HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Did Gregory break the law...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 05:26 PM

 

Did Gregory break the law...

He's waving an AR-15 30 round magazine around.



"DC High Capacity Ammunition Magazines - D.C. Official Code 7-2506.01

(b) No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. For the purposes of this subsection, the term �large capacity ammunition feeding device� means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The term �large capacity ammunition feeding device� shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.�."

Will he be prosecuted?

94 replies, 5256 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 94 replies Author Time Post
Reply Did Gregory break the law... (Original post)
Mec9000 Dec 2012 OP
sadbear Dec 2012 #1
protwodem Dec 2012 #3
LeftofObama Dec 2012 #2
orpupilofnature57 Dec 2012 #76
Rosco T. Dec 2012 #4
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #7
k2qb3 Dec 2012 #5
former-republican Dec 2012 #8
k2qb3 Dec 2012 #12
derby378 Dec 2012 #10
krawhitham Dec 2012 #14
Mass Dec 2012 #16
11 Bravo Dec 2012 #19
Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #65
Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #80
karynnj Dec 2012 #75
Glitterati Dec 2012 #6
lpbk2713 Dec 2012 #9
Son of Gob Dec 2012 #11
protwodem Dec 2012 #13
Son of Gob Dec 2012 #21
protwodem Dec 2012 #31
Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #15
DeSwiss Dec 2012 #38
Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #58
DeSwiss Dec 2012 #87
Mass Dec 2012 #17
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #18
Mass Dec 2012 #20
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #23
oldhippie Dec 2012 #68
Coyote_Tan Dec 2012 #29
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #37
Coyote_Tan Dec 2012 #93
oldhippie Dec 2012 #63
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #72
oldhippie Dec 2012 #77
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #78
ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #88
oldhippie Dec 2012 #91
Dread Pirate Roberts Dec 2012 #22
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #24
renie408 Dec 2012 #25
RKP5637 Dec 2012 #26
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #27
renie408 Dec 2012 #45
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #55
DollarBillHines Dec 2012 #28
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #33
DollarBillHines Dec 2012 #49
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #56
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #61
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #66
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #70
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #62
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #67
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #71
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #30
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #34
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #43
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #46
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #50
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #53
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #57
ProgressiveProfessor Dec 2012 #89
Shankapotomus Dec 2012 #32
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #35
Shankapotomus Dec 2012 #41
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #44
samsingh Dec 2012 #36
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #39
samsingh Dec 2012 #40
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #42
samsingh Dec 2012 #52
protwodem Dec 2012 #54
samsingh Dec 2012 #59
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #60
renie408 Dec 2012 #47
OldDem2012 Dec 2012 #48
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #51
UtahLib Dec 2012 #86
billh58 Dec 2012 #92
Dread Pirate Roberts Dec 2012 #64
Mec9000 Dec 2012 #69
Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #74
cali Dec 2012 #73
Enrique Dec 2012 #79
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #81
Enrique Dec 2012 #82
Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #83
Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #84
Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #85
bluedigger Dec 2012 #90
tavernier Dec 2012 #94

Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 05:37 PM

1. He was just holding it for a friend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sadbear (Reply #1)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:01 PM

3. It's CGI. It's impossible for him to actually be holding that magazine because they're banned in DC.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 06:04 PM

2. Didn't GHWBush hold up a bag of pot on tv that he said

was purchased across the street in Lafayette Park?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LeftofObama (Reply #2)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:28 PM

76. He should of inhaled .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:06 PM

4. of it's non functional prop...

