General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShouldn't someone go to prison for this?
Twinkie CEO Admits Company Took Employees Pensions and Put It Toward Executive Payhttp://www.alternet.org/corporate-accountability-and-workplace/twinkie-ceo-admits-company-took-employees-pensions-and-put-it
Twinkie-maker Hostess continues to screw over its workers. The company is in the process of complete liquidation and 18,000 unionized workers are set to lose their jobs. More troubling they could lose their pensions.
Seriously...shouldn't they be behind bars? or is it only stealing when the poor take from the wealthy?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Today owners can do anything they want with pension funds including pocketing it on their way out the door.
Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)Nortel went bankrupt, cut everyone's pensions in half.
Frankly, I'm surprised someone doesn't go postal over something like this. Lots of people have planned their entire lives on these pensions. Planned to pay for homes, college tuitions, retirement, and more. And then, after 30 years of work, to be told, "Oops. Sorry about that. That deal you thought you made? We're cancelling it."
They should have to sell the pencils before touching pensions.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)happens all the time
We People
(619 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
IggleDoer
(1,186 posts)... wouldn't that be embezzlement?
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)permits them to underfund their pension fund liabilities and use the difference anyway they choose. Imagine that.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)crapshoot.
i've been reading about pension problems for years, but the information was so random and non-detailed that it was hard to figure out what happened or how much the retirees eventually wound up getting.
but i'd bet a lot of money has been stolen.
Sirveri
(4,517 posts)Sadly, CEO compensation is consider an operating expense.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)If we did what they did, for sure we would be in prison. But it seems if you are a multi-millionaire CEO or Wall Street mucky muck, the laws don't apply to you. Just sayin'.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Yeah, more like job CREMATORS, if you ask me! Throw them in jail for a long time... Better yet, tar and feathers is not too good for them!
progressoid
(49,949 posts)TexasTowelie
(111,944 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Nobody big on Wall Street paid for their massive textbook fraud that caused the crash in 2008, so this is the same old same old - and it's getting old to some of us.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Nobody went to jail for all that fraud!
lightcameron
(224 posts)julian09
(1,435 posts)I know that the company puts the money in the pension fund; which is part of the workers compensation. It's like you get a paycheck and before you cash it they cancel it. Unless the union let them borrow it, it shouldn't be touched. They should have a law protecting workers pensions, especially if the company isn't profitable. They are going bankrupt and don't worry about paying money back.
Should get Elizabeth Warren on this.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)And neither did plantation owners when they beat their slaves.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)If you are wealthy or a position in power in business you can screw your employees over for your own benefit without a single thought. There is virtually NO oversight of corporate malfeasance today. I think Dodd-Frank was a good start but it is probably 10% of what we need.
I am all for businesses to thrive and flourish but not to enable executives, LEGALLY, to screw their employees and walk off with millions in loot.
We used to hunt these types down and shoot them dead.
Today, we give them golden parachutes and they move on to the next company to rape, pillage and plunder.
Talk about "values". The only value they have in mind is their net value at the end of each and every day. Screw a few thousand employees by laying them off or snarfing up their pension money to pay for my new pool? Pfffff... only little people pay taxes.
This is the level of entitlement the rich have. We talk about entitlements. Let's talk about the REAL entitlements with corporate welfare and the allowance for corporate executives to fleece stakeholders and employee so they can buy a few new homes.
onethatcares
(16,162 posts)going to be about the LIBOR scandal or Jamie Dimond, or drug money being laundered with no threat of prosecution.
Hostess is small potatos although it is potatos.
lpbk2713
(42,738 posts)In their eyes the other 99% only exist to be taken advantage of.
Purrfessor
(1,188 posts)humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Good for the CEO's, this is all the fault of the union. They say that the union should have took the deal with the small pay cuts for a couple of years, so they say the unions are what bankrupt Hostess, according to them now all the Obama voters (union workers) can just go get their EBT, Food Stamps, and Obama Phones and everything will be just fine, just add more to the deficit that our kids will have to pay and less union dues being laundered back to corrupt democrat politicians.
