Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The NRA wants a "national database of the mentally ill." (Original Post) ehrnst Dec 2012 OP
I'll start doc03 Dec 2012 #1
Next.. llmart Dec 2012 #11
Don't forget Grover Norquist. nt madinmaryland Dec 2012 #39
I try to forget him every chance I get. llmart Dec 2012 #47
Anyone who's a registered member of the Tea Party Patriots. Initech Dec 2012 #41
Cold But Fair, Sir The Magistrate Dec 2012 #2
Bravo! Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #3
I love it BainsBane Dec 2012 #4
So I'm 16, 17, or 20 years old, HockeyMom Dec 2012 #5
But they don't want a national database of gun owners. Blue Idaho Dec 2012 #6
That's what I find most ironic (n/t) Nevernose Dec 2012 #23
+1 nt Live and Learn Dec 2012 #51
Do they also nhave to wear gold stars leftyladyfrommo Dec 2012 #7
Only those undiagnosed will have guns when HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #8
Ironically, the symptoms that determine if you are mentally ill dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #13
My diagnosis goes away in DSM-V HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #14
"my dx has no available drug treatment....maybe that's why it's going away??" dixiegrrrrl Dec 2012 #17
Tons of diagnosis have no drug treatment. Every personality disorder, for starters. Care Acutely Dec 2012 #32
Well if NRA wants to be law abiding why are they so afraid of a National list of people who own southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #9
I think it is a creepy idea just like I think it is creepy that the govt is spying on everyone Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #45
They already know what we are doing now I am sure. Everyone who is on the internet is southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #48
I am not giving up my privacy that easily Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #49
I don't want to either. But don't shoot the messenger it has been happening a long time now. southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #50
I am sorry if I came off that way Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #54
Oh I didn't take it that way. I happen to feel the same way you do. I guess the only way southernyankeebelle Dec 2012 #56
I thought they wanted to put all the Teabaggers in the NCIS. Lone_Star_Dem Dec 2012 #10
How about the delusion that the gun under your bed is going to stop a tyrant? ehrnst Dec 2012 #12
How about a national database of gun owners and gun incidents? underpants Dec 2012 #15
Yeah, register your brain but not your gun. nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #16
Michele Bachmann's favorite gun is the Bushmaster AR-15 used in Newtown [VIDEO] IcyPeas Dec 2012 #18
Well that right there Aerows Dec 2012 #19
If they really do create such a database I want the first name to be Wayne LaPierre's! lastlib Dec 2012 #20
They already have one jmowreader Dec 2012 #21
You beat me to it. renie408 Dec 2012 #35
Someone on twitter pointed out that they NRA was trying to make it illegal applegrove Dec 2012 #22
It passed this year, secondvariety Dec 2012 #24
This may come as a shock to some, but we already have a database for just that purpose! slackmaster Dec 2012 #25
So they must have another motive. Follow the money. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #27
I'd like to buy you a chicken leg, and subscribe to your newsletter! slackmaster Dec 2012 #28
Bravo! nt Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #46
The problem is its woefully incomplete because a lot of data doesn't get there.... Historic NY Dec 2012 #30
Yes, there may be a conflict between HIPAA and state analogues, and the reporting requirement slackmaster Dec 2012 #31
Its been needing fixing for 20 years...guess there isn't a hurry. Historic NY Dec 2012 #34
It's funny how that works. Everything is fine until something horrible happens... slackmaster Dec 2012 #38
I wrote the technical documentation for that software/ ehrnst Dec 2012 #57
At the end of the day it does work, at least to the extent that the data in the database... slackmaster Dec 2012 #58
Anyone who is rejected for a sale gets information on how to find out ehrnst Dec 2012 #59
But not guns. nt valerief Dec 2012 #26
I think it is highly offensive to people with mental illness thucythucy Dec 2012 #29
Don't you just love the "disagreeing with me is a psychiatric disorder" meme this place gets? (nt) Posteritatis Dec 2012 #36
Wow. All of this so they can carry guns? caseymoz Dec 2012 #33
lol. nt ecstatic Dec 2012 #37
They could start with their membership list. joeunderdog Dec 2012 #40
them, and tea party members. ChairmanAgnostic Dec 2012 #52
There probably already *is* one, or the means to make one. Computerized prescriptions, those HiPointDem Dec 2012 #42
Mental health adjudications and involuntary commitments are supposed to be reported to FBI/NICS slackmaster Dec 2012 #43
there's another data base to draw from. it's conceivable that under the right circumstances all HiPointDem Dec 2012 #44
or their current membership list samsingh Dec 2012 #53
I didn't realize I was mentally ill. krispos42 Dec 2012 #55
Not all members in the NRA are in that category ehrnst Dec 2012 #60
Becuse it's against HIPPA sorefeet Dec 2012 #61
Sure. Let Wayne LaPierre be the first to be tested lunatica Dec 2012 #62

llmart

(15,536 posts)
11. Next..
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:30 PM
Dec 2012

2. Dick Cheney
3. Clint Eastwood (he talks to empty chairs)
4. Mitt Romney (his wife said so)
5. Karl Rove (no explanation necessary)

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
5. So I'm 16, 17, or 20 years old,
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:14 PM
Dec 2012

and a MINOR, and my name is in a data base saying I am mentally incompetent and cannot purchase (????) a gun? No problem. I can always STEAL Mommy's, Daddy's, Uncle's, or the neighbor's down the street.

Brilliant one, NRA!!!!! Why didn't WE think of that one?

leftyladyfrommo

(18,868 posts)
7. Do they also nhave to wear gold stars
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:23 PM
Dec 2012

on the front of their jackets?

Like the mentally ill don't already face awful discrimination.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
13. Ironically, the symptoms that determine if you are mentally ill
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:35 PM
Dec 2012

get re-written and revised every 5 years or so, thus leaving a lot of people ....instantly cured, I guess.
Hope the NRA can keep up with that.

And, ironically again.....it is Big Pharma that creates the meds for illnesses that did not exist until the meds were invented.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
14. My diagnosis goes away in DSM-V
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:37 PM
Dec 2012

I've waited for this for years.

I'm finally gonna be CURED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


on edit, my dx has no available drug treatment....maybe that's why it's going away??

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
17. "my dx has no available drug treatment....maybe that's why it's going away??"
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:57 PM
Dec 2012

Cynical me says ..."probably".

But cheer up, they are inventing drugs as we speak for some disease that hasn't been found yet, so you may make the DSV-Revised.

I worked too many years in the Mental Health system, can you tell?

Care Acutely

(1,370 posts)
32. Tons of diagnosis have no drug treatment. Every personality disorder, for starters.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:41 PM
Dec 2012

And the overwhelming majority of those non-pharmaceutically treatable diagnosis will remain.




 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
9. Well if NRA wants to be law abiding why are they so afraid of a National list of people who own
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:27 PM
Dec 2012

anything that shoots over 10 rounds?

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
45. I think it is a creepy idea just like I think it is creepy that the govt is spying on everyone
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:19 PM
Dec 2012

I do value some semblance of privacy. I don't have the answers but I hope the surveillance state is not strengthened by this.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
48. They already know what we are doing now I am sure. Everyone who is on the internet is
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 07:51 AM
Dec 2012

already in their data base. So I don't have anything to hide and something must be done.

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
49. I am not giving up my privacy that easily
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 02:55 PM
Dec 2012

It may be an illusion I have any left but I will not hand it to them on a platter.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
56. Oh I didn't take it that way. I happen to feel the same way you do. I guess the only way
Sat Dec 22, 2012, 06:37 PM
Dec 2012

we all will get our own privacy is to go completely off the grid as they say. But I'm not willing to do that just yet. Don't worry about it.

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
10. I thought they wanted to put all the Teabaggers in the NCIS.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:29 PM
Dec 2012

I guess it's a six of one and a half dozen of the other thing.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
12. How about the delusion that the gun under your bed is going to stop a tyrant?
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 08:34 PM
Dec 2012

Is that mental illness?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
19. Well that right there
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:11 PM
Dec 2012

lends credence to the OP's hypothesis, since she's nuttier than a fruitcake and a pecan pie put together.

jmowreader

(50,546 posts)
21. They already have one
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:38 PM
Dec 2012

Merge the NRA, Gun Owners of America and Republican National Convention membership rolls, add in anyone self-identifying as a teabagger, and purge the duplicate records.

applegrove

(118,589 posts)
22. Someone on twitter pointed out that they NRA was trying to make it illegal
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 09:43 PM
Dec 2012

for doctors to ask their patients if they have any weapons in Florida.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
25. This may come as a shock to some, but we already have a database for just that purpose!
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:25 PM
Dec 2012

It's been around since 1998, when the permanent provisions of the Brady Act went into effect.

It's a database of individuals who are ineligible to buy or possess a firearm, because they have been adjudicated as mentally incompetent, or been convicted of a felony or a crime of domestic violence, or have been discharged dishonorably from the military, etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics

 

Fire Walk With Me

(38,893 posts)
27. So they must have another motive. Follow the money.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:34 PM
Dec 2012

It leads to arms dealers selling to militarized cops, drones in our skies, microphones on buses, SWAT teams roaming the streets asking for ID (wtf does that have to do with anything), scanning the internet for "crazy people", etc. More profit for private prisons, who pimp inmates as cheap labor; more money for congressmen who vote with their wallets (which is how the NDAA passed); DHS purchasing millions of hollow-point rounds without explanation...people are getting extremely rich off of such contracts, all based upon the presumption that all US citizens are terrorists and must be protected from each other and themselves.