.. or the Washington PD brought it in and are standing off stage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Rosco T. (Reply #4)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:12 PM

7. or they sent an intern to a gun shop in VA for a prop...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:06 PM

5. John Kerry admitted to owning an unregistered machine gun in a presidential debate.

Some animals are more equal than others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to k2qb3 (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:14 PM

8. What !

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to former-republican (Reply #8)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:25 PM

12. You don't remember that?

Pretty sure it was in the debate, might be wrong and it was an interview, but I clearly remember him saying his favorite memento of his service was a Chinese assault rifle he'd brought back.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to k2qb3 (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:17 PM

10. Link, please? (n/t)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to k2qb3 (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:45 PM

16. Here is the true story, from a decent source.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/27/politics/campaign/27guns.html

Senator John Kerry's campaign said yesterday that Mr. Kerry did not own a Chinese assault rifle, as he was quoted as saying in Outdoor Life magazine, but a single-bolt-action military rifle, blaming aides who filled out the magazine's questionnaire on his behalf for the error.

But thanks for your freeper links.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to k2qb3 (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:51 PM

19. Also, some trolls are more subtle (not to mention smarter) than others.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 11 Bravo (Reply #19)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:10 PM

65. I'd alert, but there is no point, jurors don't care about trolls.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #65)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:44 PM

80. but mirt does yuk yuk yuk.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to k2qb3 (Reply #5)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:25 PM

75. No he didn't - I watched the three debates and all the primary debates and he NEVER said he had a

machine gun - registered or otherwise.

Kerry was a key person for the AWB in the 1990s and repeatedly spoke of how machine guns were NOT for hunting.

Please provide a link.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:08 PM

6. Hmmmm, the Freepers are going bonkers over this

Uh, yeah, I think this one is pretty obvious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:16 PM

9. It's a can of sardines.




Yeah ... really.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Son of Gob (Reply #11)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:30 PM

13. 6:57PM? They were late to the party

 

Everyone has been talking about this since it aired this morning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to protwodem (Reply #13)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:58 PM

21. Everyone?

You mean fellow freepers, right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Son of Gob (Reply #21)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:13 PM

31. All you have to do is Google it.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:39 PM

15. It was carved out of soap.

I know because I carved it for NBC. We painted it black with shoe polish.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #15)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:18 PM

38. That's sort of how Dillinger did it.....



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DeSwiss (Reply #38)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:51 PM

58. where do you think dillinger got the idea?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #58)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:08 PM

87. ....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:46 PM

17. Did it occur to you that he may have asked for a waiver for his show from the competent authorities.

I dont like Gregory, but frankly, this is stupid.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mass (Reply #17)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:48 PM

18. It is the law... There is no "TV" waiver

 

So It is OK if the right type of people have them....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #18)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:51 PM

20. Yes, I see. LaPierre, is it you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mass (Reply #20)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:58 PM

23. Nope.. and I see you don't care that he is breaking hi capacity "Murder clip" laws

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #23)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:13 PM

68. But, but, but he is doing it for a good reason, ...

 

.... so it is OK to bend those pesky little laws. They are only meant for the bad guys. C'mon, man.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #18)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:10 PM

29. Sort of...

 

Every high level politician is protected by guns, even in highly restricted areas like DC or Chicago or California.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Coyote_Tan (Reply #29)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:18 PM

37. Yes by police and the SS

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #37)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:18 PM

93. ... And private security...

 

... And personal ccw.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mass (Reply #17)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:09 PM

63. What "competent authority" can give you a waiver for a criminal statute?

 

I guess Kings can do that. I guess D.C. is kinda like that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldhippie (Reply #63)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:22 PM

72. The entertainment industry gets those

Like regularly.

What? You think all those on location shots all over the country use green screens and insert the guns later on?

I am sorry you were not aware these existed.

Chances are, they have them on file with the PD since they are an entertainment company, gasp I know, and shoot TV and movies in DC regularly. Now go and call the da and demand charges are filed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #72)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:39 PM

77. And the waiver process is noted in the statute, with the exception .....

 

... expressly spelled out. I lived in CA and have friends in the industry and I know how it works.

Does the D.C. statute have an entertainment waiver process in the statute?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldhippie (Reply #77)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:41 PM

78. So Hollywood studios break the law regularly in DC?

Is that what you are telling me? That is a real nice fantasy right there.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mass (Reply #17)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:09 PM

88. No provision for it in law

DC law is draconian and stupid in many respects.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #88)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:12 PM

91. Which is what I suspected, knowing D.C. nt

 

nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:58 PM

22. Your Screen Name...

is taken from the model number of a shotgun shell re-loader?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dread Pirate Roberts (Reply #22)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:02 PM

24. Yep Sporting Clays is expensive...

 

Don't worry it is #8 shot and a over/under. Now my son who is 17 has been shooting competitively for 4 years now. His squad came in 3rd in the nation a couple years ago in there division.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:03 PM

25. You are obviously a freeper if you think anybody in this crowd is going to defend

David Gregory.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to renie408 (Reply #25)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:05 PM

26. +1, n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to renie408 (Reply #25)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:10 PM

27. I did ask him to be defended... But it seems that he is being defended...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #27)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:31 PM

45. And that response would be the other piece of evidence that proves you are a freeper.

As it makes no sense whatsoever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to renie408 (Reply #45)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:43 PM

55. I went there one time and it gave me a headache..

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:10 PM

28. Just because he flashed it on teevee doesn't mean it was real or functional. No DA would touch that.

I mean, come on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DollarBillHines (Reply #28)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:14 PM

33. Doesn't mean its not..

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #33)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:38 PM

49. Like I said, no DA would touch it.

Proof is proof. A fart in an elevator may be offensive, but it is not a crime.

If Brooks were to load a dump truck with white powder and call it cocaine, would it be cocaine?

I could hold a bottle of beer on cam and call it a nuclear weapon. Show a clip of Nagasaki or something.

There is no crime in imagery.

I don't get where you are trying to go with this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DollarBillHines (Reply #49)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:46 PM

56. If it is proven that they just went out in VA and bought a real one what would you say...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #56)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:05 PM

61. When you prove this I will personally congratulate you

Assuming they did not have the proper waivers that you are obviously unfamiliar with.

They might even have the weapons wrangler in the same building...since they are an entertainment company as well.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #61)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:10 PM

66. I am sure they do this in DC...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #66)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:17 PM

70. Yes, they shockingly I know

Film tv and movies in DC, blocks from the White House no less.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to DollarBillHines (Reply #49)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:06 PM

62. That the liberal elite

Lives by different rules and the hypocrisy of all. It s a well trotted RW talking point. He's ignoring what he's been told about entertainment waivers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #62)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:12 PM

67. There is as much proof they had a waiver as they don't.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #67)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:19 PM

71. You were not even aware they existed

Before this conversation.

Instead of screaming lib'rul media, why not just admit it, you learned something, gasp.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:12 PM

30. Have you ever heard of entertainment licenses

And props?

Like Colbert waving that gun on his show...it's a prop, an effective one at that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #30)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:16 PM

34. Why would meet the press have a 30 roung prop in DC.. Where is Colbert filmed?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #34)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:30 PM

43. New York City for Colbert

And yes, the studious get those waivers regularly.

I am sorry you just discovered that. But really, the prop, that is what it is in this case, required somebody killing a tree...and likely a weapons wrangler off stage.

But hey, go ahead, sign the petitions. It will go nowhere because of those well known...entertainment waivers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #43)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:32 PM

46. lets see it then... This was not a movie... I doubt they did the paperwork for that.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #46)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:38 PM

50. You think a well known national news chain

Did not kill the tree? Or had the contacts to get the necessary...legal wrangler? You serious? They have lawyers to check on the lawyers casework.

You really have no clue. And are horrified at something that they got the legal clearances for.

I am not surprised though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #50)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:40 PM

53. I think they are arrogant and count on people giving them a pass like many are.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #53)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:49 PM

57. They run an entertainment division

They killed the proper trees. Not a pass, just knowledge.

So write the DA, serious.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #30)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:11 PM

89. There is no such loophole in DC law, and it looks pretty real

I have little doubt he did it...and unintentionally set up this distraction

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:13 PM

32. Unless it was an NBC Studio gun prop nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shankapotomus (Reply #32)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:17 PM

35. in DC??

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #35)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:29 PM

41. maybe they went to the district or local police

and asked if they had one they could use for the show? Seems the most likely scenario.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shankapotomus (Reply #41)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:30 PM

44. If they gave it to him then they broke the law...

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:17 PM

36. it could have been empty

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to samsingh (Reply #36)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:19 PM

39. That does not matter..

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #39)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:21 PM

40. let's arrest someone who is a threat instead

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to samsingh (Reply #40)


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #42)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:40 PM

52. no - i want the innocent deaths to stop

since gun proliferation is causing these deaths, the rational thing is to put effective controls in place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to samsingh (Reply #40)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:41 PM

54. let's go after the easy target that's right in front of us instead

 

Under any other circumstances (e.g., someone possessing it other than a member of the media, which is of course all too important to any establishment) law enforcement would jump on the opportunity to press charges against someone in possession of something that's banned, especially since the banned object in question is firearms related.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to protwodem (Reply #54)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:57 PM

59. let's make it illegal everywhere and let the arrests begin

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to samsingh (Reply #59)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:03 PM

60. That would be very expensive right now.... The current price is $50+

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:33 PM

47. PEOPLE!! Just because it followed you home, doesn't mean you have to keep feeding it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:36 PM

48. Oh, please. He's doing what he's paid to do...

...while I don't personally like Gregory because he's a total lightweight when it comes to real journalism, he gets a pass on this one. No LEO or DA will touch this with a ten-foot pole.

Try again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OldDem2012 (Reply #48)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 08:39 PM

51. Paid... I wish

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #51)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:58 PM

86. Telling - I think he meant Gregory is doing what he's paid to do. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #51)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:14 PM

92. Well thanks for the memories

and maybe FR and your Gungeon friends will consider throwing you a going away party...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:09 PM

64. This Thread Needs To Be Banished....

To The Pointless Forest!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dread Pirate Roberts (Reply #64)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:13 PM

69. Lately 1/2 the treads here could be put in that category..

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Reply #69)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:23 PM

74. you wont have to worry about it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:23 PM

73. wingnut dogshit from a wingnut site

didn't take me but a minute to figure out that's what YOU are doing.

fuck that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:43 PM

79. hopefully the country will get tired of this idiocy

and anyone making asinine arguments like the one in the OP will be laughed out of the arena.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enrique (Reply #79)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:47 PM

81. He's not alone

And when pointed the facts of life he gets friends along.

I agree...though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Enrique (Reply #82)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:54 PM

83. he cant respond . he gone

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:56 PM

84. There are exceptions to every law. Might be the definition of "possess." He didn't really "possess"

the mag. He showed it for demonstration purposes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mec9000 (Original post)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 09:58 PM

85. It's also illegal to drink alcohol on the air, isn't it? Rachel Maddow did.

She did a routine a few weeks ago where she mixed up her favorite drink and drank it. It tied in with some story she was telling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #85)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:11 PM

90. Cable programming isn't held to the same standards.

With respect to cable and satellite services, Congress has charged the Commission with enforcing the statutory prohibition against airing indecent programming "by means of radio communications." The Commission has historically interpreted this restriction to apply to radio and television broadcasters, and has never extended it to cover cable operators. In addition, because cable and satellite services are subscription-based, viewers of these services have greater control over the programming content that comes into their homes, whereas broadcast content traditionally has been available to any member of the public with a radio or television.
http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/oip/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Honeycombe8 (Reply #85)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 10:30 PM

94. Huh?? Have you ever watched Kathy Lee and Hoda?

They are smashed by noon on a daily basis and trust me, it is not make believe wine.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread