Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:00 PM
119 replies, 3765 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
 119 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 The explicitly anti-Obama posters here sure been coming out of the woodwork (Original post) |
pnwmom | Dec 2012 | OP |
| L0oniX | Dec 2012 | #1 | |
| 1StrongBlackMan | Dec 2012 | #31 | |
| Summer Hathaway | Dec 2012 | #72 | |
| cliffordu | Dec 2012 | #90 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #115 | |
| Champion Jack | Dec 2012 | #117 | |
| Arctic Dave | Dec 2012 | #2 | |
| RainDog | Dec 2012 | #4 | |
| LWolf | Dec 2012 | #6 | |
| L0oniX | Dec 2012 | #13 | |
| liberal_at_heart | Dec 2012 | #21 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Dec 2012 | #48 | |
| truebluegreen | Dec 2012 | #91 | |
| Blue_In_AK | Dec 2012 | #98 | |
| pnwmom | Dec 2012 | #110 | |
| kardonb | Dec 2012 | #81 | |
| JaneyVee | Dec 2012 | #3 | |
| djean111 | Dec 2012 | #9 | |
| UnrepentantLiberal | Dec 2012 | #47 | |
| tblue | Dec 2012 | #82 | |
| R. Daneel Olivaw | Dec 2012 | #83 | |
| DireStrike | Dec 2012 | #5 | |
| djean111 | Dec 2012 | #7 | |
| cui bono | Dec 2012 | #24 | |
| tblue | Dec 2012 | #84 | |
| woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #8 | |
| L0oniX | Dec 2012 | #10 | |
| sellitman | Dec 2012 | #14 | |
| cui bono | Dec 2012 | #22 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Dec 2012 | #57 | |
| Dragonfli | Dec 2012 | #64 | |
| R. Daneel Olivaw | Dec 2012 | #88 | |
| yurbud | Dec 2012 | #97 | |
| liberal_at_heart | Dec 2012 | #25 | |
| Poll_Blind | Dec 2012 | #27 | |
| ThomThom | Dec 2012 | #30 | |
| klyon | Dec 2012 | #39 | |
| DisgustipatedinCA | Dec 2012 | #46 | |
| klyon | Dec 2012 | #78 | |
| DisgustipatedinCA | Dec 2012 | #106 | |
| immoderate | Dec 2012 | #34 | |
| SidDithers | Dec 2012 | #36 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #37 | |
| byeya | Dec 2012 | #42 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #51 | |
| SidDithers | Dec 2012 | #54 | |
| woo me with science | Dec 2012 | #58 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #73 | |
| SidDithers | Dec 2012 | #80 | |
| R. Daneel Olivaw | Dec 2012 | #94 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #101 | |
| L0oniX | Dec 2012 | #111 | |
| SidDithers | Dec 2012 | #116 | |
| Number23 | Dec 2012 | #87 | |
| Skittles | Dec 2012 | #45 | |
| Lionessa | Dec 2012 | #52 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Dec 2012 | #59 | |
| leftstreet | Dec 2012 | #60 | |
| forestpath | Dec 2012 | #63 | |
| tblue | Dec 2012 | #89 | |
| yurbud | Dec 2012 | #93 | |
| truebluegreen | Dec 2012 | #95 | |
| a11ig8r | Dec 2012 | #104 | |
| alcibiades_mystery | Dec 2012 | #11 | |
| RainDog | Dec 2012 | #15 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #76 | |
| limpyhobbler | Dec 2012 | #12 | |
| Rex | Dec 2012 | #17 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Dec 2012 | #61 | |
| zbdent | Dec 2012 | #16 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Dec 2012 | #70 | |
| Enrique | Dec 2012 | #18 | |
| cui bono | Dec 2012 | #19 | |
| Demit | Dec 2012 | #38 | |
| SidDithers | Dec 2012 | #20 | |
| KG | Dec 2012 | #23 | |
| hay rick | Dec 2012 | #26 | |
| Jim Warren | Dec 2012 | #28 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Dec 2012 | #62 | |
| Yavin4 | Dec 2012 | #29 | |
| truebluegreen | Dec 2012 | #102 | |
| Smarmie Doofus | Dec 2012 | #32 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #33 | |
| byeya | Dec 2012 | #49 | |
| arely staircase | Dec 2012 | #71 | |
| truebluegreen | Dec 2012 | #105 | |
| lamp_shade | Dec 2012 | #35 | |
| Demit | Dec 2012 | #41 | |
| Jim Warren | Dec 2012 | #50 | |
| lamp_shade | Dec 2012 | #96 | |
| lamp_shade | Dec 2012 | #92 | |
| R. Daneel Olivaw | Dec 2012 | #99 | |
| truebluegreen | Dec 2012 | #108 | |
| RomneyLies | Dec 2012 | #40 | |
| Lionessa | Dec 2012 | #43 | |
| byeya | Dec 2012 | #53 | |
| truebluegreen | Dec 2012 | #107 | |
| L0oniX | Dec 2012 | #114 | |
| blue neen | Dec 2012 | #44 | |
| loyalkydem | Dec 2012 | #55 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Dec 2012 | #74 | |
| elleng | Dec 2012 | #56 | |
| sheshe2 | Dec 2012 | #68 | |
| NYC Liberal | Dec 2012 | #65 | |
| R. Daneel Olivaw | Dec 2012 | #66 | |
| robinlynne | Dec 2012 | #67 | |
| sulphurdunn | Dec 2012 | #69 | |
| JoePhilly | Dec 2012 | #75 | |
| kentuck | Dec 2012 | #77 | |
| leftstreet | Dec 2012 | #79 | |
| L0oniX | Dec 2012 | #112 | |
| Prometheus_unbound | Dec 2012 | #85 | |
| LWolf | Dec 2012 | #86 | |