And it extends to the military industrial complex as well as the prison industrial complex. Wheeeee....

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
30. The problem is its woefully incomplete because a lot of data doesn't get there....
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:37 PM
Dec 2012

Nearly two decades after lawmakers began requiring background checks for gun buyers, significant gaps in the F.B.I.’s database of criminal and mental health records allow thousands of people to buy firearms every year who should be barred from doing so.

The database is incomplete because many states have not provided federal authorities with comprehensive records of people involuntarily committed or otherwise ruled mentally ill. Records are also spotty for several other categories of prohibited buyers, including those who have tested positive for illegal drugs or have a history of domestic violence.

While some states, including New York, have submitted more than 100,000 names of mentally ill people to the F.B.I. database, 19 — including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Maryland and Maine — have submitted fewer than 100 records and Rhode Island has submitted none, according to federal data compiled by Mayors Against Illegal Guns. That suggests that millions of names are missing from the federal database, gun control advocates and law enforcement officials say.

“Until it has all the records of people out there in the country who have been deemed too dangerous to own a firearm, the background check system still looks like Swiss cheese,” said Mark Glaze, director of the group. The gaps exist because the system is voluntary; the Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that the federal government cannot force state officials to participate in the federal background check system. As a result, when a gun dealer asks the F.B.I. to check a buyer’s history, the bureau sometimes allows the sale to proceed, even though the purchaser should have been prohibited from acquiring a weapon, because its database is missing the relevant records.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/us/gaps-in-fbi-data-undercut-background-checks-for-guns.html?_r=0

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
31. Yes, there may be a conflict between HIPAA and state analogues, and the reporting requirement
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:40 PM
Dec 2012

It's up to Congress to fix that.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
38. It's funny how that works. Everything is fine until something horrible happens...
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:48 PM
Dec 2012

...then they get in a frantic rush to "DO SOMETHING!"

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
57. I wrote the technical documentation for that software/
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:08 PM
Dec 2012

Requirements, specifications and the user manual.

Believe me - meeting with all those from the various agencies that contributed to that database was a study in territorial marking...

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
58. At the end of the day it does work, at least to the extent that the data in the database...
Mon Dec 24, 2012, 10:48 AM
Dec 2012

...is complete and accurate.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
59. Anyone who is rejected for a sale gets information on how to find out
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 10:13 AM
Dec 2012

why they were in the database, and can appeal their inclusion.

thucythucy

(8,043 posts)
29. I think it is highly offensive to people with mental illness
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:36 PM
Dec 2012

to link them to the leadership of the NRA.

There's ill, and then there's evil.

caseymoz

(5,763 posts)
33. Wow. All of this so they can carry guns?
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:44 PM
Dec 2012

To make sure people don't get killed due to their scheme, they need 99,000 more police officers nationwide, coming to $7 billion a year, approximately. Now they have this disturbing invasion of privacy, with the added cost due to that, and what are they protecting? The right to own and carry a weapon that makes them three times as likely to die by a gunshot wound, and which will not make it any more possible to combat tyranny. (See Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, and Morocco to see how necessary a well-armed population is at the beginning).

Meanwhile, they want this all done without raising taxes, I take it?

What else are we going to need to make their version of the right to keep and bear arms practical?
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
42. There probably already *is* one, or the means to make one. Computerized prescriptions, those
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:56 PM
Dec 2012

in the public mental health system, etc.

it's all on computers.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
43. Mental health adjudications and involuntary commitments are supposed to be reported to FBI/NICS
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 10:58 PM
Dec 2012

But as others have pointed out, not all states are in full compliance with the federal rules and regulations.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
44. there's another data base to draw from. it's conceivable that under the right circumstances all
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:10 PM
Dec 2012

those databases could be used to put together a master list of 'unfit' or 'suspicious' or whatever the hell the PTB wanted to designate such people.

it may already exist, in fact. why would they tell us if it did?

i am as leery of 'more mental health funding' as i am of more gun laws. i don't trust the motives of those making the laws or spending the money.

and personally, those i've seen interact with the mental health system have wound up being harmed as much as helped. i personally don't think the system is designed to help.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
60. Not all members in the NRA are in that category
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 10:16 AM
Dec 2012

Michael Moore is a life member.

But to paraphrase what has been said about the GOP - "We're not paranoid, we're just number one with those who are."

sorefeet

(1,241 posts)
61. Becuse it's against HIPPA
Tue Dec 25, 2012, 11:17 AM
Dec 2012

RULES. Put up a registry for every diesease and give it to the insurance companies. Not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The NRA wants a "nat...