This thought process of theirs really bugs me at my job, because I work for a defense contractor, and I am convinced that they have already arranged with the managers that any layoffs that come down due to the sequestration should be handed out to those who are known to support Obama or Democratic policies in general, their position is that those that enable a society of people that exist on some form of subsistance should be the first forced out onto such subsistance because according the the teaheads they would rather work even if they have to take a pay or benefit cut to keep their job...
TexasTowelie
(111,944 posts)I bet that they also are preaching the gloom-and-doom scenario for the next four years. It can be depressing listening to them.
GiaGiovanni
(1,247 posts)And by then, we'll all be too underpaid and poor to help them.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 13, 2012, 04:49 AM - Edit history (1)
sometimes i can't help wishing people like that would just get hit by lightning or something.
santamargarita
(3,170 posts)I bet they make their oligarch masters proud.
UndahCovah
(125 posts)Yes...WILL somebody go to jail? Doubtful. Its the same the world over. The rich do as they please while we struggle to get by.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,164 posts)If these ex-workers and supporters go out on the street to protest...especially visout zee papers.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)would not prosecute.
jorno67
(1,986 posts)Like a lobbyist that represents the people...or a petition...or a hostage situation
On edit: I'm not really calling for a hostage situation
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)They won't venture very far out of their comfort zone.
donnasgirl
(656 posts)This is theft
99Forever
(14,524 posts)And take up perfectly good prison space that could hold pot smokers?
Surely you jest.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Progressoid gets an Honorable Mention.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Or angling to be the most hated people in the US?
If there were any justice, the hostess execs would be stripped of all their ill gotten gains and have it given to the rightful owners - the employees.
Rider3
(919 posts)However, in our pathetic environment, these people pull in HUGE amounts of money taken from the actual workers, and then blame the workers for the company's demise. Yep... Good American values.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)or the former jobs to a foreign country.
jorno67
(1,986 posts)But I'd rather that name fade away...
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)As usual, CEOs want everything on their side of the ledger. This is why they sent all manufacturing abroad, and why federal tax cuts to corporations NEVER benefit the population of the U.S. Greed is what corporations are about.
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)If those execs steal the pension funds, I would not want to be them.
The money may make them feel smug, but the hate that will follow them is not gonna be pretty.
This SHOULD be illegal. Our Congress SUCKS!
K & R
dickthegrouch
(3,169 posts)Individually. Every month?
1800 individual lawsuits each month against the members of the compensation committee would be a mighty fine punishment.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)santamargarita
(3,170 posts)criminal assholes.
triplepoint
(431 posts)and the "General Population" is sure to be "welcoming" them to the Monkey House.....for the rest of their hopefully short, pathetic, greedy, heartless lives.
.
.
.
.
Now, let's hear from George Carlin about the "Big Club" these asshole CEOs appear to be in:
.
.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Far more dangerous than Al Queda
As Chris Rock said, 'I'm not afraid of Al Queda, I'm afraid of Al Cracker!'
tledford
(917 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)So they did give assets in the appropriate amount to the pension fund, it's just that the assets are now-worthless debt.
mlevans
(843 posts)The longer answer is still "yes," but includes a great deal of profanity.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)If they don't start taking these crimes seriously and punishing them, one can almost hear the creaking wheels of Le Rasoir National. A back will not bend forever.
midnight
(26,624 posts)livingonearth
(728 posts)It never dawns on them that it is their actions in the first place causing workers to organize. Unions may not be able to stop this kind of thing now, but unions is where the solution needs to start.
midnight
(26,624 posts)They set hard working people up to take the fall for their crimes... But they have the laws written for them so they can get away with it scott free. I agree Unions need to come up with another way to address these crimes in the courts...
livingonearth
(728 posts)yet they create the conditions under which it is needed the most.
People don't get paid enough to save properly for retirement; the equity in their homes has been destroyed; and their pensions have been looted. You try to do everything right to not be a burden on society when you get old and they rob you blind while you're working your ass off for them. Thanks assholes.