Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:24 PM
HiPointDem (20,729 posts)
Why the US media ignored Murdoch's brazen bid to hijack the presidency
So now we have it: what appears to be hard, irrefutable evidence of Rupert Murdoch's ultimate and most audacious attempt... to hijack America's democratic institutions on a scale equal to his success in kidnapping and corrupting the essential democratic institutions of Great Britain through money, influence and wholesale abuse of the privileges of a free press.
In the American instance, Murdoch's goal seems to have been nothing less than using his media empire – notably Fox News – to stealthily recruit, bankroll and support the presidential candidacy of General David Petraeus in the 2012 election.
Thus in the spring of 2011 – less than 10 weeks before Murdoch's centrality to the hacking and politician-buying scandal enveloping his British newspapers was definitively revealed – Fox News' inventor and president, Roger Ailes, dispatched an emissary to Afghanistan to urge Petraeus to turn down President Obama's expected offer to become CIA director and, instead, run for the Republican nomination for president, with promises of being bankrolled by Murdoch. Ailes himself would resign as president of Fox News and run the campaign, according to the conversation between Petraeus and the emissary, K T McFarland, a Fox News on-air defense "analyst" and former spear carrier for national security principals in three Republican administrations.
All this was revealed in a tape recording of Petraeus's meeting with McFarland obtained by Bob Woodward, whose account of their discussion, accompanied online by audio of the tape, was published in the Washington Post – distressingly, in its style section, and not on page one, where it belonged – and, under the style logo, online on December 3.
Indeed, almost as dismaying as Ailes' and Murdoch's disdain for an independent and truly free and honest press, and as remarkable as the obsequious eagerness of their messenger to convey their extraordinary presidential draft and promise of on-air Fox support to Petraeus, has been the ho-hum response to the story by the American press and the country's political establishment, whether out of fear of Murdoch, Ailes and Fox – or, perhaps, lack of surprise at Murdoch's, Ailes' and Fox's contempt for decent journalistic values or a transparent electoral process...
I am not sure how different this is from the normal political process, though.
4 replies, 376 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Why the US media ignored Murdoch's brazen bid to hijack the presidency (Original post)
Response to HiPointDem (Original post)
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:09 PM
zbdent (35,270 posts)
$ $ $ $ $ $ $
Because they want their nominee in place, too. Bring down Murdoch for this, the rest of the media is vulnerable, too.
Like the shudder that went through "wacky radio guys" when Howard Stern was taken down...
Lando Mollari: "The universe is already mad. Anything else would be redundant"; Ford Prefect: "Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so." Live every day as if it were your last ... for one day you'll be right.