| madfloridian | Dec 2012 | #100 | |
| graham4anything | Dec 2012 | #103 | |
| truebluegreen | Dec 2012 | #109 | |
| MassedPole | Dec 2012 | #113 | |
| Jamaal510 | Dec 2012 | #118 | |
| aikoaiko | Dec 2012 | #119 |
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:08 PM
L0oniX (17,342 posts)
1. Of course ...Obama is flawless. How dare anyone anyone object to anything he says or does?
|
Don't they know that Obama is above being criticized? WTF! Certainly we all should know that Obama is 100% progressive.
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to L0oniX (Reply #1)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:04 PM
31. Interesting first post ...
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #31)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:44 PM
72. ...
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #31)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:56 PM
90. Yep.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #31)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:34 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
115. a scalded dog hollers the loudest
|
Last edited Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:35 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #31)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:35 PM
Champion Jack (4,419 posts)
117. +++!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:09 PM
Arctic Dave (12,549 posts)
2. That's what Obama called himself.
|
Should we be worried?
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #2)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:13 PM
4. He also stated he was in line with moderate Republicans, circa 1980
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to RainDog (Reply #4)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:14 PM
LWolf (35,953 posts)
6. +1
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to RainDog (Reply #4)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:20 PM
L0oniX (17,342 posts)
13. DU is in witch hunt mode.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to L0oniX (Reply #13)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:40 PM
21. yes there does seem to be a theme to today's threads
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to RainDog (Reply #4)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:23 PM
48. Moderate Republican? Circa 1980?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to RainDog (Reply #4)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:56 PM
truebluegreen (1,644 posts)
91. +1
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to RainDog (Reply #4)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:02 PM
Blue_In_AK (37,722 posts)
98. Exactly.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to RainDog (Reply #4)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:30 PM
110. I'm not objecting to people claiming Obama isn't liberal. That's a matter of opinion
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Arctic Dave (Reply #2)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:51 PM
81. Obama
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:11 PM
3. Do these anti-Obama posters know that the election is over & Obama can't run again?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #3)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:17 PM
djean111 (937 posts)
9. What does that have to do with anything?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #3)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:22 PM
UnrepentantLiberal (11,700 posts)
47. Do you know that he represents us and we have a right
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to UnrepentantLiberal (Reply #47)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:51 PM
tblue (13,910 posts)
82. Oh, dear UnrepentantLiberal.
 I think we were supposed to check our critiques at the door somewhere. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to UnrepentantLiberal (Reply #47)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:53 PM
83. Seemingly some may not realize that
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:13 PM
5. So they showed restraint in criticizing our candidate during the election, and now stop.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:14 PM
djean111 (937 posts)
7. So if I hate an Obama policy or whatever, that means I hate Obama?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to djean111 (Reply #7)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:45 PM
cui bono (7,470 posts)
24. You missed at least one thing...
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to cui bono (Reply #24)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:53 PM
tblue (13,910 posts)
84. He never actually did this:
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:16 PM
8. Maybe, just maybe, people are getting sick and tired
|
Last edited Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:19 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:19 PM
L0oniX (17,342 posts)
10. +330,000,000
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:21 PM
sellitman (9,305 posts)
14. This needs to be a stand alone post
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:40 PM
cui bono (7,470 posts)
22. Yes, but woo... if you read those threads I'm sure you'll see that none of that really happened.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to cui bono (Reply #22)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:30 PM
57. Offering to cut SS is an event in an of itself. You cannot seriously say that the offer was not made
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #57)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:38 PM
64. Really, read the exchange, it was fascinating
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #57)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:00 PM
yurbud (31,406 posts)
97. it's hard not to notice that Obama used the political capital of reelection the same way Bush did...
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:47 PM
25. +1000000
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:52 PM
27. !
|
PB |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:01 PM
30. yes
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ThomThom (Reply #30)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:11 PM
39. some of us may fear the wrath of other DUer's
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to klyon (Reply #39)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:21 PM
46. Wow. We both signed up in 2001, and you have fewer posts than I do.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to DisgustipatedinCA (Reply #46)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:49 PM
78. cool
|
Last edited Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:49 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to klyon (Reply #78)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:14 PM
106. Yes, lots of times it feels like it's all been said before; just different window dressing
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:05 PM
34. Well struck!
|
--imm |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:08 PM
SidDithers (27,065 posts)
36. CTRL-V for Victory!!...nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:09 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
37. woo me with repetition/tedium
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to arely staircase (Reply #37)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:18 PM
42. Why not post? Woo has never gotten a satisfactory answer. Too many fanboys and not enough
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to byeya (Reply #42)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:24 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
51. wasn't it einstein who said something about doing the same thing over and over
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to arely staircase (Reply #37)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:25 PM
SidDithers (27,065 posts)
54. Up to 9 or 10 now...nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to SidDithers (Reply #54)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:31 PM
58. You mean corporatist legislation coming from or being assisted by Democrats?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #58)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:45 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
73. could you post it again please?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #58)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:50 PM
SidDithers (27,065 posts)
80. Go for it...
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to SidDithers (Reply #80)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:59 PM
94. Was there anything factually inaccurate with WMWS's post?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #94)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:03 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
101. i think most spam contains some truth
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #94)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:30 PM
L0oniX (17,342 posts)
111. Have you ever seen *** reasonably discuss anything?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to L0oniX (Reply #111)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:35 PM
SidDithers (27,065 posts)
116. **** ***...nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to arely staircase (Reply #37)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:55 PM
87. You misunderstand. Apparently, some LISTS are more "important" than others
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:20 PM
Skittles (86,317 posts)
45. CORRECT
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:32 PM
59. Thank you. n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:33 PM
leftstreet (22,098 posts)
60. +1
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:35 PM
63. +1
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:56 PM
tblue (13,910 posts)
89. Oh you and your damn facts and citations
|
Last edited Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:57 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) I want to scream. If we don't push from the Left, the only pushing will be from the Right. Who is above critique? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:58 PM
yurbud (31,406 posts)
93. thank you for a substantive reply to a vapid, unsubstantiated post.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to woo me with science (Reply #8)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:59 PM
truebluegreen (1,644 posts)
95. + a million
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:19 PM
alcibiades_mystery (28,410 posts)
11. They're mad that Obama won, and that the progressive base supported the President strongly
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #11)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:23 PM
15. well, I don't know about you
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to alcibiades_mystery (Reply #11)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:48 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
76. remember how demoralized we were supposed to be?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:20 PM
12. Should this be in Meta?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to limpyhobbler (Reply #12)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:30 PM
Rex (34,649 posts)
17. Yes
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to limpyhobbler (Reply #12)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:33 PM
61. Or,
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:24 PM
16. You mean the ones who say they're "lifelong Democrats" or
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to zbdent (Reply #16)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:42 PM
70. Or the ones who say they're "lifelong Democrats" but demand loyalty to principals, not principles.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:36 PM
18. should they (we?) be thanked for waiting until after the election?
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:37 PM
cui bono (7,470 posts)
19. So true. I can't tell you how many posts I read from people who think they are progressive
|
Last edited Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:48 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to cui bono (Reply #19)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:09 PM
38. Like.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:39 PM
SidDithers (27,065 posts)
20. DU rec...nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:43 PM
23. you mad bro?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:50 PM
hay rick (3,492 posts)
26. I guess I forgot this is supposed to be Obama Underground.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:52 PM
28. Should it be all
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Jim Warren (Reply #28)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:35 PM
62. Or the BOG
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 04:54 PM
Yavin4 (18,505 posts)
29. The Obama Haters Are Just Mad That He Won Handily Without Their Support
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Yavin4 (Reply #29)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:06 PM
truebluegreen (1,644 posts)
102. Obama "Haters?"
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:04 PM
Smarmie Doofus (9,717 posts)
32. "Be aware. Just because someone calls himself or herself a progressive doesn't mean s/he is one."
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:05 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
33. the more he kicks ass the shriller they become
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to arely staircase (Reply #33)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:23 PM
49. Yeah Obama has really kicked ass with drones; directed extrajudicial murder; a terrible record
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to byeya (Reply #49)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:43 PM
arely staircase (4,149 posts)
71. so why did you vote for him?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to arely staircase (Reply #71)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:13 PM
truebluegreen (1,644 posts)
105. Assuming he/she did,
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:08 PM
lamp_shade (9,970 posts)
35. They were NEVER Obama supporters and were likely hoping for a romney win.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lamp_shade (Reply #35)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:16 PM
41. Oh for heaven's sake.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Jim Warren (Reply #50)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:00 PM
lamp_shade (9,970 posts)
96. See reply #16.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Demit (Reply #41)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:58 PM
lamp_shade (9,970 posts)
92. Sorry, dear, but I stand firmly by my statement. n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Demit (Reply #41)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:03 PM
99. "They" are those who are not we.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lamp_shade (Reply #35)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:16 PM
truebluegreen (1,644 posts)
108. Yeah, right...
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Lionessa (Reply #43)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:24 PM
53. Hear, hear!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Lionessa (Reply #43)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:14 PM
truebluegreen (1,644 posts)
107. Yup. +1000
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Lionessa (Reply #43)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:34 PM
L0oniX (17,342 posts)
114. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:19 PM
blue neen (8,032 posts)
44. It's so weird.
|
Last edited Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:27 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:26 PM
55. I am no DLC dem or a Progressive democrat.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to loyalkydem (Reply #55)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:46 PM
74. So are all those who post in the BOG.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:28 PM
elleng (40,530 posts)
56. Or a DEMOCRAT!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to elleng (Reply #56)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:41 PM
sheshe2 (4,839 posts)
68. +1!
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:40 PM
NYC Liberal (15,599 posts)
65. More like "returning"
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:40 PM
66. Would you link to these explicitly anti-Obama posters?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:41 PM
robinlynne (15,169 posts)
67. Are you calling Obama a progressive?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:41 PM
sulphurdunn (3,488 posts)
69. Would all the Obama Haters
|
i.e those who voted for Mitt Romney because they are critical of many of Obama's policies please standup.
 |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:48 PM
75. They are angry that their latest prediction, that Obama would make a deal to cut SS
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:48 PM
77. It's a dirty job...
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:49 PM
leftstreet (22,098 posts)
79. No one is 'anti-Obama.' Many are against his policies
|
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to leftstreet (Reply #79)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:32 PM
L0oniX (17,342 posts)
112. Please don't interfere with the re-framers.
|
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:53 PM
85. Just because Obama calls himself a progressive...
|
Last edited Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:54 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 05:55 PM
LWolf (35,953 posts)
86. You mean,
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:03 PM
madfloridian (78,150 posts)
100. Well, you sure don't need folks like that hanging around, do you?
|
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:08 PM
graham4anything (9,206 posts)
103. Yup. +a zillion. Democrats back President Obama.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to graham4anything (Reply #103)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:18 PM
truebluegreen (1,644 posts)
109. Democrats back Democratic policies. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:33 PM
MassedPole (242 posts)
113. My only problem with Obama hes not Left enough.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:38 PM
Jamaal510 (3,161 posts)
118. I doubt it's so much that they're anti-Obama;
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to pnwmom (Original post)
Fri Dec 28, 2012, 06:38 PM
aikoaiko (16,568 posts)
119. Locking.
Cannot reply in locked threads