the Hong Kong model has utility for Tibet.

Looking Closely at China’s Article 31

Article 31 was added to the 1982 Chinese Constitution for the purpose of easing Hong Kong and Macao (and possibly Taiwan) back under Chinese sovereignty. The inconvenient truth is that Hong Kong’s current status is simply a prelude to full incorporation into China. The Basic Law, which serves as Hong Kong’s mini-constitution, provides that Hong Kong’s “capitalist system and way of life shall remain unchanged for 50 years”. This means that, come 2047, Hong Kong will no longer be protected by its autonomous arrangement.

http://www.phayul.com/news/article.aspx?c=4&t=1&id=30709&article=Dim+Sum+Surprise%3a+Why+the+Hong+Kong+Model+Won%27t+Save+Tibet


Clearly, any change must and most likely will come from within the PRC...

Will Hong Kong be absorbed in 2047? Will Tibet ever be free? Will the PRC ever undergo revolution or dramatic political change?

2 replies, 707 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Dim Sum Surprise: Why the Hong Kong Model Won't Save Tibet (Original post)
ellisonz Jan 2012 OP
Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #1
ellisonz Jan 2012 #2

Response to ellisonz (Original post)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 04:03 AM

1. A lot can happen in 35 years

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Angry Dragon (Reply #1)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 04:11 AM

2. Let's hope so...

The PRC certainly isn't easing up on the repression button.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread