HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » My answer to Wayne LaPier...
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:34 AM

My answer to Wayne LaPierre and the National Rifle Association:

HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY NRA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!


I hope they hear that good and loud at their press conference on the 21st.

My Answer to Larry Pratt and the Gun Owners of America:

HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!
HEY HEY GOA, HOW MANY KIDS DID YOU KILL TODAY?!


I hope that it will, at least, discourage so-called "Gun Advocates" from using America in the titles of their organizations in the future. THese groups are ANTI-AMERICAN!

148 replies, 8011 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 148 replies Author Time Post
Reply My answer to Wayne LaPierre and the National Rifle Association: (Original post)
amb123 Dec 2012 OP
Indydem Dec 2012 #1
leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #4
Indydem Dec 2012 #6
leftyohiolib Dec 2012 #7
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #8
Indydem Dec 2012 #9
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #10
Indydem Dec 2012 #14
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #15
Indydem Dec 2012 #22
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #24
Indydem Dec 2012 #26
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #35
Indydem Dec 2012 #42
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #48
ellisonz Dec 2012 #50
Indydem Dec 2012 #54
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #57
PA Democrat Dec 2012 #110
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #117
ellisonz Dec 2012 #61
Indydem Dec 2012 #71
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #75
Indydem Dec 2012 #78
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #81
Indydem Dec 2012 #82
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #85
Indydem Dec 2012 #89
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #90
Indydem Dec 2012 #94
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #100
Indydem Dec 2012 #103
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #105
Indydem Dec 2012 #113
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #116
Blue Idaho Dec 2012 #119
DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2012 #98
Indydem Dec 2012 #101
DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2012 #121
laundry_queen Dec 2012 #124
ellisonz Dec 2012 #136
beevul Dec 2012 #144
ellisonz Dec 2012 #146
ellisonz Dec 2012 #147
X_Digger Dec 2012 #63
PA Democrat Dec 2012 #84
Indydem Dec 2012 #87
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #92
Indydem Dec 2012 #96
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #102
PA Democrat Dec 2012 #106
Indydem Dec 2012 #112
PA Democrat Dec 2012 #132
spanone Dec 2012 #29
Indydem Dec 2012 #32
spanone Dec 2012 #36
Indydem Dec 2012 #38
spanone Dec 2012 #40
bongbong Dec 2012 #44
spanone Dec 2012 #51
Indydem Dec 2012 #59
bongbong Dec 2012 #73
Indydem Dec 2012 #80
bongbong Dec 2012 #93
Indydem Dec 2012 #62
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #46
beevul Dec 2012 #134
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #137
beevul Dec 2012 #138
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #139
beevul Dec 2012 #140
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #141
beevul Dec 2012 #142
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #143
wilt the stilt Dec 2012 #86
BainsBane Dec 2012 #148
Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #13
Aristus Dec 2012 #5
yewberry Dec 2012 #11
ThatPoetGuy Dec 2012 #12
Indydem Dec 2012 #16
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #19
Indydem Dec 2012 #20
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #21
Indydem Dec 2012 #23
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #27
Indydem Dec 2012 #30
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #33
Indydem Dec 2012 #37
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #39
Indydem Dec 2012 #41
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #43
Indydem Dec 2012 #47
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #49
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #53
Indydem Dec 2012 #69
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #72
RC Dec 2012 #118
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #120
RC Dec 2012 #123
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #125
laundry_queen Dec 2012 #127
RC Dec 2012 #133
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #122
LanternWaste Dec 2012 #68
Indydem Dec 2012 #70
LanternWaste Dec 2012 #83
PA Democrat Dec 2012 #25
Indydem Dec 2012 #28
PA Democrat Dec 2012 #88
Indydem Dec 2012 #91
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #95
Logical Dec 2012 #31
Indydem Dec 2012 #34
Logical Dec 2012 #45
Indydem Dec 2012 #52
Logical Dec 2012 #55
Indydem Dec 2012 #58
Logical Dec 2012 #60
ThatPoetGuy Dec 2012 #66
Indydem Dec 2012 #67
ThatPoetGuy Dec 2012 #77
nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #79
laundry_queen Dec 2012 #129
laundry_queen Dec 2012 #130
yewberry Dec 2012 #74
Indydem Dec 2012 #76
ThatPoetGuy Dec 2012 #97
yewberry Dec 2012 #108
Indydem Dec 2012 #111
yewberry Dec 2012 #115
laundry_queen Dec 2012 #131
billh58 Dec 2012 #17
ellisonz Dec 2012 #18
amb123 Dec 2012 #56
Indydem Dec 2012 #65
malaise Dec 2012 #2
Care Acutely Dec 2012 #64
Erose999 Dec 2012 #3
libdem4life Dec 2012 #99
beevul Dec 2012 #135
libdem4life Dec 2012 #145
Elktrreub Dec 2012 #104
2ndAmForComputers Dec 2012 #107
hrmjustin Dec 2012 #109
Dems to Win Dec 2012 #114
Dawson Leery Dec 2012 #126
MotherPetrie Dec 2012 #128

Response to amb123 (Original post)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:37 AM

1. I didn't kill any kids today. Or yesterday. Or ever.

But thanks for your anti-gun anti constitutional ignorance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #1)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 10:22 AM

4. anti-constitution? i cant believe after all this discussion people stupidly think the constitution

 

gives local citizenry any right to guns

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftyohiolib (Reply #4)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 12:18 PM

6. It does.

Your interpretation of the constitution is at odds with all professional legal interpretations and the SCOTUS.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #6)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:39 PM

7. mine is not an interpretation the constitution doesnt give local citizenry a right to any guns

 

the supreme court did and once it changes to dem majority that could change, but you are free to tell me where in the 2nd amendment it says any yahoo can own a gun. and no fair hiding behind the republican scotus
the language in the 2a is pretty clear - those "professional legal interpretations", which ill take your word for their existence, and scotus are bought and paid for cause the language is clear.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #6)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:41 PM

8. Even Heller gives the government authority to regulate

Yes, even Heller.

