Tue Jan 24, 2012, 02:39 AM
mfcorey1 (3,888 posts)
FACT CHECK: Gingrich flubs history in GOP debate
WASHINGTON (AP) — Newt Gingrich called rival Mitt Romney a "terrible historian" but flubbed his own history in Congress on Monday night when he claimed the nation ran four consecutive budget surpluses during his time as House speaker. Romney attacked Gingrich's financial links to Freddie Mac while ignoring his own.
The accusations were fast out of the gate in the latest Republican presidential debate, and reality got tromped in the process. A look at some of claims and how they compare with the facts: ___ GINGRICH: "When I was speaker, we had four consecutive balanced budgets." THE FACTS: Actually, two. The four straight years of budget surpluses were 1998 through 2001. Gingrich left Congress in 1999, so he only had a hand in surpluses for his last two years. The budget ran deficits for his first two years as speaker. The highest surplus of that four-year string came in budget year 2000, after Gingrich was out of office. Overall, the national debt went up during the four years Gingrich was speaker. In January 1995, when he assumed the leadership http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-gingrich-flubs-history-gop-debate-030803027.htmlposition, the gross national debt was $4.8 trillion. When he left four years later, it was $5.6 trillion, an increase of $800 billion.
|
6 replies, 1011 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| mfcorey1 | Jan 2012 | OP | |
| MADem | Jan 2012 | #1 | |
| bulloney | Jan 2012 | #2 | |
| CTyankee | Jan 2012 | #5 | |
| tanyev | Jan 2012 | #3 | |
| HopeHoops | Jan 2012 | #4 | |
| Scurrilous | Jan 2012 | #6 |
Response to mfcorey1 (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 04:22 AM
MADem (86,101 posts)
1. That old boy pulls history outta his ass every chance he gets.
|
He tried to claim that his "I report to a lobbyist" job was "historical" in nature.
Oh, Speaker, please! We were not born last night! I'd love to have a job that pays three hundred grand a year for doing "historical research." I'll bet someone who is an actual HISTORIAN would love such a job, too! |
Response to MADem (Reply #1)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 06:40 AM
bulloney (3,147 posts)
2. Newt just strings a bunch of multi-syllable words together
|
and his knuckle-dragging base thinks he's some kind of a genius.
If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit, right Newt? |
Response to MADem (Reply #1)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 09:17 AM
CTyankee (35,070 posts)
5. Scarborough does the same thing and I have the same reaction as you!
|
I was THERE when those surpluses emerged. I remember the fight with Clinton. The pukes were proved wrong!
Historical revisionism, pure and simple...I wish more people would call them on it... |
Response to mfcorey1 (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:18 AM
tanyev (22,102 posts)
3. It's OK, he's clearly a historian of alternate realities.
|
Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2012, 08:19 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Response to mfcorey1 (Original post)
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 09:14 AM
HopeHoops (47,675 posts)
4. "Yo, Newt - ya got some Santorum on yer notes thar."