They only make that argument that mi,itia don't apply to gun in home.

Polly want a cracker?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #8)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:42 PM

9. Who said anything about being anti regulation?

These folks want a gun ban, not regulation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #9)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 01:53 PM

10. And you want things to remain the way they are.

I want the same regulations that apply to a tommy to apply to an infantry battle riffle. Horse, barn and all that.

I also want all extended clips to be made illegal...buy back programs to current owners with a deadline, after that point make them illegal to own. I am sure you won't like that.

I want concealed carry to be licensed with cause, not just the I am afraid of shadows or nebolous self defense, to be renewed every three years.

I want to close the gun show loophole.

But I guess I am a gun grabber.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #10)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:03 PM

14. I disagree with you for good reason.

1. When the Thompson was made restricted in the 30's there were actually very few of them in circulation. There are tens of millions of AR style weapons in circulation now. You can't put the cat back in the bag. You can't outlaw a gun that was legal to buy when it was purchased. So what have you accomplished - you've made existing AR weapons extremely expensive and you haven't made one person safer.

2. Again, this is against the constitution. You can't make something retroactively illegal. The idea that you will ever be able to accomplish this is crazy town. Even if you stop sales of new extended magazines, there are still hundreds of millions of them in circulation. The idea of a buyback is ok, but most are not going to sell them back.

3. Why is concealed carry a problem? I am unaware of any gun massacres committed with by a person with CCW. How will this make a single person more safe by making it harder to legally carry a firearm?

4. I want to open NICS to all people. This will effectively close the gun show loophole.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #14)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:14 PM

15. I was right...

Quelle surprise.

Oh and son, yes, they can do that...they can forbid extended mags, it's actually in the often cited Heller decision.

Have a good day.

You repeat NRA talking points all the time. That ground you are standing on...is really shifting.

When I actually toy with the idea of buying an armored backpack, that is a problem. When parents are buying those for kids...that is a problem.

Your right to own whatever do not supersede my right to life, you got it?

I really do not want to continue to have to look for cover everywhere I go.

Oh and I own guns.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #15)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:24 PM

22. Do you know what Ex Post Facto is?

You can't make them illegal after the fact.

You can make them illegal moving forward. You can not do so retroactively.

The constitution is very clear on this matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #22)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:29 PM

24. The sands are shifting

So go get as many guns as you can. Your logic is that of the Tom tomorrow cartoon.

You even said the occasional civilian massacre is the price the rest of us have to pay for your freedom.

Internal tranquility, and well regulated militia. They are both in the founding documents.

My right to life can't be squared with your right to a battle riffle, unless you are part of a well regulated militia.

You ARE that delicate flower in that cartoon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #24)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:32 PM

26. It isn't "MY" freedom.

It is the freedom of All Americans.

The fact that you feel restricting freedoms is awesome* is disturbing.

* As long as it's a freedom you don't like.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #26)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:43 PM

35. I am sorry

But even Hamilton, ignorant boob that he was, spoke of militias, not individual rights, when selling the Second in Federalist 29. What would he know of original intent, after all he was there!

It is far from disturbing to say that you have a right to an infantry riffle as long as you are part of the militia. So, my other solution is...you want an AR, universal conscription into the National Guard, or state militia purposely created for this by your governor...and you will report for drill once a month.

That alone will reduce ownership, we know how allergic people are to actually serving

I am not the only one to consider the ...right to keep and bear arms wrong headed, without the other two clauses it is dependent on. These include in order, to ensure the security of a free state and a well regulated militia

Look, reality is the AWB in some form is coming back, so are limits on magazines, and at the very least universal background checks. The sands are shifting and the power of the NRA, I sure hope, over the political class IS OVER.

Oh and due to the second amendment, all of it, we need a national registry. If we ever mobilized I really need to know what the hell you pack for logistics reasons.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #35)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 02:50 PM

42. The AWB is dead.

It had no effect on violent crime and the congress will never vote for it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #42)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:00 PM

48. Lovely NRA talking point you got right there

After 20 six and seven year olds were gunned down at a school, I would not bet on it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #42)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:01 PM

50. I'm sure the people of Tucson, Aurora, and Newtown are comforted by your single-minded conclusions.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ellisonz (Reply #50)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:08 PM

54. What poor deductions.

Tuscon was conducted with a handgun -not covered under the AWB. No effect.

Aurora was, ironically enough, made less terrible by NOT having an AWB, as the killer tried to use a drum mag and it jammed, stopping his rampage.

Newtown details are still unknown. I'll wait for more details. I can tell you this; if he was well acquainted with his gun, he could have changed 10 round mags out and killed just as many people.

A new AWB isn't the answer. But even if, by miracles upon miracles, it is passed, it will not stop one person from being killed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Indydem (Reply #54)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 03:10 PM

57. I also want to fund the CDC. It was defunded

In 1997 for any study on gun violence by a fellow traveller of yours.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #57)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:33 PM

110. For people who love to talk about their "freedoms"

they are certainly afraid of the truth about the impact of gun violence. I think people should be free to make INFORMED decisions about gun laws. The NRA disagrees.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PA Democrat (Reply #110)

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:00 PM

117. Absolutely.

Problem is a shift at a local trauma center would only harden their desire to 'ave more, 'cause more guns are the solution.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink